Death of art, reborn of life
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/41485 |
Resumo: | Art has always been anchored in the task to create idealities. Traditional aesthetics expressed this fundamental requirement, having Hegel as its highest moment. Contemporary art has developed an effort to deconstruct such a perspective, proposing a return to daily life. However, such an effort still remained under the command of purely spiritual principles of art considered in itself. Our hypothesis is that this leads art to self-destruction so that it becomes necessary for art to return to be engaged with the real world (natural and social), making use of all our senses, and avoiding the old precepts of disinterestedness, contemplation and hierarchical teleology. Art must die in order for life to emerge, as a new kind of pleasure that does not spring from “beauty”, but from the objects themselves. |
id |
UFC-17_95fa6c8f1742ab2a662eea7b4a3590c8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/41485 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-17 |
network_name_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Death of art, reborn of lifeMorte da arte, renascer da vidaIdeality. Death of art. Natural beauty. Senses. New pleasure.Idealidade. Morte da arte. Belo natural. Sentidos. Novo prazer.Art has always been anchored in the task to create idealities. Traditional aesthetics expressed this fundamental requirement, having Hegel as its highest moment. Contemporary art has developed an effort to deconstruct such a perspective, proposing a return to daily life. However, such an effort still remained under the command of purely spiritual principles of art considered in itself. Our hypothesis is that this leads art to self-destruction so that it becomes necessary for art to return to be engaged with the real world (natural and social), making use of all our senses, and avoiding the old precepts of disinterestedness, contemplation and hierarchical teleology. Art must die in order for life to emerge, as a new kind of pleasure that does not spring from “beauty”, but from the objects themselves.A arte esteve sempre ancorada na tarefa de criar idealidades. A estética tradicional expressou essa exigência fundamental, tendo Hegel como seu momento mais elevado. A arte contemporânea desenvolveu todo um esforço para desconstruir esse velho edifício, propondo um retorno ao cotidiano. Porém, tal esforço ainda se manteve refém dos princípios puramente espirituais da própria arte. Nossa hipótese é de que isso leva a arte à auto destruição, de tal forma que se faz necessário voltar, de forma engajada, ao mundo efetivo (natural e social), fazendo uso de todos nossos sentidos, evitando os antigos preceitos do desinteresse, da contemplação e das teologias hierarquizantes. A arte deve morrer para dar lugar à vida, a um novo tipo de prazer que não brota mais da “beleza”, mas dos próprios objetos.Universidade Federal do Ceará2019-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/4148510.36517/Argumentos.22.9Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 22; 107-119Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 22; 107-119Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 22; 107-1191984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/41485/99576Copyright (c) 2019 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarneiro Amora, Kleber2021-07-22T14:28:01Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/41485Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-22T14:28:01Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Death of art, reborn of life Morte da arte, renascer da vida |
title |
Death of art, reborn of life |
spellingShingle |
Death of art, reborn of life Carneiro Amora, Kleber Ideality. Death of art. Natural beauty. Senses. New pleasure. Idealidade. Morte da arte. Belo natural. Sentidos. Novo prazer. |
title_short |
Death of art, reborn of life |
title_full |
Death of art, reborn of life |
title_fullStr |
Death of art, reborn of life |
title_full_unstemmed |
Death of art, reborn of life |
title_sort |
Death of art, reborn of life |
author |
Carneiro Amora, Kleber |
author_facet |
Carneiro Amora, Kleber |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carneiro Amora, Kleber |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ideality. Death of art. Natural beauty. Senses. New pleasure. Idealidade. Morte da arte. Belo natural. Sentidos. Novo prazer. |
topic |
Ideality. Death of art. Natural beauty. Senses. New pleasure. Idealidade. Morte da arte. Belo natural. Sentidos. Novo prazer. |
description |
Art has always been anchored in the task to create idealities. Traditional aesthetics expressed this fundamental requirement, having Hegel as its highest moment. Contemporary art has developed an effort to deconstruct such a perspective, proposing a return to daily life. However, such an effort still remained under the command of purely spiritual principles of art considered in itself. Our hypothesis is that this leads art to self-destruction so that it becomes necessary for art to return to be engaged with the real world (natural and social), making use of all our senses, and avoiding the old precepts of disinterestedness, contemplation and hierarchical teleology. Art must die in order for life to emerge, as a new kind of pleasure that does not spring from “beauty”, but from the objects themselves. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/41485 10.36517/Argumentos.22.9 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/41485 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36517/Argumentos.22.9 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/41485/99576 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 22; 107-119 Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 22; 107-119 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 22; 107-119 1984-4255 1984-4247 reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
collection |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
argumentos@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068846908047360 |