DECREASED CARDIAC OUTPUT RISK: characterization of proposal of nursing diagnosis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Renata Pereira de Melo
Data de Publicação: 2008
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
Texto Completo: http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=2595
Resumo: The study looked to characterize a proposal for the nursing diagnosis of âRisk of Decreased Cardiac Outputâ, based on the judgement of 25 specialists. It was carried out in the period of September of 2007 to April of 2008, in two methodological stages: a) Elaboration of the proposal of the nursing diagnosis of Risk of Decreased Cardiac Output, according to NANDA, and the operational definition for each risk factor; b) Validation of the concept, of the risk factors and the operational definitions. For so, it was used the Diagnostic Content Validation model proposed by Fehring and the Delphi technique. All the specialists were selected based on Fehringâs criteria. Data was collected at two moments, from questionnaires. The quantitative analysis disposed of the calculation of the weighted mean of the value attributed by specialist to each risk factor, being: 1 (it does not cause vulnerability) = 0; 2 (it causes very little vulnerability) = 0,25; 3 (it causes moderate vulnerability) = 0,5; 4 (it causes very much vulnerability) = 0,75; and 5 (it completely causes vulnerability) = 1. Based on this calculation, the risk factors with score below the established cutoff point of 0,6 were discarded. For the evaluation of the items related to the operational definition (Clarity, Adequacy to the risk factor and Adequacy to the remaining proposed terms) the values were tabulated (+1, 0 and -1) and the mean calculated, in order to check the level of agreement/disagreement between the specialists. There was still calculated the Index of Content Validity, which indicates the confidence of the application of the diagnosis in practice. It was considered the explanation of the objectives to the participants, their declared consent in allowing the collection and supplying the solicited data, their freedom to refuse or give up from participating in any phase of the research process without prejudice of any kind to them, to ask for clarification as well as their right to anonymity. As result, was obtained the understanding that the label proposed is representative of a nursing diagnosis, to which the concept corresponded, in adequacy to the structure used by NANDA: âTo be in risk of developing a level of health characterized by insufficient quantity of blood pumped each minute by the heart to fulfill the physical metabolic demandsâ. Were considered representative risk factor for this phenomenon (≥ 0,6), according to the specialists judgement: myocardial dysfunction (0,887), blood loss (0,875), intrapericardial pressure increase (0,825), condition that causes alteration in the rhythm and/or electric cardiac driving (0,812), defective volume of liquids (0,725), plasma loss (0,712), ineffective tissular perfusion (0,712), electrolytic unbalance (0,7), acid-base unbalance (0,697), valve alteration (0,65), major surgery (0,65) and general deep anaesthesia/spinal anaesthesia (0,625), obtaining a Index of Content Validity of 0,739. With this proposal, it was provided the characterization of this phenomenon, as a form to orientate the process of clinical judgement, making possible a preventive act, as a way to avoid the development of the real entity and of his complications. However, because of the peculiarity of this study and the relevance of its finds, itâs essential the replication of the 10 risk factors (22%) that were located between the cutoff points of 0,5 and 0,59, as well as new submissions of the data to the specialists to obtain the consensus, and the realization of a study of clinical validation, in order to obtain evidences about the incident of this phenomenon in nursesâ practice
id UFC_00ea20bc4c18f5980b2f1b0c2c8ea9e8
oai_identifier_str oai:www.teses.ufc.br:2322
network_acronym_str UFC
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
