PLASTIC COVERING, PLANTING DENSITY, AND PRUNNING IN THE PRODUCTION OF CAPE GOOSEBERRY (Physalis peruviana L.) IN SUBTROPICAL REGION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5147 |
Resumo: | Physalis peruviana L. is a perennial plant, but commonly referred as annual in commercial crops. The cultivation of this species might be successful in Brazilian subtropical areas with an adequate and planned management. The objective of the present study was to quantify the production of Physalis peruviana L. with or without plastic covering over plant canopies, using two planting densities, managing the number of stems, and pruning side stems. This study was divided in two experiments; the first experiment evaluated the effect of spacing between each plant and the use of plastic covering in fruit production. The second experiment investigated the effect of the number of productive stems and of pruning in fruit production. The experimental design used for both experiments was randomized blocks, in 2 x 2 factorial scheme, which contained 6 blocks and 10 plants per plot. The following were analyzed for both experiments: production variables, estimated production, number of fruits per plant, mean fruit mass, mean fruit length and diameter, and chlorophyll relative index. Plastic covering and number of stems did not influence fruit production. The 3.0 x 0.5 m spacing without pruning side stems provided a larger production. |
id |
UFERSA-1_3ce769bec6a15d96f6357eedec0c4e1a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/5147 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PLASTIC COVERING, PLANTING DENSITY, AND PRUNNING IN THE PRODUCTION OF CAPE GOOSEBERRY (Physalis peruviana L.) IN SUBTROPICAL REGIONCOBERTURA PLÁSTICA, DENSIDADE DE PLANTIO E PODA NA PRODUÇÃO DE FISÁLIS (Physalis peruviana L.) EM REGIÃO SUBTROPICALThickening. Small fruits. Productivity. Plasticulture.Adensamento. Pequenas frutas. Produtividade. Plasticultura.Physalis peruviana L. is a perennial plant, but commonly referred as annual in commercial crops. The cultivation of this species might be successful in Brazilian subtropical areas with an adequate and planned management. The objective of the present study was to quantify the production of Physalis peruviana L. with or without plastic covering over plant canopies, using two planting densities, managing the number of stems, and pruning side stems. This study was divided in two experiments; the first experiment evaluated the effect of spacing between each plant and the use of plastic covering in fruit production. The second experiment investigated the effect of the number of productive stems and of pruning in fruit production. The experimental design used for both experiments was randomized blocks, in 2 x 2 factorial scheme, which contained 6 blocks and 10 plants per plot. The following were analyzed for both experiments: production variables, estimated production, number of fruits per plant, mean fruit mass, mean fruit length and diameter, and chlorophyll relative index. Plastic covering and number of stems did not influence fruit production. The 3.0 x 0.5 m spacing without pruning side stems provided a larger production.A Physalis peruviana L. é uma planta perene, mas usualmente tratada como anual em plantios comerciais. Com um manejo adequado e planejado, o cultivo pode ter sucesso nas zonas subtropicais brasileiras. Objetivou-se neste trabalho, quantificar a produção de Physalis peruviana L. através da utilização ou não de cobertura plástica sobre o dossel das plantas, do uso de duas densidades de plantio, do manejo no número de hastes e utilização de poda das hastes laterais. O trabalho foi dividido em dois experimentos, onde no primeiro experimento avaliou-se o efeito do espaçamento entre plantas e uso de cobertura plástica na produção de frutos. O segundo experimento constituiu do efeito do número de hastes produtivas e uso da poda na produção de frutos. O delineamento experimental adotado, para ambos os experimentos foi blocos ao acaso, em esquema fatorial 2 x 2, contendo 6 blocos e 10 plantas por parcela. Para ambos os experimentos foram analisadas as variáveis produção, produtividade estimada, número de frutos por planta, massa média dos frutos, comprimento e diâmetro médio dos frutos e índice relativo de clorofila. A cobertura plástica e o número de hastes não influenciaram na produção dos frutos. O espaçamento de 3,0 x 0,5 m sem o uso da poda das hastes laterais proporcionaram a maior produção.