Comparison of methodologies for automatic generation of limits and drainage networks for hidrographic basins
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662009000400001 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to compare methodologies for the automatic generation of limits and drainage networks, using a geographical information system for basins of low relief variation, such as the Dourados catchment area. Various data/processes were assessed, especially the ArcHydro and AVSWAT interfaces used to process 50 m resolution DTMs formed from the interpolation of digitalized contour lines using ArcInfo, ArcView and Spring GIS, and a 90 m resolution SRTM DTM acquired by interferometry radar. Their accuracy was estimated based upon the pre-processing of small basic sub-basin units of different relief variations, before applying the best combinations to the entire Dourados basin. The accuracy of the automatic stream network generation and watershed delineation depends essentially on the quality of the raw digital terrain model. The selection of the most suitable one then depends completely on the aims of the user and on the work scale. |
id |
UFCG-1_c1e8c946f184ee5e639ecfaa4a02c612 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1415-43662009000400001 |
network_acronym_str |
UFCG-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of methodologies for automatic generation of limits and drainage networks for hidrographic basinswatershedcatchmentgeographic information systemsThe objective of this work was to compare methodologies for the automatic generation of limits and drainage networks, using a geographical information system for basins of low relief variation, such as the Dourados catchment area. Various data/processes were assessed, especially the ArcHydro and AVSWAT interfaces used to process 50 m resolution DTMs formed from the interpolation of digitalized contour lines using ArcInfo, ArcView and Spring GIS, and a 90 m resolution SRTM DTM acquired by interferometry radar. Their accuracy was estimated based upon the pre-processing of small basic sub-basin units of different relief variations, before applying the best combinations to the entire Dourados basin. The accuracy of the automatic stream network generation and watershed delineation depends essentially on the quality of the raw digital terrain model. The selection of the most suitable one then depends completely on the aims of the user and on the work scale.Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG2009-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662009000400001Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.13 n.4 2009reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)instacron:UFCG10.1590/S1415-43662009000400001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlcaraz,Samantha A.Sannier,ChristopheVitorino,Antonio C. T.Daniel,Omareng2009-07-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-43662009000400001Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbeaaPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||agriambi@agriambi.com.br1807-19291415-4366opendoar:2009-07-06T00:00Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of methodologies for automatic generation of limits and drainage networks for hidrographic basins |
title |
Comparison of methodologies for automatic generation of limits and drainage networks for hidrographic basins |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of methodologies for automatic generation of limits and drainage networks for hidrographic basins Alcaraz,Samantha A. watershed catchment geographic information systems |
title_short |
Comparison of methodologies for automatic generation of limits and drainage networks for hidrographic basins |
title_full |
Comparison of methodologies for automatic generation of limits and drainage networks for hidrographic basins |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of methodologies for automatic generation of limits and drainage networks for hidrographic basins |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of methodologies for automatic generation of limits and drainage networks for hidrographic basins |
title_sort |
Comparison of methodologies for automatic generation of limits and drainage networks for hidrographic basins |
author |
Alcaraz,Samantha A. |
author_facet |
Alcaraz,Samantha A. Sannier,Christophe Vitorino,Antonio C. T. Daniel,Omar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sannier,Christophe Vitorino,Antonio C. T. Daniel,Omar |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alcaraz,Samantha A. Sannier,Christophe Vitorino,Antonio C. T. Daniel,Omar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
watershed catchment geographic information systems |
topic |
watershed catchment geographic information systems |
description |
The objective of this work was to compare methodologies for the automatic generation of limits and drainage networks, using a geographical information system for basins of low relief variation, such as the Dourados catchment area. Various data/processes were assessed, especially the ArcHydro and AVSWAT interfaces used to process 50 m resolution DTMs formed from the interpolation of digitalized contour lines using ArcInfo, ArcView and Spring GIS, and a 90 m resolution SRTM DTM acquired by interferometry radar. Their accuracy was estimated based upon the pre-processing of small basic sub-basin units of different relief variations, before applying the best combinations to the entire Dourados basin. The accuracy of the automatic stream network generation and watershed delineation depends essentially on the quality of the raw digital terrain model. The selection of the most suitable one then depends completely on the aims of the user and on the work scale. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662009000400001 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662009000400001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1415-43662009000400001 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.13 n.4 2009 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) instacron:UFCG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) |
instacron_str |
UFCG |
institution |
UFCG |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||agriambi@agriambi.com.br |
_version_ |
1750297679091466240 |