A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Chirley Lima da
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/40404
Resumo: The Federal Universities (UFs), chosen as the object of this study, are primarily maintained with resources passed through the Union and, as public institutions, need to seek efficiency.In this sense, the overall objective of this research is to evaluate the relative efficiency achieved by Brazilian federal universities in allocating public expenditures in 2017. The theoretical approach of the study dealt with higher education, its history, its structure and its functioning. It also addressed the structure of public spending on higher education in Brazil, as well as presented the technique Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), used to measure the relative efficiency of the UFs. The DEA methodology is a non-parametric technique that involves linear programming to calculate technical efficiency indices. The research was characterized as descriptive, documentary and quantitative. The research universe considered 63 Brazilian federal universities, being thus the study characterized as census. For the application of the DEA, the input factors, which are: Current Cost / Equivalent Student without University Hospital, Equivalent Teacher / Full Time Student and Teacher Qualification Index were collected from the Management Reports of the UFs, and the output factors were the notes of the indicators of the University Ranking Folha 2017, namely:Teaching, Research, Market, Innovation and Internationalization. Results from the DEA analysis using the Frontier Analyst Software revealed that, only 22 of the 63 universities studied were classified as efficient, thus achieving an efficiency score of 1 or 100%. In the ranking of relative efficiency, UFRJ, UnB, UFMG, UFPR and UFCG, among the universities classified as excellent, were considered benchmark, respectively, for 28, 25, 13, 10 and inefficient universities. The results also pointed out that the Market and Innovation indicators are the output factors that most need to be improved in the group of inefficient Decision-making Units in order to achieve relative efficiency in the allocation of public expenditures of the Brazilian federal universities.
id UFC-7_7ab577f3d8abe49ca7736b56a47689fe
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/40404
network_acronym_str UFC-7
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository_id_str
spelling A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no BrasilEficiênciaGastos públicosUniversidades FederaisDEAThe Federal Universities (UFs), chosen as the object of this study, are primarily maintained with resources passed through the Union and, as public institutions, need to seek efficiency.In this sense, the overall objective of this research is to evaluate the relative efficiency achieved by Brazilian federal universities in allocating public expenditures in 2017. The theoretical approach of the study dealt with higher education, its history, its structure and its functioning. It also addressed the structure of public spending on higher education in Brazil, as well as presented the technique Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), used to measure the relative efficiency of the UFs. The DEA methodology is a non-parametric technique that involves linear programming to calculate technical efficiency indices. The research was characterized as descriptive, documentary and quantitative. The research universe considered 63 Brazilian federal universities, being thus the study characterized as census. For the application of the DEA, the input factors, which are: Current Cost / Equivalent Student without University Hospital, Equivalent Teacher / Full Time Student and Teacher Qualification Index were collected from the Management Reports of the UFs, and the output factors were the notes of the indicators of the University Ranking Folha 2017, namely:Teaching, Research, Market, Innovation and Internationalization. Results from the DEA analysis using the Frontier Analyst Software revealed that, only 22 of the 63 universities studied were classified as efficient, thus achieving an efficiency score of 1 or 100%. In the ranking of relative efficiency, UFRJ, UnB, UFMG, UFPR and UFCG, among the universities classified as excellent, were considered benchmark, respectively, for 28, 25, 13, 10 and inefficient universities. The results also pointed out that the Market and Innovation indicators are the output factors that most need to be improved in the group of inefficient Decision-making Units in order to achieve relative efficiency in the allocation of public expenditures of the Brazilian federal universities.As Universidades Federais (UFs), escolhidas como objeto deste estudo, são mantidas, primordialmente, com recursos repassados pela União e, enquanto instituições públicas, precisam buscar a eficiência. Nesse sentido, o objetivo geral desta pesquisa é avaliar a eficiência relativa alcançada pelas universidades federais brasileiras na alocação dos gastos públicos no ano 2017. A abordagem teórica do estudo tratou da educação superior, seu histórico, sua estrutura e seu funcionamento. Abordou também a estrutura dos gastos públicos com educação superior no Brasil, bem como apresentou a técnica Análise Envoltória de Dados (DEA), utilizada para medir a eficiência relativa das UFs. A metodologia DEA é uma técnica não paramétrica que envolve programação linear para calcular índices de eficiência técnica. A pesquisa caracterizou-se como descritiva, documental e quantitativa. O universo da pesquisa considerou 63 universidades federais brasileiras, portanto o estudo foi censitário. Para a aplicação da DEA, os fatores de inputs, quais sejam: Custo Corrente/Aluno Equivalente sem