Deliberative democracy and ideal of reciprocity. An analysis from the theory of discourse

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Prono, Santiago
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19100
Resumo: The aim of this paper is to show that the deliberative ideal of reciprocity, introduced by Rawls in his writings on political liberalism to define matters of basic justice, it is not conceptually feasible in the theoretical framework of Habermas’s deliberative democracy. The reason offered as foundation, argues that this ideal not only involves one strategic use of rationality, which discredits the intersubjective and public procedure of rational deliberation for the foundation of decisions and norms that establishes the concept of deliberative politics of the German philosopher, but it also contradicts the principle of argumentative discourse, which defines the conditions of validity of the decisions adopted in a such procedure because it ensures his epistemic value.
id UFC-17_208e97063ae33feb1270dfb68d6f9d10
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/19100
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Deliberative democracy and ideal of reciprocity. An analysis from the theory of discourseDemocracia deliberativa e ideal de reciprocidad. Un análisis desde la teoria del discursoDemocracia deliberativa e ideal de reciprocidad. Un análisis desde la teoria del discursoHabermas. Rawls. Reciprocity. Deliberative Democracy. Discourse.Habermas. Rawls. Reciprocidad. Democracia Deliberativa. Discurso.Habermas. Rawls. Reciprocidad. Democracia Deliberativa. Discurso.The aim of this paper is to show that the deliberative ideal of reciprocity, introduced by Rawls in his writings on political liberalism to define matters of basic justice, it is not conceptually feasible in the theoretical framework of Habermas’s deliberative democracy. The reason offered as foundation, argues that this ideal not only involves one strategic use of rationality, which discredits the intersubjective and public procedure of rational deliberation for the foundation of decisions and norms that establishes the concept of deliberative politics of the German philosopher, but it also contradicts the principle of argumentative discourse, which defines the conditions of validity of the decisions adopted in a such procedure because it ensures his epistemic value.El objetivo del presente trabajo es mostrar que el ideal deliberativo de reciprocidad, introducido por Rawls en sus escritos sobre el liberalismo político para la definición de cuestiones de justicia básica, resulta conceptualmente inviable en el marco teórico de la democracia deliberativa de Habermas. La razón ofrecida como fundamento, sostiene que dicho ideal no sólo implica un uso estratégico de la racionalidad, que como tal deslegitima el procedimiento intersubjetivo y público de deliberación racional para la fundamentación de decisiones y normas que establece el concepto de política deliberativa del filósofo alemán, sino que también entra en contradicción con el principio del discurso argumentativo, el cual define las condiciones de validez de las decisiones adoptadas en tal procedimiento al asegurar su valor epistémico. El objetivo del presente trabajo es mostrar que el ideal deliberativo de reciprocidad, introducido por Rawls en sus escritos sobre el liberalismo político para la definición de cuestiones de justicia básica, resulta conceptualmente inviable en el marco teórico de la democracia deliberativa de Habermas. La razón ofrecida como fundamento, sostiene que dicho ideal no sólo implica un uso estratégico de la racionalidad, que como tal deslegitima el procedimiento intersubjetivo y público de deliberación racional para la fundamentación de decisiones y normas que establece el concepto de política deliberativa del filósofo alemán, sino que también entra en contradicción con el principio del discurso argumentativo, el cual define las condiciones de validez de las decisiones adoptadas en tal procedimiento al asegurar su valor epistémico. Universidade Federal do Ceará2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19100Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 13Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 13Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 131984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19100/29818Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessProno, Santiago2021-07-23T16:26:33Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/19100Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-23T16:26:33Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Deliberative democracy and ideal of reciprocity. An analysis from the theory of discourse
Democracia deliberativa e ideal de reciprocidad. Un análisis desde la teoria del discurso
Democracia deliberativa e ideal de reciprocidad. Un análisis desde la teoria del discurso
title Deliberative democracy and ideal of reciprocity. An analysis from the theory of discourse
spellingShingle Deliberative democracy and ideal of reciprocity. An analysis from the theory of discourse
Prono, Santiago
Habermas. Rawls. Reciprocity. Deliberative Democracy. Discourse.
Habermas. Rawls. Reciprocidad. Democracia Deliberativa. Discurso.
Habermas. Rawls. Reciprocidad. Democracia Deliberativa. Discurso.
title_short Deliberative democracy and ideal of reciprocity. An analysis from the theory of discourse
title_full Deliberative democracy and ideal of reciprocity. An analysis from the theory of discourse
title_fullStr Deliberative democracy and ideal of reciprocity. An analysis from the theory of discourse
title_full_unstemmed Deliberative democracy and ideal of reciprocity. An analysis from the theory of discourse
title_sort Deliberative democracy and ideal of reciprocity. An analysis from the theory of discourse
author Prono, Santiago
author_facet Prono, Santiago
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Prono, Santiago
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Habermas. Rawls. Reciprocity. Deliberative Democracy. Discourse.
Habermas. Rawls. Reciprocidad. Democracia Deliberativa. Discurso.
Habermas. Rawls. Reciprocidad. Democracia Deliberativa. Discurso.
topic Habermas. Rawls. Reciprocity. Deliberative Democracy. Discourse.
Habermas. Rawls. Reciprocidad. Democracia Deliberativa. Discurso.
Habermas. Rawls. Reciprocidad. Democracia Deliberativa. Discurso.
description The aim of this paper is to show that the deliberative ideal of reciprocity, introduced by Rawls in his writings on political liberalism to define matters of basic justice, it is not conceptually feasible in the theoretical framework of Habermas’s deliberative democracy. The reason offered as foundation, argues that this ideal not only involves one strategic use of rationality, which discredits the intersubjective and public procedure of rational deliberation for the foundation of decisions and norms that establishes the concept of deliberative politics of the German philosopher, but it also contradicts the principle of argumentative discourse, which defines the conditions of validity of the decisions adopted in a such procedure because it ensures his epistemic value.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19100
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19100
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19100/29818
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 13
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 13
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 13
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068845931823104

Registros relacionados