On what is properly human in the Nicomachean ethics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santana, Juliana
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78535
Resumo: In this paper we intend to investigate what the Nicomachean Ethics proposes as being properly human, which of the uses of the capacity of reason could be configured as such, specifically defining man. The question arose from the observation that the treatise describes man sometimes as a political animal, sometimes its rational aspect is highlighted, however, without openly associating or dissociating these two characteristics. We found a double specification not related in the treatise, but strongly linked to the capacity of the rational soul and its practical and theoretical uses. Therefore, we propose a research concerning what is properly human from what the treatise indicates regarding reason. Therefore, we begin with observations of the first Books, but especially Book I, because there we see highlighted that man is naturally political, but also the beginning of the discussion about reason. We continue with more detailed research of Book VI and what it presents regarding the relations and dissensions of the two types of reason, as well as their virtues. Afterwards, we visit the lines of Book X, in its second half, that sometimes emphasizes the theoretical use and the life of contemplation, sometimes indicates the impossibilities of living fully in this way, reinforcing the importance of the proposed research and bringing us crucial elements to the answer we are looking for.
id UFC-17_5e54fdf34f9dd49d6816ff062417b075
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/78535
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling On what is properly human in the Nicomachean ethicsSobre o que é propriamente humano na Ética nicomaqueiaProperly human. Practical reason. Theorectical reason.Propriamente humano. Razão prática. Razão teorética.In this paper we intend to investigate what the Nicomachean Ethics proposes as being properly human, which of the uses of the capacity of reason could be configured as such, specifically defining man. The question arose from the observation that the treatise describes man sometimes as a political animal, sometimes its rational aspect is highlighted, however, without openly associating or dissociating these two characteristics. We found a double specification not related in the treatise, but strongly linked to the capacity of the rational soul and its practical and theoretical uses. Therefore, we propose a research concerning what is properly human from what the treatise indicates regarding reason. Therefore, we begin with observations of the first Books, but especially Book I, because there we see highlighted that man is naturally political, but also the beginning of the discussion about reason. We continue with more detailed research of Book VI and what it presents regarding the relations and dissensions of the two types of reason, as well as their virtues. Afterwards, we visit the lines of Book X, in its second half, that sometimes emphasizes the theoretical use and the life of contemplation, sometimes indicates the impossibilities of living fully in this way, reinforcing the importance of the proposed research and bringing us crucial elements to the answer we are looking for.Neste artigo, temos a intenção de averiguar o que a Ética nicomaqueia propõe como sendo propriamente humano, dentre os usos da capacidade de razão, qual poderia ser configurado como tal, definindo especificamente o homem. A pergunta surgiu a partir da observação que o tratado às vezes descreve o homem como animal político, às vezes salienta seu aspecto racional, porém, sem associar ou dissociar abertamente essas duas características. Constatamos uma dupla especificação não relacionada no tratado, mas fortemente atrelada à capacidade racional da alma e seus usos prático e teorético. Sendo assim, propomos a pesquisa acerca do que pode ser propriamente humano a partir do que a Ética indica sobre a razão. Para tanto, iniciamos com observações dos primeiros Livros, especialmente do Livro I, porque ali vemos destacado que o homem é naturalmente político, mas também os primeiros traços da discussão sobre a razão humana. Seguimos com a pesquisa mais detida do Livro VI e o que este apresenta sobre as relações e dissenções dos dois tipos de razão, bem como de suas virtudes. Depois, visitamos as linhas do Livro X, em sua segunda metade, que ora enfatiza o uso teorético da razão e a vida de contemplação, ora indica as impossibilidades de se viver plenamente deste modo, reforçando a importância da pesquisa proposta e trazendo elementos cruciais para a resposta que procuramos.Universidade Federal do Ceará2022-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/7853510.36517/Argumentos.28.2Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 28 (2022); 18-35Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 28 (2022); 18-35Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 28 (2022); 18-351984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78535/226136Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantana, Juliana2022-07-04T08:19:15Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/78535Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2022-07-04T08:19:15Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On what is properly human in the Nicomachean ethics
Sobre o que é propriamente humano na Ética nicomaqueia
title On what is properly human in the Nicomachean ethics
spellingShingle On what is properly human in the Nicomachean ethics
Santana, Juliana
Properly human. Practical reason. Theorectical reason.
Propriamente humano. Razão prática. Razão teorética.
title_short On what is properly human in the Nicomachean ethics
title_full On what is properly human in the Nicomachean ethics
title_fullStr On what is properly human in the Nicomachean ethics
title_full_unstemmed On what is properly human in the Nicomachean ethics
title_sort On what is properly human in the Nicomachean ethics
author Santana, Juliana
author_facet Santana, Juliana
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santana, Juliana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Properly human. Practical reason. Theorectical reason.
Propriamente humano. Razão prática. Razão teorética.
topic Properly human. Practical reason. Theorectical reason.
Propriamente humano. Razão prática. Razão teorética.
description In this paper we intend to investigate what the Nicomachean Ethics proposes as being properly human, which of the uses of the capacity of reason could be configured as such, specifically defining man. The question arose from the observation that the treatise describes man sometimes as a political animal, sometimes its rational aspect is highlighted, however, without openly associating or dissociating these two characteristics. We found a double specification not related in the treatise, but strongly linked to the capacity of the rational soul and its practical and theoretical uses. Therefore, we propose a research concerning what is properly human from what the treatise indicates regarding reason. Therefore, we begin with observations of the first Books, but especially Book I, because there we see highlighted that man is naturally political, but also the beginning of the discussion about reason. We continue with more detailed research of Book VI and what it presents regarding the relations and dissensions of the two types of reason, as well as their virtues. Afterwards, we visit the lines of Book X, in its second half, that sometimes emphasizes the theoretical use and the life of contemplation, sometimes indicates the impossibilities of living fully in this way, reinforcing the importance of the proposed research and bringing us crucial elements to the answer we are looking for.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78535
10.36517/Argumentos.28.2
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78535
identifier_str_mv 10.36517/Argumentos.28.2
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78535/226136
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 28 (2022); 18-35
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 28 (2022); 18-35
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 28 (2022); 18-35
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068847341109248