Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/31918 |
Resumo: | Purpose Oncofertility focuses on providing fertility and endocrine-sparing options to patients who undergo life-preserving but gonadotoxic cancer treatment. The resources needed to meet patient demand often are fragmented along disciplinary lines. We quantify assets and gaps in oncofertility care on a global scale. Methods Survey-based questionnaires were provided to 191 members of the Oncofertility Consortium Global Partners Network, a National Institutes of Health–funded organization. Responses were analyzed to measure trends and regional subtleties about patient oncofertility experiences and to analyze barriers to care at sites that provide oncofertility services. Results Sixty-three responses were received (response rate, 25%), and 40 were analyzed from oncofertility centers in 28 countries. Thirty of 40 survey results (75%) showed that formal referral processes and psychological care are provided to patients at the majority of sites. Fourteen of 23 respondents (61%) stated that some fertility preservation services are not offered because of cultural and legal barriers. The growth of oncofertility and its capacity to improve the lives of cancer survivors around the globe relies on concentrated efforts to increase awareness, promote collaboration, share best practices, and advocate for research funding. Conclusion This survey reveals global and regional successes and challenges and provides insight into what is needed to advance the field and make the discussion of fertility preservation and endocrine health a standard component of the cancer treatment plan. As the field of oncofertility continues to develop around the globe, regular assessment of both international and regional barriers to quality care must continue to guide process improvements. |
id |
UFC-7_f40b47118479e758f2e80563a3361cea |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/31918 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-7 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globeFertilidadeFertilityPurpose Oncofertility focuses on providing fertility and endocrine-sparing options to patients who undergo life-preserving but gonadotoxic cancer treatment. The resources needed to meet patient demand often are fragmented along disciplinary lines. We quantify assets and gaps in oncofertility care on a global scale. Methods Survey-based questionnaires were provided to 191 members of the Oncofertility Consortium Global Partners Network, a National Institutes of Health–funded organization. Responses were analyzed to measure trends and regional subtleties about patient oncofertility experiences and to analyze barriers to care at sites that provide oncofertility services. Results Sixty-three responses were received (response rate, 25%), and 40 were analyzed from oncofertility centers in 28 countries. Thirty of 40 survey results (75%) showed that formal referral processes and psychological care are provided to patients at the majority of sites. Fourteen of 23 respondents (61%) stated that some fertility preservation services are not offered because of cultural and legal barriers. The growth of oncofertility and its capacity to improve the lives of cancer survivors around the globe relies on concentrated efforts to increase awareness, promote collaboration, share best practices, and advocate for research funding. Conclusion This survey reveals global and regional successes and challenges and provides insight into what is needed to advance the field and make the discussion of fertility preservation and endocrine health a standard component of the cancer treatment plan. As the field of oncofertility continues to develop around the globe, regular assessment of both international and regional barriers to quality care must continue to guide process improvements.Journal of Global Oncology2018-05-15T18:02:58Z2018-05-15T18:02:58Z2018-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfRASHEDI, A, S. et al. Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe. Journal of Global Oncology, n. 4, p. 1-16, may. 2018.2378-9506 (On-line)http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/31918Rashedi, Alexandra S.Roo, Saskia F. deAtaman, Lauren M.Edmonds, Maxwell E.Silva, Adelino AmaralScarella, AnibalHorbaczewska, AnnaAnazodo, AntoinetteArvas, AyseCarvalho, Bruno Ramalho deSartorio, CassioBeerendonk, Catharina C.M.Diaz-Garcia, CesarSuh, Chang SukMelo, CláudiaAndersen, Claus YdingMotta, EduardoGreenblatt, Ellen M.Moer, Ellen VanZand, ElnazReis, Fernando M.Sánchez, FlorTerrado, GuillermoRodrigues, Jhenifer K.Silva, João Marcos de Meneses eSmitz, JohanMedrano, JoseLee, Jung RyeolWinkler-Crepaz, KatharinaSmith, KristinSilva, Lígia Helena Ferreira Melo eWildt, LudwigSalama, MahmoudAndrés, María del MarBourlon, Maria T.Vega, MarioChehin, Maurício BarbourVos, Michel DeKhrouf, MohamedSuzuki, NaoAzmy, Suzuki OsamaFontoura, PaulaCampos-Junior, Paulo Henrique AlmeidaMallmann, PeterAzambuja, RicardoMarinho, Ricardo M.Anderson, Richard A.Jach, RobertAntunes, Roberto de A.Mitchell, RodFathi, RouhollahAdiga, Satish KumarTakae, SeidoKim, Seok HyunRomero, SergioGrieco, Silvana ChedidShaulov, TalyaFurui, TatsuroAlmeida-Santos, TeresaNelen, WillianneJayasinghe, YasminSugishita, YodoWoodruff, Teresa K.engreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-14T17:39:20Zoai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/31918Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2024-09-11T18:44:24.665539Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe |
title |
Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe |
spellingShingle |
Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe Rashedi, Alexandra S. Fertilidade Fertility |
title_short |
Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe |
title_full |
Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe |
title_fullStr |
Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe |
title_full_unstemmed |
Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe |
title_sort |
Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe |
author |
Rashedi, Alexandra S. |
author_facet |
Rashedi, Alexandra S. Roo, Saskia F. de Ataman, Lauren M. Edmonds, Maxwell E. Silva, Adelino Amaral Scarella, Anibal Horbaczewska, Anna Anazodo, Antoinette Arvas, Ayse Carvalho, Bruno Ramalho de Sartorio, Cassio Beerendonk, Catharina C.M. Diaz-Garcia, Cesar Suh, Chang Suk Melo, Cláudia Andersen, Claus Yding Motta, Eduardo Greenblatt, Ellen M. Moer, Ellen Van Zand, Elnaz Reis, Fernando M. Sánchez, Flor Terrado, Guillermo Rodrigues, Jhenifer K. Silva, João Marcos de Meneses e Smitz, Johan Medrano, Jose Lee, Jung Ryeol Winkler-Crepaz, Katharina Smith, Kristin Silva, Lígia Helena Ferreira Melo e Wildt, Ludwig Salama, Mahmoud Andrés, María del Mar Bourlon, Maria T. Vega, Mario Chehin, Maurício Barbour Vos, Michel De Khrouf, Mohamed Suzuki, Nao Azmy, Suzuki Osama Fontoura, Paula Campos-Junior, Paulo Henrique Almeida Mallmann, Peter Azambuja, Ricardo Marinho, Ricardo M. Anderson, Richard A. Jach, Robert Antunes, Roberto de A. Mitchell, Rod Fathi, Rouhollah Adiga, Satish Kumar Takae, Seido Kim, Seok Hyun Romero, Sergio Grieco, Silvana Chedid Shaulov, Talya Furui, Tatsuro Almeida-Santos, Teresa Nelen, Willianne Jayasinghe, Yasmin Sugishita, Yodo Woodruff, Teresa K. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Roo, Saskia F. de Ataman, Lauren M. Edmonds, Maxwell E. Silva, Adelino Amaral Scarella, Anibal Horbaczewska, Anna Anazodo, Antoinette Arvas, Ayse Carvalho, Bruno Ramalho de Sartorio, Cassio Beerendonk, Catharina C.M. Diaz-Garcia, Cesar Suh, Chang Suk Melo, Cláudia Andersen, Claus Yding Motta, Eduardo Greenblatt, Ellen M. Moer, Ellen Van Zand, Elnaz Reis, Fernando M. Sánchez, Flor Terrado, Guillermo Rodrigues, Jhenifer K. Silva, João Marcos de Meneses e Smitz, Johan Medrano, Jose Lee, Jung Ryeol Winkler-Crepaz, Katharina Smith, Kristin Silva, Lígia Helena Ferreira Melo e Wildt, Ludwig Salama, Mahmoud Andrés, María del Mar Bourlon, Maria T. Vega, Mario Chehin, Maurício Barbour Vos, Michel De Khrouf, Mohamed Suzuki, Nao Azmy, Suzuki Osama Fontoura, Paula Campos-Junior, Paulo Henrique Almeida Mallmann, Peter Azambuja, Ricardo Marinho, Ricardo M. Anderson, Richard A. Jach, Robert Antunes, Roberto de A. Mitchell, Rod Fathi, Rouhollah Adiga, Satish Kumar Takae, Seido Kim, Seok Hyun Romero, Sergio Grieco, Silvana Chedid Shaulov, Talya Furui, Tatsuro Almeida-Santos, Teresa Nelen, Willianne Jayasinghe, Yasmin Sugishita, Yodo Woodruff, Teresa K. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rashedi, Alexandra S. Roo, Saskia F. de Ataman, Lauren M. Edmonds, Maxwell E. Silva, Adelino Amaral Scarella, Anibal Horbaczewska, Anna Anazodo, Antoinette Arvas, Ayse Carvalho, Bruno Ramalho de Sartorio, Cassio Beerendonk, Catharina C.M. Diaz-Garcia, Cesar Suh, Chang Suk Melo, Cláudia Andersen, Claus Yding Motta, Eduardo Greenblatt, Ellen M. Moer, Ellen Van Zand, Elnaz Reis, Fernando M. Sánchez, Flor Terrado, Guillermo Rodrigues, Jhenifer K. Silva, João Marcos de Meneses e Smitz, Johan Medrano, Jose Lee, Jung Ryeol Winkler-Crepaz, Katharina Smith, Kristin Silva, Lígia Helena Ferreira Melo e Wildt, Ludwig Salama, Mahmoud Andrés, María del Mar Bourlon, Maria T. Vega, Mario Chehin, Maurício Barbour Vos, Michel De Khrouf, Mohamed Suzuki, Nao Azmy, Suzuki Osama Fontoura, Paula Campos-Junior, Paulo Henrique Almeida Mallmann, Peter Azambuja, Ricardo Marinho, Ricardo M. Anderson, Richard A. Jach, Robert Antunes, Roberto de A. Mitchell, Rod Fathi, Rouhollah Adiga, Satish Kumar Takae, Seido Kim, Seok Hyun Romero, Sergio Grieco, Silvana Chedid Shaulov, Talya Furui, Tatsuro Almeida-Santos, Teresa Nelen, Willianne Jayasinghe, Yasmin Sugishita, Yodo Woodruff, Teresa K. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fertilidade Fertility |
topic |
Fertilidade Fertility |
description |
Purpose Oncofertility focuses on providing fertility and endocrine-sparing options to patients who undergo life-preserving but gonadotoxic cancer treatment. The resources needed to meet patient demand often are fragmented along disciplinary lines. We quantify assets and gaps in oncofertility care on a global scale. Methods Survey-based questionnaires were provided to 191 members of the Oncofertility Consortium Global Partners Network, a National Institutes of Health–funded organization. Responses were analyzed to measure trends and regional subtleties about patient oncofertility experiences and to analyze barriers to care at sites that provide oncofertility services. Results Sixty-three responses were received (response rate, 25%), and 40 were analyzed from oncofertility centers in 28 countries. Thirty of 40 survey results (75%) showed that formal referral processes and psychological care are provided to patients at the majority of sites. Fourteen of 23 respondents (61%) stated that some fertility preservation services are not offered because of cultural and legal barriers. The growth of oncofertility and its capacity to improve the lives of cancer survivors around the globe relies on concentrated efforts to increase awareness, promote collaboration, share best practices, and advocate for research funding. Conclusion This survey reveals global and regional successes and challenges and provides insight into what is needed to advance the field and make the discussion of fertility preservation and endocrine health a standard component of the cancer treatment plan. As the field of oncofertility continues to develop around the globe, regular assessment of both international and regional barriers to quality care must continue to guide process improvements. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-05-15T18:02:58Z 2018-05-15T18:02:58Z 2018-05 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
RASHEDI, A, S. et al. Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe. Journal of Global Oncology, n. 4, p. 1-16, may. 2018. 2378-9506 (On-line) http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/31918 |
identifier_str_mv |
RASHEDI, A, S. et al. Survey of fertility preservation options available to patients with cancer around the globe. Journal of Global Oncology, n. 4, p. 1-16, may. 2018. 2378-9506 (On-line) |
url |
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/31918 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Global Oncology |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Global Oncology |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br |
_version_ |
1813028927052972032 |