Response of elephant grass to grazing under an organic production system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bratz,Vinicius Felipe
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Olivo,Clair Jorge, Fernandes,Julia Aires, Seibt,Daiane Cristine, Alessio,Vinicius
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902019000100159
Resumo: ABSTRACT The aim of this research was to evaluate elephant grass under an organic and a conventional system. Under the organic system, species with complementary growth periods were combined; elephant grass was planted in rows 3.0 m apart and ryegrass was sown between the rows of elephant grass during the winter period, with spontaneous species being allowed to develop during the summer period. For the conventional production, two types of pasture were studied: one using the same strategy as for the organic production, and the other with a monocrop of elephant grass. Under the conventional and organic systems, 120 kg of N ha-1 were applied as chemical and organic fertiliser (cattle manure and pig slurry) respectively. Holstein cows were used in the evaluation. The experimental design was completely randomised, with three treatments (forage systems), three replications (paddocks) and measurements repeated over time (season). During the experimental period (370 days), nine grazing cycles were carried out under the organic and conventional systems (elephant grass in association with other forages) and eight grazing cycles under the conventional system (a monocrop of elephant grass). Forage production was 31.6, 32.8 and 24.2 t ha-1, and the stocking rate was 3.4, 2.1 and 4.6 AU ha-1 day-1 under the respective systems. Better results for forage production and distribution were found under the organic and conventional systems including a mixture of forages. The best results for leaf to stem ratio in the elephant grass and for stocking rate were seen under the monocrop system.
id UFC-2_847eb6c6312436b6d9c8ae02094d6c72
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-66902019000100159
network_acronym_str UFC-2
network_name_str Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Response of elephant grass to grazing under an organic production systemApparent forage intakeGrazing efficiencyRotational stockingPennisetum purpureumForage production systemsABSTRACT The aim of this research was to evaluate elephant grass under an organic and a conventional system. Under the organic system, species with complementary growth periods were combined; elephant grass was planted in rows 3.0 m apart and ryegrass was sown between the rows of elephant grass during the winter period, with spontaneous species being allowed to develop during the summer period. For the conventional production, two types of pasture were studied: one using the same strategy as for the organic production, and the other with a monocrop of elephant grass. Under the conventional and organic systems, 120 kg of N ha-1 were applied as chemical and organic fertiliser (cattle manure and pig slurry) respectively. Holstein cows were used in the evaluation. The experimental design was completely randomised, with three treatments (forage systems), three replications (paddocks) and measurements repeated over time (season). During the experimental period (370 days), nine grazing cycles were carried out under the organic and conventional systems (elephant grass in association with other forages) and eight grazing cycles under the conventional system (a monocrop of elephant grass). Forage production was 31.6, 32.8 and 24.2 t ha-1, and the stocking rate was 3.4, 2.1 and 4.6 AU ha-1 day-1 under the respective systems. Better results for forage production and distribution were found under the organic and conventional systems including a mixture of forages. The best results for leaf to stem ratio in the elephant grass and for stocking rate were seen under the monocrop system.Universidade Federal do Ceará2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902019000100159Revista Ciência Agronômica v.50 n.1 2019reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFC10.5935/1806-6690.20190019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBratz,Vinicius FelipeOlivo,Clair JorgeFernandes,Julia AiresSeibt,Daiane CristineAlessio,Viniciuseng2018-11-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-66902019000100159Revistahttp://www.ccarevista.ufc.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br1806-66900045-6888opendoar:2018-11-07T00:00Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Response of elephant grass to grazing under an organic production system
title Response of elephant grass to grazing under an organic production system
spellingShingle Response of elephant grass to grazing under an organic production system
Bratz,Vinicius Felipe
Apparent forage intake
Grazing efficiency
Rotational stocking
Pennisetum purpureum
Forage production systems
title_short Response of elephant grass to grazing under an organic production system
title_full Response of elephant grass to grazing under an organic production system
title_fullStr Response of elephant grass to grazing under an organic production system
title_full_unstemmed Response of elephant grass to grazing under an organic production system
title_sort Response of elephant grass to grazing under an organic production system
author Bratz,Vinicius Felipe
author_facet Bratz,Vinicius Felipe
Olivo,Clair Jorge
Fernandes,Julia Aires
Seibt,Daiane Cristine
Alessio,Vinicius
author_role author
author2 Olivo,Clair Jorge
Fernandes,Julia Aires
Seibt,Daiane Cristine
Alessio,Vinicius
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bratz,Vinicius Felipe
Olivo,Clair Jorge
Fernandes,Julia Aires
Seibt,Daiane Cristine
Alessio,Vinicius
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Apparent forage intake
Grazing efficiency
Rotational stocking
Pennisetum purpureum
Forage production systems
topic Apparent forage intake
Grazing efficiency
Rotational stocking
Pennisetum purpureum
Forage production systems
description ABSTRACT The aim of this research was to evaluate elephant grass under an organic and a conventional system. Under the organic system, species with complementary growth periods were combined; elephant grass was planted in rows 3.0 m apart and ryegrass was sown between the rows of elephant grass during the winter period, with spontaneous species being allowed to develop during the summer period. For the conventional production, two types of pasture were studied: one using the same strategy as for the organic production, and the other with a monocrop of elephant grass. Under the conventional and organic systems, 120 kg of N ha-1 were applied as chemical and organic fertiliser (cattle manure and pig slurry) respectively. Holstein cows were used in the evaluation. The experimental design was completely randomised, with three treatments (forage systems), three replications (paddocks) and measurements repeated over time (season). During the experimental period (370 days), nine grazing cycles were carried out under the organic and conventional systems (elephant grass in association with other forages) and eight grazing cycles under the conventional system (a monocrop of elephant grass). Forage production was 31.6, 32.8 and 24.2 t ha-1, and the stocking rate was 3.4, 2.1 and 4.6 AU ha-1 day-1 under the respective systems. Better results for forage production and distribution were found under the organic and conventional systems including a mixture of forages. The best results for leaf to stem ratio in the elephant grass and for stocking rate were seen under the monocrop system.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902019000100159
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902019000100159
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1806-6690.20190019
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência Agronômica v.50 n.1 2019
reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
collection Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br
_version_ 1750297489401970688