WEED INTERFERENCE IN CARROT YIELD IN TWO LOCALIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reginaldo, Laís Tereza Rêgo Torquato
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lins, Hamurábi Anizio, Sousa, Matheus de Freitas, Teófilo, Taliane Maria da Silva, Mendonça, Vander, Silva, Daniel Valadão
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10006
Resumo: Weed interference is one of the factors that reduces carrot yield considerably. The aim of this study was to determine the periods of weed interference in carrots cultivated under two localized irrigation systems. The experiment used a completely randomized block design, with three replications, using the split plot scheme. The plots consisted of two irrigation systems (drip and micro sprinkler) and the subplots corresponded to the duration of coexistence of the crop with weeds, comprising periods of control (weed-free) or coexistence (with weeds) (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 120 days after emergence (DAE) of the crop). Considering a yield loss of 2.5%, 5%, and 10% in marketable carrots, the beginning and end of the critical period of weed control (CPWC) was determined by adjusting a sigmoid model to the relative production data. The presence of the weed community throughout the crop cycle resulted in yield losses of up to 98%. The CPWP varied for the irrigation systems used. Carrot cultivation with and without competition, under the micro sprinkler irrigation system showed a higher yield than with the drip system. Considering a yield loss of 5%, the CPWC was 23 DAE and 7 DAE in the drip irrigation and micro sprinkler irrigation systems, respectively.
id UFERSA-1_65ada3682f123dce2d6f7ca919e203ec
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10006
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling WEED INTERFERENCE IN CARROT YIELD IN TWO LOCALIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEMSINTERFERÊNCIA DE PLANTAS DANINHAS NA PRODUTIVIDADE DA CENOURA EM DOIS SISTEMAS DE IRRIGAÇÃO LOCALIZADADaucus carota L. Competição. Período de interferência. Gotejamento. Microaspersão.Daucus carota L. Competition. Interference period. Drip. Micro sprinkler.Weed interference is one of the factors that reduces carrot yield considerably. The aim of this study was to determine the periods of weed interference in carrots cultivated under two localized irrigation systems. The experiment used a completely randomized block design, with three replications, using the split plot scheme. The plots consisted of two irrigation systems (drip and micro sprinkler) and the subplots corresponded to the duration of coexistence of the crop with weeds, comprising periods of control (weed-free) or coexistence (with weeds) (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 120 days after emergence (DAE) of the crop). Considering a yield loss of 2.5%, 5%, and 10% in marketable carrots, the beginning and end of the critical period of weed control (CPWC) was determined by adjusting a sigmoid model to the relative production data. The presence of the weed community throughout the crop cycle resulted in yield losses of up to 98%. The CPWP varied for the irrigation systems used. Carrot cultivation with and without competition, under the micro sprinkler irrigation system showed a higher yield than with the drip system. Considering a yield loss of 5%, the CPWC was 23 DAE and 7 DAE in the drip irrigation and micro sprinkler irrigation systems, respectively.A interferência de plantas daninhas representa um dos fatores de maior impacto na redução da produtividade na cultura da cenoura. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar os períodos de interferência de plantas daninhas na cenoura em dois sistemas de irrigação localizada. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos casualizados, com três repetições, no esquema de parcelas subdivididas. As parcelas foram constituídas dos dois sistemas de irrigação (gotejamento e microaspersão), e as subparcelas corresponderam à duração da convivência com as plantas daninhas, constituídos de períodos de controle (no limpo) ou convivência (no mato) das plantas daninhas com a cultura (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 e 120 dias após a emergência (DAE)). O início e o fim do período crítico de prevenção a interferência (PCPI), com base em uma perda de produtividade de 2,5, 5 e 10 % de cenoura comercializável, foi determinado pelo ajuste do modelo Sigmoide aos dados de produção relativa. A presença da comunidade de plantas daninhas durante todo o ciclo da cultura pode acarretar perdas de até 98% na produtividade. O PCPI variou em 16 dias entre os sistemas de irrigação utilizados. O cultivo da cenoura com e sem competição, sob o sistema de irrigação por microaspersão apresentou maior produtividade em comparação ao cultivo no sistema de gotejamento. No sistema de irrigação por gotejamento o PCPI foi de 23 DAE e no sistema de irrigação por microaspersão foi de 7 DAE, considerando perdas de produtividade de 5 %.