Performance of drippers in two filtering systems using sewage treatment effluent
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000600363 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of three models of drippers using treated sewage effluent, pure and diluted, and two types of filters, screen and disc. The treated sewage effluent used in the experiment was collected from the city’s treatment plant. The experiment included 12 lateral lines with three types of emitters to apply pure (100%) and diluted (50%) effluent filtered by screen and disc filters. The combination of those factors set the treatments: T1 (50% effluent diluted in fresh water filtered by a screen filter); T2 (50% effluent diluted in fresh water filtered by a disc filter); T3 (pure effluent filtered by a screen filter); T4 (pure effluent filtered by a disc filter). The results showed that the flat type emitter is less sensitive to clogging, the disc filter is the most suitable to prevent clogging and the use of pure or diluted sewage effluent increases the drippers’ flow rate coefficient of variation. |
id |
UFCG-1_6ba2385e3da27124dbf42601203e7f5f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1415-43662017000600363 |
network_acronym_str |
UFCG-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Performance of drippers in two filtering systems using sewage treatment effluentwastewateremittersfilterreuseirrigationABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of three models of drippers using treated sewage effluent, pure and diluted, and two types of filters, screen and disc. The treated sewage effluent used in the experiment was collected from the city’s treatment plant. The experiment included 12 lateral lines with three types of emitters to apply pure (100%) and diluted (50%) effluent filtered by screen and disc filters. The combination of those factors set the treatments: T1 (50% effluent diluted in fresh water filtered by a screen filter); T2 (50% effluent diluted in fresh water filtered by a disc filter); T3 (pure effluent filtered by a screen filter); T4 (pure effluent filtered by a disc filter). The results showed that the flat type emitter is less sensitive to clogging, the disc filter is the most suitable to prevent clogging and the use of pure or diluted sewage effluent increases the drippers’ flow rate coefficient of variation.Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000600363Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.21 n.6 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)instacron:UFCG10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v21n6p363-368info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDalri,Alexandre B.Santos,Gilmar O.Dantas,Geffson de F.Faria,Rogério T. deZanini,José R.Palaretti,Luiz F.eng2017-05-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-43662017000600363Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbeaaPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||agriambi@agriambi.com.br1807-19291415-4366opendoar:2017-05-17T00:00Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Performance of drippers in two filtering systems using sewage treatment effluent |
title |
Performance of drippers in two filtering systems using sewage treatment effluent |
spellingShingle |
Performance of drippers in two filtering systems using sewage treatment effluent Dalri,Alexandre B. wastewater emitters filter reuse irrigation |
title_short |
Performance of drippers in two filtering systems using sewage treatment effluent |
title_full |
Performance of drippers in two filtering systems using sewage treatment effluent |
title_fullStr |
Performance of drippers in two filtering systems using sewage treatment effluent |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of drippers in two filtering systems using sewage treatment effluent |
title_sort |
Performance of drippers in two filtering systems using sewage treatment effluent |
author |
Dalri,Alexandre B. |
author_facet |
Dalri,Alexandre B. Santos,Gilmar O. Dantas,Geffson de F. Faria,Rogério T. de Zanini,José R. Palaretti,Luiz F. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos,Gilmar O. Dantas,Geffson de F. Faria,Rogério T. de Zanini,José R. Palaretti,Luiz F. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dalri,Alexandre B. Santos,Gilmar O. Dantas,Geffson de F. Faria,Rogério T. de Zanini,José R. Palaretti,Luiz F. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
wastewater emitters filter reuse irrigation |
topic |
wastewater emitters filter reuse irrigation |
description |
ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of three models of drippers using treated sewage effluent, pure and diluted, and two types of filters, screen and disc. The treated sewage effluent used in the experiment was collected from the city’s treatment plant. The experiment included 12 lateral lines with three types of emitters to apply pure (100%) and diluted (50%) effluent filtered by screen and disc filters. The combination of those factors set the treatments: T1 (50% effluent diluted in fresh water filtered by a screen filter); T2 (50% effluent diluted in fresh water filtered by a disc filter); T3 (pure effluent filtered by a screen filter); T4 (pure effluent filtered by a disc filter). The results showed that the flat type emitter is less sensitive to clogging, the disc filter is the most suitable to prevent clogging and the use of pure or diluted sewage effluent increases the drippers’ flow rate coefficient of variation. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000600363 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000600363 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v21n6p363-368 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.21 n.6 2017 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) instacron:UFCG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) |
instacron_str |
UFCG |
institution |
UFCG |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||agriambi@agriambi.com.br |
_version_ |
1750297685517139968 |