Nagel's reduction theory revisited
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/40996 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to develop further a model of reduction derived from Nagel’s model and from the deductive-nomological model of explanation. We propose this development by examining its consistency with the history of physics, in particular, with Nagel´s further account of the history of physics. In the first part, we introduce the issue of intertheoretical reduction. In the second, we examine the partial consistency of the derived D-N model of reduction with Nagel’s further considerations on reduction. As a conclusion, we argue that, in agreement with Nagel´s theory, the full consistency with history of science is a criterion needed for any purported theory of reduction and that the autonomy of the reducing science is to be preserved. |
id |
UFC-17_9f7cf3e87c90ef70f6747735c0acbc4f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/40996 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-17 |
network_name_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Nagel's reduction theory revisitedNagel's reduction theory revisitedIntertheoretical reduction. Nagel. Scientific explanation.Redução. Nagel. Explicação científica.The aim of this paper is to develop further a model of reduction derived from Nagel’s model and from the deductive-nomological model of explanation. We propose this development by examining its consistency with the history of physics, in particular, with Nagel´s further account of the history of physics. In the first part, we introduce the issue of intertheoretical reduction. In the second, we examine the partial consistency of the derived D-N model of reduction with Nagel’s further considerations on reduction. As a conclusion, we argue that, in agreement with Nagel´s theory, the full consistency with history of science is a criterion needed for any purported theory of reduction and that the autonomy of the reducing science is to be preserved.O objetivo deste artigo é desenvolver um modelo de redução derivado do modelo de Nagel e do modelo dedutivo-nomológico de explicação. Propomos este desenvolvimento examinando sua consistência com a história da física, em particular, com a abordagem posterior de Nagel sobre a história da física. Na primeira parte, introduzimos a questão da redução interteórica. Na segunda, examinamos a consistência parcial do modelo dedutivo-nomológico de redução com relação às considerações posteriores de Nagel sobre a redução. Em conclusão, argumentamos que, em concordância com a teoria de Nagel, uma consistência total com a história da ciência e um critério necessário para qualquer teoria da redução e que a autonomia da ciência reduzida deve ser preservada.Universidade Federal do Ceará2019-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/4099610.36517/Argumentos.22.4Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 22; 39-48Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 22; 39-48Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 22; 39-481984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/40996/99571Copyright (c) 2019 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Henrique de Morais2021-07-22T14:21:20Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/40996Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-22T14:21:20Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Nagel's reduction theory revisited Nagel's reduction theory revisited |
title |
Nagel's reduction theory revisited |
spellingShingle |
Nagel's reduction theory revisited Ribeiro, Henrique de Morais Intertheoretical reduction. Nagel. Scientific explanation. Redução. Nagel. Explicação científica. |
title_short |
Nagel's reduction theory revisited |
title_full |
Nagel's reduction theory revisited |
title_fullStr |
Nagel's reduction theory revisited |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nagel's reduction theory revisited |
title_sort |
Nagel's reduction theory revisited |
author |
Ribeiro, Henrique de Morais |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Henrique de Morais |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Henrique de Morais |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Intertheoretical reduction. Nagel. Scientific explanation. Redução. Nagel. Explicação científica. |
topic |
Intertheoretical reduction. Nagel. Scientific explanation. Redução. Nagel. Explicação científica. |
description |
The aim of this paper is to develop further a model of reduction derived from Nagel’s model and from the deductive-nomological model of explanation. We propose this development by examining its consistency with the history of physics, in particular, with Nagel´s further account of the history of physics. In the first part, we introduce the issue of intertheoretical reduction. In the second, we examine the partial consistency of the derived D-N model of reduction with Nagel’s further considerations on reduction. As a conclusion, we argue that, in agreement with Nagel´s theory, the full consistency with history of science is a criterion needed for any purported theory of reduction and that the autonomy of the reducing science is to be preserved. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/40996 10.36517/Argumentos.22.4 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/40996 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36517/Argumentos.22.4 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/40996/99571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 22; 39-48 Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 22; 39-48 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 22; 39-48 1984-4255 1984-4247 reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
collection |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
argumentos@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068846860861440 |