spelling info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisDECREASED CARDIAC OUTPUT RISK: characterization of proposal of nursing diagnosisRisco para dÃbito cardÃaco diminuÃdo: caracterizaÃÃo de proposta de diagnÃstico de enfermagem2008-08-29Marcos VenÃcios de Oliveira Lopes67729410397Thelma Leite de AraÃjo02245477804Ana Ruth MacÃdo Monteiro28926048349http://lattes.cnpq.br/7807421121458701 Lucia de Fatima da Silva12102919999993235895353http://lattes.cnpq.br/4750426992822806Renata Pereira de MeloUniversidade Federal do CearÃPrograma de PÃs-GraduaÃÃo em EnfermagemUFCBRcardiac output nursing diagnosis validation studiesENFERMAGEMThe study looked to characterize a proposal for the nursing diagnosis of âRisk of Decreased Cardiac Outputâ, based on the judgement of 25 specialists. It was carried out in the period of September of 2007 to April of 2008, in two methodological stages: a) Elaboration of the proposal of the nursing diagnosis of Risk of Decreased Cardiac Output, according to NANDA, and the operational definition for each risk factor; b) Validation of the concept, of the risk factors and the operational definitions. For so, it was used the Diagnostic Content Validation model proposed by Fehring and the Delphi technique. All the specialists were selected based on Fehringâs criteria. Data was collected at two moments, from questionnaires. The quantitative analysis disposed of the calculation of the weighted mean of the value attributed by specialist to each risk factor, being: 1 (it does not cause vulnerability) = 0; 2 (it causes very little vulnerability) = 0,25; 3 (it causes moderate vulnerability) = 0,5; 4 (it causes very much vulnerability) = 0,75; and 5 (it completely causes vulnerability) = 1. Based on this calculation, the risk factors with score below the established cutoff point of 0,6 were discarded. For the evaluation of the items related to the operational definition (Clarity, Adequacy to the risk factor and Adequacy to the remaining proposed terms) the values were tabulated (+1, 0 and -1) and the mean calculated, in order to check the level of agreement/disagreement between the specialists. There was still calculated the Index of Content Validity, which indicates the confidence of the application of the diagnosis in practice. It was considered the explanation of the objectives to the participants, their declared consent in allowing the collection and supplying the solicited data, their freedom to refuse or give up from participating in any phase of the research process without prejudice of any kind to them, to ask for clarification as well as their right to anonymity. As result, was obtained the understanding that the label proposed is representative of a nursing diagnosis, to which the concept corresponded, in adequacy to the structure used by NANDA: âTo be in risk of developing a level of health characterized by insufficient quantity of blood pumped each minute by the heart to fulfill the physical metabolic demandsâ. Were considered representative risk factor for this phenomenon (≥ 0,6), according to the specialists judgement: myocardial dysfunction (0,887), blood loss (0,875), intrapericardial pressure increase (0,825), condition that causes alteration in the rhythm and/or electric cardiac driving (0,812), defective volume of liquids (0,725), plasma loss (0,712), ineffective tissular perfusion (0,712), electrolytic unbalance (0,7), acid-base unbalance (0,697), valve alteration (0,65), major surgery (0,65) and general deep anaesthesia/spinal anaesthesia (0,625), obtaining a Index of Content Validity of 0,739. With this proposal, it was provided the characterization of this phenomenon, as a form to orientate the process of clinical judgement, making possible a preventive act, as a way to avoid the development of the real entity and of his complications. However, because of the peculiarity of this study and the relevance of its finds, itâs essential the replication of the 10 risk factors (22%) that were located between the cutoff points of 0,5 and 0,59, as well as new submissions of the data to the specialists to obtain the consensus, and the realization of a study of clinical validation, in order to obtain evidences about the incident of this phenomenon in nursesâ practiceO estudo buscou caracterizar proposta para o diagnÃstico de enfermagem Risco para DÃbito CardÃaco diminuÃdo, com base no juÃzo de 25 especialistas. Foi realizado no perÃodo de setembro de 2007 a abril de 2008, em duas etapas metodolÃgicas: a) ElaboraÃÃo da proposta do diagnÃstico de enfermagem Risco para DÃbito CardÃaco diminuÃdo, de