Disabled person: construction of concept by this population

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pagliuca, Lorita Marlena Freitag
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Paula Marciana Pinheiro de, Mariano, Monaliza Ribeiro, Silva, Jacqueline Mota da, Almeida, Paulo Cesar de, Oliveira, Giselly Oseni Barbosa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Rev Rene (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2836
Resumo: Objective: to build the concept of disabled person. Methods: study of analysis of concept using the phases field work and statistical analysis with 120 individuals divided into three groups of 40 people with hearing, visual and motor disability. Results: there was predomination of men (68%), 18-29 years old (55%), with superior education (35%) and married/common-law married (75%). The attribute accepted was person with limitation and still able to perform activity, with a difference between groups (p = 0.018); the keyword accepted was limitation (p = 0.001); the expression was disabled person, with intergroup difference (p = 0.013). Concept of choice by group was deaf (97.51%); blind (45%) and person with visual disability (45%) and; person with physical disability (27.5%). Conclusion: attributes, keywords used in the literature and public policy were not accepted. They prefer to be called deaf; blind or visually impaired; They reject people with motor disability and wheelchair user. 
id UFC-16_93b87d94c17193aacc233cd22fc21bd6
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/2836
network_acronym_str UFC-16
network_name_str Rev Rene (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Disabled person: construction of concept by this populationDisabled PersonsConcept FormationMobility LimitationVisually Impaired PersonsPersons with Hearing Impairments.Objective: to build the concept of disabled person. Methods: study of analysis of concept using the phases field work and statistical analysis with 120 individuals divided into three groups of 40 people with hearing, visual and motor disability. Results: there was predomination of men (68%), 18-29 years old (55%), with superior education (35%) and married/common-law married (75%). The attribute accepted was person with limitation and still able to perform activity, with a difference between groups (p = 0.018); the keyword accepted was limitation (p = 0.001); the expression was disabled person, with intergroup difference (p = 0.013). Concept of choice by group was deaf (97.51%); blind (45%) and person with visual disability (45%) and; person with physical disability (27.5%). Conclusion: attributes, keywords used in the literature and public policy were not accepted. They prefer to be called deaf; blind or visually impaired; They reject people with motor disability and wheelchair user. Universidade Federal do Ceará2015-11-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/283610.15253/2175-6783.2015000500012Rev Rene; Vol 16 No 5 (2015); 705-713Rev Rene; v. 16 n. 5 (2015); 705-7132175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2836/2201Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPagliuca, Lorita Marlena FreitagOliveira, Paula Marciana Pinheiro deMariano, Monaliza RibeiroSilva, Jacqueline Mota daAlmeida, Paulo Cesar deOliveira, Giselly Oseni Barbosa2018-12-04T15:53:36Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/2836Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2018-12-04T15:53:36Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disabled person: construction of concept by this population
title Disabled person: construction of concept by this population
spellingShingle Disabled person: construction of concept by this population
Pagliuca, Lorita Marlena Freitag
Disabled Persons
Concept Formation
Mobility Limitation
Visually Impaired Persons
Persons with Hearing Impairments.
title_short Disabled person: construction of concept by this population
title_full Disabled person: construction of concept by this population
title_fullStr Disabled person: construction of concept by this population
title_full_unstemmed Disabled person: construction of concept by this population
title_sort Disabled person: construction of concept by this population
author Pagliuca, Lorita Marlena Freitag
author_facet Pagliuca, Lorita Marlena Freitag
Oliveira, Paula Marciana Pinheiro de
Mariano, Monaliza Ribeiro
Silva, Jacqueline Mota da
Almeida, Paulo Cesar de
Oliveira, Giselly Oseni Barbosa
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Paula Marciana Pinheiro de
Mariano, Monaliza Ribeiro
Silva, Jacqueline Mota da
Almeida, Paulo Cesar de
Oliveira, Giselly Oseni Barbosa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pagliuca, Lorita Marlena Freitag
Oliveira, Paula Marciana Pinheiro de
Mariano, Monaliza Ribeiro
Silva, Jacqueline Mota da
Almeida, Paulo Cesar de
Oliveira, Giselly Oseni Barbosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Disabled Persons
Concept Formation
Mobility Limitation
Visually Impaired Persons
Persons with Hearing Impairments.
topic Disabled Persons
Concept Formation
Mobility Limitation
Visually Impaired Persons
Persons with Hearing Impairments.
description Objective: to build the concept of disabled person. Methods: study of analysis of concept using the phases field work and statistical analysis with 120 individuals divided into three groups of 40 people with hearing, visual and motor disability. Results: there was predomination of men (68%), 18-29 years old (55%), with superior education (35%) and married/common-law married (75%). The attribute accepted was person with limitation and still able to perform activity, with a difference between groups (p = 0.018); the keyword accepted was limitation (p = 0.001); the expression was disabled person, with intergroup difference (p = 0.013). Concept of choice by group was deaf (97.51%); blind (45%) and person with visual disability (45%) and; person with physical disability (27.5%). Conclusion: attributes, keywords used in the literature and public policy were not accepted. They prefer to be called deaf; blind or visually impaired; They reject people with motor disability and wheelchair user. 
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2836
10.15253/2175-6783.2015000500012
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2836
identifier_str_mv 10.15253/2175-6783.2015000500012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2836/2201
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Rev Rene; Vol 16 No 5 (2015); 705-713
Rev Rene; v. 16 n. 5 (2015); 705-713
2175-6783
1517-3852
reponame:Rev Rene (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Rev Rene (Online)
collection Rev Rene (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rene@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797174725762351104