Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo, Bruna Marques de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Gomes, Linicarla Fabiole de Souza, Henriques, Ana Ciléia Pinto Teixeira, Lima, Sâmua Kelen Mendes de, Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Rev Rene (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/20066
Resumo: Objective: to describe the implementation of good practices of attention to labor at a reference maternity. Methods: descriptive, documentary study, with 300 Forms for Monitoring Assistance to Labor and Birth. The data were gathered on tables and submitted to descriptive and numerical inferential analysis. Results: in category A we observed that 48.3% of the births filled the partogram; 84.0% of women did not use pharmacological methods for pain relief; 67.0% remained at zero diet during labor; 84.7% had no companion during labor, delivery and after giving birth; 57.0% had skin-to-skin contact; and 65.3% breast-fed in the delivery room. In category B it was found that 54.0% of women remained in venoclysis; 60.7% remained in semi-sit position in the expulsive period; and 14.7% women were shaved. Conclusion: some practices proved useful in childbirth are still not implemented in many cases, while others that are harmful or ineffective are still being carried out.
id UFC-16_75f6ca4ca17d976ab7bc758057b72027
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/20066
network_acronym_str UFC-16
network_name_str Rev Rene (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternityObstetric NursingNatural Childbirth. Humanization of Assistance.Objective: to describe the implementation of good practices of attention to labor at a reference maternity. Methods: descriptive, documentary study, with 300 Forms for Monitoring Assistance to Labor and Birth. The data were gathered on tables and submitted to descriptive and numerical inferential analysis. Results: in category A we observed that 48.3% of the births filled the partogram; 84.0% of women did not use pharmacological methods for pain relief; 67.0% remained at zero diet during labor; 84.7% had no companion during labor, delivery and after giving birth; 57.0% had skin-to-skin contact; and 65.3% breast-fed in the delivery room. In category B it was found that 54.0% of women remained in venoclysis; 60.7% remained in semi-sit position in the expulsive period; and 14.7% women were shaved. Conclusion: some practices proved useful in childbirth are still not implemented in many cases, while others that are harmful or ineffective are still being carried out.Universidade Federal do Ceará2017-08-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2006610.15253/2175-6783.2017000300013Rev Rene; Vol 18 No 3 (2017); 376-382Rev Rene; v. 18 n. 3 (2017); 376-3822175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/20066/30716Copyright (c) 2017 Northeast Network Nursing Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Bruna Marques deGomes, Linicarla Fabiole de SouzaHenriques, Ana Ciléia Pinto TeixeiraLima, Sâmua Kelen Mendes deDamasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro2021-04-15T15:56:20Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/20066Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2021-04-15T15:56:20Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity
title Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity
spellingShingle Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity
Melo, Bruna Marques de
Obstetric Nursing
Natural Childbirth. Humanization of Assistance.
title_short Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity
title_full Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity
title_fullStr Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity
title_sort Implementation of good practice in assistance to labor at a reference maternity
author Melo, Bruna Marques de
author_facet Melo, Bruna Marques de
Gomes, Linicarla Fabiole de Souza
Henriques, Ana Ciléia Pinto Teixeira
Lima, Sâmua Kelen Mendes de
Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro
author_role author
author2 Gomes, Linicarla Fabiole de Souza
Henriques, Ana Ciléia Pinto Teixeira
Lima, Sâmua Kelen Mendes de
Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo, Bruna Marques de
Gomes, Linicarla Fabiole de Souza
Henriques, Ana Ciléia Pinto Teixeira
Lima, Sâmua Kelen Mendes de
Damasceno, Ana Kelve de Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Obstetric Nursing
Natural Childbirth. Humanization of Assistance.
topic Obstetric Nursing
Natural Childbirth. Humanization of Assistance.
description Objective: to describe the implementation of good practices of attention to labor at a reference maternity. Methods: descriptive, documentary study, with 300 Forms for Monitoring Assistance to Labor and Birth. The data were gathered on tables and submitted to descriptive and numerical inferential analysis. Results: in category A we observed that 48.3% of the births filled the partogram; 84.0% of women did not use pharmacological methods for pain relief; 67.0% remained at zero diet during labor; 84.7% had no companion during labor, delivery and after giving birth; 57.0% had skin-to-skin contact; and 65.3% breast-fed in the delivery room. In category B it was found that 54.0% of women remained in venoclysis; 60.7% remained in semi-sit position in the expulsive period; and 14.7% women were shaved. Conclusion: some practices proved useful in childbirth are still not implemented in many cases, while others that are harmful or ineffective are still being carried out.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/20066
10.15253/2175-6783.2017000300013
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/20066
identifier_str_mv 10.15253/2175-6783.2017000300013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/20066/30716
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Northeast Network Nursing Journal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Northeast Network Nursing Journal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Rev Rene; Vol 18 No 3 (2017); 376-382
Rev Rene; v. 18 n. 3 (2017); 376-382
2175-6783
1517-3852
reponame:Rev Rene (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Rev Rene (Online)
collection Rev Rene (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rene@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797174732227870720