Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
dARK ID: | ark:/83112/001300001r18m |
Texto Completo: | http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6906 |
Resumo: | Objective To assess the measurement properties of the COPD assessment test (CAT) in a randomized trial comparing a face-to-face interview (FFI) with a telephone interview (TI). Methods A randomized study was conducted at two teaching hospitals in Fortaleza, Brazil. Patients were randomly assigned to answer the CAT questionnaire either in a FFI or by TI. The two groups were assessed for internal consistency reliability, cross-sectional validity and test– retest reliability. All patients performed spirometry and answered the modified medical research council dyspnea scale and the St. George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ). Results The total scores of the CAT questionnaire were similar for face-to-face and TI groups, 20.71 (95 % CI 18–23.4) versus 20.81 (95 % CI 19.31–21.7), respectively. For both mode of administration, we found good internal consistency reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.74 (95 % CI 0.61–0.84) to 0.89 (95 % CI 0.84–0.93) for the TI and FFI, respectively. In general, moderate-to-high correlations of CAT with SGRQ were observed, independent of the administration format. For the test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were very similar for both FFI and TI group 0.96 (95 % CI 0.93–0.97) versus 0.98 (95 % CI 0.96–0.98), respectively. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the CAT questionnaire administration either in a FFI or by TI presents moderate-to-high measurement properties. This provides support for the use of both modes of questionnaire administration. |
id |
UFC-7_fc0641647f8dc496549b56830e11cbfd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/6906 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-7 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized studyDoença Pulmonar Obstrutiva CrônicaEntrevistaObjective To assess the measurement properties of the COPD assessment test (CAT) in a randomized trial comparing a face-to-face interview (FFI) with a telephone interview (TI). Methods A randomized study was conducted at two teaching hospitals in Fortaleza, Brazil. Patients were randomly assigned to answer the CAT questionnaire either in a FFI or by TI. The two groups were assessed for internal consistency reliability, cross-sectional validity and test– retest reliability. All patients performed spirometry and answered the modified medical research council dyspnea scale and the St. George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ). Results The total scores of the CAT questionnaire were similar for face-to-face and TI groups, 20.71 (95 % CI 18–23.4) versus 20.81 (95 % CI 19.31–21.7), respectively. For both mode of administration, we found good internal consistency reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.74 (95 % CI 0.61–0.84) to 0.89 (95 % CI 0.84–0.93) for the TI and FFI, respectively. In general, moderate-to-high correlations of CAT with SGRQ were observed, independent of the administration format. For the test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were very similar for both FFI and TI group 0.96 (95 % CI 0.93–0.97) versus 0.98 (95 % CI 0.96–0.98), respectively. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the CAT questionnaire administration either in a FFI or by TI presents moderate-to-high measurement properties. This provides support for the use of both modes of questionnaire administration.Quality of Life Research2013-12-06T11:31:52Z2013-12-06T11:31:52Z2013-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfSILVA, G. F. et al. Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study. Quality of Life Research, Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 1, p. 1-5, nov. 2013.0962-9343 Impresso1573-2649 On linehttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6906ark:/83112/001300001r18mSilva, Guilherme F. daMorano, Maria Tereza A.Sales, Maria Penha U.Olegário, Natalia B.Cavalcante, Antonio George M.Pereira, Eanes Delgado Barrosengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-13T18:26:15Zoai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/6906Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2024-09-11T18:51:35.236446Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study |
title |
Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study Silva, Guilherme F. da Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Entrevista |
title_short |
Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study |
title_full |
Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study |
title_sort |
Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study |
author |
Silva, Guilherme F. da |
author_facet |
Silva, Guilherme F. da Morano, Maria Tereza A. Sales, Maria Penha U. Olegário, Natalia B. Cavalcante, Antonio George M. Pereira, Eanes Delgado Barros |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Morano, Maria Tereza A. Sales, Maria Penha U. Olegário, Natalia B. Cavalcante, Antonio George M. Pereira, Eanes Delgado Barros |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Guilherme F. da Morano, Maria Tereza A. Sales, Maria Penha U. Olegário, Natalia B. Cavalcante, Antonio George M. Pereira, Eanes Delgado Barros |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Entrevista |
topic |
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Entrevista |
description |
Objective To assess the measurement properties of the COPD assessment test (CAT) in a randomized trial comparing a face-to-face interview (FFI) with a telephone interview (TI). Methods A randomized study was conducted at two teaching hospitals in Fortaleza, Brazil. Patients were randomly assigned to answer the CAT questionnaire either in a FFI or by TI. The two groups were assessed for internal consistency reliability, cross-sectional validity and test– retest reliability. All patients performed spirometry and answered the modified medical research council dyspnea scale and the St. George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ). Results The total scores of the CAT questionnaire were similar for face-to-face and TI groups, 20.71 (95 % CI 18–23.4) versus 20.81 (95 % CI 19.31–21.7), respectively. For both mode of administration, we found good internal consistency reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.74 (95 % CI 0.61–0.84) to 0.89 (95 % CI 0.84–0.93) for the TI and FFI, respectively. In general, moderate-to-high correlations of CAT with SGRQ were observed, independent of the administration format. For the test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were very similar for both FFI and TI group 0.96 (95 % CI 0.93–0.97) versus 0.98 (95 % CI 0.96–0.98), respectively. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the CAT questionnaire administration either in a FFI or by TI presents moderate-to-high measurement properties. This provides support for the use of both modes of questionnaire administration. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-06T11:31:52Z 2013-12-06T11:31:52Z 2013-11 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
SILVA, G. F. et al. Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study. Quality of Life Research, Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 1, p. 1-5, nov. 2013. 0962-9343 Impresso 1573-2649 On line http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6906 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/83112/001300001r18m |
identifier_str_mv |
SILVA, G. F. et al. Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study. Quality of Life Research, Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 1, p. 1-5, nov. 2013. 0962-9343 Impresso 1573-2649 On line ark:/83112/001300001r18m |
url |
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6906 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality of Life Research |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality of Life Research |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br |
_version_ |
1818374005811314688 |