Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
DOI: | 10.36517/Argumentos.28.3 |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78093 |
Resumo: | The objective of this article is to discuss the relations between multitude and people for the constitution of the theory of representation proposed by Hobbes. To do so, the discussions are directed to the scope of the works Elements of Law and Leviathan through which the argumentative trajectory that dispenses the elements of plurality of wills to the scope of its unity is reconstituted. Therefore, an argumentative evolution concerning the idea of unity and representation between Hobbes' two works is evidenced. To this end, the acquisition of the unity of wills is discussed as an indispensable element for the establishment of the artificial person. As a consequence, it is shown that the theory of representation is conditioned to the constitution of a single will by which the premises of the reduction of the multiple to the one are established, whose consequence is the emergence of the concept of authorization, fundamental to the core of political representation. |
id |
UFC-17_eff7bf1207ac60677ecc25b72e2a1237 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/78093 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-17 |
network_name_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
spelling |
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and LeviathanUnidade e multiplicidade na constituição do corpo político em Thomas Hobbes: uma leitura do Elements of Law e do Leviathan Multitude. People. Hobbes. Consent. Representation.Multidão. Povo. Hobbes. Consenso. Representação.The objective of this article is to discuss the relations between multitude and people for the constitution of the theory of representation proposed by Hobbes. To do so, the discussions are directed to the scope of the works Elements of Law and Leviathan through which the argumentative trajectory that dispenses the elements of plurality of wills to the scope of its unity is reconstituted. Therefore, an argumentative evolution concerning the idea of unity and representation between Hobbes' two works is evidenced. To this end, the acquisition of the unity of wills is discussed as an indispensable element for the establishment of the artificial person. As a consequence, it is shown that the theory of representation is conditioned to the constitution of a single will by which the premises of the reduction of the multiple to the one are established, whose consequence is the emergence of the concept of authorization, fundamental to the core of political representation.O objetivo desse artigo consiste em discutir as relações entre multidão e povo para a constituição da teoria da representação proposta por Thomas Hobbes. Para tanto, direcionam-se as discussões para o âmbito das obras Elements of Law e Leviathan, pelas quais se reconstitui a trajetória argumentativa que dispensa os elementos da pluralidade das vontades para o âmbito da sua unidade. Evidencia-se, portanto, uma evolução argumentativa no que concerne à ideia de unidade e representação entre as duas obras de Hobbes. Para tanto, discute-se a aquisição da unidade das vontades como um elemento indispensável para o estabelecimento da pessoa artificial. Como consequência, demonstra-se que a teoria da representação está condicionada à constituição de uma vontade única, pela qual se estabelecem as premissas da redução do múltiplo ao uno, cuja consequência é o surgimento da concepção de autorização, fundamental ao núcleo da representatividade política. Universidade Federal do Ceará2022-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/7809310.36517/Argumentos.28.3Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 28 (2022); 36-46Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 28 (2022); 36-46Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 28 (2022); 36-461984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78093/226137Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMattos, Delmo2022-07-04T08:19:15Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/78093Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2022-07-04T08:19:15Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan Unidade e multiplicidade na constituição do corpo político em Thomas Hobbes: uma leitura do Elements of Law e do Leviathan |
title |
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan |
spellingShingle |
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan Mattos, Delmo Multitude. People. Hobbes. Consent. Representation. Multidão. Povo. Hobbes. Consenso. Representação. Mattos, Delmo Multitude. People. Hobbes. Consent. Representation. Multidão. Povo. Hobbes. Consenso. Representação. |
title_short |
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan |
title_full |
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan |
title_fullStr |
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan |
title_full_unstemmed |
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan |
title_sort |
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan |
author |
Mattos, Delmo |
author_facet |
Mattos, Delmo Mattos, Delmo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mattos, Delmo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Multitude. People. Hobbes. Consent. Representation. Multidão. Povo. Hobbes. Consenso. Representação. |
topic |
Multitude. People. Hobbes. Consent. Representation. Multidão. Povo. Hobbes. Consenso. Representação. |
description |
The objective of this article is to discuss the relations between multitude and people for the constitution of the theory of representation proposed by Hobbes. To do so, the discussions are directed to the scope of the works Elements of Law and Leviathan through which the argumentative trajectory that dispenses the elements of plurality of wills to the scope of its unity is reconstituted. Therefore, an argumentative evolution concerning the idea of unity and representation between Hobbes' two works is evidenced. To this end, the acquisition of the unity of wills is discussed as an indispensable element for the establishment of the artificial person. As a consequence, it is shown that the theory of representation is conditioned to the constitution of a single will by which the premises of the reduction of the multiple to the one are established, whose consequence is the emergence of the concept of authorization, fundamental to the core of political representation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78093 10.36517/Argumentos.28.3 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78093 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36517/Argumentos.28.3 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78093/226137 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 28 (2022); 36-46 Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 28 (2022); 36-46 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 28 (2022); 36-46 1984-4255 1984-4247 reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
collection |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
argumentos@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1822179630698725376 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.36517/Argumentos.28.3 |