Disabled person: construction of concept by this population
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Rev Rene (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2836 |
Resumo: | Objective: to build the concept of disabled person. Methods: study of analysis of concept using the phases field work and statistical analysis with 120 individuals divided into three groups of 40 people with hearing, visual and motor disability. Results: there was predomination of men (68%), 18-29 years old (55%), with superior education (35%) and married/common-law married (75%). The attribute accepted was person with limitation and still able to perform activity, with a difference between groups (p = 0.018); the keyword accepted was limitation (p = 0.001); the expression was disabled person, with intergroup difference (p = 0.013). Concept of choice by group was deaf (97.51%); blind (45%) and person with visual disability (45%) and; person with physical disability (27.5%). Conclusion: attributes, keywords used in the literature and public policy were not accepted. They prefer to be called deaf; blind or visually impaired; They reject people with motor disability and wheelchair user. |
id |
UFC-16_93b87d94c17193aacc233cd22fc21bd6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/2836 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-16 |
network_name_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Disabled person: construction of concept by this populationDisabled PersonsConcept FormationMobility LimitationVisually Impaired PersonsPersons with Hearing Impairments.Objective: to build the concept of disabled person. Methods: study of analysis of concept using the phases field work and statistical analysis with 120 individuals divided into three groups of 40 people with hearing, visual and motor disability. Results: there was predomination of men (68%), 18-29 years old (55%), with superior education (35%) and married/common-law married (75%). The attribute accepted was person with limitation and still able to perform activity, with a difference between groups (p = 0.018); the keyword accepted was limitation (p = 0.001); the expression was disabled person, with intergroup difference (p = 0.013). Concept of choice by group was deaf (97.51%); blind (45%) and person with visual disability (45%) and; person with physical disability (27.5%). Conclusion: attributes, keywords used in the literature and public policy were not accepted. They prefer to be called deaf; blind or visually impaired; They reject people with motor disability and wheelchair user. Universidade Federal do Ceará2015-11-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/283610.15253/2175-6783.2015000500012Rev Rene; Vol 16 No 5 (2015); 705-713Rev Rene; v. 16 n. 5 (2015); 705-7132175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2836/2201Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPagliuca, Lorita Marlena FreitagOliveira, Paula Marciana Pinheiro deMariano, Monaliza RibeiroSilva, Jacqueline Mota daAlmeida, Paulo Cesar deOliveira, Giselly Oseni Barbosa2018-12-04T15:53:36Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/2836Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2018-12-04T15:53:36Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Disabled person: construction of concept by this population |
title |
Disabled person: construction of concept by this population |
spellingShingle |
Disabled person: construction of concept by this population Pagliuca, Lorita Marlena Freitag Disabled Persons Concept Formation Mobility Limitation Visually Impaired Persons Persons with Hearing Impairments. |
title_short |
Disabled person: construction of concept by this population |
title_full |
Disabled person: construction of concept by this population |
title_fullStr |
Disabled person: construction of concept by this population |
title_full_unstemmed |
Disabled person: construction of concept by this population |
title_sort |
Disabled person: construction of concept by this population |
author |
Pagliuca, Lorita Marlena Freitag |
author_facet |
Pagliuca, Lorita Marlena Freitag Oliveira, Paula Marciana Pinheiro de Mariano, Monaliza Ribeiro Silva, Jacqueline Mota da Almeida, Paulo Cesar de Oliveira, Giselly Oseni Barbosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Paula Marciana Pinheiro de Mariano, Monaliza Ribeiro Silva, Jacqueline Mota da Almeida, Paulo Cesar de Oliveira, Giselly Oseni Barbosa |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pagliuca, Lorita Marlena Freitag Oliveira, Paula Marciana Pinheiro de Mariano, Monaliza Ribeiro Silva, Jacqueline Mota da Almeida, Paulo Cesar de Oliveira, Giselly Oseni Barbosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Disabled Persons Concept Formation Mobility Limitation Visually Impaired Persons Persons with Hearing Impairments. |
topic |
Disabled Persons Concept Formation Mobility Limitation Visually Impaired Persons Persons with Hearing Impairments. |
description |
Objective: to build the concept of disabled person. Methods: study of analysis of concept using the phases field work and statistical analysis with 120 individuals divided into three groups of 40 people with hearing, visual and motor disability. Results: there was predomination of men (68%), 18-29 years old (55%), with superior education (35%) and married/common-law married (75%). The attribute accepted was person with limitation and still able to perform activity, with a difference between groups (p = 0.018); the keyword accepted was limitation (p = 0.001); the expression was disabled person, with intergroup difference (p = 0.013). Concept of choice by group was deaf (97.51%); blind (45%) and person with visual disability (45%) and; person with physical disability (27.5%). Conclusion: attributes, keywords used in the literature and public policy were not accepted. They prefer to be called deaf; blind or visually impaired; They reject people with motor disability and wheelchair user. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2836 10.15253/2175-6783.2015000500012 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2836 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15253/2175-6783.2015000500012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2836/2201 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene; Vol 16 No 5 (2015); 705-713 Rev Rene; v. 16 n. 5 (2015); 705-713 2175-6783 1517-3852 reponame:Rev Rene (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
collection |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rene@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797174725762351104 |