SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sari, Bruno Giacomini
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Lúcio, Alessandro Dal'Col, Costa, Ivan Francisco Dressler da, Ribeiro, Ana Lúcia de Paula
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4444
Resumo: The aim of this study was to determine the sample size needed to assess the severity of leaf blast in rice in experiments with different fungicide treatments. The severity and the area under the disease progress curve data of three chemical disease control treatments carried out in Rio Grande do Sul, were used in the study. Analysis of variance was performed to verify whether the severity of the disease differed between treatments. The spread of disease was was also found to be different between treatments and assessments, using the variance/mean ratio and Morisita index. The spatial distribution of the disease among the treatments and during the evaluations is important for the choice of the equation used to calculate the sample size. The spatial distribution of the disease was not the same across the experiments, and it varied between treatments and evaluations. Thus, we decided to use a formula that was not associated with distributions to indicate the spatial distribution (negative binomial or Poisson) of the disease in the field. The sample size to estimate the average of rice leaf blast severity varied between treatments and evaluations. The area under the disease progress curve is necessary to be determined to reduce the number of samples needed. Thus, it is recommended to assess 293 sheets to estimate severity, and 63 to estimate AUDPC at 20% error.
id UFERSA-1_4d39b8ffe536548f65fce844756e3753
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/4444
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICETAMANHO DE AMOSTRA PARA AVALIAR A SEVERIDADE DE BRUSONE DA FOLHA EM EXPERIMENTOS COM ARROZ IRRIGADOOryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Precisão experimental. Amostragem.Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Experimental precision. Sampling.The aim of this study was to determine the sample size needed to assess the severity of leaf blast in rice in experiments with different fungicide treatments. The severity and the area under the disease progress curve data of three chemical disease control treatments carried out in Rio Grande do Sul, were used in the study. Analysis of variance was performed to verify whether the severity of the disease differed between treatments. The spread of disease was was also found to be different between treatments and assessments, using the variance/mean ratio and Morisita index. The spatial distribution of the disease among the treatments and during the evaluations is important for the choice of the equation used to calculate the sample size. The spatial distribution of the disease was not the same across the experiments, and it varied between treatments and evaluations. Thus, we decided to use a formula that was not associated with distributions to indicate the spatial distribution (negative binomial or Poisson) of the disease in the field. The sample size to estimate the average of rice leaf blast severity varied between treatments and evaluations. The area under the disease progress curve is necessary to be determined to reduce the number of samples needed. Thus, it is recommended to assess 293 sheets to estimate severity, and 63 to estimate AUDPC at 20% error.O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar o tamanho de amostra necessário para avaliar a severidade da brusone da folha no arroz irrigado em experimentos com diferentes tratamentos fungicidas. Foram utilizados dados de severidade da brusone e área abaixo da curva de progresso da doença de três experimentos utilizando o controle químico realizados no Rio Grande do Sul. Foi realizada a análise de variância, para verificar se a severidade da doença foi diferenciada entre os tratamentos. Também foi verificado se a dispersão da doença foi diferenciada entre os tratamentos e as avaliações, através da razão variância/média e do índice de Morisita. A dispersão da doença entre os tratamentos e ao longo das avaliações é importante para a escolha da fórmula utilizada no cálculo do tamanho da amostra. A dispersão da doença não foi a mesma ao longo dos experimentos, variando entre tratamentos e avaliações. Diante deste comportamento, optou-se por utilizar uma fórmula de cálculo que não estivesse associado a distribuições que indicassem a distribuição espacial da doença no campo (binomial negativa ou Poisson). O tamanho de amostra para a estimação da severidade média da brusone do arroz variou entre os tratamentos e as avaliações. Para avaliar a área abaixo a curva de progresso da doença é necessário avaliar menos folhas. Recomenda-se a avaliação de 293 folhas para estimar a severidade, e 63 para estimar a AUDPC, com 20% de erro.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2016-09-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/444410.1590/1983-21252016v29n406rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2016); 822-831Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 4 (2016); 822-8311983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4444/pdfSari, Bruno GiacominiLúcio, Alessandro Dal'ColCosta, Ivan Francisco Dressler daRibeiro, Ana Lúcia de Paulainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-19T18:45:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/4444Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:15.829941Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE
TAMANHO DE AMOSTRA PARA AVALIAR A SEVERIDADE DE BRUSONE DA FOLHA EM EXPERIMENTOS COM ARROZ IRRIGADO
title SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE
spellingShingle SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE
Sari, Bruno Giacomini
Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Precisão experimental. Amostragem.
Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Experimental precision. Sampling.
title_short SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE
title_full SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE
title_fullStr SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE
title_full_unstemmed SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE
title_sort SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE
author Sari, Bruno Giacomini
author_facet Sari, Bruno Giacomini
Lúcio, Alessandro Dal'Col
Costa, Ivan Francisco Dressler da
Ribeiro, Ana Lúcia de Paula
author_role author
author2 Lúcio, Alessandro Dal'Col
Costa, Ivan Francisco Dressler da
Ribeiro, Ana Lúcia de Paula
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sari, Bruno Giacomini
Lúcio, Alessandro Dal'Col
Costa, Ivan Francisco Dressler da
Ribeiro, Ana Lúcia de Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Precisão experimental. Amostragem.
Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Experimental precision. Sampling.
topic Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Precisão experimental. Amostragem.
Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Experimental precision. Sampling.
description The aim of this study was to determine the sample size needed to assess the severity of leaf blast in rice in experiments with different fungicide treatments. The severity and the area under the disease progress curve data of three chemical disease control treatments carried out in Rio Grande do Sul, were used in the study. Analysis of variance was performed to verify whether the severity of the disease differed between treatments. The spread of disease was was also found to be different between treatments and assessments, using the variance/mean ratio and Morisita index. The spatial distribution of the disease among the treatments and during the evaluations is important for the choice of the equation used to calculate the sample size. The spatial distribution of the disease was not the same across the experiments, and it varied between treatments and evaluations. Thus, we decided to use a formula that was not associated with distributions to indicate the spatial distribution (negative binomial or Poisson) of the disease in the field. The sample size to estimate the average of rice leaf blast severity varied between treatments and evaluations. The area under the disease progress curve is necessary to be determined to reduce the number of samples needed. Thus, it is recommended to assess 293 sheets to estimate severity, and 63 to estimate AUDPC at 20% error.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4444
10.1590/1983-21252016v29n406rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4444
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252016v29n406rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4444/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2016); 822-831
Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 4 (2016); 822-831
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674025406693376