The historical and social dimension of science in Popper
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32030 |
Resumo: | The aim of the present paper is to show that Popper’s theory of science, first presented in his work The Logic of Scientific Discovery, in which the emphasis was given to logical aspects was complemented in later works by an approach that emphasizes aspects historical and social. This new approach is outlined when the philosopher elaborates a rational theory of tradition and an institutional theory of objectivity and scientific progress. In this way, science is defined not only by means of a logical criterion, but also, by following a tradition, not only to receive the theories produced, but to criticize them and to depend on institutions thatfoment debate and criticism of theories in order to guarantee objectivity and scientific progress. |
id |
UFC-17_75ff9643369823ed9ee7c2f10c2cba33 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/32030 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-17 |
network_name_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The historical and social dimension of science in PopperA dimensão histórica e social da ciência em PopperScience. Tradition. Institutions. Objectivity. Scientific progress.Ciência. Tradição. Instituições. Objetividade. Progresso cientifico.The aim of the present paper is to show that Popper’s theory of science, first presented in his work The Logic of Scientific Discovery, in which the emphasis was given to logical aspects was complemented in later works by an approach that emphasizes aspects historical and social. This new approach is outlined when the philosopher elaborates a rational theory of tradition and an institutional theory of objectivity and scientific progress. In this way, science is defined not only by means of a logical criterion, but also, by following a tradition, not only to receive the theories produced, but to criticize them and to depend on institutions thatfoment debate and criticism of theories in order to guarantee objectivity and scientific progress. O objetivo do presente trabalho é mostrar que a teoria da ciência de Popper, apresentada inicialmente em sua obra A Lógica da pesquisa cientifica, na qual a ênfase era dada aos aspectos lógicos, foi complementada, em obras posteriores, por uma abordagem que dá ênfase aos aspectos históricos e sociais. Essa nova abordagem se delineia quando o filósofo elabora uma teoria racional da tradição e uma teoria institucional da objetividade e do progresso cientifico. Deste modo, a ciência passa a ser definida não apenas por meio de um critério lógico, mas também, por seguir uma tradição, de não apenas receber as teorias produzidas, mas de criticá-las e por depender de instituições que fomentem o debate e a critica de teorias de modo a garantir a objetividade e o progresso cientifico. Universidade Federal do Ceará2018-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32030Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 19Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 19Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 191984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32030/72341Copyright (c) 2018 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Elizabeth Assis2021-07-23T00:12:12Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/32030Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-23T00:12:12Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The historical and social dimension of science in Popper A dimensão histórica e social da ciência em Popper |
title |
The historical and social dimension of science in Popper |
spellingShingle |
The historical and social dimension of science in Popper Dias, Elizabeth Assis Science. Tradition. Institutions. Objectivity. Scientific progress. Ciência. Tradição. Instituições. Objetividade. Progresso cientifico. |
title_short |
The historical and social dimension of science in Popper |
title_full |
The historical and social dimension of science in Popper |
title_fullStr |
The historical and social dimension of science in Popper |
title_full_unstemmed |
The historical and social dimension of science in Popper |
title_sort |
The historical and social dimension of science in Popper |
author |
Dias, Elizabeth Assis |
author_facet |
Dias, Elizabeth Assis |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dias, Elizabeth Assis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Science. Tradition. Institutions. Objectivity. Scientific progress. Ciência. Tradição. Instituições. Objetividade. Progresso cientifico. |
topic |
Science. Tradition. Institutions. Objectivity. Scientific progress. Ciência. Tradição. Instituições. Objetividade. Progresso cientifico. |
description |
The aim of the present paper is to show that Popper’s theory of science, first presented in his work The Logic of Scientific Discovery, in which the emphasis was given to logical aspects was complemented in later works by an approach that emphasizes aspects historical and social. This new approach is outlined when the philosopher elaborates a rational theory of tradition and an institutional theory of objectivity and scientific progress. In this way, science is defined not only by means of a logical criterion, but also, by following a tradition, not only to receive the theories produced, but to criticize them and to depend on institutions thatfoment debate and criticism of theories in order to guarantee objectivity and scientific progress. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32030 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32030 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32030/72341 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 19 Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 19 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 19 1984-4255 1984-4247 reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
collection |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
argumentos@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068846470791168 |