Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rollemberg, Silvio Luiz de Sousa
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Barros, Amanda Nascimento de, Firmino, Paulo Igor Milen, Santos, André Bezerra dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
dARK ID: ark:/83112/001300000bmx7
Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/71061
Resumo: We performed a comparison of different aerobic granular sludge (AGS) discharge methodologies in sequencing batch reactors (SBRs), evaluating the system efficiency, physical and microbiological characteristics of granules, and resource recovery of the discharged biomass. In R1, there was a selective discharge (30% top sludge and 70% bottom sludge, based on biomass weight) with SRT control (10–20 days). The same selective discharge was applied to R2, but with control of food to microorganisms (F/M) ratio (0.22–0.44 gCOD/gVSS·day). In R3, the discharge was conventional (similar to activated sludge reactors), i.e., mixed liquor during the aerobic period. Additionally, the best protocol of the lab-scale studies was used in a pilot-scale reactor (R4) treating municipal wastewater. R1 protocol was the best strategy for AGS formation, maintenance, and performance, achieving better removal efficiencies of COD (95%), total nitrogen (85%), and phosphorus (80%). Sludge discharge improved the system's performance and resource recovery, especially alginate-like exopolysaccharides (ALE).
id UFC-7_26170d57dd3af2e6f4f0a6a6971dd912
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/71061
network_acronym_str UFC-7
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactorsAerobic granular sludgeSludge dischargeResource recoveryWe performed a comparison of different aerobic granular sludge (AGS) discharge methodologies in sequencing batch reactors (SBRs), evaluating the system efficiency, physical and microbiological characteristics of granules, and resource recovery of the discharged biomass. In R1, there was a selective discharge (30% top sludge and 70% bottom sludge, based on biomass weight) with SRT control (10–20 days). The same selective discharge was applied to R2, but with control of food to microorganisms (F/M) ratio (0.22–0.44 gCOD/gVSS·day). In R3, the discharge was conventional (similar to activated sludge reactors), i.e., mixed liquor during the aerobic period. Additionally, the best protocol of the lab-scale studies was used in a pilot-scale reactor (R4) treating municipal wastewater. R1 protocol was the best strategy for AGS formation, maintenance, and performance, achieving better removal efficiencies of COD (95%), total nitrogen (85%), and phosphorus (80%). Sludge discharge improved the system's performance and resource recovery, especially alginate-like exopolysaccharides (ALE).Bioresource Technology Reports2023-03-02T16:41:53Z2023-03-02T16:41:53Z2022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfROLLEMBERG, Silvio Luiz de Sousa et al. Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors. Bioresource Technology Reports, [S. l.], v. 18, n. 101018, p. 1-9, 2022.2589-014Xhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/71061ark:/83112/001300000bmx7Rollemberg, Silvio Luiz de SousaBarros, Amanda Nascimento deFirmino, Paulo Igor MilenSantos, André Bezerra dosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFC2023-12-07T16:59:40Zoai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/71061Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2024-09-11T18:36:00.321679Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors
title Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors
spellingShingle Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors
Rollemberg, Silvio Luiz de Sousa
Aerobic granular sludge
Sludge discharge
Resource recovery
title_short Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors
title_full Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors
title_fullStr Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors
title_sort Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors
author Rollemberg, Silvio Luiz de Sousa
author_facet Rollemberg, Silvio Luiz de Sousa
Barros, Amanda Nascimento de
Firmino, Paulo Igor Milen
Santos, André Bezerra dos
author_role author
author2 Barros, Amanda Nascimento de
Firmino, Paulo Igor Milen
Santos, André Bezerra dos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rollemberg, Silvio Luiz de Sousa
Barros, Amanda Nascimento de
Firmino, Paulo Igor Milen
Santos, André Bezerra dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aerobic granular sludge
Sludge discharge
Resource recovery
topic Aerobic granular sludge
Sludge discharge
Resource recovery
description We performed a comparison of different aerobic granular sludge (AGS) discharge methodologies in sequencing batch reactors (SBRs), evaluating the system efficiency, physical and microbiological characteristics of granules, and resource recovery of the discharged biomass. In R1, there was a selective discharge (30% top sludge and 70% bottom sludge, based on biomass weight) with SRT control (10–20 days). The same selective discharge was applied to R2, but with control of food to microorganisms (F/M) ratio (0.22–0.44 gCOD/gVSS·day). In R3, the discharge was conventional (similar to activated sludge reactors), i.e., mixed liquor during the aerobic period. Additionally, the best protocol of the lab-scale studies was used in a pilot-scale reactor (R4) treating municipal wastewater. R1 protocol was the best strategy for AGS formation, maintenance, and performance, achieving better removal efficiencies of COD (95%), total nitrogen (85%), and phosphorus (80%). Sludge discharge improved the system's performance and resource recovery, especially alginate-like exopolysaccharides (ALE).
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2023-03-02T16:41:53Z
2023-03-02T16:41:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv ROLLEMBERG, Silvio Luiz de Sousa et al. Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors. Bioresource Technology Reports, [S. l.], v. 18, n. 101018, p. 1-9, 2022.
2589-014X
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/71061
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/83112/001300000bmx7
identifier_str_mv ROLLEMBERG, Silvio Luiz de Sousa et al. Evaluation of sludge discharge methodologies in aerobic granular sludge reactors. Bioresource Technology Reports, [S. l.], v. 18, n. 101018, p. 1-9, 2022.
2589-014X
ark:/83112/001300000bmx7
url http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/71061
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Bioresource Technology Reports
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Bioresource Technology Reports
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br
_version_ 1818373746243665920