Political Jurists and their Convictions: towards an anatomy of the juridical component in Brazil’s 2016’ Coup

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Pedro Luiz
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Chaloub, Jorge
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciências Sociais
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/19489
Resumo: Through an inquiry on the protagonistic role played by “political jurists” in contemporary Brazil, the article provides an interpretation for the juridical component of the 2016’ Coup that founded Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment process. Anchored on methods of discourse analysis, this research takes as its main objects several public sphere interventions made by two of the most relevant characters that can be framed as “political jurists” in Brazil’s recent context: Luís Roberto Barroso, a Supreme Court judge, and Sergio Moro, a first instance judge. In spite of relevant differences on their modes of speech, public discourses show two lines of convergence that were crucial for the making of the Coup’s ideological context: a) the legitimation of a widespread judicial offensive over politics and society, broadening the scope of the “fight against corruption” through a de-legitimation of political actors and institutions; b) the idealization of an “organized civil society”, which would turn itself against the Brazilian State’s renitent vices in a movement that links the desired virtuous reform of political and social relations to an affirmation of the market’s alleged socializing powers.
id UFC-6_153190ab59323a0d34e75540a8f004ac
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/19489
network_acronym_str UFC-6
network_name_str Revista de Ciências Sociais
repository_id_str
spelling Political Jurists and their Convictions: towards an anatomy of the juridical component in Brazil’s 2016’ CoupOs Juristas Políticos e suas Convicções: para uma anatomia do componente jurídico do golpe de 2016 no Brasil2016’ Coup in BrazilJudiciaryPolitical JuristsCorruptionMoralityCivil SocietyGolpe de 2016Judiciáriojurista políticocorrupçãomoralsociedade civil.Through an inquiry on the protagonistic role played by “political jurists” in contemporary Brazil, the article provides an interpretation for the juridical component of the 2016’ Coup that founded Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment process. Anchored on methods of discourse analysis, this research takes as its main objects several public sphere interventions made by two of the most relevant characters that can be framed as “political jurists” in Brazil’s recent context: Luís Roberto Barroso, a Supreme Court judge, and Sergio Moro, a first instance judge. In spite of relevant differences on their modes of speech, public discourses show two lines of convergence that were crucial for the making of the Coup’s ideological context: a) the legitimation of a widespread judicial offensive over politics and society, broadening the scope of the “fight against corruption” through a de-legitimation of political actors and institutions; b) the idealization of an “organized civil society”, which would turn itself against the Brazilian State’s renitent vices in a movement that links the desired virtuous reform of political and social relations to an affirmation of the market’s alleged socializing powers.O presente artigo busca contribuir para a interpretação do componente jurídico do golpe de 2016 a partir de uma investigação sobre o protagonismo contemporâneo da figura do jurista político no Brasil. Uma reconstrução histórica das condições institucionais de emergência deste personagem, dadas a nova feição do Judiciário após 1988 e a sua inserção em um movimento global de maior monta, embasa a interpretação sobre os modos de seu protagonismo, efetuada através de análises de discurso tendo como objeto a atuação na esfera pública de dois dos mais relevantes personagens desse tipo: o ministro do Supremo Tribunal Federal Luís Roberto Barroso e o juiz Sérgio Moro. Busca-se desenvolver a hipótese de que, malgrado relevantes distinções em seus modos de atuação, ambos convergem na postulação de dois imperativos que determinaram a formação do contexto ideológico do golpe de 2016: a) legitimar o avanço das instâncias judiciais sobre a política e a sociedade, ampliando o “combate à corrupção”, através da deslegitimação das instâncias políticas; b) atribuir protagonismo à “sociedade civil organizada”, contra as limitações intrínsecas à esfera da política e os vícios congênitos do Estado brasileiro, em um movimento de saneamento virtuoso das relações políticas e sociais no país, via a desobstrução de supostas potências socializadoras do mercado.  Universidade Federal do Ceará2018-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/19489Revista de Ciências Sociais (Social Sciences' Journal); Vol. 49 No. 1_Mar/Jun (2018): Os Significados das novas quedas presidenciais na América Latina: instabilidade dos governos ou dos regimes?; 202-252Revista de Ciências Sociais (Revista de Ciencias Sociales); Vol. 49 Núm. 1_Mar/Jun (2018): Os Significados das novas quedas presidenciais na América Latina: instabilidade dos governos ou dos regimes?; 202-252Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 49 n. 1_Mar/Jun (2018): Os Significados das novas quedas presidenciais na América Latina: instabilidade dos governos ou dos regimes?; 202-2522318-46200041-8862reponame:Revista de Ciências Sociaisinstname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/19489/71771Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Sociaisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Pedro LuizChaloub, Jorge2019-01-15T20:32:26Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/19489Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/revciensoPUBhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/index.php/revcienso/oai||rcs.ufc@gmail.com|| cunhafilho@ufc.br2318-46200041-8862opendoar:2019-01-15T20:32:26Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Political Jurists and their Convictions: towards an anatomy of the juridical component in Brazil’s 2016’ Coup
Os Juristas Políticos e suas Convicções: para uma anatomia do componente jurídico do golpe de 2016 no Brasil
title Political Jurists and their Convictions: towards an anatomy of the juridical component in Brazil’s 2016’ Coup
spellingShingle Political Jurists and their Convictions: towards an anatomy of the juridical component in Brazil’s 2016’ Coup
Lima, Pedro Luiz
2016’ Coup in Brazil
Judiciary
Political Jurists
Corruption
Morality
Civil Society
Golpe de 2016
Judiciário
jurista político
corrupção
moral
sociedade civil.
