Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mattos, Delmo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
DOI: 10.36517/Argumentos.28.3
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78093
Resumo: The objective of this article is to discuss the relations between multitude and people for the constitution of the theory of representation proposed by Hobbes. To do so, the discussions are directed to the scope of the works Elements of Law and Leviathan through which the argumentative trajectory that dispenses the elements of plurality of wills to the scope of its unity is reconstituted. Therefore, an argumentative evolution concerning the idea of unity and representation between Hobbes' two works is evidenced. To this end, the acquisition of the unity of wills is discussed as an indispensable element for the establishment of the artificial person. As a consequence, it is shown that the theory of representation is conditioned to the constitution of a single will by which the premises of the reduction of the multiple to the one are established, whose consequence is the emergence of the concept of authorization, fundamental to the core of political representation.
id UFC-17_eff7bf1207ac60677ecc25b72e2a1237
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/78093
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
spelling Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and LeviathanUnidade e multiplicidade na constituição do corpo político em Thomas Hobbes: uma leitura do Elements of Law e do Leviathan Multitude. People. Hobbes. Consent. Representation.Multidão. Povo. Hobbes. Consenso. Representação.The objective of this article is to discuss the relations between multitude and people for the constitution of the theory of representation proposed by Hobbes. To do so, the discussions are directed to the scope of the works Elements of Law and Leviathan through which the argumentative trajectory that dispenses the elements of plurality of wills to the scope of its unity is reconstituted. Therefore, an argumentative evolution concerning the idea of unity and representation between Hobbes' two works is evidenced. To this end, the acquisition of the unity of wills is discussed as an indispensable element for the establishment of the artificial person. As a consequence, it is shown that the theory of representation is conditioned to the constitution of a single will by which the premises of the reduction of the multiple to the one are established, whose consequence is the emergence of the concept of authorization, fundamental to the core of political representation.O objetivo desse artigo consiste em discutir as relações entre multidão e povo para a constituição da teoria da representação proposta por Thomas Hobbes. Para tanto, direcionam-se as discussões para o âmbito das obras Elements of Law e Leviathan, pelas quais se reconstitui a trajetória argumentativa que dispensa os elementos da pluralidade das vontades para o âmbito da sua unidade. Evidencia-se, portanto, uma evolução argumentativa no que concerne à ideia de unidade e representação entre as duas obras de Hobbes. Para tanto, discute-se a aquisição da unidade das vontades como um elemento indispensável para o estabelecimento da pessoa artificial. Como consequência, demonstra-se que a teoria da representação está condicionada à constituição de uma vontade única, pela qual se estabelecem as premissas da redução do múltiplo ao uno, cuja consequência é o surgimento da concepção de autorização, fundamental ao núcleo da representatividade política.  Universidade Federal do Ceará2022-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/7809310.36517/Argumentos.28.3Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 28 (2022); 36-46Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 28 (2022); 36-46Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 28 (2022); 36-461984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78093/226137Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMattos, Delmo2022-07-04T08:19:15Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/78093Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2022-07-04T08:19:15Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
Unidade e multiplicidade na constituição do corpo político em Thomas Hobbes: uma leitura do Elements of Law e do Leviathan
title Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
spellingShingle Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
Mattos, Delmo
Multitude. People. Hobbes. Consent. Representation.
Multidão. Povo. Hobbes. Consenso. Representação.
Mattos, Delmo
Multitude. People. Hobbes. Consent. Representation.
Multidão. Povo. Hobbes. Consenso. Representação.
title_short Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
title_full Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
title_fullStr Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
title_full_unstemmed Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
title_sort Unity and multiplicity in the constitution of the body politic in Thomas Hobbes: a reading of the Elements of Law and Leviathan
author Mattos, Delmo
author_facet Mattos, Delmo
Mattos, Delmo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mattos, Delmo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Multitude. People. Hobbes. Consent. Representation.
Multidão. Povo. Hobbes. Consenso. Representação.
topic Multitude. People. Hobbes. Consent. Representation.
Multidão. Povo. Hobbes. Consenso. Representação.
description The objective of this article is to discuss the relations between multitude and people for the constitution of the theory of representation proposed by Hobbes. To do so, the discussions are directed to the scope of the works Elements of Law and Leviathan through which the argumentative trajectory that dispenses the elements of plurality of wills to the scope of its unity is reconstituted. Therefore, an argumentative evolution concerning the idea of unity and representation between Hobbes' two works is evidenced. To this end, the acquisition of the unity of wills is discussed as an indispensable element for the establishment of the artificial person. As a consequence, it is shown that the theory of representation is conditioned to the constitution of a single will by which the premises of the reduction of the multiple to the one are established, whose consequence is the emergence of the concept of authorization, fundamental to the core of political representation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78093
10.36517/Argumentos.28.3
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78093
identifier_str_mv 10.36517/Argumentos.28.3
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/78093/226137
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 28 (2022); 36-46
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 28 (2022); 36-46
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 28 (2022); 36-46
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1822179630698725376
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.36517/Argumentos.28.3