SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4444 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to determine the sample size needed to assess the severity of leaf blast in rice in experiments with different fungicide treatments. The severity and the area under the disease progress curve data of three chemical disease control treatments carried out in Rio Grande do Sul, were used in the study. Analysis of variance was performed to verify whether the severity of the disease differed between treatments. The spread of disease was was also found to be different between treatments and assessments, using the variance/mean ratio and Morisita index. The spatial distribution of the disease among the treatments and during the evaluations is important for the choice of the equation used to calculate the sample size. The spatial distribution of the disease was not the same across the experiments, and it varied between treatments and evaluations. Thus, we decided to use a formula that was not associated with distributions to indicate the spatial distribution (negative binomial or Poisson) of the disease in the field. The sample size to estimate the average of rice leaf blast severity varied between treatments and evaluations. The area under the disease progress curve is necessary to be determined to reduce the number of samples needed. Thus, it is recommended to assess 293 sheets to estimate severity, and 63 to estimate AUDPC at 20% error. |
id |
UFERSA-1_4d39b8ffe536548f65fce844756e3753 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/4444 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICETAMANHO DE AMOSTRA PARA AVALIAR A SEVERIDADE DE BRUSONE DA FOLHA EM EXPERIMENTOS COM ARROZ IRRIGADOOryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Precisão experimental. Amostragem.Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Experimental precision. Sampling.The aim of this study was to determine the sample size needed to assess the severity of leaf blast in rice in experiments with different fungicide treatments. The severity and the area under the disease progress curve data of three chemical disease control treatments carried out in Rio Grande do Sul, were used in the study. Analysis of variance was performed to verify whether the severity of the disease differed between treatments. The spread of disease was was also found to be different between treatments and assessments, using the variance/mean ratio and Morisita index. The spatial distribution of the disease among the treatments and during the evaluations is important for the choice of the equation used to calculate the sample size. The spatial distribution of the disease was not the same across the experiments, and it varied between treatments and evaluations. Thus, we decided to use a formula that was not associated with distributions to indicate the spatial distribution (negative binomial or Poisson) of the disease in the field. The sample size to estimate the average of rice leaf blast severity varied between treatments and evaluations. The area under the disease progress curve is necessary to be determined to reduce the number of samples needed. Thus, it is recommended to assess 293 sheets to estimate severity, and 63 to estimate AUDPC at 20% error.O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar o tamanho de amostra necessário para avaliar a severidade da brusone da folha no arroz irrigado em experimentos com diferentes tratamentos fungicidas. Foram utilizados dados de severidade da brusone e área abaixo da curva de progresso da doença de três experimentos utilizando o controle químico realizados no Rio Grande do Sul. Foi realizada a análise de variância, para verificar se a severidade da doença foi diferenciada entre os tratamentos. Também foi verificado se a dispersão da doença foi diferenciada entre os tratamentos e as avaliações, através da razão variância/média e do índice de Morisita. A dispersão da doença entre os tratamentos e ao longo das avaliações é importante para a escolha da fórmula utilizada no cálculo do tamanho da amostra. A dispersão da doença não foi a mesma ao longo dos experimentos, variando entre tratamentos e avaliações. Diante deste comportamento, optou-se por utilizar uma fórmula de cálculo que não estivesse associado a distribuições que indicassem a distribuição espacial da doença no campo (binomial negativa ou Poisson). O tamanho de amostra para a estimação da severidade média da brusone do arroz variou entre os tratamentos e as avaliações. Para avaliar a área abaixo a curva de progresso da doença é necessário avaliar menos folhas. Recomenda-se a avaliação de 293 folhas para estimar a severidade, e 63 para estimar a AUDPC, com 20% de erro.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2016-09-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/444410.1590/1983-21252016v29n406rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2016); 822-831Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 4 (2016); 822-8311983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4444/pdfSari, Bruno GiacominiLúcio, Alessandro Dal'ColCosta, Ivan Francisco Dressler daRibeiro, Ana Lúcia de Paulainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-19T18:45:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/4444Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:15.829941Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE TAMANHO DE AMOSTRA PARA AVALIAR A SEVERIDADE DE BRUSONE DA FOLHA EM EXPERIMENTOS COM ARROZ IRRIGADO |
title |
SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE |
spellingShingle |
SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE Sari, Bruno Giacomini Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Precisão experimental. Amostragem. Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Experimental precision. Sampling. |
title_short |
SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE |
title_full |
SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE |
title_fullStr |
SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE |
title_full_unstemmed |
SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE |
title_sort |
SAMPLE SIZE FOR ASSESS THE LEAF BLAST SEVERITY IN EXPERIMENTS WITH IRRIGATED RICE |
author |
Sari, Bruno Giacomini |
author_facet |
Sari, Bruno Giacomini Lúcio, Alessandro Dal'Col Costa, Ivan Francisco Dressler da Ribeiro, Ana Lúcia de Paula |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lúcio, Alessandro Dal'Col Costa, Ivan Francisco Dressler da Ribeiro, Ana Lúcia de Paula |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sari, Bruno Giacomini Lúcio, Alessandro Dal'Col Costa, Ivan Francisco Dressler da Ribeiro, Ana Lúcia de Paula |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Precisão experimental. Amostragem. Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Experimental precision. Sampling. |
topic |
Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Precisão experimental. Amostragem. Oryza sativa. Pyricularia grisea. Experimental precision. Sampling. |
description |
The aim of this study was to determine the sample size needed to assess the severity of leaf blast in rice in experiments with different fungicide treatments. The severity and the area under the disease progress curve data of three chemical disease control treatments carried out in Rio Grande do Sul, were used in the study. Analysis of variance was performed to verify whether the severity of the disease differed between treatments. The spread of disease was was also found to be different between treatments and assessments, using the variance/mean ratio and Morisita index. The spatial distribution of the disease among the treatments and during the evaluations is important for the choice of the equation used to calculate the sample size. The spatial distribution of the disease was not the same across the experiments, and it varied between treatments and evaluations. Thus, we decided to use a formula that was not associated with distributions to indicate the spatial distribution (negative binomial or Poisson) of the disease in the field. The sample size to estimate the average of rice leaf blast severity varied between treatments and evaluations. The area under the disease progress curve is necessary to be determined to reduce the number of samples needed. Thus, it is recommended to assess 293 sheets to estimate severity, and 63 to estimate AUDPC at 20% error. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4444 10.1590/1983-21252016v29n406rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4444 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252016v29n406rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4444/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2016); 822-831 Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 4 (2016); 822-831 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674025406693376 |