SOURGRASS INTERFERENCE ON SOYBEAN GROWN IN BRAZILIAN CERRADO
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9643 |
Resumo: | Sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) is one of the main species causing significant losses in Brazilian soybean production systems. Thus, this paper aimed to evaluate sourgrass interference on soybeans grown under Cerrado conditions. Three field experiments were conducted, of which the first two (E1 and E2) simulated sourgrass after pre-sowing burndown, using plants already emerged by the time soybeans were sown; whereas the third (E3) simulated both sourgrass and soybeans emerged simultaneously. Both E1 and E2 were conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with five treatments based on sourgrass infestation densities (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 plants m-2) and four replications. In turn, E3 was also carried out in an RCBD but with treatments arranged in a 2 x 5 factorial and four replications. The first factor comprised two soybean cultivars, while the second was sourgrass density levels, just as in E1 and E2. The results showed that increasing sourgrass densities reduced soybean yield regardless of the plant growth stage when the crop was sown. Yield losses were higher when sourgrass plants were already established by the time soybean was sown. Soybean yield losses reached up to 80% under higher sourgrass infestation levels. |
id |
UFERSA-1_454cf8f9ebe9b7c246f9b0d3ec873398 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9643 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
SOURGRASS INTERFERENCE ON SOYBEAN GROWN IN BRAZILIAN CERRADOINTERFERÊNCIA DO CAPIM-AMARGOSO NA CULTURA DA SOJA NO CERRADO BRASILEIRODigitaria insularis. Glycine max. Matocompetição. Densidade de planta daninha.Digitaria insularis. Glycine max. Weed-crop competition. Weed density.Sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) is one of the main species causing significant losses in Brazilian soybean production systems. Thus, this paper aimed to evaluate sourgrass interference on soybeans grown under Cerrado conditions. Three field experiments were conducted, of which the first two (E1 and E2) simulated sourgrass after pre-sowing burndown, using plants already emerged by the time soybeans were sown; whereas the third (E3) simulated both sourgrass and soybeans emerged simultaneously. Both E1 and E2 were conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with five treatments based on sourgrass infestation densities (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 plants m-2) and four replications. In turn, E3 was also carried out in an RCBD but with treatments arranged in a 2 x 5 factorial and four replications. The first factor comprised two soybean cultivars, while the second was sourgrass density levels, just as in E1 and E2. The results showed that increasing sourgrass densities reduced soybean yield regardless of the plant growth stage when the crop was sown. Yield losses were higher when sourgrass plants were already established by the time soybean was sown. Soybean yield losses reached up to 80% under higher sourgrass infestation levels. Entre as espécies que tem causado maiores prejuízos nos sistemas brasileiros de produção de soja, está o capim-amargoso. Neste contexto, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito da interferência do capim-amargoso na soja cultivada em condições de Cerrado. Para tanto, foram instalados três experimentos à campo, sendo dois simulando área com falhas na dessecação de capim-amargoso na pré-semeadura da soja, com plantas remanescentes desta espécie (E1 e E2) e um no qual simulou a emergência do capim-amargoso ocorreu de forma simultânea a da soja (E3). No E1 e E2, o delineamento utilizado foi o de blocos casualizados (DBC), sendo avaliados cinco tratamentos compostos por densidades crescentes de capim-amargoso (0, 2, 4, 6 e 8 plantas por m2) e quatro repetições. No E3, também foi utilizado o DBC, estando os tratamentos dispostos em arranjo fatorial 2 x 5, com quatro repetições. O primeiro fator foi composto de duas cultivares de soja de ciclo distinto; enquanto que no segundo foram simuladas densidades de capim-amargoso em convivência com a soja, sendo adotadas as mesmas do E1 e E2. O aumento de densidade de capim-amargoso em convivência com a soja proporciona redução na produtividade da cultura, independentemente se estas plantas estavam emergidas na ocasião da semeadura ou se a infestação foi estabelecida após a emergência da soja. A intensidade de redução na produtividade da cultura é maior quando as plantas de capim-amargoso já se encontram entouceiradas na área na ocasião da semeadura da soja, chegando a reduções próximas de 80% na maior densidade de infestação. Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2021-05-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/964310.1590/1983-21252021v34n211rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 2 (2021); 350-358Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 2 (2021); 350-3581983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9643/10616Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBraz, Guilherme Braga PereiraCruvinel, Aline GuimarãesCaneppele, Alan BrunoTakano, Hudson KagueyamaSilva, Alessandro Guerra daOliveira Júnior, Rubem Silvério de2023-07-19T12:07:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9643Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:51.604009Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SOURGRASS INTERFERENCE ON SOYBEAN GROWN IN BRAZILIAN CERRADO INTERFERÊNCIA DO CAPIM-AMARGOSO NA CULTURA DA SOJA NO CERRADO BRASILEIRO |
title |
SOURGRASS INTERFERENCE ON SOYBEAN GROWN IN BRAZILIAN CERRADO |
spellingShingle |
SOURGRASS INTERFERENCE ON SOYBEAN GROWN IN BRAZILIAN CERRADO Braz, Guilherme Braga Pereira Digitaria insularis. Glycine max. Matocompetição. Densidade de planta daninha. Digitaria insularis. Glycine max. Weed-crop competition. Weed density. |
title_short |
SOURGRASS INTERFERENCE ON SOYBEAN GROWN IN BRAZILIAN CERRADO |
title_full |
SOURGRASS INTERFERENCE ON SOYBEAN GROWN IN BRAZILIAN CERRADO |
title_fullStr |
SOURGRASS INTERFERENCE ON SOYBEAN GROWN IN BRAZILIAN CERRADO |
title_full_unstemmed |
SOURGRASS INTERFERENCE ON SOYBEAN GROWN IN BRAZILIAN CERRADO |
title_sort |
SOURGRASS INTERFERENCE ON SOYBEAN GROWN IN BRAZILIAN CERRADO |
author |
Braz, Guilherme Braga Pereira |
author_facet |
Braz, Guilherme Braga Pereira Cruvinel, Aline Guimarães Caneppele, Alan Bruno Takano, Hudson Kagueyama Silva, Alessandro Guerra da Oliveira Júnior, Rubem Silvério de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cruvinel, Aline Guimarães Caneppele, Alan Bruno Takano, Hudson Kagueyama Silva, Alessandro Guerra da Oliveira Júnior, Rubem Silvério de |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Braz, Guilherme Braga Pereira Cruvinel, Aline Guimarães Caneppele, Alan Bruno Takano, Hudson Kagueyama Silva, Alessandro Guerra da Oliveira Júnior, Rubem Silvério de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Digitaria insularis. Glycine max. Matocompetição. Densidade de planta daninha. Digitaria insularis. Glycine max. Weed-crop competition. Weed density. |
topic |
Digitaria insularis. Glycine max. Matocompetição. Densidade de planta daninha. Digitaria insularis. Glycine max. Weed-crop competition. Weed density. |
description |
Sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) is one of the main species causing significant losses in Brazilian soybean production systems. Thus, this paper aimed to evaluate sourgrass interference on soybeans grown under Cerrado conditions. Three field experiments were conducted, of which the first two (E1 and E2) simulated sourgrass after pre-sowing burndown, using plants already emerged by the time soybeans were sown; whereas the third (E3) simulated both sourgrass and soybeans emerged simultaneously. Both E1 and E2 were conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with five treatments based on sourgrass infestation densities (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 plants m-2) and four replications. In turn, E3 was also carried out in an RCBD but with treatments arranged in a 2 x 5 factorial and four replications. The first factor comprised two soybean cultivars, while the second was sourgrass density levels, just as in E1 and E2. The results showed that increasing sourgrass densities reduced soybean yield regardless of the plant growth stage when the crop was sown. Yield losses were higher when sourgrass plants were already established by the time soybean was sown. Soybean yield losses reached up to 80% under higher sourgrass infestation levels. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9643 10.1590/1983-21252021v34n211rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9643 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252021v34n211rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9643/10616 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 2 (2021); 350-358 Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 2 (2021); 350-358 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674028957171712 |