CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Uzuele, Elvio Lorençato, Soares, Daniel Jorge, Ovejero, Ramiro Fernando López, Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7126
Resumo: Controlling volunteer plants was aggravated due to the emergence of genetically modified glyphosate-resistant cultivars, requiring new technical recommendations. This work was developed with the objective of evaluating alternatives for chemical control of glyphosate-resistant maize infesting soybean crops, using ACCase inhibiting herbicides. Two experiments were carried out, one in Santa Cruz das Palmeiras (SP) and other in Não-Me-Toque (RS), Brazil. Volunteer maize plants were simulated with seeds of the DKB 390 YGRR2 hybrids, distributed between rows of soybean crops, at the density of 6 plants m-2. Combinations of the herbicides clethodim (65 and 84 g ha-1), sethoxydim (138 and 165 g ha-1), and haloxyfop (36 and 45 g ha-1) were applied at two phenological stages of the soybean crop [three (3T) and six (6T) trifoliate leaves], corresponding to the V4/V5 and V7/V8 stages of the volunteer maize, respectively, resulting in 14 treatments. A treatment without herbicide application and a treatment with manual weeding were included as check plots. Applying graminicides on maize plants at V4/V5 stage resulted in more consistent results and general efficacy.  Soybean yield was lower when applying herbicide only on maize plants at V7/V8, in both locations. Therefore, management practices for glyphosate-resistant volunteer maize should be adopted early, on maize plants at the V4/V5 stage, mainly when the maize plants are from lost grains in the harvesting process. The use of the herbicides clethodim and haloxyfop results in consistent control efficacy of volunteer maize plants.
id UFERSA-1_436fa017e8f0290bae487b1b4bef5ad6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7126
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDESCONTROLE DE MILHO VOLUNTÁRIO RESISTENTE AO GLYPHOSATE COM HERBICIDAS INIBIDORES DA ACCaseGlycine max. Graminicides. Management. Tolerance. Zea mays.Glycine max. Graminicidas. Manejo. Tolerância. Zea mays.Controlling volunteer plants was aggravated due to the emergence of genetically modified glyphosate-resistant cultivars, requiring new technical recommendations. This work was developed with the objective of evaluating alternatives for chemical control of glyphosate-resistant maize infesting soybean crops, using ACCase inhibiting herbicides. Two experiments were carried out, one in Santa Cruz das Palmeiras (SP) and other in Não-Me-Toque (RS), Brazil. Volunteer maize plants were simulated with seeds of the DKB 390 YGRR2 hybrids, distributed between rows of soybean crops, at the density of 6 plants m-2. Combinations of the herbicides clethodim (65 and 84 g ha-1), sethoxydim (138 and 165 g ha-1), and haloxyfop (36 and 45 g ha-1) were applied at two phenological stages of the soybean crop [three (3T) and six (6T) trifoliate leaves], corresponding to the V4/V5 and V7/V8 stages of the volunteer maize, respectively, resulting in 14 treatments. A treatment without herbicide application and a treatment with manual weeding were included as check plots. Applying graminicides on maize plants at V4/V5 stage resulted in more consistent results and general efficacy.  Soybean yield was lower when applying herbicide only on maize plants at V7/V8, in both locations. Therefore, management practices for glyphosate-resistant volunteer maize should be adopted early, on maize plants at the V4/V5 stage, mainly when the maize plants are from lost grains in the harvesting process. The use of the herbicides clethodim and haloxyfop results in consistent control efficacy of volunteer maize plants.O controle das plantas voluntárias foi dificultado com o advento das culturas geneticamente modificadas para tolerância ao herbicida glyphosate, exigindo novas recomendações técnicas para manejo. Este trabalho foi desenvolvido com o objetivo de avaliar alternativas para controle químico de plantas voluntárias de milho resistentes ao glyphosate, infestantes na cultura da soja, por meio de herbicidas graminicidas inibidores da ACCase. Dois experimentos foram desenvolvidos em campo, sendo um em Santa Cruz das Palmeiras (SP) e outro em Não-Me-Toque (RS). Para representar as plantas voluntárias de milho, sementes do híbrido DKB 390 YGRR2 foram distribuídos nas entrelinhas da soja, na densidade de 6 plantas m-2. Adotaram-se 14 tratamentos, resultantes da combinação dos herbicidas clethodim (65 e 84 g ha-1), sethoxydim (138 e 165 g ha-1) e haloxyfop (36 e 45 g ha-1), com dois estádios fenológicos da cultura de soja (três (3T) e seis (6T) trifólios); estando as plantas de milho voluntário nos estádios V4/V5 e V7/V8, respectivamente. Foi adicionado um tratamento sem aplicação de herbicidas e uma testemunha capinada manualmente. A pulverização dos graminicidas sobre plantas de milho em V4/V5 promoveu melhor consistência dos resultados e eficácia geral. A produtividade da soja foi reduzida em ambas as localidades com as pulverizações realizadas somente em V7/V8. Assim sendo, medidas de controle do milho voluntário resistente ao glyphosate devem ser adotadas precocemente, sobretudo quando o milho for resultante de grãos perdidos no processo de colheita. Neste sentido, destaca-se a adoção dos herbicidas clethodim e haloxyfop por sua eficácia consistente.