CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7126 |
Resumo: | Controlling volunteer plants was aggravated due to the emergence of genetically modified glyphosate-resistant cultivars, requiring new technical recommendations. This work was developed with the objective of evaluating alternatives for chemical control of glyphosate-resistant maize infesting soybean crops, using ACCase inhibiting herbicides. Two experiments were carried out, one in Santa Cruz das Palmeiras (SP) and other in Não-Me-Toque (RS), Brazil. Volunteer maize plants were simulated with seeds of the DKB 390 YGRR2 hybrids, distributed between rows of soybean crops, at the density of 6 plants m-2. Combinations of the herbicides clethodim (65 and 84 g ha-1), sethoxydim (138 and 165 g ha-1), and haloxyfop (36 and 45 g ha-1) were applied at two phenological stages of the soybean crop [three (3T) and six (6T) trifoliate leaves], corresponding to the V4/V5 and V7/V8 stages of the volunteer maize, respectively, resulting in 14 treatments. A treatment without herbicide application and a treatment with manual weeding were included as check plots. Applying graminicides on maize plants at V4/V5 stage resulted in more consistent results and general efficacy. Soybean yield was lower when applying herbicide only on maize plants at V7/V8, in both locations. Therefore, management practices for glyphosate-resistant volunteer maize should be adopted early, on maize plants at the V4/V5 stage, mainly when the maize plants are from lost grains in the harvesting process. The use of the herbicides clethodim and haloxyfop results in consistent control efficacy of volunteer maize plants. |
id |
UFERSA-1_436fa017e8f0290bae487b1b4bef5ad6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7126 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDESCONTROLE DE MILHO VOLUNTÁRIO RESISTENTE AO GLYPHOSATE COM HERBICIDAS INIBIDORES DA ACCaseGlycine max. Graminicides. Management. Tolerance. Zea mays.Glycine max. Graminicidas. Manejo. Tolerância. Zea mays.Controlling volunteer plants was aggravated due to the emergence of genetically modified glyphosate-resistant cultivars, requiring new technical recommendations. This work was developed with the objective of evaluating alternatives for chemical control of glyphosate-resistant maize infesting soybean crops, using ACCase inhibiting herbicides. Two experiments were carried out, one in Santa Cruz das Palmeiras (SP) and other in Não-Me-Toque (RS), Brazil. Volunteer maize plants were simulated with seeds of the DKB 390 YGRR2 hybrids, distributed between rows of soybean crops, at the density of 6 plants m-2. Combinations of the herbicides clethodim (65 and 84 g ha-1), sethoxydim (138 and 165 g ha-1), and haloxyfop (36 and 45 g ha-1) were applied at two phenological stages of the soybean crop [three (3T) and six (6T) trifoliate leaves], corresponding to the V4/V5 and V7/V8 stages of the volunteer maize, respectively, resulting in 14 treatments. A treatment without herbicide application and a treatment with manual weeding were included as check plots. Applying graminicides on maize plants at V4/V5 stage resulted in more consistent results and general efficacy. Soybean yield was lower when applying herbicide only on maize plants at V7/V8, in both locations. Therefore, management practices for glyphosate-resistant volunteer maize should be adopted early, on maize plants at the V4/V5 stage, mainly when the maize plants are from lost grains in the harvesting process. The use of the herbicides clethodim and haloxyfop results in consistent control efficacy of volunteer maize plants.O controle das plantas voluntárias foi dificultado com o advento das culturas geneticamente modificadas para tolerância ao herbicida glyphosate, exigindo novas recomendações técnicas para manejo. Este trabalho foi desenvolvido com o objetivo de avaliar alternativas para controle químico de plantas voluntárias de milho resistentes ao glyphosate, infestantes na cultura da soja, por meio de herbicidas graminicidas inibidores da ACCase. Dois experimentos foram desenvolvidos em campo, sendo um em Santa Cruz das Palmeiras (SP) e outro em Não-Me-Toque (RS). Para representar as plantas voluntárias de milho, sementes do híbrido DKB 390 YGRR2 foram distribuídos nas entrelinhas da soja, na densidade de 6 plantas m-2. Adotaram-se 14 tratamentos, resultantes da combinação dos herbicidas clethodim (65 e 84 g ha-1), sethoxydim (138 e 165 g ha-1) e haloxyfop (36 e 45 g ha-1), com dois estádios fenológicos da cultura de soja (três (3T) e seis (6T) trifólios); estando as plantas de milho voluntário nos estádios V4/V5 e V7/V8, respectivamente. Foi adicionado um tratamento sem aplicação de herbicidas e uma testemunha capinada manualmente. A pulverização dos graminicidas sobre plantas de milho em V4/V5 promoveu melhor consistência dos resultados e eficácia geral. A produtividade da soja foi reduzida em ambas as localidades com as pulverizações realizadas somente em V7/V8. Assim sendo, medidas de controle do milho voluntário resistente ao glyphosate devem ser adotadas precocemente, sobretudo quando o milho for resultante de grãos perdidos no processo de colheita. Neste sentido, destaca-se a adoção dos herbicidas clethodim e haloxyfop por sua eficácia consistente.