Tillage systems and cover crops on soil physical properties after soybean cultivation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662016001201057 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Soil management alters soil physical attributes and may affect crop yield. In order to evaluate soil physical attributes in layers from 0 to 0.40 m and soybean grain yield, in the 2012/2013 agricultural year, an essay was installed in the experimental area of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS/CPCS). Soil tillage systems were: conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT) and no tillage (DS), the cover crops used were millet, sunn hemp and fallow. The experimental design was randomized blocks with split plots. For the layer of 0.20-0.30 m, millet provided the best results for soil bulk density, macro and microporosity. The resistance to penetration (RP) was influenced in the layer of 0-0.10 m, and millet provided lower RP. The DS provided the lowest RP values for the layer of 0.10-0.20 m. The treatments did not influence yield or thousand-seed weight. |
id |
UFCG-1_6b5216bd34f03cd3487853c3ae4bdf75 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1415-43662016001201057 |
network_acronym_str |
UFCG-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tillage systems and cover crops on soil physical properties after soybean cultivationsoil resistance to penetrationdirect sowingsoil densityABSTRACT Soil management alters soil physical attributes and may affect crop yield. In order to evaluate soil physical attributes in layers from 0 to 0.40 m and soybean grain yield, in the 2012/2013 agricultural year, an essay was installed in the experimental area of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS/CPCS). Soil tillage systems were: conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT) and no tillage (DS), the cover crops used were millet, sunn hemp and fallow. The experimental design was randomized blocks with split plots. For the layer of 0.20-0.30 m, millet provided the best results for soil bulk density, macro and microporosity. The resistance to penetration (RP) was influenced in the layer of 0-0.10 m, and millet provided lower RP. The DS provided the lowest RP values for the layer of 0.10-0.20 m. The treatments did not influence yield or thousand-seed weight.Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662016001201057Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.20 n.12 2016reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)instacron:UFCG10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v20n12p1057-1061info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira,Rafael B.Borges,Monica C. R. Z.Roque,Cassiano G.Oliveira,Marcela P.eng2016-11-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-43662016001201057Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbeaaPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||agriambi@agriambi.com.br1807-19291415-4366opendoar:2016-11-29T00:00Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tillage systems and cover crops on soil physical properties after soybean cultivation |
title |
Tillage systems and cover crops on soil physical properties after soybean cultivation |
spellingShingle |
Tillage systems and cover crops on soil physical properties after soybean cultivation Teixeira,Rafael B. soil resistance to penetration direct sowing soil density |
title_short |
Tillage systems and cover crops on soil physical properties after soybean cultivation |
title_full |
Tillage systems and cover crops on soil physical properties after soybean cultivation |
title_fullStr |
Tillage systems and cover crops on soil physical properties after soybean cultivation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tillage systems and cover crops on soil physical properties after soybean cultivation |
title_sort |
Tillage systems and cover crops on soil physical properties after soybean cultivation |
author |
Teixeira,Rafael B. |
author_facet |
Teixeira,Rafael B. Borges,Monica C. R. Z. Roque,Cassiano G. Oliveira,Marcela P. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Borges,Monica C. R. Z. Roque,Cassiano G. Oliveira,Marcela P. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira,Rafael B. Borges,Monica C. R. Z. Roque,Cassiano G. Oliveira,Marcela P. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
soil resistance to penetration direct sowing soil density |
topic |
soil resistance to penetration direct sowing soil density |
description |
ABSTRACT Soil management alters soil physical attributes and may affect crop yield. In order to evaluate soil physical attributes in layers from 0 to 0.40 m and soybean grain yield, in the 2012/2013 agricultural year, an essay was installed in the experimental area of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS/CPCS). Soil tillage systems were: conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT) and no tillage (DS), the cover crops used were millet, sunn hemp and fallow. The experimental design was randomized blocks with split plots. For the layer of 0.20-0.30 m, millet provided the best results for soil bulk density, macro and microporosity. The resistance to penetration (RP) was influenced in the layer of 0-0.10 m, and millet provided lower RP. The DS provided the lowest RP values for the layer of 0.10-0.20 m. The treatments did not influence yield or thousand-seed weight. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662016001201057 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662016001201057 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v20n12p1057-1061 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.20 n.12 2016 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) instacron:UFCG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) |
instacron_str |
UFCG |
institution |
UFCG |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||agriambi@agriambi.com.br |
_version_ |
1750297685129166848 |