CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Paulo Vinicius da
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Monquero, Patrícia Andrea, Munhoz, William Sanches
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/3807
Resumo: The implantation of the mechanized harvesting system of sugarcane led to changes in the production system, in the production system was the modification of the weed flora, promoting the emergence of weed species that weren`t present in the conventional production system where the sugar cane was burnt. The present work had the objective of determining dose response curves of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone in post-emergence, over the weed species Merremia aegyptia; Ipomoea purpurea; Luffa aegyptiaca; Mucuna aterrima e Ricinus communis. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, with delineation entirely randomized, with four repetitions. The treatments constituted of the spraying of different doses of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone over the weed plants M. aegyptia; I. purpurea; L. aegyptiaca; M. aterrima e R. communis when the plants had two pairs of true leaves. . The method used was the dose response curves, being sprayed doses equivalent to 1,5; 1,0; 0,5; 0,25 and 0,0 times the commercial dose of each product (amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione, and sulfentrazone). The herbicides were sprayed individually over each weed species,. By 7, 14 and 21 days after the applications of the treatments (DAT), the symptoms of phytotoxicity were visually evaluated, and by 21 DAT, the dry mass of the shoots was determined. The herbicides saflufenacil and mesotrione weren`t effective in controlling Luffa aegyptiaca e Ricinus communis, respectively. The application of the herbicides sulfentrazone and amicarbazone resulted in control superior to 80% for all weed species times the commercial dose studied. Therefore, different levels of susceptibility of the weed plants to post-emergent herbicides were observed. The herbicides amicarbazone and sulfentrazone were the most effective.
id UFERSA-1_8a5bea3a55dca2df7955d320324d056d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/3807
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANECONTROLE EM PÓS-EMERGÊNCIA DE PLANTAS DANINHAS POR HERBICIDAS UTILIZADOS NA CULTURA DA CANA-DE-AÇÚCARChemical control. Straw. Mechanized harvest. Sugarcane.Controle químico. Palha. Colheita mecanizada. Cana-de-açúcar.The implantation of the mechanized harvesting system of sugarcane led to changes in the production system, in the production system was the modification of the weed flora, promoting the emergence of weed species that weren`t present in the conventional production system where the sugar cane was burnt. The present work had the objective of determining dose response curves of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone in post-emergence, over the weed species Merremia aegyptia; Ipomoea purpurea; Luffa aegyptiaca; Mucuna aterrima e Ricinus communis. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, with delineation entirely randomized, with four repetitions. The treatments constituted of the spraying of different doses of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone over the weed plants M. aegyptia; I. purpurea; L. aegyptiaca; M. aterrima e R. communis when the plants had two pairs of true leaves. . The method used was the dose response curves, being sprayed doses equivalent to 1,5; 1,0; 0,5; 0,25 and 0,0 times the commercial dose of each product (amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione, and sulfentrazone). The herbicides were sprayed individually over each weed species,. By 7, 14 and 21 days after the applications of the treatments (DAT), the symptoms of phytotoxicity were visually evaluated, and by 21 DAT, the dry mass of the shoots was determined. The herbicides saflufenacil and mesotrione weren`t effective in controlling Luffa aegyptiaca e Ricinus communis, respectively. The application of the herbicides sulfentrazone and amicarbazone resulted in control superior to 80% for all weed species times the commercial dose studied. Therefore, different levels of susceptibility of the weed plants to post-emergent herbicides were observed. The herbicides amicarbazone and sulfentrazone were the most effective.A implantação do sistema de colheita mecanizada de cana-de-açúcar resultou em alterações no sistema produtivo, dentre elas a modificação da flora infestante, haja vista a promoção do surgimento de espécies de plantas daninhas que antes não eram recorrentes nos canaviais. Diante do exposto, o presente trabalho teve como objetivo determinar curvas de dose resposta dos herbicidas amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione e sulfentrazone em pós-emergência no controle das plantas daninhas Merremia aegyptia, Ipomoea purpurea, Luffa aegyptiaca, Mucuna aterrima e Ricinus communis. O experimento foi realizado em casa de vegetação, em delineamento inteiramente casualizado, com quatro repetições. Os tratamentos constituíram da aplicação das diferentes doses dos herbicidas sobre as plantas daninhas M. aegyptia, I. purpúrea, L. aegyptiaca, M. aterrima e R. communis quando estas se