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-08-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/712610.1590/1983-21252019v32n301rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2019); 575-580Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 3 (2019); 575-5801983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7126/10019Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto deUzuele, Elvio LorençatoSoares, Daniel JorgeOvejero, Ramiro Fernando LópezChristoffoleti, Pedro Jacob2023-07-20T17:26:13Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7126Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:33.500873Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES
CONTROLE DE MILHO VOLUNTÁRIO RESISTENTE AO GLYPHOSATE COM HERBICIDAS INIBIDORES DA ACCase
title CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES
spellingShingle CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES
Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de
Glycine max. Graminicides. Management. Tolerance. Zea mays.
Glycine max. Graminicidas. Manejo. Tolerância. Zea mays.
title_short CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES
title_full CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES
title_fullStr CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES
title_full_unstemmed CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES
title_sort CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES
author Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de
author_facet Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de
Uzuele, Elvio Lorençato
Soares, Daniel Jorge
Ovejero, Ramiro Fernando López
Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob
author_role author
author2 Uzuele, Elvio Lorençato
Soares, Daniel Jorge
Ovejero, Ramiro Fernando López
Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de
Uzuele, Elvio Lorençato
Soares, Daniel Jorge
Ovejero, Ramiro Fernando López
Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glycine max. Graminicides. Management. Tolerance. Zea mays.
Glycine max. Graminicidas. Manejo. Tolerância. Zea mays.
topic Glycine max. Graminicides. Management. Tolerance. Zea mays.
Glycine max. Graminicidas. Manejo. Tolerância. Zea mays.
description Controlling volunteer plants was aggravated due to the emergence of genetically modified glyphosate-resistant cultivars, requiring new technical recommendations. This work was developed with the objective of evaluating alternatives for chemical control of glyphosate-resistant maize infesting soybean crops, using ACCase inhibiting herbicides. Two experiments were carried out, one in Santa Cruz das Palmeiras (SP) and other in Não-Me-Toque (RS), Brazil. Volunteer maize plants were simulated with seeds of the DKB 390 YGRR2 hybrids, distributed between rows of soybean crops, at the density of 6 plants m-2. Combinations of the herbicides clethodim (65 and 84 g ha-1), sethoxydim (138 and 165 g ha-1), and haloxyfop (36 and 45 g ha-1) were applied at two phenological stages of the soybean crop [three (3T) and six (6T) trifoliate leaves], corresponding to the V4/V5 and V7/V8 stages of the volunteer maize, respectively, resulting in 14 treatments. A treatment without herbicide application and a treatment with manual weeding were included as check plots. Applying graminicides on maize plants at V4/V5 stage resulted in more consistent results and general efficacy.  Soybean yield was lower when applying herbicide only on maize plants at V7/V8, in both locations. Therefore, management practices for glyphosate-resistant volunteer maize should be adopted early, on maize plants at the V4/V5 stage, mainly when the maize plants are from lost grains in the harvesting process. The use of the herbicides clethodim and haloxyfop results in consistent control efficacy of volunteer maize plants.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7126
10.1590/1983-21252019v32n301rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7126
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252019v32n301rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7126/10019
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2019); 575-580
Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 3 (2019); 575-580
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674027133698048