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2021-03-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1000610.1590/1983-21252021v34n113rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 119-131Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 119-1311983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10006/10563Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReginaldo, Laís Tereza Rêgo TorquatoLins, Hamurábi AnizioSousa, Matheus de FreitasTeófilo, Taliane Maria da SilvaMendonça, VanderSilva, Daniel Valadão2023-07-19T12:30:30Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10006Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:54.677059Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv WEED INTERFERENCE IN CARROT YIELD IN TWO LOCALIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
INTERFERÊNCIA DE PLANTAS DANINHAS NA PRODUTIVIDADE DA CENOURA EM DOIS SISTEMAS DE IRRIGAÇÃO LOCALIZADA
title WEED INTERFERENCE IN CARROT YIELD IN TWO LOCALIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
spellingShingle WEED INTERFERENCE IN CARROT YIELD IN TWO LOCALIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
Reginaldo, Laís Tereza Rêgo Torquato
Daucus carota L. Competição. Período de interferência. Gotejamento. Microaspersão.
Daucus carota L. Competition. Interference period. Drip. Micro sprinkler.
title_short WEED INTERFERENCE IN CARROT YIELD IN TWO LOCALIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
title_full WEED INTERFERENCE IN CARROT YIELD IN TWO LOCALIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
title_fullStr WEED INTERFERENCE IN CARROT YIELD IN TWO LOCALIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
title_full_unstemmed WEED INTERFERENCE IN CARROT YIELD IN TWO LOCALIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
title_sort WEED INTERFERENCE IN CARROT YIELD IN TWO LOCALIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
author Reginaldo, Laís Tereza Rêgo Torquato
author_facet Reginaldo, Laís Tereza Rêgo Torquato
Lins, Hamurábi Anizio
Sousa, Matheus de Freitas
Teófilo, Taliane Maria da Silva
Mendonça, Vander
Silva, Daniel Valadão
author_role author
author2 Lins, Hamurábi Anizio
Sousa, Matheus de Freitas
Teófilo, Taliane Maria da Silva
Mendonça, Vander
Silva, Daniel Valadão
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reginaldo, Laís Tereza Rêgo Torquato
Lins, Hamurábi Anizio
Sousa, Matheus de Freitas
Teófilo, Taliane Maria da Silva
Mendonça, Vander
Silva, Daniel Valadão
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Daucus carota L. Competição. Período de interferência. Gotejamento. Microaspersão.
Daucus carota L. Competition. Interference period. Drip. Micro sprinkler.
topic Daucus carota L. Competição. Período de interferência. Gotejamento. Microaspersão.
Daucus carota L. Competition. Interference period. Drip. Micro sprinkler.
description Weed interference is one of the factors that reduces carrot yield considerably. The aim of this study was to determine the periods of weed interference in carrots cultivated under two localized irrigation systems. The experiment used a completely randomized block design, with three replications, using the split plot scheme. The plots consisted of two irrigation systems (drip and micro sprinkler) and the subplots corresponded to the duration of coexistence of the crop with weeds, comprising periods of control (weed-free) or coexistence (with weeds) (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 120 days after emergence (DAE) of the crop). Considering a yield loss of 2.5%, 5%, and 10% in marketable carrots, the beginning and end of the critical period of weed control (CPWC) was determined by adjusting a sigmoid model to the relative production data. The presence of the weed community throughout the crop cycle resulted in yield losses of up to 98%. The CPWP varied for the irrigation systems used. Carrot cultivation with and without competition, under the micro sprinkler irrigation system showed a higher yield than with the drip system. Considering a yield loss of 5%, the CPWC was 23 DAE and 7 DAE in the drip irrigation and micro sprinkler irrigation systems, respectively.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10006
10.1590/1983-21252021v34n113rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10006
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252021v34n113rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10006/10563
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 119-131
Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 119-131
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674029391282176