encontravam no segundo par de folhas verdadeiras. O método utilizado foi o de curva de dose resposta, sendo aplicadas doses equivalentes a 1,5, 1,0, 0,5, 0,25 e 0,00 vezes a dose comercial de cada produto (amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione e sulfentrazone). Aos 7, 14 e 21 dias após as aplicações dos tratamentos (DAT) foram avaliados visualmente o controle, e aos 21 DAT determinada a massa seca da parte aérea. O amicarbazone e sulfentrazone na dose comercial ocasionou controle superior a 80% para todas as espécies estudadas. Os herbicidas saflufenacil e mesotrione não foram eficazes no controle de L. aegyptiaca e R. communis, respectivamente. Dessa forma, foram observados diferentes níveis de suscetibilidade das espécies de plantas daninhas aos herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência, sendo os mais eficazes amicarbazone e sulfentrazone.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2015-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/380710.1590/1983-21252015v28n403rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2015); 21-32Revista Caatinga; v. 28 n. 4 (2015); 21-321983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAporhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/3807/pdf_302Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Paulo Vinicius daMonquero, Patrícia AndreaMunhoz, William Sanches2023-07-03T16:35:32Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/3807Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:09.627548Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE
CONTROLE EM PÓS-EMERGÊNCIA DE PLANTAS DANINHAS POR HERBICIDAS UTILIZADOS NA CULTURA DA CANA-DE-AÇÚCAR
title CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE
spellingShingle CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE
Silva, Paulo Vinicius da
Chemical control. Straw. Mechanized harvest. Sugarcane.
Controle químico. Palha. Colheita mecanizada. Cana-de-açúcar.
title_short CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE
title_full CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE
title_fullStr CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE
title_full_unstemmed CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE
title_sort CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE
author Silva, Paulo Vinicius da
author_facet Silva, Paulo Vinicius da
Monquero, Patrícia Andrea
Munhoz, William Sanches
author_role author
author2 Monquero, Patrícia Andrea
Munhoz, William Sanches
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Paulo Vinicius da
Monquero, Patrícia Andrea
Munhoz, William Sanches
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chemical control. Straw. Mechanized harvest. Sugarcane.
Controle químico. Palha. Colheita mecanizada. Cana-de-açúcar.
topic Chemical control. Straw. Mechanized harvest. Sugarcane.
Controle químico. Palha. Colheita mecanizada. Cana-de-açúcar.
description The implantation of the mechanized harvesting system of sugarcane led to changes in the production system, in the production system was the modification of the weed flora, promoting the emergence of weed species that weren`t present in the conventional production system where the sugar cane was burnt. The present work had the objective of determining dose response curves of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone in post-emergence, over the weed species Merremia aegyptia; Ipomoea purpurea; Luffa aegyptiaca; Mucuna aterrima e Ricinus communis. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, with delineation entirely randomized, with four repetitions. The treatments constituted of the spraying of different doses of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone over the weed plants M. aegyptia; I. purpurea; L. aegyptiaca; M. aterrima e R. communis when the plants had two pairs of true leaves. . The method used was the dose response curves, being sprayed doses equivalent to 1,5; 1,0; 0,5; 0,25 and 0,0 times the commercial dose of each product (amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione, and sulfentrazone). The herbicides were sprayed individually over each weed species,. By 7, 14 and 21 days after the applications of the treatments (DAT), the symptoms of phytotoxicity were visually evaluated, and by 21 DAT, the dry mass of the shoots was determined. The herbicides saflufenacil and mesotrione weren`t effective in controlling Luffa aegyptiaca e Ricinus communis, respectively. The application of the herbicides sulfentrazone and amicarbazone resulted in control superior to 80% for all weed species times the commercial dose studied. Therefore, different levels of susceptibility of the weed plants to post-emergent herbicides were observed. The herbicides amicarbazone and sulfentrazone were the most effective.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/3807
10.1590/1983-21252015v28n403rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/3807
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252015v28n403rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/3807/pdf_302
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2015); 21-32
Revista Caatinga; v. 28 n. 4 (2015); 21-32
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674024753430528