Toxicity of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.: Meliaceae) for Apis mellifera and its beekeeping importance in caatinga and coastal vegatations of CearÃ.

• Autor(a) principal: Josà Everton Alves
• Data de Publicação: 2010
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
• Texto Completo: http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=7390
• topic: Azadirachta indica; nim indiano; Apis mellifera; toxicidade; flora apÃcola; Azadirachta indica; neem; Apis mellifera; Ttxicity; flowers for beekeeping; ZOOTECNIA

Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.: Meliaceae) is a plant species originating in India introduced to Brazil mainly due to its insecticidal properties. However, the effect of such insecticidal properties on floral visitors, wild or reared, is not known. This study aimed to evaluate the toxicity of this plant species to Apis mellifera and its importance as a source of pollen and nectar for beekeeping. Experiments on the neem floral biology, floral visitors, A. mellifera colony development in areas with and without neem in the caatnga a coastal vegetations and larval and adult survivalship when fed with pollen or nectar of neem in controlled environment were carried out in the bee labs of the Universidade Federal do Cearà - UFC, Universidade Estadual Vale do Acaraà - UVA and private properties in the state of CearÃ, Brazil. Results showed that all neem individuals studied bore bissexual flowers, with anthesis occurring around 16:00h and most flower buds presenting receptive stigmas and releasing pollen, though still unviable, 24h before anthesis. The highest pollen viability was observed at anthesis. Flowers of A. indica produced nectar in diminute amounts that did not allow sampling with capilars. Apis mellifera workers were the only floral visitors registered showing higher frequency early in the morning, when searching for pollen and nectar, and pollinating neem flowers. The wind played no role in neem pollination. Results also showed that honeybee colonies placed in the area with neem produced significantly (p<0.05) larger brood area than those palcedwhere neem was absent, both in caatinga and coastal vegetations. This difference was significanlty (p<0.05) greater in caatinga, where there were less natural resources during the dry season than in the coastal vegetation. Regarding brood mortality, that in caatinga with neem was higher (p<0.05) than thaof coastal vegetation with neem, and when compared within the same biome, brood mortality in colonies placed in areas with neem was significantly (p<0.05) higher than that in colonies of areas without neem. Despite brood mortality be higher in areas with neem, such mortality percentual was less than 10%, and within normal mortality parameters for honeybee brood. Under controlled environment, adult A. mellifera fed exclusively on neem were the ones with the shortest lifespan, but as neem was progressively replaced in the diet for other food sources, the worker lifespan increased. Flower odor per si did not produce repelence nor affect bee lifespan. Honeybee brood reared in artificial cups in the lab receiving larval food + neem pollen presented 100% mortality, significantly (p<0.05) higher than the other treatments (larval food, larval food + 100% pollen from other sources, larval food + 50% pollen from other sources + 50% neem pollen). It was concluded that the use of neem in association with other sources of pollen and nectar seems to estimulate colony growth due to the augment in food availability compensating, in populational terms, the increase in brood mortality. This effect seems to be inversally proportional to the scarcity of other floral resources, being as higher as shorter becomes the availability of other sources of pollen and nectar. However, both neem pollen and neem nectar are toxic for adults and larvas of A. mellifera, and it is not advisable its use as exclusive food source to these bees. Regarding other floral vistors of caatinga and coastal vegetation fauna, apparently neem does not constitute any threat or food resource, because no native species was observed exploiting this plant species. There is a need for further studies to determine safety levels for use of neem in beekeeping, to learn about other possible effects on A. mellifera individuals and colony and to investigate better the relationship of this plant species with native floral visitors.