Defoliation percentage in two soybean cultivars at different growth stages
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000600567 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic variables due to the effects of different levels of defoliation in the phenological phases of two soybean cultivars. The experiment was conducted during the 2011/2012 season, in a randomized block design with three replicates, in a 2 x 4 x 5 factorial scheme. Two cultivars were exposed to defoliations of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% at the stages of V4, V9, R3 and R5. The cultivar 'NK 7059RR' showed less sensitivity to defoliation than the cultivar 'IN 4990RG'. 25% defoliation levels reduced the yield of the cultivar 'IN 4990RG', while levels of 75 and 100% reduce the number of grains per pod in both cultivars. The defoliation performed in the V4 stage lead to lower grain yield than defoliation in V9. The most sensitive stages to defoliation are R3 and R5, where there is a greater reduction in the production potential of soybeans. |
id |
UFCG-1_640da86c9597aee07fd3bb1cfff83791 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1415-43662015000600567 |
network_acronym_str |
UFCG-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Defoliation percentage in two soybean cultivars at different growth stagesGlycine max L.yieldleaf area indicesABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic variables due to the effects of different levels of defoliation in the phenological phases of two soybean cultivars. The experiment was conducted during the 2011/2012 season, in a randomized block design with three replicates, in a 2 x 4 x 5 factorial scheme. Two cultivars were exposed to defoliations of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% at the stages of V4, V9, R3 and R5. The cultivar 'NK 7059RR' showed less sensitivity to defoliation than the cultivar 'IN 4990RG'. 25% defoliation levels reduced the yield of the cultivar 'IN 4990RG', while levels of 75 and 100% reduce the number of grains per pod in both cultivars. The defoliation performed in the V4 stage lead to lower grain yield than defoliation in V9. The most sensitive stages to defoliation are R3 and R5, where there is a greater reduction in the production potential of soybeans.Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000600567Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.19 n.6 2015reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)instacron:UFCG10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n6p567-573info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGlier,Cláudio A. da S.Duarte Júnior,José B.Fachin,Gabriel M.Costa,Antonio C. T. daGuimarães,Vandeir F.Mrozinski,Chrismam R.eng2015-07-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-43662015000600567Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbeaaPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||agriambi@agriambi.com.br1807-19291415-4366opendoar:2015-07-31T00:00Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Defoliation percentage in two soybean cultivars at different growth stages |
title |
Defoliation percentage in two soybean cultivars at different growth stages |
spellingShingle |
Defoliation percentage in two soybean cultivars at different growth stages Glier,Cláudio A. da S. Glycine max L. yield leaf area indices |
title_short |
Defoliation percentage in two soybean cultivars at different growth stages |
title_full |
Defoliation percentage in two soybean cultivars at different growth stages |
title_fullStr |
Defoliation percentage in two soybean cultivars at different growth stages |
title_full_unstemmed |
Defoliation percentage in two soybean cultivars at different growth stages |
title_sort |
Defoliation percentage in two soybean cultivars at different growth stages |
author |
Glier,Cláudio A. da S. |
author_facet |
Glier,Cláudio A. da S. Duarte Júnior,José B. Fachin,Gabriel M. Costa,Antonio C. T. da Guimarães,Vandeir F. Mrozinski,Chrismam R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Duarte Júnior,José B. Fachin,Gabriel M. Costa,Antonio C. T. da Guimarães,Vandeir F. Mrozinski,Chrismam R. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Glier,Cláudio A. da S. Duarte Júnior,José B. Fachin,Gabriel M. Costa,Antonio C. T. da Guimarães,Vandeir F. Mrozinski,Chrismam R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Glycine max L. yield leaf area indices |
topic |
Glycine max L. yield leaf area indices |
description |
ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic variables due to the effects of different levels of defoliation in the phenological phases of two soybean cultivars. The experiment was conducted during the 2011/2012 season, in a randomized block design with three replicates, in a 2 x 4 x 5 factorial scheme. Two cultivars were exposed to defoliations of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% at the stages of V4, V9, R3 and R5. The cultivar 'NK 7059RR' showed less sensitivity to defoliation than the cultivar 'IN 4990RG'. 25% defoliation levels reduced the yield of the cultivar 'IN 4990RG', while levels of 75 and 100% reduce the number of grains per pod in both cultivars. The defoliation performed in the V4 stage lead to lower grain yield than defoliation in V9. The most sensitive stages to defoliation are R3 and R5, where there is a greater reduction in the production potential of soybeans. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000600567 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000600567 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n6p567-573 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.19 n.6 2015 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) instacron:UFCG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) |
instacron_str |
UFCG |
institution |
UFCG |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||agriambi@agriambi.com.br |
_version_ |
1750297683727220736 |