As for the critical character of Kant's rechtslehre

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Scherer, Fábio César
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/18953
Resumo: The Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (1797) text is unanimously, in terms of law theory, the most appropriate among Kant publications. This is because, besides exposing in a improved manner the main ideas developed in the previous writings and the complete division of law, he presents the metaphysical principles of right (Metaphysics) and application to particular cases (law empiric application). However, the determination of space in this text, from 1797, inside the transcendental philosophy project is not univocal. The two most important authors in this discussion about the criticism of the late Kantian juridical doctrine were Ritter (1971) e Busch (1979). The aim of this article is, firstly, to analyze both theses in order to, then, endorse the interpretation that defends Rechtslehre composition in accordance to the critical project of the first Kritik and the adaptations of the second Kritik.
id UFC-17_7f96cbb66e23903d187d207c34bbde9e
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/18953
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling As for the critical character of Kant's rechtslehreQuanto ao caráter crítico da rechtslehre de KantLaw philosophy. Transcendental philosophy. Method. Freedom. Juridical semantics.Filosofia do direito. Filosofia transcendental. Método. Liberdade. Semântica jurídica.The Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (1797) text is unanimously, in terms of law theory, the most appropriate among Kant publications. This is because, besides exposing in a improved manner the main ideas developed in the previous writings and the complete division of law, he presents the metaphysical principles of right (Metaphysics) and application to particular cases (law empiric application). However, the determination of space in this text, from 1797, inside the transcendental philosophy project is not univocal. The two most important authors in this discussion about the criticism of the late Kantian juridical doctrine were Ritter (1971) e Busch (1979). The aim of this article is, firstly, to analyze both theses in order to, then, endorse the interpretation that defends Rechtslehre composition in accordance to the critical project of the first Kritik and the adaptations of the second Kritik.O texto Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (1797) é unanimemente, em termos da teoria do direito, o mais aprimorado dentre as publicações de Kant. Isto porque, além de expor de maneira aperfeiçoada, as principais idéias trabalhadas nos escritos anteriores e a divisão completa do direito, apresenta os princípios metafísicos do direito (metafísica) e aplicação aos casos particulares (aplicação empírica dos direitos). Todavia, a determinação do espaço deste texto, de 1797, no interior do projeto de filosofia transcendental não é unívoca. Os dois maiores expoentes dessa discussão sobre o criticismo da doutrina jurídica kantiana tardia foram Ritter (1971) e Busch (1979). A proposta do artigo é, inicialmente, analisar a tese de ambos os autores para, em seguida, endossar a interpretação que defende a redação da Rechtslehre em conformidade com projeto crítico da primeira Kritik e as adaptações da segunda Kritik.Universidade Federal do Ceará2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/18953Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 3Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 3Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 31984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/18953/29672Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScherer, Fábio César2021-07-24T13:12:38Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/18953Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-24T13:12:38Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv As for the critical character of Kant's rechtslehre
Quanto ao caráter crítico da rechtslehre de Kant
title As for the critical character of Kant's rechtslehre
spellingShingle As for the critical character of Kant's rechtslehre
Scherer, Fábio César
Law philosophy. Transcendental philosophy. Method. Freedom. Juridical semantics.
Filosofia do direito. Filosofia transcendental. Método. Liberdade. Semântica jurídica.
title_short As for the critical character of Kant's rechtslehre
title_full As for the critical character of Kant's rechtslehre
title_fullStr As for the critical character of Kant's rechtslehre
title_full_unstemmed As for the critical character of Kant's rechtslehre
title_sort As for the critical character of Kant's rechtslehre
author Scherer, Fábio César
author_facet Scherer, Fábio César
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Scherer, Fábio César
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Law philosophy. Transcendental philosophy. Method. Freedom. Juridical semantics.
Filosofia do direito. Filosofia transcendental. Método. Liberdade. Semântica jurídica.
topic Law philosophy. Transcendental philosophy. Method. Freedom. Juridical semantics.
Filosofia do direito. Filosofia transcendental. Método. Liberdade. Semântica jurídica.
description The Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (1797) text is unanimously, in terms of law theory, the most appropriate among Kant publications. This is because, besides exposing in a improved manner the main ideas developed in the previous writings and the complete division of law, he presents the metaphysical principles of right (Metaphysics) and application to particular cases (law empiric application). However, the determination of space in this text, from 1797, inside the transcendental philosophy project is not univocal. The two most important authors in this discussion about the criticism of the late Kantian juridical doctrine were Ritter (1971) e Busch (1979). The aim of this article is, firstly, to analyze both theses in order to, then, endorse the interpretation that defends Rechtslehre composition in accordance to the critical project of the first Kritik and the adaptations of the second Kritik.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/18953
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/18953
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/18953/29672
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 3
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 3
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 3
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068844996493312

Registros relacionados