Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6878 |
Resumo: | Various methods have been applied to evaluate the effect of erosion and abrasion. So, the aim of this study was to check the applicability of stylus profilometry (SP), surface hardness (SH) and focus-variation 3D microscopy (FVM) to the analysis of human enamel and dentin subjected to erosion/abrasion. The samples were randomly allocated into four groups (n 5 10): G1-enamel/erosion, G2-enamel/erosion plus abrasion, G3-dentin/erosion, and G4-dentin/erosion plus abrasion. The specimens were selected by their surface hardness, and they were subjected to cycles of demineralization (Coca-Cola1-60 s) and remineralization (artificial saliva-60 min). For groups G2 and G4, the remineralization procedures were followed by toothbrushing (150 strokes). The above cycle was repeated 33/day during 5 days. The samples were assessed using SH, SP, and FVM. For each substrate, the groups were compared using an unpaired t-test, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated (a 5 5%). For enamel, both profilometry technique showed greater surface loss when the erosion and abrasion processes were combined (P <0.05). The correlation analysis did not reveal any relationships among SH, SP, and FVM to G2 and G4. There were significant correlation coefficients (–0.70 and –0.67) for the comparisons between the FVM and SH methods in enamel and dentin, respectively, in G1 and G3. Choosing the ideal technique for the analysis of erosion depends on the type of dental substrate. SP was not sufficiently sensitive to measure the effects on dentin of erosion or erosion/abrasion. However, SP, FVM and SH were adequate for the detection of tissue loss and demineralization in enamel. |
id |
UFC-7_b79d49e61768a20760909da9068eac9c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/6878 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-7 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasionAbrasão DentáriaEsmalte DentárioDentinaVarious methods have been applied to evaluate the effect of erosion and abrasion. So, the aim of this study was to check the applicability of stylus profilometry (SP), surface hardness (SH) and focus-variation 3D microscopy (FVM) to the analysis of human enamel and dentin subjected to erosion/abrasion. The samples were randomly allocated into four groups (n 5 10): G1-enamel/erosion, G2-enamel/erosion plus abrasion, G3-dentin/erosion, and G4-dentin/erosion plus abrasion. The specimens were selected by their surface hardness, and they were subjected to cycles of demineralization (Coca-Cola1-60 s) and remineralization (artificial saliva-60 min). For groups G2 and G4, the remineralization procedures were followed by toothbrushing (150 strokes). The above cycle was repeated 33/day during 5 days. The samples were assessed using SH, SP, and FVM. For each substrate, the groups were compared using an unpaired t-test, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated (a 5 5%). For enamel, both profilometry technique showed greater surface loss when the erosion and abrasion processes were combined (P <0.05). The correlation analysis did not reveal any relationships among SH, SP, and FVM to G2 and G4. There were significant correlation coefficients (–0.70 and –0.67) for the comparisons between the FVM and SH methods in enamel and dentin, respectively, in G1 and G3. Choosing the ideal technique for the analysis of erosion depends on the type of dental substrate. SP was not sufficiently sensitive to measure the effects on dentin of erosion or erosion/abrasion. However, SP, FVM and SH were adequate for the detection of tissue loss and demineralization in enamel.Microscopy Research and Technique2013-12-02T14:31:01Z2013-12-02T14:31:01Z2013-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfPASSOS, V. F. Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion. Microscopy Research and Technique, New York, US, v. 76, n. 2, p. 178-183, fev. 2013.1059-910X Impressohttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6878Passos, Vanara FlorêncioMelo, Mary A. S.Vasconcelos, Andréa AraújoRodrigues, Lidiany K.A.Santiago, Sérgio L.engreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-04T19:47:04Zoai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/6878Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2022-05-04T19:47:04Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion |
title |
Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion Passos, Vanara Florêncio Abrasão Dentária Esmalte Dentário Dentina |
title_short |
Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion |
title_full |
Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion |
title_sort |
Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion |
author |
Passos, Vanara Florêncio |
author_facet |
Passos, Vanara Florêncio Melo, Mary A. S. Vasconcelos, Andréa Araújo Rodrigues, Lidiany K.A. Santiago, Sérgio L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Melo, Mary A. S. Vasconcelos, Andréa Araújo Rodrigues, Lidiany K.A. Santiago, Sérgio L. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Passos, Vanara Florêncio Melo, Mary A. S. Vasconcelos, Andréa Araújo Rodrigues, Lidiany K.A. Santiago, Sérgio L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Abrasão Dentária Esmalte Dentário Dentina |
topic |
Abrasão Dentária Esmalte Dentário Dentina |
description |
Various methods have been applied to evaluate the effect of erosion and abrasion. So, the aim of this study was to check the applicability of stylus profilometry (SP), surface hardness (SH) and focus-variation 3D microscopy (FVM) to the analysis of human enamel and dentin subjected to erosion/abrasion. The samples were randomly allocated into four groups (n 5 10): G1-enamel/erosion, G2-enamel/erosion plus abrasion, G3-dentin/erosion, and G4-dentin/erosion plus abrasion. The specimens were selected by their surface hardness, and they were subjected to cycles of demineralization (Coca-Cola1-60 s) and remineralization (artificial saliva-60 min). For groups G2 and G4, the remineralization procedures were followed by toothbrushing (150 strokes). The above cycle was repeated 33/day during 5 days. The samples were assessed using SH, SP, and FVM. For each substrate, the groups were compared using an unpaired t-test, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated (a 5 5%). For enamel, both profilometry technique showed greater surface loss when the erosion and abrasion processes were combined (P <0.05). The correlation analysis did not reveal any relationships among SH, SP, and FVM to G2 and G4. There were significant correlation coefficients (–0.70 and –0.67) for the comparisons between the FVM and SH methods in enamel and dentin, respectively, in G1 and G3. Choosing the ideal technique for the analysis of erosion depends on the type of dental substrate. SP was not sufficiently sensitive to measure the effects on dentin of erosion or erosion/abrasion. However, SP, FVM and SH were adequate for the detection of tissue loss and demineralization in enamel. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-02T14:31:01Z 2013-12-02T14:31:01Z 2013-02 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
PASSOS, V. F. Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion. Microscopy Research and Technique, New York, US, v. 76, n. 2, p. 178-183, fev. 2013. 1059-910X Impresso http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6878 |
identifier_str_mv |
PASSOS, V. F. Comparison of methods for quantifying dental wear caused by erosion and abrasion. Microscopy Research and Technique, New York, US, v. 76, n. 2, p. 178-183, fev. 2013. 1059-910X Impresso |
url |
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6878 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Microscopy Research and Technique |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Microscopy Research and Technique |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br |
_version_ |
1823806792179646464 |