Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego : desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Katia Neyla de Freitas Macêdo
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/2099
Resumo: Although blind people have limitations, this cannot impede their communication and relationship with other people. In academic education, however, health professionals, such as nurses, are not prepared to take care of blind people. This study aimed to validate a Verbal Communication Model with the Blind and the nurse in the light of Roman Jakobson’s Theory. A quantitative study was a methodological approach was carried out at the LabCom_Saúde of the Nursing Department at the Federal University of Ceará, Brazil, between December 2007 and December 2008, using filming. The environment was organized for the sake of maximum similarity with a nursing consultation room for the screening of blind diabetes patients. Participants were 30 newly-graduated nurses and graduates of the Nursing course and 30 patients blind in both eyes and their possible companions. The specialists who assessed the model and the judges who analyzed the filming collaborated in the research, in view of their degree, scientific production and work on the theme. After the construction, the model was assessed by three specialists for face and content validation. After the assessment, modifications were incorporated. To test the model, 30 nursing consultations were registered and filmed. Fifteen of these were under the responsibility of untrained and 15 under the responsibility of trained nurses. The films were analyzed by three judges, who were nurses with training on the Communication Model. All principles of Resolution 196/96 were complied with. Data were processed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software and analyzed through univariate tables with relative frequency and percentage. Seventeen (56.7%) of the nurses were between 22 and 25 years of age, and a majority, 26 (86.7%), were women. Eight (26.7%) blind patients were between 39 and 49 years old and most of them, 16 (53.4%), were women; 20 (66.7%) became blind when they were between 21 and 35 years of age. The model was constructed in four phases: general guidelines; welcoming; data collection; nursing interventions. In the general guidelines, the trained group obtained excellent results on all times, ranging from 60% to 91.1%. The non-trained group showed very bad/bad communication, with higher frequencies on four items, using words that indicate direction (97.8%); lightly touching the arm or shoulder (95.6%); avoiding gestures (68.9%); talk while looking at the blind (22.2%). In the welcoming phase, all trained nurses displayed a successful performance, as opposed to the non-trained nurses: 100% very bad or bad in some actions. In the data collection phase, the trained group obtained an excellent performance on five of the actions and, in the nursing diagnosis and planning phases, trained nurses presented good and excellent actions for the following items: following the protocol (95.6%); informing on the reason for the silence when making notes (93.4%); and avoiding long periods of silence (100%). The performance of the non-trained group was considered very bad in terms of notes because they did not inform on the reason for the silence (100%); avoiding long periods of silence (91%). In the nursing intervention phase, the trained group achieved excellent performance on all items, without any very bad/bad actions on any of the items in the assessment phase. In the final phase of the consultation, excellent performance of the trained nurses was identified on the following items: communicates while accompanying the blind to the door (82.2%); says goodbye while talking and shaking hands (62.2%); and strengthens the information (42.2%). In the analysis of verbal communication between the nurse and the blind, the vocative function presented 65.7% of actions, against 19.5% for the imperative function. Silence was manifested in almost half (45%) of interactions with non-trained nurses against 12.4% for trained nurses. In the trained group, empathy (69.2%), tranquility (49.6%), satisfaction (44.2%) and solidarity (29.4%) were also present. The most evidenced channel in the trained group was speech (86.8%). And common language occurred in the trained group’s (85.6%) and the non-trained group’s (50.1%) interactions. In conclusion, the model was validated by the sample and it can be affirmed that the Verbal Communication Model is effective. Thus, its use in nursing consultations with blind people is recommended.
