Semantic ambiguity does not imply syntactic ambiguity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: López-Astorga, Miguel
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42936
Resumo: A problem to solve in generative grammar is to account for why children are able to note when a sentence or expression is ambiguous, even if they have not received explicit training for that. The theory of mental models can give an explanation in that way. That explanation is based upon the idea that people interpret linguistic messages by considering the semantics models corresponding to them, and it has been also proposed that the syntactic structures of those messages can be recovered by taken those very models into account. However, the point of this paper is that it tries to show that ambiguity at semantic level, that is, the cases in which models referring to different facts can be attributed to one sentence, does not necessarily lead to ambiguity at syntactic level. As it is argued, it is possible to capture models describing several opposite circumstances by means of only one logical form.
id UFC-17_577702fa35b836dd2e92f67dda6059db
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/42936
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Semantic ambiguity does not imply syntactic ambiguityAmbiguity. Logical form. Model. Semantics. Syntax.Ambiguidade. Forma lógica. Modelo. Semântica. Sintaxe.A problem to solve in generative grammar is to account for why children are able to note when a sentence or expression is ambiguous, even if they have not received explicit training for that. The theory of mental models can give an explanation in that way. That explanation is based upon the idea that people interpret linguistic messages by considering the semantics models corresponding to them, and it has been also proposed that the syntactic structures of those messages can be recovered by taken those very models into account. However, the point of this paper is that it tries to show that ambiguity at semantic level, that is, the cases in which models referring to different facts can be attributed to one sentence, does not necessarily lead to ambiguity at syntactic level. As it is argued, it is possible to capture models describing several opposite circumstances by means of only one logical form.Um problema para resolver na gramática generativa é explicar por que os meninos são capazes de notar quando uma frase ou expressão é ambígua, mesmo que não tenham recebido ensino explícito para isso. A teoria dos modelos mentais pode dar uma explicação nesse sentido. Essa explicação é baseada na ideia de que as pessoas interpretam as mensagens linguísticas considerando os modelos semânticos correspondentes a elas, e foi proposto que as estruturas sintáticas dessas mensagens podem ser recuperadas tomando esses mesmos modelos em consideração. No entanto, o ponto deste trabalho é que tenta mostrar que a ambiguidade ao nível semântico, isso é, os casos nos que modelos se referindo a fatos diferentes podem ser atribuídos a uma frase, não necessariamente leva a uma ambiguidade ao nível sintático. Como é argumentado, é possível captar modelos descrevendo várias circunstâncias opostas por meio de uma só forma lógica.Universidade Federal do Ceará2020-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/4293610.36517/Argumentos.23.1Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 23 (2020); 7-13Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 23 (2020); 7-13Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 23 (2020); 7-131984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42936/100310Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLópez-Astorga, Miguel2021-03-15T01:00:43Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/42936Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-03-15T01:00:43Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Semantic ambiguity does not imply syntactic ambiguity
title Semantic ambiguity does not imply syntactic ambiguity
spellingShingle Semantic ambiguity does not imply syntactic ambiguity
López-Astorga, Miguel
Ambiguity. Logical form. Model. Semantics. Syntax.
Ambiguidade. Forma lógica. Modelo. Semântica. Sintaxe.
title_short Semantic ambiguity does not imply syntactic ambiguity
title_full Semantic ambiguity does not imply syntactic ambiguity
title_fullStr Semantic ambiguity does not imply syntactic ambiguity
title_full_unstemmed Semantic ambiguity does not imply syntactic ambiguity
title_sort Semantic ambiguity does not imply syntactic ambiguity
author López-Astorga, Miguel
author_facet López-Astorga, Miguel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv López-Astorga, Miguel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ambiguity. Logical form. Model. Semantics. Syntax.
Ambiguidade. Forma lógica. Modelo. Semântica. Sintaxe.
topic Ambiguity. Logical form. Model. Semantics. Syntax.
Ambiguidade. Forma lógica. Modelo. Semântica. Sintaxe.
description A problem to solve in generative grammar is to account for why children are able to note when a sentence or expression is ambiguous, even if they have not received explicit training for that. The theory of mental models can give an explanation in that way. That explanation is based upon the idea that people interpret linguistic messages by considering the semantics models corresponding to them, and it has been also proposed that the syntactic structures of those messages can be recovered by taken those very models into account. However, the point of this paper is that it tries to show that ambiguity at semantic level, that is, the cases in which models referring to different facts can be attributed to one sentence, does not necessarily lead to ambiguity at syntactic level. As it is argued, it is possible to capture models describing several opposite circumstances by means of only one logical form.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42936
10.36517/Argumentos.23.1
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42936
identifier_str_mv 10.36517/Argumentos.23.1
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42936/100310
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 23 (2020); 7-13
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 23 (2020); 7-13
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 23 (2020); 7-13
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068846927970304

Registros relacionados