acordo com a NANDA, e da definiÃÃo operacional para cada fator de risco; b) ValidaÃÃo do construto, dos fatores de risco e das definiÃÃes operacionais. Para tanto, utilizou o modelo de ValidaÃÃo de ConteÃdo DiagnÃstico de Fehring e a tÃcnica Delphi. Todos os especialistas foram selecionados com base nos critÃrios de Fehring. Os dados foram coletados em dois momentos, por meio de questionÃrio. Jà a anÃlise quantitativa empregou a mÃdia ponderada do valor atribuÃdo por especialista a cada fator de risco, sendo: 1 (nÃo causador de vulnerabilidade) = 0; 2 (pouco causador de vulnerabilidade) = 0,25; 3 (moderadamente causador de vulnerabilidade) = 0,5; 4 (muito causador de vulnerabilidade) = 0,75; e 5 (totalmente causador de vulnerabilidade) = 1. Com base nesse cÃlculo, descartaram-se os fatores de risco com escore abaixo do ponto de corte estabelecido de 0,6. Para a avaliaÃÃo dos itens relacionados à definiÃÃo operacional (Clareza, AdequaÃÃo ao fator de risco e AdequaÃÃo aos demais termos propostos) seus valores foram tabulados (+1, 0 e -1) e a mÃdia calculada, com vistas a verificar o nÃvel de concordÃncia/discordÃncia entre os especialistas. Calculou-se ainda o Ãndice de Validade de ConteÃdo, o qual indica a confianÃa da aplicaÃÃo do diagnÃstico na prÃtica. Considerou-se o esclarecimento dos objetivos e da metodologia aos participantes, o consentimento declarado destes em permitir a coleta e fornecer os dados solicitados, a sua liberdade para recusar ou desistir de participar em qualquer fase do processo de pesquisa sem prejuÃzo de qualquer natureza à sua pessoa, assim como para solicitar esclarecimentos e o seu direito ao anonimato. Como resultado, obteve-se a compreensÃo do rÃtulo proposto como representativo de um diagnÃstico de enfermagem, para o qual prevaleceu o construto: âEstar em risco de desenvolver um estado de saÃde caracterizado por quantidade insuficiente de sangue bombeado pelo coraÃÃo a cada minuto para atender Ãs demandas metabÃlicas corporaisâ. Foram considerados fatores de risco representativos deste fenÃmeno (≥ 0,6), segundo o juÃzo dos especialistas: disfunÃÃo miocÃrdica (0,887), perda sangÃÃnea (0,875), aumento da pressÃo intrapericÃrdica (0,825), condiÃÃo que causa alteraÃÃo no ritmo e/ou conduÃÃo elÃtrica cardÃaca (0,812), Volume de LÃquidos deficiente (0,725), perda plasmÃtica (0,712), PerfusÃo Tissular ineficaz (0,712), desequilÃbrio eletrolÃtico (0,7), desequilÃbrio acidobÃsico (0,697), alteraÃÃo valvar (0,65), grandes cirurgias (0,65) e anestesia geral profunda/ anestesia espinhal (0,625), obtendo-se um Ãndice de Validade de ConteÃdo de 0,739. Com esta proposta, propiciou-se a caracterizaÃÃo deste fenÃmeno, como forma de orientar o processo de julgamento clÃnico, possibilitando uma atuaÃÃo de cunho preventivo, de modo a evitar o desenvolvimento da entidade real e das suas complicaÃÃes. No entanto, em virtude da sua singularidade e da relevÃncia dos seus achados, à imprescindÃvel a replicaÃÃo dos 10 fatores de risco (22%) situados entre os pontos de corte de 0,5 e 0,59, assim como novas submissÃes dos dados aos especialistas para a obtenÃÃo do consenso e a realizaÃÃo de estudo de validaÃÃo clÃnica, a fim de obter evidÃncias acerca da ocorrÃncia desse fenÃmeno na prÃtica dos enfermeirosCoordenaÃÃo de AperfeiÃoamento de Pessoal de NÃvel Superiorhttp://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=2595application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFCinstname:Universidade Federal do Cearáinstacron:UFC2019-01-21T11:15:40Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv DECREASED CARDIAC OUTPUT RISK: characterization of proposal of nursing diagnosis
dc.title.alternative.pt.fl_str_mv Risco para dÃbito cardÃaco diminuÃdo: caracterizaÃÃo de proposta de diagnÃstico de enfermagem
title DECREASED CARDIAC OUTPUT RISK: characterization of proposal of nursing diagnosis
spellingShingle DECREASED CARDIAC OUTPUT RISK: characterization of proposal of nursing diagnosis
Renata Pereira de Melo
cardiac output
nursing diagnosis
validation studies
ENFERMAGEM
title_short DECREASED CARDIAC OUTPUT RISK: characterization of proposal of nursing diagnosis
title_full DECREASED CARDIAC OUTPUT RISK: characterization of proposal of nursing diagnosis
title_fullStr DECREASED CARDIAC OUTPUT RISK: characterization of proposal of nursing diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed DECREASED CARDIAC OUTPUT RISK: characterization of proposal of nursing diagnosis