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-08-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/712610.1590/1983-21252019v32n301rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2019); 575-580Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 3 (2019); 575-5801983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7126/10019Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto deUzuele, Elvio LorençatoSoares, Daniel JorgeOvejero, Ramiro Fernando LópezChristoffoleti, Pedro Jacob2023-07-20T17:26:13Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7126Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:33.500873Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES CONTROLE DE MILHO VOLUNTÁRIO RESISTENTE AO GLYPHOSATE COM HERBICIDAS INIBIDORES DA ACCase |
title |
CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES |
spellingShingle |
CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de Glycine max. Graminicides. Management. Tolerance. Zea mays. Glycine max. Graminicidas. Manejo. Tolerância. Zea mays. |
title_short |
CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES |
title_full |
CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES |
title_fullStr |
CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES |
title_full_unstemmed |
CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES |
title_sort |
CONTROL OF GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT VOLUNTEER MAIZE USING ACCase INHIBITING HERBICIDES |
author |
Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de Uzuele, Elvio Lorençato Soares, Daniel Jorge Ovejero, Ramiro Fernando López Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Uzuele, Elvio Lorençato Soares, Daniel Jorge Ovejero, Ramiro Fernando López Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Saul Jorge Pinto de Uzuele, Elvio Lorençato Soares, Daniel Jorge Ovejero, Ramiro Fernando López Christoffoleti, Pedro Jacob |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Glycine max. Graminicides. Management. Tolerance. Zea mays. Glycine max. Graminicidas. Manejo. Tolerância. Zea mays. |
topic |
Glycine max. Graminicides. Management. Tolerance. Zea mays. Glycine max. Graminicidas. Manejo. Tolerância. Zea mays. |
description |
Controlling volunteer plants was aggravated due to the emergence of genetically modified glyphosate-resistant cultivars, requiring new technical recommendations. This work was developed with the objective of evaluating alternatives for chemical control of glyphosate-resistant maize infesting soybean crops, using ACCase inhibiting herbicides. Two experiments were carried out, one in Santa Cruz das Palmeiras (SP) and other in Não-Me-Toque (RS), Brazil. Volunteer maize plants were simulated with seeds of the DKB 390 YGRR2 hybrids, distributed between rows of soybean crops, at the density of 6 plants m-2. Combinations of the herbicides clethodim (65 and 84 g ha-1), sethoxydim (138 and 165 g ha-1), and haloxyfop (36 and 45 g ha-1) were applied at two phenological stages of the soybean crop [three (3T) and six (6T) trifoliate leaves], corresponding to the V4/V5 and V7/V8 stages of the volunteer maize, respectively, resulting in 14 treatments. A treatment without herbicide application and a treatment with manual weeding were included as check plots. Applying graminicides on maize plants at V4/V5 stage resulted in more consistent results and general efficacy. Soybean yield was lower when applying herbicide only on maize plants at V7/V8, in both locations. Therefore, management practices for glyphosate-resistant volunteer maize should be adopted early, on maize plants at the V4/V5 stage, mainly when the maize plants are from lost grains in the harvesting process. The use of the herbicides clethodim and haloxyfop results in consistent control efficacy of volunteer maize plants. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7126 10.1590/1983-21252019v32n301rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7126 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252019v32n301rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7126/10019 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2019); 575-580 Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 3 (2019); 575-580 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674027133698048 |