id UFC-7_f18a3be5c455d07e4f748e4217ec00d9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/2099
network_acronym_str UFC-7
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository_id_str
spelling Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego : desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagemVerbal comonication model with the blind person : development and validation in nursing consultationPessoas com Deficiência VisualEstudos de Validação como AssuntoAlthough blind people have limitations, this cannot impede their communication and relationship with other people. In academic education, however, health professionals, such as nurses, are not prepared to take care of blind people. This study aimed to validate a Verbal Communication Model with the Blind and the nurse in the light of Roman Jakobson’s Theory. A quantitative study was a methodological approach was carried out at the LabCom_Saúde of the Nursing Department at the Federal University of Ceará, Brazil, between December 2007 and December 2008, using filming. The environment was organized for the sake of maximum similarity with a nursing consultation room for the screening of blind diabetes patients. Participants were 30 newly-graduated nurses and graduates of the Nursing course and 30 patients blind in both eyes and their possible companions. The specialists who assessed the model and the judges who analyzed the filming collaborated in the research, in view of their degree, scientific production and work on the theme. After the construction, the model was assessed by three specialists for face and content validation. After the assessment, modifications were incorporated. To test the model, 30 nursing consultations were registered and filmed. Fifteen of these were under the responsibility of untrained and 15 under the responsibility of trained nurses. The films were analyzed by three judges, who were nurses with training on the Communication Model. All principles of Resolution 196/96 were complied with. Data were processed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software and analyzed through univariate tables with relative frequency and percentage. Seventeen (56.7%) of the nurses were between 22 and 25 years of age, and a majority, 26 (86.7%), were women. Eight (26.7%) blind patients were between 39 and 49 years old and most of them, 16 (53.4%), were women; 20 (66.7%) became blind when they were between 21 and 35 years of age. The model was constructed in four phases: general guidelines; welcoming; data collection; nursing interventions. In the general guidelines, the trained group obtained excellent results on all times, ranging from 60% to 91.1%. The non-trained group showed very bad/bad communication, with higher frequencies on four items, using words that indicate direction (97.8%); lightly touching the arm or shoulder (95.6%); avoiding gestures (68.9%); talk while looking at the blind (22.2%). In the welcoming phase, all trained nurses displayed a successful performance, as opposed to the non-trained nurses: 100% very bad or bad in some actions. In the data collection phase, the trained group obtained an excellent performance on five of the actions and, in the nursing diagnosis and planning phases, trained nurses presented good and excellent actions for the following items: following the protocol (95.6%); informing on the reason for the silence when making notes (93.4%); and avoiding long periods of silence (100%). The performance of the non-trained group was considered very bad in terms of notes because they did not inform on the reason for the silence (100%); avoiding long periods of silence (91%). In the nursing intervention phase, the trained group achieved excellent performance on all items, without any very bad/bad actions on any of the items in the assessment phase. In the final phase of the consultation, excellent performance of the trained nurses was identified on the following items: communicates while accompanying the blind to the door (82.2%); says goodbye while talking and shaking hands (62.2%); and strengthens the information (42.2%). In the analysis of verbal communication between the nurse and the blind, the vocative function presented 65.7% of actions, against 19.5% for the imperative function. Silence was manifested in almost half (45%) of interactions with non-trained nurses against 12.4% for trained nurses. In the trained group, empathy (69.2%), tranquility (49.6%), satisfaction (44.2%) and solidarity (29.4%) were also present. The most evidenced channel in the trained group was speech (86.8%). And common language occurred in the trained group’s (85.6%) and the non-trained group’s (50.1%) interactions. In conclusion, the model was validated by the sample and it can be affirmed that the Verbal Communication Model is effective. Thus, its use in nursing consultations with blind people is recommended.Embora o cego tenha limitações, isso não pode impedir sua comunicação e seu relacionamento com outras pessoas. Porém na formação acadêmica os profissionais da saúde, a exemplo dos enfermeiros, não são preparados para cuidar de cegos. Assim, objetivou-se validar um Modelo de Comunicação Verbal com o Cego e o Enfermeiro à luz da Teoria de Roman Jakobson. Estudo quantitativo, com abordagem metodológica realizado por meio de filmagens no LabCom_Saúde no Departamento de Enfermagem da UFC, de dezembro/2007 a dezembro/2008. O ambiente foi organizado com vistas a se aproximar das condições ideais de uma sala de consulta de enfermagem para triagem de pessoas cegas e com diabetes. Participaram 30 enfermeiros recém-formados e concludentes do curso de graduação