Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/19207 |
Resumo: | We validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about being caring, altruistic, and kind to others as discussed by Kabasakal and Bodur (2004), but there is also a certain ambivalence to this concept. We suggest differentiating humane orientation toward in-group members from humane orientation toward out-group members. A multicountry construct validation study used student samples from 25 countries that were either high or low in humane orientation (N = 876) and studied their relation to the traditional GLOBE scale and other cultural-level measures (agreeableness, religiosity, authoritarianism, and welfare state score). Findings revealed a strong correlation between humane orientation and agreeableness, welfare state score, and religiosity. Out-group humane orientation proved to be the more relevant subfacet of the original humane orientation construct, suggesting that future research on humane orientation should make use of this measure instead of the vague original scale. The ambivalent character of out-group humane orientation is displayed in its positive correlation to high authoritarianism. Patriotism was used as a control variable for noncritical acceptance of one’s society but did not change the correlations. Our findings are discussed as an example of how rigid expectations and a lack of tolerance for diversity may help explain the ambivalent nature of humane orientation. |
id |
UFC-7_fdce95c2d983dbf11ccab43611267806 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/19207 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-7 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries.Construct ValidationAgreeablenessAuthoritarianismWelfare StateReligiosityWe validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about being caring, altruistic, and kind to others as discussed by Kabasakal and Bodur (2004), but there is also a certain ambivalence to this concept. We suggest differentiating humane orientation toward in-group members from humane orientation toward out-group members. A multicountry construct validation study used student samples from 25 countries that were either high or low in humane orientation (N = 876) and studied their relation to the traditional GLOBE scale and other cultural-level measures (agreeableness, religiosity, authoritarianism, and welfare state score). Findings revealed a strong correlation between humane orientation and agreeableness, welfare state score, and religiosity. Out-group humane orientation proved to be the more relevant subfacet of the original humane orientation construct, suggesting that future research on humane orientation should make use of this measure instead of the vague original scale. The ambivalent character of out-group humane orientation is displayed in its positive correlation to high authoritarianism. Patriotism was used as a control variable for noncritical acceptance of one’s society but did not change the correlations. Our findings are discussed as an example of how rigid expectations and a lack of tolerance for diversity may help explain the ambivalent nature of humane orientation.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology2016-08-22T12:44:29Z2016-08-22T12:44:29Z2012info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfSCHLÖSSER, Oliver; HEINTZE, Anna-Maria; AL-NAJJAR, Musaed; ARCISZEWSKI, Thomas; BESEVEGIS, Elias; BISHOP, George David; BONNES, Mirilia; CLEGG, Chris W.; DROZDA-SENKOWSKA, Ewa; GABORIT, Mauricio; GARZON, Dayra; HANSEN, Tia G. B.; HESZEN, Irena; JUHASZ, Marta; KEATING, Mary A.; MANGUNDJAYA, Wustari; MANSOR, Norma; MITCHELSON, Jacqueline K.; ORTIZ-REYNOSO, Alejandra; PANDEY, Janak; PAVAKANUN, Ubolwanna; PAVLOPOULOS, Vassilis; PEIRO, Jose M.; POTOCNIK, Kristina; RESTREPO-ESPINOSA, Maria H.; SEMMER, Norbert; TUPINAMBA, Antonio Caubi Ribeiro; VENTURA, Elizabeth R.; WHOOLERY, Matthew; ZHANG, Kan. Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, v. 44, n. 4, p. 535-551, 2012.0022-0221 (Impresso)1552-5422 (Online)http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/19207Schlosser, OliverFrese, MichaelHeintze, Anna-MariaAl-Najjar, MusaedArciszewski, ThomasBesevegis, EliasBishop, George DavidBonnes, MiriliaClegg, Chris W.Drozda-Senkowska, EwaGaborit, MauricioGarzon, DayraHansen, Tia G. B.Heszen, IrenaJuhasz, MartaKeating, Mary A.Mangundjaya, WustariMansor, NormaMitchelson, Jacqueline K.Ortiz-Reynoso, AlejandraPandey, JanakPavakanun, UbolwannaPavlopoulos, VassilisPeiro, Jose M.Potocnik, KristinaRestrepo-Espinosa, Maria H.Semmer, NorbertTupinambá, Antonio Caubi RibeiroVentura, Elizabeth R.Whoolery, MatthewZhang, Kaninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFC2023-11-16T19:45:20Zoai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/19207Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2024-09-11T18:17:29.730309Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. |
title |
Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. |
spellingShingle |
Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. Schlosser, Oliver Construct Validation Agreeableness Authoritarianism Welfare State Religiosity |
title_short |
Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. |
title_full |
Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. |
title_fullStr |
Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. |
title_sort |
Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. |
author |
Schlosser, Oliver |
author_facet |
