GOAT MANURE FERTILIZATION AND IRRIGATION ON PRODUCTION COMPONENTS OF SUNFLOWER

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borges, Francisca Robevania Medeiros
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Bezerra, Francisco Marcus Lima, Marinho, Albanise Barbosa, Ramos, Elísia Gomes, Adriano, Jilson de Nazaré José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7251
Resumo: Sunflower can be an economically viable crop in the Northeast region of Brazil depending on the use of appropriate irrigation and fertilization managements. The objective of this work was to evaluate production components of sunflower plants (Helianthus annuus L.) of the BRS-324 cultivar subjected to different organic fertilizer rates (goat manure) and irrigation water depths in two crop cycles (November 2014 to February 2015; and August to November 2015). The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with a split-split-plot arrangement, consisting of five organic fertilizer rates (OFR) (0, 300, 600, 900, and 1.200 mL plant-1 week-1) and five irrigation water depths (IWD) (33; 66; 100; 133, and 166% of the class A tank evaporation), with three blocks. The highest achene yield (1,220.78 kg ha-1) in the first cycle was found using OFR of 1,200 mL plant-1 week-1 and IWD of 134.9% (524.9 mm); and the highest yield (882.07 kg ha-1) in the second crop cycle was found using the highest OFR combined with IWD of 166% (843.0 mm). The use of goat manure as organic fertilizer had no effect on the sunflower oil content; however, this variable was affected by the irrigation water depths used. Protein content was higher in the second crop cycle (14%) when using IWD of 100% and OFR of 536 mL plant-1 week-1.
id UFERSA-1_7fba112f32d80e5db3be2ca758986612
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7251
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling GOAT MANURE FERTILIZATION AND IRRIGATION ON PRODUCTION COMPONENTS OF SUNFLOWERPOTENCIAL PRODUTIVO DO GIRASSOL SOB DOSES DE BIOFERTILIZANTE CAPRINO E LÂMINAS DE IRRIGAÇÃOHelianthus annuus L. Organic fertilizer. Irrigation management. Class A tank. Yield.Helianthus annuus L. Adubação orgânica. Manejo da irrigação. Tanque Classe A. Produtividade.Sunflower can be an economically viable crop in the Northeast region of Brazil depending on the use of appropriate irrigation and fertilization managements. The objective of this work was to evaluate production components of sunflower plants (Helianthus annuus L.) of the BRS-324 cultivar subjected to different organic fertilizer rates (goat manure) and irrigation water depths in two crop cycles (November 2014 to February 2015; and August to November 2015). The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with a split-split-plot arrangement, consisting of five organic fertilizer rates (OFR) (0, 300, 600, 900, and 1.200 mL plant-1 week-1) and five irrigation water depths (IWD) (33; 66; 100; 133, and 166% of the class A tank evaporation), with three blocks. The highest achene yield (1,220.78 kg ha-1) in the first cycle was found using OFR of 1,200 mL plant-1 week-1 and IWD of 134.9% (524.9 mm); and the highest yield (882.07 kg ha-1) in the second crop cycle was found using the highest OFR combined with IWD of 166% (843.0 mm). The use of goat manure as organic fertilizer had no effect on the sunflower oil content; however, this variable was affected by the irrigation water depths used. Protein content was higher in the second crop cycle (14%) when using IWD of 100% and OFR of 536 mL plant-1 week-1.O girassol, do ponto de vista econômico, apresenta viabilidade para a região Nordeste, desde que adotado o manejo adequado de aplicação de água e adubação. Baseado nisso, o presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o potencial produtivo do girassol, variedade BRS 324, sob doses de biofertilizante caprino e lâminas de irrigação, em dois ciclos. O experimento foi instalado em blocos casualizados no esquema de parcelas subsubdivididas, onde foram testadas a aplicação de cinco doses de biofertilizante caprino (0, 300, 600, 900 e 1.200 mL planta-1 semana-1) e cinco lâminas de irrigação (33; 66; 100; 133 e 166% da evaporação medida no tanque Classe “A”), em dois ciclos de cultivo, com três blocos. O 1º ciclo foi conduzido entre novembro/2014 e fevereiro/2015 e o 2º ciclo de agosto/2015 a novembro/2015. A maior produtividade da cultura foi obtida no 1º ciclo (1.220,78 kg ha-1) na dose de biofertilizante 1.200 mL planta-1 semana-1 combinada à lâmina 134,9% da ECA (524,9 mm). No 2º ciclo, a máxima produtividade de 882,07 kg ha-1 foi proporcionada com a maior dose de biofertilizante e a lâmina de irrigação de 166% da ECA (843,0 mm). A aplicação do biofertilizante caprino não alterou o teor de óleo de girassol, todavia, evidencia-se incrementos para esta variável em resposta às lâminas de irrigação. Os teores de proteína se mostram superiores no 2º ciclo de cultivo (14%) respondendo de forma efetiva a combinação da lâmina média de 100% da ECA com a dose 536 mL planta-1 semana-1 de biofertilizante caprino.