An ambiguous response to the false dilemmas of philosophical making – the actuality of the Sartrean perspective of Being and Nothingness

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Souza, Thana Mara
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/92074
Resumo: The aim of this article is to think about a current issue, the discourse of the Brazilian philosophical making, not worked in the content of Being and Nothingness. However, we think it is possible to bring up some of the themes discussed there, as well as Sartre's philosophical writing, to warn us about the pitfalls of this discourse, which is positioned as the opposite and better than the previous one, but which ends up reproducing what he criticizes by remaining in an excluding dualism. Returning to the Sartrean perspective of thinking in terms of ambiguities, avoiding falling into both realism and idealism, balancing presence to oneself with presence to the world, seems us fundamental, even today, for a more complex discussion, which does not fall into false dilemmas.
id UFC-17_f8cffe127de31eb155281ec781d9a8aa
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/92074
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling An ambiguous response to the false dilemmas of philosophical making – the actuality of the Sartrean perspective of Being and Nothingness Uma resposta ambígua aos falsos dilemas do fazer filosófico – a atualidade da perspectiva sartriana de O ser e o NadaSartre. Ambiguidade. Fazer filosófico atual.Sartre. Ambiguity. Current philosophical making.The aim of this article is to think about a current issue, the discourse of the Brazilian philosophical making, not worked in the content of Being and Nothingness. However, we think it is possible to bring up some of the themes discussed there, as well as Sartre's philosophical writing, to warn us about the pitfalls of this discourse, which is positioned as the opposite and better than the previous one, but which ends up reproducing what he criticizes by remaining in an excluding dualism. Returning to the Sartrean perspective of thinking in terms of ambiguities, avoiding falling into both realism and idealism, balancing presence to oneself with presence to the world, seems us fundamental, even today, for a more complex discussion, which does not fall into false dilemmas.Trata-se de pensar uma questão atual, o discurso sobre o fazer filosófico brasileiro, não trabalhada no conteúdo de O ser e o nada. No entanto, pensamos ser possível trazer alguns temas ali discutidos, assim como a forma de escrita filosófica de Sartre, para nos alertar sobre as armadilhas desse discurso, que se coloca como oposto e melhor do que o fazer anterior, mas que acaba por reproduzir o que critica ao se manter em um dualismo excludente. Retomar a perspectiva sartriana de pensar em termos de ambiguidades, evitando cair tanto no realismo quanto no idealismo, equilibrando a presença a si com a presença ao mundo, nos parece fundamental, ainda hoje, para uma discussão mais complexa, que não caia em falsos dilemas.  Universidade Federal do Ceará2024-01-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/9207410.36517/Argumentos.31.1Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No. 31 (2024); 8-18Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 31 (2024); 8-18Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 31 (2024); 8-181984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/92074/250048Copyright (c) 2024 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Souza, Thana Mara2024-02-17T18:03:46Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/92074Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2024-02-17T18:03:46Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An ambiguous response to the false dilemmas of philosophical making – the actuality of the Sartrean perspective of Being and Nothingness
Uma resposta ambígua aos falsos dilemas do fazer filosófico – a atualidade da perspectiva sartriana de O ser e o Nada
title An ambiguous response to the false dilemmas of philosophical making – the actuality of the Sartrean perspective of Being and Nothingness
spellingShingle An ambiguous response to the false dilemmas of philosophical making – the actuality of the Sartrean perspective of Being and Nothingness
de Souza, Thana Mara
Sartre. Ambiguidade. Fazer filosófico atual.
Sartre. Ambiguity. Current philosophical making.
title_short An ambiguous response to the false dilemmas of philosophical making – the actuality of the Sartrean perspective of Being and Nothingness
title_full An ambiguous response to the false dilemmas of philosophical making – the actuality of the Sartrean perspective of Being and Nothingness
title_fullStr An ambiguous response to the false dilemmas of philosophical making – the actuality of the Sartrean perspective of Being and Nothingness
title_full_unstemmed An ambiguous response to the false dilemmas of philosophical making – the actuality of the Sartrean perspective of Being and Nothingness
title_sort An ambiguous response to the false dilemmas of philosophical making – the actuality of the Sartrean perspective of Being and Nothingness
author de Souza, Thana Mara
author_facet de Souza, Thana Mara
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Souza, Thana Mara
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sartre. Ambiguidade. Fazer filosófico atual.
Sartre. Ambiguity. Current philosophical making.
topic Sartre. Ambiguidade. Fazer filosófico atual.
Sartre. Ambiguity. Current philosophical making.
description The aim of this article is to think about a current issue, the discourse of the Brazilian philosophical making, not worked in the content of Being and Nothingness. However, we think it is possible to bring up some of the themes discussed there, as well as Sartre's philosophical writing, to warn us about the pitfalls of this discourse, which is positioned as the opposite and better than the previous one, but which ends up reproducing what he criticizes by remaining in an excluding dualism. Returning to the Sartrean perspective of thinking in terms of ambiguities, avoiding falling into both realism and idealism, balancing presence to oneself with presence to the world, seems us fundamental, even today, for a more complex discussion, which does not fall into false dilemmas.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/92074
10.36517/Argumentos.31.1
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/92074
identifier_str_mv 10.36517/Argumentos.31.1
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/92074/250048
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No. 31 (2024); 8-18
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 31 (2024); 8-18
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 31 (2024); 8-18
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068844927287296

Registros relacionados