Hospital Universitário, Professor Equivalente/Aluno Tempo Integral e Índice de Qualificação do Corpo Docente foram coletados dos Relatórios de Gestão das UFs, e os fatores de outputs foram as notas dos indicadores do Ranking Universitário Folha 2017, nomeadamente: Ensino, Pesquisa, Mercado, Inovação e Internacionalização. Os resultados da pesquisa, obtidos a partir da análise DEA por meio do Software Frontier Analyst, revelaram que, das 63 universidades estudadas, apenas 22 foram classificadas como eficientes, alcançando, portanto, escore de eficiência igual a 1 ou 100%. No ranking de eficiência relativa, dentre as universidades classificadas como excelentes estão a UFRJ, a UnB, a UFMG, a UFPR e a UFCG, as quais foram consideradas benchmark, respectivamente, para 28, 25, 13, 10 e 8 universidades ineficientes. Os resultados apontaram ainda que as notas dos indicadores Mercado e Inovação são os fatores de outputs que mais precisam ser melhorados no conjunto das Unidades Tomadoras de Decisão ineficientes para que atinjam a eficiência relativa na alocação de gastos públicos das universidades federais brasileiras.Cavalcante, Sueli Maria de AraújoSilva, Chirley Lima da2019-03-26T15:56:53Z2019-03-26T15:56:53Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfSILVA, Chirley Lima da. A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil. 2019.126f. - Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-graduação em Políticas Públicas e Gestão da Educação Superior, Fortaleza (CE), 2019.http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/40404porreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-03-26T15:56:53Zoai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/40404Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2024-09-11T18:49:45.045714Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil
title A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil
spellingShingle A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil
Silva, Chirley Lima da
Eficiência
Gastos públicos
Universidades Federais
DEA
title_short A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil
title_full A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil
title_fullStr A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil
title_full_unstemmed A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil
title_sort A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil
author Silva, Chirley Lima da
author_facet Silva, Chirley Lima da
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Cavalcante, Sueli Maria de Araújo
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Chirley Lima da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eficiência
Gastos públicos
Universidades Federais
DEA
topic Eficiência
Gastos públicos
Universidades Federais
DEA
description The Federal Universities (UFs), chosen as the object of this study, are primarily maintained with resources passed through the Union and, as public institutions, need to seek efficiency.In this sense, the overall objective of this research is to evaluate the relative efficiency achieved by Brazilian federal universities in allocating public expenditures in 2017. The theoretical approach of the study dealt with higher education, its history, its structure and its functioning. It also addressed the structure of public spending on higher education in Brazil, as well as presented the technique Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), used to measure the relative efficiency of the UFs. The DEA methodology is a non-parametric technique that involves linear programming to calculate technical efficiency indices. The research was characterized as descriptive, documentary and quantitative. The research universe considered 63 Brazilian federal universities, being thus the study characterized as census. For the application of the DEA, the input factors, which are: Current Cost / Equivalent Student without University Hospital, Equivalent Teacher / Full Time Student and Teacher Qualification Index were collected from the Management Reports of the UFs, and the output factors were the notes of the indicators of the University Ranking Folha 2017, namely:Teaching, Research, Market, Innovation and Internationalization. Results from the DEA analysis using the Frontier Analyst Software revealed that, only 22 of the 63 universities studied were classified as efficient, thus achieving an efficiency score of 1 or 100%. In the ranking of relative efficiency, UFRJ, UnB, UFMG, UFPR and UFCG, among the universities classified as excellent, were considered benchmark, respectively, for 28, 25, 13, 10 and inefficient universities. The results also pointed out that the Market and Innovation indicators are the output factors that most need to be improved in the group of inefficient Decision-making Units in order to achieve relative efficiency in the allocation of public expenditures of the Brazilian federal universities.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-26T15:56:53Z
2019-03-26T15:56:53Z
2019
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv SILVA, Chirley Lima da. A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil. 2019.126f. - Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-graduação em Políticas Públicas e Gestão da Educação Superior, Fortaleza (CE), 2019.
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/40404
identifier_str_mv SILVA, Chirley Lima da. A eficiência relativa dos gastos públicos federais em educação superior no Brasil. 2019.126f. - Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-graduação em Políticas Públicas e Gestão da Educação Superior, Fortaleza (CE), 2019.
url http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/40404
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br
_version_ 1813028962090090496