Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Guilherme F. da
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Morano, Maria Tereza A., Sales, Maria Penha U., Olegário, Natalia B., Cavalcante, Antonio George M., Pereira, Eanes Delgado Barros
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
dARK ID: ark:/83112/001300001r18m
Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6906
Resumo: Objective To assess the measurement properties of the COPD assessment test (CAT) in a randomized trial comparing a face-to-face interview (FFI) with a telephone interview (TI). Methods A randomized study was conducted at two teaching hospitals in Fortaleza, Brazil. Patients were randomly assigned to answer the CAT questionnaire either in a FFI or by TI. The two groups were assessed for internal consistency reliability, cross-sectional validity and test– retest reliability. All patients performed spirometry and answered the modified medical research council dyspnea scale and the St. George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ). Results The total scores of the CAT questionnaire were similar for face-to-face and TI groups, 20.71 (95 % CI 18–23.4) versus 20.81 (95 % CI 19.31–21.7), respectively. For both mode of administration, we found good internal consistency reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.74 (95 % CI 0.61–0.84) to 0.89 (95 % CI 0.84–0.93) for the TI and FFI, respectively. In general, moderate-to-high correlations of CAT with SGRQ were observed, independent of the administration format. For the test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were very similar for both FFI and TI group 0.96 (95 % CI 0.93–0.97) versus 0.98 (95 % CI 0.96–0.98), respectively. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the CAT questionnaire administration either in a FFI or by TI presents moderate-to-high measurement properties. This provides support for the use of both modes of questionnaire administration.
id UFC-7_fc0641647f8dc496549b56830e11cbfd
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/6906
network_acronym_str UFC-7
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized studyDoença Pulmonar Obstrutiva CrônicaEntrevistaObjective To assess the measurement properties of the COPD assessment test (CAT) in a randomized trial comparing a face-to-face interview (FFI) with a telephone interview (TI). Methods A randomized study was conducted at two teaching hospitals in Fortaleza, Brazil. Patients were randomly assigned to answer the CAT questionnaire either in a FFI or by TI. The two groups were assessed for internal consistency reliability, cross-sectional validity and test– retest reliability. All patients performed spirometry and answered the modified medical research council dyspnea scale and the St. George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ). Results The total scores of the CAT questionnaire were similar for face-to-face and TI groups, 20.71 (95 % CI 18–23.4) versus 20.81 (95 % CI 19.31–21.7), respectively. For both mode of administration, we found good internal consistency reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.74 (95 % CI 0.61–0.84) to 0.89 (95 % CI 0.84–0.93) for the TI and FFI, respectively. In general, moderate-to-high correlations of CAT with SGRQ were observed, independent of the administration format. For the test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were very similar for both FFI and TI group 0.96 (95 % CI 0.93–0.97) versus 0.98 (95 % CI 0.96–0.98), respectively. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the CAT questionnaire administration either in a FFI or by TI presents moderate-to-high measurement properties. This provides support for the use of both modes of questionnaire administration.Quality of Life Research2013-12-06T11:31:52Z2013-12-06T11:31:52Z2013-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfSILVA, G. F. et al. Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study. Quality of Life Research, Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 1, p. 1-5, nov. 2013.0962-9343 Impresso1573-2649 On linehttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6906ark:/83112/001300001r18mSilva, Guilherme F. daMorano, Maria Tereza A.Sales, Maria Penha U.Olegário, Natalia B.Cavalcante, Antonio George M.Pereira, Eanes Delgado Barrosengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-13T18:26:15Zoai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/6906Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2024-09-11T18:51:35.236446Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study
title Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study
spellingShingle Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study
Silva, Guilherme F. da
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica
Entrevista
title_short Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study
title_full Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study
title_fullStr Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study
title_sort Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study
author Silva, Guilherme F. da
author_facet Silva, Guilherme F. da
Morano, Maria Tereza A.
Sales, Maria Penha U.
Olegário, Natalia B.
Cavalcante, Antonio George M.
Pereira, Eanes Delgado Barros
author_role author
author2 Morano, Maria Tereza A.
Sales, Maria Penha U.
Olegário, Natalia B.
Cavalcante, Antonio George M.
Pereira, Eanes Delgado Barros
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Guilherme F. da
Morano, Maria Tereza A.
Sales, Maria Penha U.
Olegário, Natalia B.
Cavalcante, Antonio George M.
Pereira, Eanes Delgado Barros
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica
Entrevista
topic Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica
Entrevista
description Objective To assess the measurement properties of the COPD assessment test (CAT) in a randomized trial comparing a face-to-face interview (FFI) with a telephone interview (TI). Methods A randomized study was conducted at two teaching hospitals in Fortaleza, Brazil. Patients were randomly assigned to answer the CAT questionnaire either in a FFI or by TI. The two groups were assessed for internal consistency reliability, cross-sectional validity and test– retest reliability. All patients performed spirometry and answered the modified medical research council dyspnea scale and the St. George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ). Results The total scores of the CAT questionnaire were similar for face-to-face and TI groups, 20.71 (95 % CI 18–23.4) versus 20.81 (95 % CI 19.31–21.7), respectively. For both mode of administration, we found good internal consistency reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.74 (95 % CI 0.61–0.84) to 0.89 (95 % CI 0.84–0.93) for the TI and FFI, respectively. In general, moderate-to-high correlations of CAT with SGRQ were observed, independent of the administration format. For the test–retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were very similar for both FFI and TI group 0.96 (95 % CI 0.93–0.97) versus 0.98 (95 % CI 0.96–0.98), respectively. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the CAT questionnaire administration either in a FFI or by TI presents moderate-to-high measurement properties. This provides support for the use of both modes of questionnaire administration.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-06T11:31:52Z
2013-12-06T11:31:52Z
2013-11
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv SILVA, G. F. et al. Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study. Quality of Life Research, Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 1, p. 1-5, nov. 2013.
0962-9343 Impresso
1573-2649 On line
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6906
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/83112/001300001r18m
identifier_str_mv SILVA, G. F. et al. Comparison of face-to-face interview and telephone interview administration of COPD assessment test : a randomized study. Quality of Life Research, Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 1, p. 1-5, nov. 2013.
0962-9343 Impresso
1573-2649 On line
ark:/83112/001300001r18m
url http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6906
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Quality of Life Research
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Quality of Life Research
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br
_version_ 1818374005811314688