title_sort DECREASED CARDIAC OUTPUT RISK: characterization of proposal of nursing diagnosis
author Renata Pereira de Melo
author_facet Renata Pereira de Melo
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Marcos VenÃcios de Oliveira Lopes
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv 67729410397
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Thelma Leite de AraÃjo
dc.contributor.referee1ID.fl_str_mv 02245477804
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Ana Ruth MacÃdo Monteiro
dc.contributor.referee2ID.fl_str_mv 28926048349
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7807421121458701
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Lucia de Fatima da Silva
dc.contributor.referee3ID.fl_str_mv 121029199999
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 93235895353
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4750426992822806
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Renata Pereira de Melo
contributor_str_mv Marcos VenÃcios de Oliveira Lopes
Thelma Leite de AraÃjo
Ana Ruth MacÃdo Monteiro
Lucia de Fatima da Silva
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv cardiac output
nursing diagnosis
validation studies
topic cardiac output
nursing diagnosis
validation studies
ENFERMAGEM
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv ENFERMAGEM
dc.description.sponsorship.fl_txt_mv CoordenaÃÃo de AperfeiÃoamento de Pessoal de NÃvel Superior
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv The study looked to characterize a proposal for the nursing diagnosis of âRisk of Decreased Cardiac Outputâ, based on the judgement of 25 specialists. It was carried out in the period of September of 2007 to April of 2008, in two methodological stages: a) Elaboration of the proposal of the nursing diagnosis of Risk of Decreased Cardiac Output, according to NANDA, and the operational definition for each risk factor; b) Validation of the concept, of the risk factors and the operational definitions. For so, it was used the Diagnostic Content Validation model proposed by Fehring and the Delphi technique. All the specialists were selected based on Fehringâs criteria. Data was collected at two moments, from questionnaires. The quantitative analysis disposed of the calculation of the weighted mean of the value attributed by specialist to each risk factor, being: 1 (it does not cause vulnerability) = 0; 2 (it causes very little vulnerability) = 0,25; 3 (it causes moderate vulnerability) = 0,5; 4 (it causes very much vulnerability) = 0,75; and 5 (it completely causes vulnerability) = 1. Based on this calculation, the risk factors with score below the established cutoff point of 0,6 were discarded. For the evaluation of the items related to the operational definition (Clarity, Adequacy to the risk factor and Adequacy to the remaining proposed terms) the values were tabulated (+1, 0 and -1) and the mean calculated, in order to check the level of agreement/disagreement between the specialists. There was still calculated the Index of Content Validity, which indicates the confidence of the application of the diagnosis in practice. It was considered the explanation of the objectives to the participants, their declared consent in allowing the collection and supplying the solicited data, their freedom to refuse or give up from participating in any phase of the research process without prejudice of any kind to them, to ask for clarification as well as their right to anonymity. As result, was obtained the understanding that the label proposed is representative of a nursing diagnosis, to which the concept corresponded, in adequacy to the structure used by NANDA: âTo be in risk of developing a level of health characterized by insufficient quantity of blood pumped each minute by the heart to fulfill the physical metabolic demandsâ. Were considered representative risk factor for this phenomenon (≥ 0,6), according to the specialists judgement: myocardial dysfunction (0,887), blood loss (0,875), intrapericardial pressure increase (0,825), condition that causes alteration in the rhythm and/or electric cardiac driving (0,812), defective volume of liquids (0,725), plasma loss (0,712), ineffective tissular perfusion (0,712), electrolytic unbalance (0,7), acid-base unbalance (0,697), valve alteration (0,65), major surgery (0,65) and general deep anaesthesia/spinal anaesthesia (0,625), obtaining a Index of Content Validity of 0,739. With this proposal, it was provided the characterization of this phenomenon, as a form to orientate the process of clinical judgement, making possible a preventive act, as a way to avoid the development of the real entity and of his complications. However, because of the peculiarity of this study and the relevance of its finds, itâs essential the replication of the 10 risk factors (22%) that were located between the cutoff points of 0,5 and 0,59, as well as new submissions of the data to the specialists to obtain the consensus, and the realization of a study of clinical validation, in order to obtain evidences about the incident of this phenomenon in nursesâ practice
O estudo buscou caracterizar proposta para o diagnÃstico de enfermagem Risco para DÃbito CardÃaco diminuÃdo, com base no juÃzo de 25 especialistas. Foi realizado no perÃodo de setembro de 2007 a abril de 2008, em duas etapas metodolÃgicas: a) ElaboraÃÃo da proposta do diagnÃstico de enfermagem Risco para DÃbito CardÃaco diminuÃdo, de acordo com a NANDA, e da definiÃÃo operacional para cada fator de risco; b) ValidaÃÃo do construto, dos fatores de risco e das definiÃÃes operacionais. Para tanto, utilizou o modelo de ValidaÃÃo de ConteÃdo DiagnÃstico de Fehring e a tÃcnica Delphi. Todos os especialistas foram selecionados com base nos critÃrios de Fehring. Os dados foram coletados em dois momentos, por meio de questionÃrio. Jà a anÃlise quantitativa empregou a mÃdia ponderada do valor atribuÃdo por especialista a cada fator de risco, sendo: 1 (nÃo causador de vulnerabilidade) = 0; 2 (pouco causador de vulnerabilidade) = 0,25; 3 (moderadamente causador de vulnerabilidade) = 0,5; 4 (muito causador de vulnerabilidade) = 0,75; e 5 (totalmente causador de vulnerabilidade) = 1. Com base nesse cÃlculo, descartaram-se os fatores de risco com escore abaixo do ponto de corte estabelecido de 0,6. Para a avaliaÃÃo dos itens relacionados à definiÃÃo operacional (Clareza, AdequaÃÃo ao fator de risco e AdequaÃÃo aos demais termos propostos) seus valores foram tabulados (+1, 0 e -1) e a mÃdia calculada, com vistas a verificar o nÃvel de concordÃncia/discordÃncia entre os especialistas. Calculou-se ainda o Ãndice de Validade de ConteÃdo, o qual indica a confianÃa da aplicaÃÃo do diagnÃstico na prÃtica. Considerou-se o esclarecimento dos objetivos e da metodologia aos participantes, o consentimento declarado destes em permitir a coleta e fornecer os dados solicitados, a sua liberdade para recusar ou desistir de participar em qualquer fase do processo de pesquisa sem prejuÃzo de qualquer natureza à sua pessoa, assim como para solicitar esclarecimentos e o seu direito ao anonimato. Como resultado, obteve-se a compreensÃo do rÃtulo proposto como representativo de um diagnÃstico de enfermagem, para o qual prevaleceu o construto: âEstar em risco de desenvolver um estado de saÃde caracterizado por quantidade insuficiente de sangue bombeado pelo coraÃÃo a cada minuto para atender Ãs demandas metabÃlicas corporaisâ. Foram considerados fatores de risco representativos deste fenÃmeno (≥ 0,6), segundo o juÃzo dos especialistas: disfunÃÃo miocÃrdica (0,887), perda sangÃÃnea (0,875), aumento da pressÃo intrapericÃrdica (0,825), condiÃÃo que causa alteraÃÃo no ritmo e/ou conduÃÃo elÃtrica cardÃaca (0,812), Volume de LÃquidos deficiente (0,725), perda plasmÃtica (0,712), PerfusÃo Tissular ineficaz (0,712), desequilÃbrio eletrolÃtico (0,7), desequilÃbrio acidobÃsico (0,697), alteraÃÃo valvar (0,65), grandes cirurgias (0,65) e anestesia geral profunda/ anestesia espinhal (0,625), obtendo-se um Ãndice de Validade de ConteÃdo de 0,739. Com esta proposta, propiciou-se a caracterizaÃÃo deste fenÃmeno, como forma de orientar o processo de julgamento clÃnico, possibilitando uma atuaÃÃo de cunho preventivo, de modo a evitar o desenvolvimento da entidade real e das suas complicaÃÃes. No entanto, em virtude da sua singularidade e da relevÃncia dos seus achados, à imprescindÃvel a replicaÃÃo dos 10 fatores de risco (22%) situados entre os pontos de corte de 0,5 e 0,59, assim como novas submissÃes dos dados aos especialistas para a obtenÃÃo do consenso e a realizaÃÃo de estudo de validaÃÃo clÃnica, a fim de obter evidÃncias acerca da ocorrÃncia desse fenÃmeno na prÃtica dos enfermeiros