title_short Political Jurists and their Convictions: towards an anatomy of the juridical component in Brazil’s 2016’ Coup
title_full Political Jurists and their Convictions: towards an anatomy of the juridical component in Brazil’s 2016’ Coup
title_fullStr Political Jurists and their Convictions: towards an anatomy of the juridical component in Brazil’s 2016’ Coup
title_full_unstemmed Political Jurists and their Convictions: towards an anatomy of the juridical component in Brazil’s 2016’ Coup
title_sort Political Jurists and their Convictions: towards an anatomy of the juridical component in Brazil’s 2016’ Coup
author Lima, Pedro Luiz
author_facet Lima, Pedro Luiz
Chaloub, Jorge
author_role author
author2 Chaloub, Jorge
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Pedro Luiz
Chaloub, Jorge
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv 2016’ Coup in Brazil
Judiciary
Political Jurists
Corruption
Morality
Civil Society
Golpe de 2016
Judiciário
jurista político
corrupção
moral
sociedade civil.
topic 2016’ Coup in Brazil
Judiciary
Political Jurists
Corruption
Morality
Civil Society
Golpe de 2016
Judiciário
jurista político
corrupção
moral
sociedade civil.
description Through an inquiry on the protagonistic role played by “political jurists” in contemporary Brazil, the article provides an interpretation for the juridical component of the 2016’ Coup that founded Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment process. Anchored on methods of discourse analysis, this research takes as its main objects several public sphere interventions made by two of the most relevant characters that can be framed as “political jurists” in Brazil’s recent context: Luís Roberto Barroso, a Supreme Court judge, and Sergio Moro, a first instance judge. In spite of relevant differences on their modes of speech, public discourses show two lines of convergence that were crucial for the making of the Coup’s ideological context: a) the legitimation of a widespread judicial offensive over politics and society, broadening the scope of the “fight against corruption” through a de-legitimation of political actors and institutions; b) the idealization of an “organized civil society”, which would turn itself against the Brazilian State’s renitent vices in a movement that links the desired virtuous reform of political and social relations to an affirmation of the market’s alleged socializing powers.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/19489
url http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/19489
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/19489/71771
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Sociais
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Sociais
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Sociais (Social Sciences' Journal); Vol. 49 No. 1_Mar/Jun (2018): Os Significados das novas quedas presidenciais na América Latina: instabilidade dos governos ou dos regimes?; 202-252
Revista de Ciências Sociais (Revista de Ciencias Sociales); Vol. 49 Núm. 1_Mar/Jun (2018): Os Significados das novas quedas presidenciais na América Latina: instabilidade dos governos ou dos regimes?; 202-252
Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 49 n. 1_Mar/Jun (2018): Os Significados das novas quedas presidenciais na América Latina: instabilidade dos governos ou dos regimes?; 202-252
2318-4620
0041-8862
reponame:Revista de Ciências Sociais
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Revista de Ciências Sociais
collection Revista de Ciências Sociais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rcs.ufc@gmail.com|| cunhafilho@ufc.br
_version_ 1799698947387686912