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/725110.1590/1983-21252019v32n121rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2019); 211-221Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 1 (2019); 211-2211983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7251/9932Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorges, Francisca Robevania MedeirosBezerra, Francisco Marcus LimaMarinho, Albanise BarbosaRamos, Elísia GomesAdriano, Jilson de Nazaré José2023-07-20T16:58:43Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7251Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:34.331231Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv GOAT MANURE FERTILIZATION AND IRRIGATION ON PRODUCTION COMPONENTS OF SUNFLOWER
POTENCIAL PRODUTIVO DO GIRASSOL SOB DOSES DE BIOFERTILIZANTE CAPRINO E LÂMINAS DE IRRIGAÇÃO
title GOAT MANURE FERTILIZATION AND IRRIGATION ON PRODUCTION COMPONENTS OF SUNFLOWER
spellingShingle GOAT MANURE FERTILIZATION AND IRRIGATION ON PRODUCTION COMPONENTS OF SUNFLOWER
Borges, Francisca Robevania Medeiros
Helianthus annuus L. Organic fertilizer. Irrigation management. Class A tank. Yield.
Helianthus annuus L. Adubação orgânica. Manejo da irrigação. Tanque Classe A. Produtividade.
title_short GOAT MANURE FERTILIZATION AND IRRIGATION ON PRODUCTION COMPONENTS OF SUNFLOWER
title_full GOAT MANURE FERTILIZATION AND IRRIGATION ON PRODUCTION COMPONENTS OF SUNFLOWER
title_fullStr GOAT MANURE FERTILIZATION AND IRRIGATION ON PRODUCTION COMPONENTS OF SUNFLOWER
title_full_unstemmed GOAT MANURE FERTILIZATION AND IRRIGATION ON PRODUCTION COMPONENTS OF SUNFLOWER
title_sort GOAT MANURE FERTILIZATION AND IRRIGATION ON PRODUCTION COMPONENTS OF SUNFLOWER
author Borges, Francisca Robevania Medeiros
author_facet Borges, Francisca Robevania Medeiros
Bezerra, Francisco Marcus Lima
Marinho, Albanise Barbosa
Ramos, Elísia Gomes
Adriano, Jilson de Nazaré José
author_role author
author2 Bezerra, Francisco Marcus Lima
Marinho, Albanise Barbosa
Ramos, Elísia Gomes
Adriano, Jilson de Nazaré José
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borges, Francisca Robevania Medeiros
Bezerra, Francisco Marcus Lima
Marinho, Albanise Barbosa
Ramos, Elísia Gomes
Adriano, Jilson de Nazaré José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Helianthus annuus L. Organic fertilizer. Irrigation management. Class A tank. Yield.
Helianthus annuus L. Adubação orgânica. Manejo da irrigação. Tanque Classe A. Produtividade.
topic Helianthus annuus L. Organic fertilizer. Irrigation management. Class A tank. Yield.
Helianthus annuus L. Adubação orgânica. Manejo da irrigação. Tanque Classe A. Produtividade.
description Sunflower can be an economically viable crop in the Northeast region of Brazil depending on the use of appropriate irrigation and fertilization managements. The objective of this work was to evaluate production components of sunflower plants (Helianthus annuus L.) of the BRS-324 cultivar subjected to different organic fertilizer rates (goat manure) and irrigation water depths in two crop cycles (November 2014 to February 2015; and August to November 2015). The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with a split-split-plot arrangement, consisting of five organic fertilizer rates (OFR) (0, 300, 600, 900, and 1.200 mL plant-1 week-1) and five irrigation water depths (IWD) (33; 66; 100; 133, and 166% of the class A tank evaporation), with three blocks. The highest achene yield (1,220.78 kg ha-1) in the first cycle was found using OFR of 1,200 mL plant-1 week-1 and IWD of 134.9% (524.9 mm); and the highest yield (882.07 kg ha-1) in the second crop cycle was found using the highest OFR combined with IWD of 166% (843.0 mm). The use of goat manure as organic fertilizer had no effect on the sunflower oil content; however, this variable was affected by the irrigation water depths used. Protein content was higher in the second crop cycle (14%) when using IWD of 100% and OFR of 536 mL plant-1 week-1.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7251
10.1590/1983-21252019v32n121rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7251
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252019v32n121rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7251/9932
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2019); 211-221
Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 1 (2019); 211-221
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674027171446784