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2016-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/514710.1590/1983-21252016v29n213rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2016); 367-374Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 2 (2016); 367-3741983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5147/pdf_372Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoura, Pedro Henrique AbreuCoutinho, GivagoPio, RafaelBianchini, Flávio GabrielCuri, Paula Nogueira2023-07-19T13:57:49Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/5147Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:21.225926Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PLASTIC COVERING, PLANTING DENSITY, AND PRUNNING IN THE PRODUCTION OF CAPE GOOSEBERRY (Physalis peruviana L.) IN SUBTROPICAL REGION COBERTURA PLÁSTICA, DENSIDADE DE PLANTIO E PODA NA PRODUÇÃO DE FISÁLIS (Physalis peruviana L.) EM REGIÃO SUBTROPICAL |
title |
PLASTIC COVERING, PLANTING DENSITY, AND PRUNNING IN THE PRODUCTION OF CAPE GOOSEBERRY (Physalis peruviana L.) IN SUBTROPICAL REGION |
spellingShingle |
PLASTIC COVERING, PLANTING DENSITY, AND PRUNNING IN THE PRODUCTION OF CAPE GOOSEBERRY (Physalis peruviana L.) IN SUBTROPICAL REGION Moura, Pedro Henrique Abreu Thickening. Small fruits. Productivity. Plasticulture. Adensamento. Pequenas frutas. Produtividade. Plasticultura. |
title_short |
PLASTIC COVERING, PLANTING DENSITY, AND PRUNNING IN THE PRODUCTION OF CAPE GOOSEBERRY (Physalis peruviana L.) IN SUBTROPICAL REGION |
title_full |
PLASTIC COVERING, PLANTING DENSITY, AND PRUNNING IN THE PRODUCTION OF CAPE GOOSEBERRY (Physalis peruviana L.) IN SUBTROPICAL REGION |
title_fullStr |
PLASTIC COVERING, PLANTING DENSITY, AND PRUNNING IN THE PRODUCTION OF CAPE GOOSEBERRY (Physalis peruviana L.) IN SUBTROPICAL REGION |
title_full_unstemmed |
PLASTIC COVERING, PLANTING DENSITY, AND PRUNNING IN THE PRODUCTION OF CAPE GOOSEBERRY (Physalis peruviana L.) IN SUBTROPICAL REGION |
title_sort |
PLASTIC COVERING, PLANTING DENSITY, AND PRUNNING IN THE PRODUCTION OF CAPE GOOSEBERRY (Physalis peruviana L.) IN SUBTROPICAL REGION |
author |
Moura, Pedro Henrique Abreu |
author_facet |
Moura, Pedro Henrique Abreu Coutinho, Givago Pio, Rafael Bianchini, Flávio Gabriel Curi, Paula Nogueira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Coutinho, Givago Pio, Rafael Bianchini, Flávio Gabriel Curi, Paula Nogueira |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moura, Pedro Henrique Abreu Coutinho, Givago Pio, Rafael Bianchini, Flávio Gabriel Curi, Paula Nogueira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Thickening. Small fruits. Productivity. Plasticulture. Adensamento. Pequenas frutas. Produtividade. Plasticultura. |
topic |
Thickening. Small fruits. Productivity. Plasticulture. Adensamento. Pequenas frutas. Produtividade. Plasticultura. |
description |
Physalis peruviana L. is a perennial plant, but commonly referred as annual in commercial crops. The cultivation of this species might be successful in Brazilian subtropical areas with an adequate and planned management. The objective of the present study was to quantify the production of Physalis peruviana L. with or without plastic covering over plant canopies, using two planting densities, managing the number of stems, and pruning side stems. This study was divided in two experiments; the first experiment evaluated the effect of spacing between each plant and the use of plastic covering in fruit production. The second experiment investigated the effect of the number of productive stems and of pruning in fruit production. The experimental design used for both experiments was randomized blocks, in 2 x 2 factorial scheme, which contained 6 blocks and 10 plants per plot. The following were analyzed for both experiments: production variables, estimated production, number of fruits per plant, mean fruit mass, mean fruit length and diameter, and chlorophyll relative index. Plastic covering and number of stems did not influence fruit production. The 3.0 x 0.5 m spacing without pruning side stems provided a larger production. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5147 10.1590/1983-21252016v29n213rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5147 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252016v29n213rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5147/pdf_372 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2016); 367-374 Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 2 (2016); 367-374 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674025940418560 |