Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Rev Rene (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/20066 |
Resumo: | Objective: to describe the implementation of good practices of attention to labor at a reference maternity. Methods: descriptive, documentary study, with 300 Forms for Monitoring Assistance to Labor and Birth. The data were gathered on tables and submitted to descriptive and numerical inferential analysis. Results: in category A we observed that 48.3% of the births filled the partogram; 84.0% of women did not use pharmacological methods for pain relief; 67.0% remained at zero diet during labor; 84.7% had no companion during labor, delivery and after giving birth; 57.0% had skin-to-skin contact; and 65.3% breast-fed in the delivery room. In category B it was found that 54.0% of women remained in venoclysis; 60.7% remained in semi-sit position in the expulsive period; and 14.7% women were shaved. Conclusion: some practices proved useful in childbirth are still not implemented in many cases, while others that are harmful or ineffective are still being carried out. |
id |
UFC-16_75f6ca4ca17d976ab7bc758057b72027 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/20066 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-16 |
network_name_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternityObstetric NursingNatural Childbirth. Humanization of Assistance.Objective: to describe the implementation of good practices of attention to labor at a reference maternity. Methods: descriptive, documentary study, with 300 Forms for Monitoring Assistance to Labor and Birth. The data were gathered on tables and submitted to descriptive and numerical inferential analysis. Results: in category A we observed that 48.3% of the births filled the partogram; 84.0% of women did not use pharmacological methods for pain relief; 67.0% remained at zero diet during labor; 84.7% had no companion during labor, delivery and after giving birth; 57.0% had skin-to-skin contact; and 65.3% breast-fed in the delivery room. In category B it was found that 54.0% of women remained in venoclysis; 60.7% remained in semi-sit position in the expulsive period; and 14.7% women were shaved. Conclusion: some practices proved useful in childbirth are still not implemented in many cases, while others that are harmful or ineffective are still being carried out.Universidade Federal do Ceará2017-08-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2006610.15253/2175-6783.2017000300013Rev Rene; Vol 18 No 3 (2017); 376-382Rev Rene; v. 18 n. 3 (2017); 376-3822175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/20066/30716Copyright (c) 2017 Northeast Network Nursing Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Bruna Marques deGomes, Linicarla Fabiole de SouzaHenriques, Ana Ciléia Pinto TeixeiraLima, Sâmua Kelen Mendes deDamasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro2021-04-15T15:56:20Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/20066Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2021-04-15T15:56:20Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity |
title |
Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity |
spellingShingle |
Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity Melo, Bruna Marques de Obstetric Nursing Natural Childbirth. Humanization of Assistance. |
title_short |
Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity |
title_full |
Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity |
title_fullStr |
Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity |
title_sort |
Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity |
author |
Melo, Bruna Marques de |
author_facet |
Melo, Bruna Marques de Gomes, Linicarla Fabiole de Souza Henriques, Ana Ciléia Pinto Teixeira Lima, Sâmua Kelen Mendes de Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gomes, Linicarla Fabiole de Souza Henriques, Ana Ciléia Pinto Teixeira Lima, Sâmua Kelen Mendes de Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo, Bruna Marques de Gomes, Linicarla Fabiole de Souza Henriques, Ana Ciléia Pinto Teixeira Lima, Sâmua Kelen Mendes de Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Obstetric Nursing Natural Childbirth. Humanization of Assistance. |
topic |
Obstetric Nursing Natural Childbirth. Humanization of Assistance. |
description |
Objective: to describe the implementation of good practices of attention to labor at a reference maternity. Methods: descriptive, documentary study, with 300 Forms for Monitoring Assistance to Labor and Birth. The data were gathered on tables and submitted to descriptive and numerical inferential analysis. Results: in category A we observed that 48.3% of the births filled the partogram; 84.0% of women did not use pharmacological methods for pain relief; 67.0% remained at zero diet during labor; 84.7% had no companion during labor, delivery and after giving birth; 57.0% had skin-to-skin contact; and 65.3% breast-fed in the delivery room. In category B it was found that 54.0% of women remained in venoclysis; 60.7% remained in semi-sit position in the expulsive period; and 14.7% women were shaved. Conclusion: some practices proved useful in childbirth are still not implemented in many cases, while others that are harmful or ineffective are still being carried out. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/20066 10.15253/2175-6783.2017000300013 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/20066 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15253/2175-6783.2017000300013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/20066/30716 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Northeast Network Nursing Journal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Northeast Network Nursing Journal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene; Vol 18 No 3 (2017); 376-382 Rev Rene; v. 18 n. 3 (2017); 376-382 2175-6783 1517-3852 reponame:Rev Rene (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
collection |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rene@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797174732227870720 |