em Enfermagem e 30 cegos de ambos os olhos e seus acompanhantes. Além desses, colaboraram na pesquisa os especialistas que avaliaram o modelo e os juízes que analisaram as filmagens, observada a titulação, produção científica e atuação na temática. Após a construção, o modelo foi avaliado por três especialistas para validação aparente e de conteúdo. Feito o julgamento, incorporaram-se as modificações. Para o teste do modelo realizaram-se 30 consultas de enfermagem registradas e filmadas. Destas, 15 foram de responsabilidade de enfermeiros não-treinados e 15 de treinados. As filmagens foram analisadas por três juízes, enfermeiras treinadas no Modelo de Comunicação. Atentou-se para todos os princípios da Resolução 196/96. Os dados foram processados no programa Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) versão 14.0 e analisados por meio de tabelas univariadas com freqüência relativa e porcentagens. Dos enfermeiros, 17 (56,7%) tinham idade entre 22 e 25 anos, a maioria, 26 (86,7%), era do sexo feminino. Dos cegos, 8 (26,7%) estavam na faixa etária entre 39 e 49 anos e a maioria, 16 (53,4%), era do sexo feminino; 20 (66,7%) ficaram cegos entre 21 e 35 anos. A construção do modelo desenvolveu-se em quatro momentos: diretrizes gerais; acolhimento; processo de enfermagem; encerramento. Nas diretrizes gerais, o grupo treinado apresentou excelência em todos os itens, variável de 60% a 91,1%. O grupo não-treinado mostrou comunicação péssima/ruim, em maior freqüência, em quatro itens ao empregar palavras que indicam a direção (97,8%); tocar ligeiramente braço ou ombro (95,6%); evitar gesticular (68,9%); falar olhando para o cego (22,2%). Na etapa de acolhimento, todos os enfermeiros treinados a desempenharam com êxito, diferentemente do ocorrido com os não-treinados, cujo resultado foi péssimo ou ruim em 100% de algumas ações. Na etapa da coleta de dados, o grupo treinado teve excelente atuação em cinco das ações e nas etapas de diagnósticos e planejamentos de enfermagem, apresentou ações boas e excelentes nos seguintes itens: seguir protocolo (95,6%); fazer anotações informando o motivo do silêncio (93,4%); e evitar silêncio prolongado (100%). O desempenho do grupo não- treinado foi considerado péssimo nos itens: anotações por não informar o motivo do silêncio (100%); evitar o silêncio prolongado (91%). Na etapa de intervenções de enfermagem o grupo treinado denotou excelência em todos os itens, enquanto na etapa de avaliação não ocorreram ações consideradas péssimas/ruins em nenhum dos itens do mencionado grupo. Já na etapa de encerramento da consulta, identificou-se excelência dos treinados nos seguintes itens: comunica-se acompanhando o cego até a porta (82,2%); despede-se falando e apertando a mão (62,2%); e reforça as informações (42,2%). Na análise da comunicação verbal entre o enfermeiro e o cego, na função vocativa, este grupo apresentou 65,7% das ações e na função imperativa 19,5%. O silêncio manifestou-se em quase metade (45%) das interações dos participantes não-treinados e em 12,4% das dos treinados. No grupo treinado também estiveram presentes a empatia (69,2%), a tranqüilidade (49,6%), a satisfação (44,2%) e, a solidariedade (29,4%). Dos canais, o mais evidenciado nos treinados foi a fala (86,8%), enquanto a linguagem comum ocorreu nas interações dos treinados (85,6%) e nas dos não-treinados (50,1%). Conforme se conclui, o modelo foi validado pela amostra e pode-se afirmar que o Modelo de Comunicação Verbal com Cegos é eficaz. Recomenda-se, pois, sua utilização na consulta de enfermagem a pessoas cegas.Pagliuca, Lorita Marlena FreitagCosta, Katia Neyla de Freitas Macêdo2012-02-16T13:40:54Z2012-02-16T13:40:54Z2009info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfCOSTA, K. N. F. M. Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego: desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem. 2009. 131 f. Tese (Doutorado em Enfermagem) - Faculdade de Farmácia, Odontologia e Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2009.http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/2099porreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-01-24T17:43:14Zoai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/2099Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2024-09-11T18:42:34.047748Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego : desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem
Verbal comonication model with the blind person : development and validation in nursing consultation
title Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego : desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem
spellingShingle Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego : desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem
Costa, Katia Neyla de Freitas Macêdo
Pessoas com Deficiência Visual
Estudos de Validação como Assunto
title_short Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego : desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem
title_full Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego : desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem
title_fullStr Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego : desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem
title_full_unstemmed Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego : desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem
title_sort Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego : desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem
author Costa, Katia Neyla de Freitas Macêdo
author_facet Costa, Katia Neyla de Freitas Macêdo
