Content validation of the nursing intervention Dialysis Access Maintenance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Rev Rene (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/67917 |
Resumo: | Objective: to validate the content of the Dialysis Access Maintenance intervention. Methods: methodological validation study, composed of 28 participants who analyzed each activity of the intervention through the Likert scale, considering the importance and objectivity, which provided the calculation of the index of validity of content and frequency to assess the realization of the activities. Results: the 11 intervention activities were validated. Of these, seven obtained a content validity index ≥ 0.8 and four, > 0.5 and < 0.8. In the qualitative part, three categories emerged: 1) Positive reinforcement of the Nursing Interventions Classification activity; 2) Contribution to improve the Nursing Interventions Classification activity; and 3) Disagreement regarding the activity proposed by the Nursing Interventions Classification. Conclusion: all activities were considered important and objective, validating the intervention. |
id |
UFC-16_1f54f746e5da7acc90c4b38fda61db2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/67917 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-16 |
network_name_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Content validation of the nursing intervention Dialysis Access MaintenanceValidação de conteúdo da intervenção de enfermagem Manutenção de Acesso para DiáliseValidation Study; Renal Dialysis; Nursing Process.Estudos de Validação; Diálise Renal; Processo de Enfermagem.Objective: to validate the content of the Dialysis Access Maintenance intervention. Methods: methodological validation study, composed of 28 participants who analyzed each activity of the intervention through the Likert scale, considering the importance and objectivity, which provided the calculation of the index of validity of content and frequency to assess the realization of the activities. Results: the 11 intervention activities were validated. Of these, seven obtained a content validity index ≥ 0.8 and four, > 0.5 and < 0.8. In the qualitative part, three categories emerged: 1) Positive reinforcement of the Nursing Interventions Classification activity; 2) Contribution to improve the Nursing Interventions Classification activity; and 3) Disagreement regarding the activity proposed by the Nursing Interventions Classification. Conclusion: all activities were considered important and objective, validating the intervention.Objetivo: validar o conteúdo da intervenção Manutenção de Acesso para Diálise. Métodos: estudo metodológico, de validação, composto de 28 participantes que analisaram cada atividade da intervenção por meio da escala likert, perante a importância e objetividade, a qual proporcionou o cálculo do índice de validade de conteúdo e frequência para avaliar a realização das atividades. Resultados: as 11 atividades da intervenção foram validadas. Destas, sete obtiveram índice de validade de conteúdo ≥ 0,8 e quatro, > 0,5 e < 0,8. Na parte qualitativa, emergiram três categorias: 1) Reforço positivo à atividade da Nursing Interventions Classification; 2) Contribuição de melhoria para atividade da Nursing Interventions Classification; e 3) Discordância em relação à atividade proposta pela Nursing Interventions Classification. Conclusão: todas as atividades da intervenção foram consideradas importantes e objetivas, validando a intervenção.Universidade Federal do Ceará2021-08-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion'texto'application/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/6791710.15253/2175-6783.20212267917Rev Rene; Vol 22 (2021): Rev Rene; e67917Rev Rene; v. 22 (2021): Rev Rene; e679172175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/67917/197206http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/67917/197207Copyright (c) 2021 Rev Renehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves, Letícia MattosLins, Silvia Maria de Sá BasílioSouza, Priscilla Alfradique deTavares, Joyce Martins Arimatéa BrancoPires, Bruna Maiara Ferreira BarretoAssad, Luciana Guimarães2021-08-12T19:40:43Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/67917Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2021-08-12T19:40:43Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Content validation of the nursing intervention Dialysis Access Maintenance Validação de conteúdo da intervenção de enfermagem Manutenção de Acesso para Diálise |
title |
Content validation of the nursing intervention Dialysis Access Maintenance |
spellingShingle |
Content validation of the nursing intervention Dialysis Access Maintenance Gonçalves, Letícia Mattos Validation Study; Renal Dialysis; Nursing Process. Estudos de Validação; Diálise Renal; Processo de Enfermagem. |
title_short |
Content validation of the nursing intervention Dialysis Access Maintenance |
title_full |
Content validation of the nursing intervention Dialysis Access Maintenance |
title_fullStr |
Content validation of the nursing intervention Dialysis Access Maintenance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Content validation of the nursing intervention Dialysis Access Maintenance |
title_sort |
Content validation of the nursing intervention Dialysis Access Maintenance |
author |
Gonçalves, Letícia Mattos |
author_facet |
Gonçalves, Letícia Mattos Lins, Silvia Maria de Sá Basílio Souza, Priscilla Alfradique de Tavares, Joyce Martins Arimatéa Branco Pires, Bruna Maiara Ferreira Barreto Assad, Luciana Guimarães |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lins, Silvia Maria de Sá Basílio Souza, Priscilla Alfradique de Tavares, Joyce Martins Arimatéa Branco Pires, Bruna Maiara Ferreira Barreto Assad, Luciana Guimarães |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves, Letícia Mattos Lins, Silvia Maria de Sá Basílio Souza, Priscilla Alfradique de Tavares, Joyce Martins Arimatéa Branco Pires, Bruna Maiara Ferreira Barreto Assad, Luciana Guimarães |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Validation Study; Renal Dialysis; Nursing Process. Estudos de Validação; Diálise Renal; Processo de Enfermagem. |
topic |
Validation Study; Renal Dialysis; Nursing Process. Estudos de Validação; Diálise Renal; Processo de Enfermagem. |
description |
Objective: to validate the content of the Dialysis Access Maintenance intervention. Methods: methodological validation study, composed of 28 participants who analyzed each activity of the intervention through the Likert scale, considering the importance and objectivity, which provided the calculation of the index of validity of content and frequency to assess the realization of the activities. Results: the 11 intervention activities were validated. Of these, seven obtained a content validity index ≥ 0.8 and four, > 0.5 and < 0.8. In the qualitative part, three categories emerged: 1) Positive reinforcement of the Nursing Interventions Classification activity; 2) Contribution to improve the Nursing Interventions Classification activity; and 3) Disagreement regarding the activity proposed by the Nursing Interventions Classification. Conclusion: all activities were considered important and objective, validating the intervention. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 'texto' |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/67917 10.15253/2175-6783.20212267917 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/67917 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15253/2175-6783.20212267917 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/67917/197206 http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/67917/197207 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Rev Rene https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Rev Rene https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene; Vol 22 (2021): Rev Rene; e67917 Rev Rene; v. 22 (2021): Rev Rene; e67917 2175-6783 1517-3852 reponame:Rev Rene (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
collection |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rene@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797174735216312320 |