Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Passos, Vanara Florêncio
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Melo, Mary A. S., Vasconcelos, Andréa Araújo, Rodrigues, Lidiany K.A., Santiago, Sérgio L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6878
Resumo: Various methods have been applied to evaluate the effect of erosion and abrasion. So, the aim of this study was to check the applicability of stylus profilometry (SP), surface hardness (SH) and focus-variation 3D microscopy (FVM) to the analysis of human enamel and dentin subjected to erosion/abrasion. The samples were randomly allocated into four groups (n 5 10): G1-enamel/erosion, G2-enamel/erosion plus abrasion, G3-dentin/erosion, and G4-dentin/erosion plus abrasion. The specimens were selected by their surface hardness, and they were subjected to cycles of demineralization (Coca-Cola1-60 s) and remineralization (artificial saliva-60 min). For groups G2 and G4, the remineralization procedures were followed by toothbrushing (150 strokes). The above cycle was repeated 33/day during 5 days. The samples were assessed using SH, SP, and FVM. For each substrate, the groups were compared using an unpaired t-test, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated (a 5 5%). For enamel, both profilometry technique showed greater surface loss when the erosion and abrasion processes were combined (P <0.05). The correlation analysis did not reveal any relationships among SH, SP, and FVM to G2 and G4. There were significant correlation coefficients (–0.70 and –0.67) for the comparisons between the FVM and SH methods in enamel and dentin, respectively, in G1 and G3. Choosing the ideal technique for the analysis of erosion depends on the type of dental substrate. SP was not sufficiently sensitive to measure the effects on dentin of erosion or erosion/abrasion. However, SP, FVM and SH were adequate for the detection of tissue loss and demineralization in enamel.
id UFC-7_b79d49e61768a20760909da9068eac9c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/6878
network_acronym_str UFC-7
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasionAbrasão DentáriaEsmalte DentárioDentinaVarious methods have been applied to evaluate the effect of erosion and abrasion. So, the aim of this study was to check the applicability of stylus profilometry (SP), surface hardness (SH) and focus-variation 3D microscopy (FVM) to the analysis of human enamel and dentin subjected to erosion/abrasion. The samples were randomly allocated into four groups (n 5 10): G1-enamel/erosion, G2-enamel/erosion plus abrasion, G3-dentin/erosion, and G4-dentin/erosion plus abrasion. The specimens were selected by their surface hardness, and they were subjected to cycles of demineralization (Coca-Cola1-60 s) and remineralization (artificial saliva-60 min). For groups G2 and G4, the remineralization procedures were followed by toothbrushing (150 strokes). The above cycle was repeated 33/day during 5 days. The samples were assessed using SH, SP, and FVM. For each substrate, the groups were compared using an unpaired t-test, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated (a 5 5%). For enamel, both profilometry technique showed greater surface loss when the erosion and abrasion processes were combined (P <0.05). The correlation analysis did not reveal any relationships among SH, SP, and FVM to G2 and G4. There were significant correlation coefficients (–0.70 and –0.67) for the comparisons between the FVM and SH methods in enamel and dentin, respectively, in G1 and G3. Choosing the ideal technique for the analysis of erosion depends on the type of dental substrate. SP was not sufficiently sensitive to measure the effects on dentin of erosion or erosion/abrasion. However, SP, FVM and SH were adequate for the detection of tissue loss and demineralization in enamel.Microscopy Research and Technique2013-12-02T14:31:01Z2013-12-02T14:31:01Z2013-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfPASSOS, V. F. Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion. Microscopy Research and Technique, New York, US, v. 76, n. 2, p. 178-183, fev. 2013.1059-910X Impressohttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6878Passos, Vanara FlorêncioMelo, Mary A. S.Vasconcelos, Andréa AraújoRodrigues, Lidiany K.A.Santiago, Sérgio L.engreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-04T19:47:04Zoai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/6878Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2022-05-04T19:47:04Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion
title Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion
spellingShingle Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion
Passos, Vanara Florêncio
Abrasão Dentária
Esmalte Dentário
Dentina
title_short Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion
title_full Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion
title_fullStr Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion
title_sort Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion
author Passos, Vanara Florêncio
author_facet Passos, Vanara Florêncio
Melo, Mary A. S.
Vasconcelos, Andréa Araújo
Rodrigues, Lidiany K.A.
Santiago, Sérgio L.
author_role author
author2 Melo, Mary A. S.
Vasconcelos, Andréa Araújo
Rodrigues, Lidiany K.A.
Santiago, Sérgio L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Passos, Vanara Florêncio
Melo, Mary A. S.
Vasconcelos, Andréa Araújo
Rodrigues, Lidiany K.A.
Santiago, Sérgio L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Abrasão Dentária
Esmalte Dentário
Dentina
topic Abrasão Dentária
Esmalte Dentário
Dentina
description Various methods have been applied to evaluate the effect of erosion and abrasion. So, the aim of this study was to check the applicability of stylus profilometry (SP), surface hardness (SH) and focus-variation 3D microscopy (FVM) to the analysis of human enamel and dentin subjected to erosion/abrasion. The samples were randomly allocated into four groups (n 5 10): G1-enamel/erosion, G2-enamel/erosion plus abrasion, G3-dentin/erosion, and G4-dentin/erosion plus abrasion. The specimens were selected by their surface hardness, and they were subjected to cycles of demineralization (Coca-Cola1-60 s) and remineralization (artificial saliva-60 min). For groups G2 and G4, the remineralization procedures were followed by toothbrushing (150 strokes). The above cycle was repeated 33/day during 5 days. The samples were assessed using SH, SP, and FVM. For each substrate, the groups were compared using an unpaired t-test, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated (a 5 5%). For enamel, both profilometry technique showed greater surface loss when the erosion and abrasion processes were combined (P <0.05). The correlation analysis did not reveal any relationships among SH, SP, and FVM to G2 and G4. There were significant correlation coefficients (–0.70 and –0.67) for the comparisons between the FVM and SH methods in enamel and dentin, respectively, in G1 and G3. Choosing the ideal technique for the analysis of erosion depends on the type of dental substrate. SP was not sufficiently sensitive to measure the effects on dentin of erosion or erosion/abrasion. However, SP, FVM and SH were adequate for the detection of tissue loss and demineralization in enamel.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-02T14:31:01Z
2013-12-02T14:31:01Z
2013-02
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv PASSOS, V. F. Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion. Microscopy Research and Technique, New York, US, v. 76, n. 2, p. 178-183, fev. 2013.
1059-910X Impresso
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6878
identifier_str_mv PASSOS, V. F. Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion. Microscopy Research and Technique, New York, US, v. 76, n. 2, p. 178-183, fev. 2013.
1059-910X Impresso
url http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6878
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Microscopy Research and Technique
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Microscopy Research and Technique
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br
_version_ 1823806792179646464