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Pagliuca, Lorita Marlena Freitag
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Katia Neyla de Freitas Macêdo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pessoas com Deficiência Visual
Estudos de Validação como Assunto
topic Pessoas com Deficiência Visual
Estudos de Validação como Assunto
description Although blind people have limitations, this cannot impede their communication and relationship with other people. In academic education, however, health professionals, such as nurses, are not prepared to take care of blind people. This study aimed to validate a Verbal Communication Model with the Blind and the nurse in the light of Roman Jakobson’s Theory. A quantitative study was a methodological approach was carried out at the LabCom_Saúde of the Nursing Department at the Federal University of Ceará, Brazil, between December 2007 and December 2008, using filming. The environment was organized for the sake of maximum similarity with a nursing consultation room for the screening of blind diabetes patients. Participants were 30 newly-graduated nurses and graduates of the Nursing course and 30 patients blind in both eyes and their possible companions. The specialists who assessed the model and the judges who analyzed the filming collaborated in the research, in view of their degree, scientific production and work on the theme. After the construction, the model was assessed by three specialists for face and content validation. After the assessment, modifications were incorporated. To test the model, 30 nursing consultations were registered and filmed. Fifteen of these were under the responsibility of untrained and 15 under the responsibility of trained nurses. The films were analyzed by three judges, who were nurses with training on the Communication Model. All principles of Resolution 196/96 were complied with. Data were processed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software and analyzed through univariate tables with relative frequency and percentage. Seventeen (56.7%) of the nurses were between 22 and 25 years of age, and a majority, 26 (86.7%), were women. Eight (26.7%) blind patients were between 39 and 49 years old and most of them, 16 (53.4%), were women; 20 (66.7%) became blind when they were between 21 and 35 years of age. The model was constructed in four phases: general guidelines; welcoming; data collection; nursing interventions. In the general guidelines, the trained group obtained excellent results on all times, ranging from 60% to 91.1%. The non-trained group showed very bad/bad communication, with higher frequencies on four items, using words that indicate direction (97.8%); lightly touching the arm or shoulder (95.6%); avoiding gestures (68.9%); talk while looking at the blind (22.2%). In the welcoming phase, all trained nurses displayed a successful performance, as opposed to the non-trained nurses: 100% very bad or bad in some actions. In the data collection phase, the trained group obtained an excellent performance on five of the actions and, in the nursing diagnosis and planning phases, trained nurses presented good and excellent actions for the following items: following the protocol (95.6%); informing on the reason for the silence when making notes (93.4%); and avoiding long periods of silence (100%). The performance of the non-trained group was considered very bad in terms of notes because they did not inform on the reason for the silence (100%); avoiding long periods of silence (91%). In the nursing intervention phase, the trained group achieved excellent performance on all items, without any very bad/bad actions on any of the items in the assessment phase. In the final phase of the consultation, excellent performance of the trained nurses was identified on the following items: communicates while accompanying the blind to the door (82.2%); says goodbye while talking and shaking hands (62.2%); and strengthens the information (42.2%). In the analysis of verbal communication between the nurse and the blind, the vocative function presented 65.7% of actions, against 19.5% for the imperative function. Silence was manifested in almost half (45%) of interactions with non-trained nurses against 12.4% for trained nurses. In the trained group, empathy (69.2%), tranquility (49.6%), satisfaction (44.2%) and solidarity (29.4%) were also present. The most evidenced channel in the trained group was speech (86.8%). And common language occurred in the trained group’s (85.6%) and the non-trained group’s (50.1%) interactions. In conclusion, the model was validated by the sample and it can be affirmed that the Verbal Communication Model is effective. Thus, its use in nursing consultations with blind people is recommended.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009
2012-02-16T13:40:54Z
2012-02-16T13:40:54Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv COSTA, K. N. F. M. Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego: desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem. 2009. 131 f. Tese (Doutorado em Enfermagem) - Faculdade de Farmácia, Odontologia e Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2009.
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/2099
identifier_str_mv COSTA, K. N. F. M. Modelo de comunicação verbal com o cego: desenvolvimento e validação em consulta de enfermagem. 2009. 131 f. Tese (Doutorado em Enfermagem) - Faculdade de Farmácia, Odontologia e Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2009.
url http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/2099
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br
_version_ 1813028915017416704