RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5272 |
Resumo: | Herbicides with high persistence in soil can cause problems for crops sown in succession to their application. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate, in greenhouse conditions, the safe period of time after application of preemergent herbicides used on cotton crops (isolated or in mixtures) for the crops grown in succession (bean, corn, and soybean). The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (5 x 11) + 1, with five repetitions. For each experiment, treatments combined different time periods between herbicide application and sowing of crops (280, 210, 140, 70, and 0 days before sowing of crops) with eleven herbicide treatments: fomesafen (625 g ha-1) prometryne (1250 g ha-1), diuron (1250 g ha-1), S-metolachlor (768 g ha-1), clomazone (1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + prometryne (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + diuron (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + S-metolachlor (625 + 768 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone (625 + 1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone + diuron (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), and fomesafen + clomazone + prometryne (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), plus an untreated control. Applications of diuron showed the greatest persistence, causing the largest carryover effects for the three crops evaluated. The other treatments showed residual effects or affected crop development when sowings were performed up to 70 days after application. At later periods no significant damage was observed. |
id |
UFERSA-1_183e143418185dcdee072289dc9e3299 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/5272 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSIONATIVIDADE RESIDUAL DE HERBICIDAS APLICADOS NO ALGODOEIRO SOBRE CULTURAS SEMEADAS EM SUCESSÃOCarryover. Fitointoxicação. Persistência. Bioensaio.Carryover. Phytointoxication. Persistence. Bioassay.Herbicides with high persistence in soil can cause problems for crops sown in succession to their application. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate, in greenhouse conditions, the safe period of time after application of preemergent herbicides used on cotton crops (isolated or in mixtures) for the crops grown in succession (bean, corn, and soybean). The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (5 x 11) + 1, with five repetitions. For each experiment, treatments combined different time periods between herbicide application and sowing of crops (280, 210, 140, 70, and 0 days before sowing of crops) with eleven herbicide treatments: fomesafen (625 g ha-1) prometryne (1250 g ha-1), diuron (1250 g ha-1), S-metolachlor (768 g ha-1), clomazone (1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + prometryne (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + diuron (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + S-metolachlor (625 + 768 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone (625 + 1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone + diuron (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), and fomesafen + clomazone + prometryne (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), plus an untreated control. Applications of diuron showed the greatest persistence, causing the largest carryover effects for the three crops evaluated. The other treatments showed residual effects or affected crop development when sowings were performed up to 70 days after application. At later periods no significant damage was observed.Herbicidas com alta persistência no solo podem causar problemas em culturas semeadas em sucessão a sua aplicação. Desta forma, o objetivo deste trabalho foi estimar, em condições de casa-de-vegetação, o período de tempo seguro após aplicações em pré-emergência de herbicidas utilizados no algodoeiro (isolados ou em misturas) sobre culturas semeadas em sucessão (feijoeiro, milho e soja). O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o inteiramente casualizado, em arranjo fatorial (5 x 11) + 1, com cinco repetições. Em cada experimento (cultura), os tratamentos foram constituídos pela combinação de intervalos de tempo entre aplicação do herbicida e a semeadura das culturas (280, 210, 140, 70 e 0 dia, antes da semeadura das culturas) e onze tratamentos com herbicidas: fomesafen (625 g ha-1) prometryne (1250 g ha-1), diuron (1250 g ha-1), s-metolachlor (768 g ha-1), clomazone (1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + prometryne (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + diuron (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + s-metolachlor (625 + 768 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone (625 + 1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone + diuron (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1) e fomesafen + clomazone + prometryne (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1) acrescidos de uma testemunha sem aplicação de herbicidas. Constatou-se que as aplicações dos tratamentos contendo diuron apresentaram maior persistência, causando maior efeito carryover para as três culturas. Os demais tratamentos apresentaram efeito residual ou comprometeram o desenvolvimento das culturas quando as semeaduras foram realizadas até 70 dias após as aplicações, nos períodos superiores não foram observados danos significativos.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2016-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/527210.1590/1983-21252016v29n117rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2016); 143-152Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 1 (2016); 143-1521983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5272/pdf_346Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGheno, Eliezer AntonioOliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério deConstantin, JamilTakano, Hudson KagueyamaGemelli, Alexandre2023-07-19T13:36:57Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/5272Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:21.723349Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION ATIVIDADE RESIDUAL DE HERBICIDAS APLICADOS NO ALGODOEIRO SOBRE CULTURAS SEMEADAS EM SUCESSÃO |
title |
RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION |
spellingShingle |
RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION Gheno, Eliezer Antonio Carryover. Fitointoxicação. Persistência. Bioensaio. Carryover. Phytointoxication. Persistence. Bioassay. |
title_short |
RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION |
title_full |
RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION |
title_fullStr |
RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION |
title_full_unstemmed |
RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION |
title_sort |
RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF HERBICIDES APPLIED TO COTTON ON CROPS CULTIVATED IN SUCCESSION |
author |
Gheno, Eliezer Antonio |
author_facet |
Gheno, Eliezer Antonio Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério de Constantin, Jamil Takano, Hudson Kagueyama Gemelli, Alexandre |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério de Constantin, Jamil Takano, Hudson Kagueyama Gemelli, Alexandre |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gheno, Eliezer Antonio Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silvério de Constantin, Jamil Takano, Hudson Kagueyama Gemelli, Alexandre |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carryover. Fitointoxicação. Persistência. Bioensaio. Carryover. Phytointoxication. Persistence. Bioassay. |
topic |
Carryover. Fitointoxicação. Persistência. Bioensaio. Carryover. Phytointoxication. Persistence. Bioassay. |
description |
Herbicides with high persistence in soil can cause problems for crops sown in succession to their application. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate, in greenhouse conditions, the safe period of time after application of preemergent herbicides used on cotton crops (isolated or in mixtures) for the crops grown in succession (bean, corn, and soybean). The experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (5 x 11) + 1, with five repetitions. For each experiment, treatments combined different time periods between herbicide application and sowing of crops (280, 210, 140, 70, and 0 days before sowing of crops) with eleven herbicide treatments: fomesafen (625 g ha-1) prometryne (1250 g ha-1), diuron (1250 g ha-1), S-metolachlor (768 g ha-1), clomazone (1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + prometryne (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + diuron (625 + 1250 g ha-1), fomesafen + S-metolachlor (625 + 768 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone (625 + 1000 g ha-1), fomesafen + clomazone + diuron (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), and fomesafen + clomazone + prometryne (625 + 1000 + 1250 g ha-1), plus an untreated control. Applications of diuron showed the greatest persistence, causing the largest carryover effects for the three crops evaluated. The other treatments showed residual effects or affected crop development when sowings were performed up to 70 days after application. At later periods no significant damage was observed. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5272 10.1590/1983-21252016v29n117rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5272 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252016v29n117rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5272/pdf_346 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2016); 143-152 Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 1 (2016); 143-152 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674025962438656 |