RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gheno, Eliezer Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério de, Constantin, Jamil, Takano, Hudson Kagueyama, Gemelli, Alexandre
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5272
Resumo: Herbicides with high persistence in soil can cause problems for crops sown in succession to their application. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate, in greenhouse conditions, the safe period of time after application of preemergent herbicides used on cotton crops (isolated or in mixtures) for the crops grown in succession (bean, corn, and soybean). The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (5 x 11) + 1, with five repetitions. For each experiment, treatments combined different time periods between herbicide application and sowing of crops (280, 210, 140, 70, and 0 days before sowing of crops) with eleven herbicide treatments: fomesafen (625 g ha-1) prometryne (1250 g ha-1), diuron (1250 g ha-1), S-metolachlor (768 g ha-1), clomazone (1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + prometryne (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + diuron (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + S-metolachlor (625 + 768 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone (625 + 1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone + diuron (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), and fomesafen + clomazone + prometryne (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), plus an untreated control. Applications of diuron showed the greatest persistence, causing the largest carryover effects for the three crops evaluated. The other treatments showed residual effects or affected crop development when sowings were performed up to 70 days after application. At later periods no significant damage was observed.
id UFERSA-1_183e143418185dcdee072289dc9e3299
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/5272
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSIONATIVIDADE RESIDUAL DE HERBICIDAS APLICADOS NO ALGODOEIRO SOBRE CULTURAS SEMEADAS EM SUCESSÃOCarryover. Fitointoxicação. Persistência. Bioensaio.Carryover. Phytointoxication. Persistence. Bioassay.Herbicides with high persistence in soil can cause problems for crops sown in succession to their application. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate, in greenhouse conditions, the safe period of time after application of preemergent herbicides used on cotton crops (isolated or in mixtures) for the crops grown in succession (bean, corn, and soybean). The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (5 x 11) + 1, with five repetitions. For each experiment, treatments combined different time periods between herbicide application and sowing of crops (280, 210, 140, 70, and 0 days before sowing of crops) with eleven herbicide treatments: fomesafen (625 g ha-1) prometryne (1250 g ha-1), diuron (1250 g ha-1), S-metolachlor (768 g ha-1), clomazone (1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + prometryne (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + diuron (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + S-metolachlor (625 + 768 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone (625 + 1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone + diuron (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), and fomesafen + clomazone + prometryne (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), plus an untreated control. Applications of diuron showed the greatest persistence, causing the largest carryover effects for the three crops evaluated. The other treatments showed residual effects or affected crop development when sowings were performed up to 70 days after application. At later periods no significant damage was observed.Herbicidas com alta persistência no solo podem causar problemas em culturas semeadas em sucessão a sua aplicação. Desta forma, o objetivo deste trabalho foi estimar, em condições de casa-de-vegetação, o período de tempo seguro após aplicações em pré-emergência de herbicidas utilizados no algodoeiro (isolados ou em misturas) sobre culturas semeadas em sucessão (feijoeiro, milho e soja). O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o inteiramente casualizado, em arranjo fatorial (5 x 11) + 1, com cinco repetições. Em cada experimento (cultura), os tratamentos foram constituídos pela combinação de intervalos de tempo entre aplicação do herbicida e a semeadura das culturas (280, 210, 140, 70 e 0 dia, antes da semeadura das culturas) e onze tratamentos com herbicidas: fomesafen (625 g ha-1) prometryne (1250 g ha-1), diuron (1250 g ha-1), s-metolachlor (768 g ha-1), clomazone (1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + prometryne (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + diuron (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + s-metolachlor (625 + 768 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone (625 + 1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone + diuron (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1) e fomesafen + clomazone + prometryne (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1) acrescidos de uma testemunha sem aplicação de herbicidas. Constatou-se que as aplicações dos tratamentos contendo diuron apresentaram maior persistência, causando maior efeito carryover para as três culturas. Os demais tratamentos apresentaram efeito residual ou comprometeram o desenvolvimento das culturas quando as semeaduras foram realizadas até 70 dias após as aplicações, nos períodos superiores não foram observados danos significativos.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2016-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/527210.1590/1983-21252016v29n117rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2016); 143-152Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 1 (2016); 143-1521983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5272/pdf_346Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGheno, Eliezer AntonioOliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério deConstantin, JamilTakano, Hudson KagueyamaGemelli, Alexandre2023-07-19T13:36:57Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/5272Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:21.723349Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION
ATIVIDADE RESIDUAL DE HERBICIDAS APLICADOS NO ALGODOEIRO SOBRE CULTURAS SEMEADAS EM SUCESSÃO
title RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION
spellingShingle RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION
Gheno, Eliezer Antonio
Carryover. Fitointoxicação. Persistência. Bioensaio.
Carryover. Phytointoxication. Persistence. Bioassay.
title_short RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION
title_full RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION
title_fullStr RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION
title_full_unstemmed RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION
title_sort RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION
author Gheno, Eliezer Antonio
author_facet Gheno, Eliezer Antonio
Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério de
Constantin, Jamil
Takano, Hudson Kagueyama
Gemelli, Alexandre
author_role author
author2 Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério de
Constantin, Jamil
Takano, Hudson Kagueyama
Gemelli, Alexandre
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gheno, Eliezer Antonio
Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério de
Constantin, Jamil
Takano, Hudson Kagueyama
Gemelli, Alexandre
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carryover. Fitointoxicação. Persistência. Bioensaio.
Carryover. Phytointoxication. Persistence. Bioassay.
topic Carryover. Fitointoxicação. Persistência. Bioensaio.
Carryover. Phytointoxication. Persistence. Bioassay.
description Herbicides with high persistence in soil can cause problems for crops sown in succession to their application. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate, in greenhouse conditions, the safe period of time after application of preemergent herbicides used on cotton crops (isolated or in mixtures) for the crops grown in succession (bean, corn, and soybean). The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (5 x 11) + 1, with five repetitions. For each experiment, treatments combined different time periods between herbicide application and sowing of crops (280, 210, 140, 70, and 0 days before sowing of crops) with eleven herbicide treatments: fomesafen (625 g ha-1) prometryne (1250 g ha-1), diuron (1250 g ha-1), S-metolachlor (768 g ha-1), clomazone (1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + prometryne (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + diuron (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + S-metolachlor (625 + 768 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone (625 + 1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone + diuron (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), and fomesafen + clomazone + prometryne (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), plus an untreated control. Applications of diuron showed the greatest persistence, causing the largest carryover effects for the three crops evaluated. The other treatments showed residual effects or affected crop development when sowings were performed up to 70 days after application. At later periods no significant damage was observed.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5272
10.1590/1983-21252016v29n117rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5272
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252016v29n117rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5272/pdf_346
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2016); 143-152
Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 1 (2016); 143-152
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674025962438656