Philosophy in “Dark Times”: the Criteo reading about Sócrates in the Pólis in front of laws and the majority opinion – an arendtian look
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/43255 |
Resumo: | The issues put to Socrates consist in "guiding" by the advice of others to save his life; not to deprive himself of friends, and much less to transmit unhappiness to those who have money to help each other when necessary: after all, what is the value of money when friendship is put at risk? Socrates does not guide himself through the heads of others, he examines his own questions (posed by him or others) as a challenger, or a inductor of reflections and thoughts. This happens because his answers seem to be a deviation of route, beginning a dialogue based on the majority opinion, what for Criteo, it is fundamental, for Socrates it is not, so we should not be worried with the majority opinion, however, with the best considerations. |
id |
UFC-17_48e682d03167191b48ad1e356edbd249 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/43255 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-17 |
network_name_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Philosophy in “Dark Times”: the Criteo reading about Sócrates in the Pólis in front of laws and the majority opinion – an arendtian lookFilosofia em "Tempos Sombrios": A leitura de Critão sobre Sócrates na pólis diante das leis e da opinião da maioria_Um olhar arendtiano Socrates. Criteo. Dark times. The majority opinion. Hannah Arendt.Sócrates. Critão. Tempos sombrios. Opinião da maioria. Hannah Arendt.The issues put to Socrates consist in "guiding" by the advice of others to save his life; not to deprive himself of friends, and much less to transmit unhappiness to those who have money to help each other when necessary: after all, what is the value of money when friendship is put at risk? Socrates does not guide himself through the heads of others, he examines his own questions (posed by him or others) as a challenger, or a inductor of reflections and thoughts. This happens because his answers seem to be a deviation of route, beginning a dialogue based on the majority opinion, what for Criteo, it is fundamental, for Socrates it is not, so we should not be worried with the majority opinion, however, with the best considerations.As questões postas para Sócrates consistem em “guiar-se” pelo conselho dos outros para salvar a sua vida; para não se privar dos amigos e muito menos legar infelicidade para os que dispõem de dinheiro para ajudá-los entre si quando necessário: pois, qual é o valor do dinheiro quando a amizade é colocada em jogo? Sócrates não se guia pelas cabeças alheias, pois examina as próprias questões (colocadas por ele ou outros) como um provocador, ou parteiro das reflexões e pensamentos. Isso porque as respostas indicadas por Sócrates parecem um desvio de rota, ao começar um diálogo sobre a opinião da maioria, que, para Critão, é ponto significativo, e para Sócrates não, pois não devemos nos preocupar com a opinião da maioria, mas com as considerações dos melhores.Universidade Federal do Ceará2020-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/4325510.36517/Argumentos.23.8Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 23 (2020); 95-111Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 23 (2020); 95-111Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 23 (2020); 95-1111984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/43255/100321Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHornich, Daner2021-07-22T14:11:02Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/43255Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-22T14:11:02Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Philosophy in “Dark Times”: the Criteo reading about Sócrates in the Pólis in front of laws and the majority opinion – an arendtian look Filosofia em "Tempos Sombrios": A leitura de Critão sobre Sócrates na pólis diante das leis e da opinião da maioria_Um olhar arendtiano |
title |
Philosophy in “Dark Times”: the Criteo reading about Sócrates in the Pólis in front of laws and the majority opinion – an arendtian look |
spellingShingle |
Philosophy in “Dark Times”: the Criteo reading about Sócrates in the Pólis in front of laws and the majority opinion – an arendtian look Hornich, Daner Socrates. Criteo. Dark times. The majority opinion. Hannah Arendt. Sócrates. Critão. Tempos sombrios. Opinião da maioria. Hannah Arendt. |
title_short |
Philosophy in “Dark Times”: the Criteo reading about Sócrates in the Pólis in front of laws and the majority opinion – an arendtian look |
title_full |
Philosophy in “Dark Times”: the Criteo reading about Sócrates in the Pólis in front of laws and the majority opinion – an arendtian look |
title_fullStr |
Philosophy in “Dark Times”: the Criteo reading about Sócrates in the Pólis in front of laws and the majority opinion – an arendtian look |
title_full_unstemmed |
Philosophy in “Dark Times”: the Criteo reading about Sócrates in the Pólis in front of laws and the majority opinion – an arendtian look |
title_sort |
Philosophy in “Dark Times”: the Criteo reading about Sócrates in the Pólis in front of laws and the majority opinion – an arendtian look |
author |
Hornich, Daner |
author_facet |
Hornich, Daner |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hornich, Daner |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Socrates. Criteo. Dark times. The majority opinion. Hannah Arendt. Sócrates. Critão. Tempos sombrios. Opinião da maioria. Hannah Arendt. |
topic |
Socrates. Criteo. Dark times. The majority opinion. Hannah Arendt. Sócrates. Critão. Tempos sombrios. Opinião da maioria. Hannah Arendt. |
description |
The issues put to Socrates consist in "guiding" by the advice of others to save his life; not to deprive himself of friends, and much less to transmit unhappiness to those who have money to help each other when necessary: after all, what is the value of money when friendship is put at risk? Socrates does not guide himself through the heads of others, he examines his own questions (posed by him or others) as a challenger, or a inductor of reflections and thoughts. This happens because his answers seem to be a deviation of route, beginning a dialogue based on the majority opinion, what for Criteo, it is fundamental, for Socrates it is not, so we should not be worried with the majority opinion, however, with the best considerations. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/43255 10.36517/Argumentos.23.8 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/43255 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36517/Argumentos.23.8 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/43255/100321 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 23 (2020); 95-111 Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 23 (2020); 95-111 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 23 (2020); 95-111 1984-4255 1984-4247 reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
collection |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
argumentos@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068846931116032 |