Reduction of fuel consumption using driving strategy in agricultural tractor

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Farias,Marcelo S. de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Schlosser,José F., Linares,Pilar, Bertollo,Gilvan M., Martini,Alfran T.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662019000200144
Resumo: ABSTRACT During the acquisition and use of an agricultural tractor, the consumption of fuel by the engine must be taken into account by the user, considering its nonrenewable origin and the marketing price. Appropriate strategies in driving tractors can help users to reduce production costs. In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate the fuel consumption of an agricultural tractor using different driving strategies. Load levels were imposed, following the instructions from Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Code 2, using an instrumented dynamometer car, in a concrete test track. Six load levels (30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80% of Q0) and three travel speeds (5.16, 7.29, and 10.48 km h-1) were applied for the strategies used (Full Throttle and Shifted Up - Throttle Back), where Q0 is the traction force corresponding to the maximum power in the drawbar for each gear selected. Three repetitions were made, which totaled 108 experimental units (2 × 3 × 6 × 3), in a completely randomized experimental design. Shifted Up - Throttle Back mode should be used as a strategy of tractor driving, because it can save up to 29.39% of fuel in relation to the Full Throttle mode, typically used by users.
id UFCG-1_1d2cea60bafaffa142cd16fb1019abce
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1415-43662019000200144
network_acronym_str UFCG-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reduction of fuel consumption using driving strategy in agricultural tractorconcrete test trackload levelsenergy efficiencyABSTRACT During the acquisition and use of an agricultural tractor, the consumption of fuel by the engine must be taken into account by the user, considering its nonrenewable origin and the marketing price. Appropriate strategies in driving tractors can help users to reduce production costs. In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate the fuel consumption of an agricultural tractor using different driving strategies. Load levels were imposed, following the instructions from Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Code 2, using an instrumented dynamometer car, in a concrete test track. Six load levels (30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80% of Q0) and three travel speeds (5.16, 7.29, and 10.48 km h-1) were applied for the strategies used (Full Throttle and Shifted Up - Throttle Back), where Q0 is the traction force corresponding to the maximum power in the drawbar for each gear selected. Three repetitions were made, which totaled 108 experimental units (2 × 3 × 6 × 3), in a completely randomized experimental design. Shifted Up - Throttle Back mode should be used as a strategy of tractor driving, because it can save up to 29.39% of fuel in relation to the Full Throttle mode, typically used by users.Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG2019-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662019000200144Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.23 n.2 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)instacron:UFCG10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n2p144-149info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFarias,Marcelo S. deSchlosser,José F.Linares,PilarBertollo,Gilvan M.Martini,Alfran T.eng2019-02-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-43662019000200144Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbeaaPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||agriambi@agriambi.com.br1807-19291415-4366opendoar:2019-02-15T00:00Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reduction of fuel consumption using driving strategy in agricultural tractor
title Reduction of fuel consumption using driving strategy in agricultural tractor
spellingShingle Reduction of fuel consumption using driving strategy in agricultural tractor
Farias,Marcelo S. de
concrete test track
load levels
energy efficiency
title_short Reduction of fuel consumption using driving strategy in agricultural tractor
title_full Reduction of fuel consumption using driving strategy in agricultural tractor
title_fullStr Reduction of fuel consumption using driving strategy in agricultural tractor
title_full_unstemmed Reduction of fuel consumption using driving strategy in agricultural tractor
title_sort Reduction of fuel consumption using driving strategy in agricultural tractor
author Farias,Marcelo S. de
author_facet Farias,Marcelo S. de
Schlosser,José F.
Linares,Pilar
Bertollo,Gilvan M.
Martini,Alfran T.
author_role author
author2 Schlosser,José F.
Linares,Pilar
Bertollo,Gilvan M.
Martini,Alfran T.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Farias,Marcelo S. de
Schlosser,José F.
Linares,Pilar
Bertollo,Gilvan M.
Martini,Alfran T.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv concrete test track
load levels
energy efficiency
topic concrete test track
load levels
energy efficiency
description ABSTRACT During the acquisition and use of an agricultural tractor, the consumption of fuel by the engine must be taken into account by the user, considering its nonrenewable origin and the marketing price. Appropriate strategies in driving tractors can help users to reduce production costs. In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate the fuel consumption of an agricultural tractor using different driving strategies. Load levels were imposed, following the instructions from Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Code 2, using an instrumented dynamometer car, in a concrete test track. Six load levels (30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80% of Q0) and three travel speeds (5.16, 7.29, and 10.48 km h-1) were applied for the strategies used (Full Throttle and Shifted Up - Throttle Back), where Q0 is the traction force corresponding to the maximum power in the drawbar for each gear selected. Three repetitions were made, which totaled 108 experimental units (2 × 3 × 6 × 3), in a completely randomized experimental design. Shifted Up - Throttle Back mode should be used as a strategy of tractor driving, because it can save up to 29.39% of fuel in relation to the Full Throttle mode, typically used by users.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662019000200144
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662019000200144
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n2p144-149
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.23 n.2 2019
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
instacron:UFCG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
instacron_str UFCG
institution UFCG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||agriambi@agriambi.com.br
_version_ 1750297686494412800