description The study looked to characterize a proposal for the nursing diagnosis of âRisk of Decreased Cardiac Outputâ, based on the judgement of 25 specialists. It was carried out in the period of September of 2007 to April of 2008, in two methodological stages: a) Elaboration of the proposal of the nursing diagnosis of Risk of Decreased Cardiac Output, according to NANDA, and the operational definition for each risk factor; b) Validation of the concept, of the risk factors and the operational definitions. For so, it was used the Diagnostic Content Validation model proposed by Fehring and the Delphi technique. All the specialists were selected based on Fehringâs criteria. Data was collected at two moments, from questionnaires. The quantitative analysis disposed of the calculation of the weighted mean of the value attributed by specialist to each risk factor, being: 1 (it does not cause vulnerability) = 0; 2 (it causes very little vulnerability) = 0,25; 3 (it causes moderate vulnerability) = 0,5; 4 (it causes very much vulnerability) = 0,75; and 5 (it completely causes vulnerability) = 1. Based on this calculation, the risk factors with score below the established cutoff point of 0,6 were discarded. For the evaluation of the items related to the operational definition (Clarity, Adequacy to the risk factor and Adequacy to the remaining proposed terms) the values were tabulated (+1, 0 and -1) and the mean calculated, in order to check the level of agreement/disagreement between the specialists. There was still calculated the Index of Content Validity, which indicates the confidence of the application of the diagnosis in practice. It was considered the explanation of the objectives to the participants, their declared consent in allowing the collection and supplying the solicited data, their freedom to refuse or give up from participating in any phase of the research process without prejudice of any kind to them, to ask for clarification as well as their right to anonymity. As result, was obtained the understanding that the label proposed is representative of a nursing diagnosis, to which the concept corresponded, in adequacy to the structure used by NANDA: âTo be in risk of developing a level of health characterized by insufficient quantity of blood pumped each minute by the heart to fulfill the physical metabolic demandsâ. Were considered representative risk factor for this phenomenon (≥ 0,6), according to the specialists judgement: myocardial dysfunction (0,887), blood loss (0,875), intrapericardial pressure increase (0,825), condition that causes alteration in the rhythm and/or electric cardiac driving (0,812), defective volume of liquids (0,725), plasma loss (0,712), ineffective tissular perfusion (0,712), electrolytic unbalance (0,7), acid-base unbalance (0,697), valve alteration (0,65), major surgery (0,65) and general deep anaesthesia/spinal anaesthesia (0,625), obtaining a Index of Content Validity of 0,739. With this proposal, it was provided the characterization of this phenomenon, as a form to orientate the process of clinical judgement, making possible a preventive act, as a way to avoid the development of the real entity and of his complications. However, because of the peculiarity of this study and the relevance of its finds, itâs essential the replication of the 10 risk factors (22%) that were located between the cutoff points of 0,5 and 0,59, as well as new submissions of the data to the specialists to obtain the consensus, and the realization of a study of clinical validation, in order to obtain evidences about the incident of this phenomenon in nursesâ practice
publishDate 2008
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2008-08-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=2595
url http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=2595
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do CearÃ
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de PÃs-GraduaÃÃo em Enfermagem
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFC
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do CearÃ
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará
instacron:UFC
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1643295126361997312