Schlosser, Oliver Frese, Michael Heintze, Anna-Maria Al-Najjar, Musaed Arciszewski, Thomas Besevegis, Elias Bishop, George David Bonnes, Mirilia Clegg, Chris W. Drozda-Senkowska, Ewa Gaborit, Mauricio Garzon, Dayra Hansen, Tia G. B. Heszen, Irena Juhasz, Marta Keating, Mary A. Mangundjaya, Wustari Mansor, Norma Mitchelson, Jacqueline K. Ortiz-Reynoso, Alejandra Pandey, Janak Pavakanun, Ubolwanna Pavlopoulos, Vassilis Peiro, Jose M. Potocnik, Kristina Restrepo-Espinosa, Maria H. Semmer, Norbert Tupinambá, Antonio Caubi Ribeiro Ventura, Elizabeth R. Whoolery, Matthew Zhang, Kan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Frese, Michael Heintze, Anna-Maria Al-Najjar, Musaed Arciszewski, Thomas Besevegis, Elias Bishop, George David Bonnes, Mirilia Clegg, Chris W. Drozda-Senkowska, Ewa Gaborit, Mauricio Garzon, Dayra Hansen, Tia G. B. Heszen, Irena Juhasz, Marta Keating, Mary A. Mangundjaya, Wustari Mansor, Norma Mitchelson, Jacqueline K. Ortiz-Reynoso, Alejandra Pandey, Janak Pavakanun, Ubolwanna Pavlopoulos, Vassilis Peiro, Jose M. Potocnik, Kristina Restrepo-Espinosa, Maria H. Semmer, Norbert Tupinambá, Antonio Caubi Ribeiro Ventura, Elizabeth R. Whoolery, Matthew Zhang, Kan |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schlosser, Oliver Frese, Michael Heintze, Anna-Maria Al-Najjar, Musaed Arciszewski, Thomas Besevegis, Elias Bishop, George David Bonnes, Mirilia Clegg, Chris W. Drozda-Senkowska, Ewa Gaborit, Mauricio Garzon, Dayra Hansen, Tia G. B. Heszen, Irena Juhasz, Marta Keating, Mary A. Mangundjaya, Wustari Mansor, Norma Mitchelson, Jacqueline K. Ortiz-Reynoso, Alejandra Pandey, Janak Pavakanun, Ubolwanna Pavlopoulos, Vassilis Peiro, Jose M. Potocnik, Kristina Restrepo-Espinosa, Maria H. Semmer, Norbert Tupinambá, Antonio Caubi Ribeiro Ventura, Elizabeth R. Whoolery, Matthew Zhang, Kan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Construct Validation Agreeableness Authoritarianism Welfare State Religiosity |
topic |
Construct Validation Agreeableness Authoritarianism Welfare State Religiosity |
description |
We validate, extend, and empirically and theoretically criticize the cultural dimension of humane orientation of the project GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness Research Program). Theoretically, humane orientation is not just a one-dimensionally positive concept about being caring, altruistic, and kind to others as discussed by Kabasakal and Bodur (2004), but there is also a certain ambivalence to this concept. We suggest differentiating humane orientation toward in-group members from humane orientation toward out-group members. A multicountry construct validation study used student samples from 25 countries that were either high or low in humane orientation (N = 876) and studied their relation to the traditional GLOBE scale and other cultural-level measures (agreeableness, religiosity, authoritarianism, and welfare state score). Findings revealed a strong correlation between humane orientation and agreeableness, welfare state score, and religiosity. Out-group humane orientation proved to be the more relevant subfacet of the original humane orientation construct, suggesting that future research on humane orientation should make use of this measure instead of the vague original scale. The ambivalent character of out-group humane orientation is displayed in its positive correlation to high authoritarianism. Patriotism was used as a control variable for noncritical acceptance of one’s society but did not change the correlations. Our findings are discussed as an example of how rigid expectations and a lack of tolerance for diversity may help explain the ambivalent nature of humane orientation. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012 2016-08-22T12:44:29Z 2016-08-22T12:44:29Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
SCHLÖSSER, Oliver; HEINTZE, Anna-Maria; AL-NAJJAR, Musaed; ARCISZEWSKI, Thomas; BESEVEGIS, Elias; BISHOP, George David; BONNES, Mirilia; CLEGG, Chris W.; DROZDA-SENKOWSKA, Ewa; GABORIT, Mauricio; GARZON, Dayra; HANSEN, Tia G. B.; HESZEN, Irena; JUHASZ, Marta; KEATING, Mary A.; MANGUNDJAYA, Wustari; MANSOR, Norma; MITCHELSON, Jacqueline K.; ORTIZ-REYNOSO, Alejandra; PANDEY, Janak; PAVAKANUN, Ubolwanna; PAVLOPOULOS, Vassilis; PEIRO, Jose M.; POTOCNIK, Kristina; RESTREPO-ESPINOSA, Maria H.; SEMMER, Norbert; TUPINAMBA, Antonio Caubi Ribeiro; VENTURA, Elizabeth R.; WHOOLERY, Matthew; ZHANG, Kan. Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, v. 44, n. 4, p. 535-551, 2012. 0022-0221 (Impresso) 1552-5422 (Online) http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/19207 |
identifier_str_mv |
SCHLÖSSER, Oliver; HEINTZE, Anna-Maria; AL-NAJJAR, Musaed; ARCISZEWSKI, Thomas; BESEVEGIS, Elias; BISHOP, George David; BONNES, Mirilia; CLEGG, Chris W.; DROZDA-SENKOWSKA, Ewa; GABORIT, Mauricio; GARZON, Dayra; HANSEN, Tia G. B.; HESZEN, Irena; JUHASZ, Marta; KEATING, Mary A.; MANGUNDJAYA, Wustari; MANSOR, Norma; MITCHELSON, Jacqueline K.; ORTIZ-REYNOSO, Alejandra; PANDEY, Janak; PAVAKANUN, Ubolwanna; PAVLOPOULOS, Vassilis; PEIRO, Jose M.; POTOCNIK, Kristina; RESTREPO-ESPINOSA, Maria H.; SEMMER, Norbert; TUPINAMBA, Antonio Caubi Ribeiro; VENTURA, Elizabeth R.; WHOOLERY, Matthew; ZHANG, Kan. Humane orientation as a new cultural dimension of the globe project: a validation study of the globe scale and out-group humane orientation in 25 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, v. 44, n. 4, p. 535-551, 2012. 0022-0221 (Impresso) 1552-5422 (Online) |
url |
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/19207 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br |
_version_ |
1813028740415881216 |