CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/3807 |
Resumo: | The implantation of the mechanized harvesting system of sugarcane led to changes in the production system, in the production system was the modification of the weed flora, promoting the emergence of weed species that weren`t present in the conventional production system where the sugar cane was burnt. The present work had the objective of determining dose response curves of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone in post-emergence, over the weed species Merremia aegyptia; Ipomoea purpurea; Luffa aegyptiaca; Mucuna aterrima e Ricinus communis. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, with delineation entirely randomized, with four repetitions. The treatments constituted of the spraying of different doses of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone over the weed plants M. aegyptia; I. purpurea; L. aegyptiaca; M. aterrima e R. communis when the plants had two pairs of true leaves. . The method used was the dose response curves, being sprayed doses equivalent to 1,5; 1,0; 0,5; 0,25 and 0,0 times the commercial dose of each product (amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione, and sulfentrazone). The herbicides were sprayed individually over each weed species,. By 7, 14 and 21 days after the applications of the treatments (DAT), the symptoms of phytotoxicity were visually evaluated, and by 21 DAT, the dry mass of the shoots was determined. The herbicides saflufenacil and mesotrione weren`t effective in controlling Luffa aegyptiaca e Ricinus communis, respectively. The application of the herbicides sulfentrazone and amicarbazone resulted in control superior to 80% for all weed species times the commercial dose studied. Therefore, different levels of susceptibility of the weed plants to post-emergent herbicides were observed. The herbicides amicarbazone and sulfentrazone were the most effective. |
id |
UFERSA-1_8a5bea3a55dca2df7955d320324d056d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/3807 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANECONTROLE EM PÓS-EMERGÊNCIA DE PLANTAS DANINHAS POR HERBICIDAS UTILIZADOS NA CULTURA DA CANA-DE-AÇÚCARChemical control. Straw. Mechanized harvest. Sugarcane.Controle químico. Palha. Colheita mecanizada. Cana-de-açúcar.The implantation of the mechanized harvesting system of sugarcane led to changes in the production system, in the production system was the modification of the weed flora, promoting the emergence of weed species that weren`t present in the conventional production system where the sugar cane was burnt. The present work had the objective of determining dose response curves of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone in post-emergence, over the weed species Merremia aegyptia; Ipomoea purpurea; Luffa aegyptiaca; Mucuna aterrima e Ricinus communis. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, with delineation entirely randomized, with four repetitions. The treatments constituted of the spraying of different doses of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone over the weed plants M. aegyptia; I. purpurea; L. aegyptiaca; M. aterrima e R. communis when the plants had two pairs of true leaves. . The method used was the dose response curves, being sprayed doses equivalent to 1,5; 1,0; 0,5; 0,25 and 0,0 times the commercial dose of each product (amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione, and sulfentrazone). The herbicides were sprayed individually over each weed species,. By 7, 14 and 21 days after the applications of the treatments (DAT), the symptoms of phytotoxicity were visually evaluated, and by 21 DAT, the dry mass of the shoots was determined. The herbicides saflufenacil and mesotrione weren`t effective in controlling Luffa aegyptiaca e Ricinus communis, respectively. The application of the herbicides sulfentrazone and amicarbazone resulted in control superior to 80% for all weed species times the commercial dose studied. Therefore, different levels of susceptibility of the weed plants to post-emergent herbicides were observed. The herbicides amicarbazone and sulfentrazone were the most effective.A implantação do sistema de colheita mecanizada de cana-de-açúcar resultou em alterações no sistema produtivo, dentre elas a modificação da flora infestante, haja vista a promoção do surgimento de espécies de plantas daninhas que antes não eram recorrentes nos canaviais. Diante do exposto, o presente trabalho teve como objetivo determinar curvas de dose resposta dos herbicidas amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione e sulfentrazone em pós-emergência no controle das plantas daninhas Merremia aegyptia, Ipomoea purpurea, Luffa aegyptiaca, Mucuna aterrima e Ricinus communis. O experimento foi realizado em casa de vegetação, em delineamento inteiramente casualizado, com quatro repetições. Os tratamentos constituíram da aplicação das diferentes doses dos herbicidas sobre as plantas daninhas M. aegyptia, I. purpúrea, L. aegyptiaca, M. aterrima e R. communis quando estas se encontravam no segundo par de folhas verdadeiras. O método utilizado foi o de curva de dose resposta, sendo aplicadas doses equivalentes a 1,5, 1,0, 0,5, 0,25 e 0,00 vezes a dose comercial de cada produto (amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione e sulfentrazone). Aos 7, 14 e 21 dias após as aplicações dos tratamentos (DAT) foram avaliados visualmente o controle, e aos 21 DAT determinada a massa seca da parte aérea. O amicarbazone e sulfentrazone na dose comercial ocasionou controle superior a 80% para todas as espécies estudadas. Os herbicidas saflufenacil e mesotrione não foram eficazes no controle de L. aegyptiaca e R. communis, respectivamente. Dessa forma, foram observados diferentes níveis de suscetibilidade das espécies de plantas daninhas aos herbicidas aplicados em pós-emergência, sendo os mais eficazes amicarbazone e sulfentrazone.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2015-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/380710.1590/1983-21252015v28n403rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2015); 21-32Revista Caatinga; v. 28 n. 4 (2015); 21-321983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAporhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/3807/pdf_302Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Paulo Vinicius daMonquero, Patrícia AndreaMunhoz, William Sanches2023-07-03T16:35:32Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/3807Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:09.627548Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE CONTROLE EM PÓS-EMERGÊNCIA DE PLANTAS DANINHAS POR HERBICIDAS UTILIZADOS NA CULTURA DA CANA-DE-AÇÚCAR |
title |
CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE |
spellingShingle |
CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE Silva, Paulo Vinicius da Chemical control. Straw. Mechanized harvest. Sugarcane. Controle químico. Palha. Colheita mecanizada. Cana-de-açúcar. |
title_short |
CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE |
title_full |
CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE |
title_fullStr |
CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE |
title_full_unstemmed |
CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE |
title_sort |
CONTROL OF WEEDS IN POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES USED IN CULTURE OF SUGAR CANE |
author |
Silva, Paulo Vinicius da |
author_facet |
Silva, Paulo Vinicius da Monquero, Patrícia Andrea Munhoz, William Sanches |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Monquero, Patrícia Andrea Munhoz, William Sanches |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Paulo Vinicius da Monquero, Patrícia Andrea Munhoz, William Sanches |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chemical control. Straw. Mechanized harvest. Sugarcane. Controle químico. Palha. Colheita mecanizada. Cana-de-açúcar. |
topic |
Chemical control. Straw. Mechanized harvest. Sugarcane. Controle químico. Palha. Colheita mecanizada. Cana-de-açúcar. |
description |
The implantation of the mechanized harvesting system of sugarcane led to changes in the production system, in the production system was the modification of the weed flora, promoting the emergence of weed species that weren`t present in the conventional production system where the sugar cane was burnt. The present work had the objective of determining dose response curves of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone in post-emergence, over the weed species Merremia aegyptia; Ipomoea purpurea; Luffa aegyptiaca; Mucuna aterrima e Ricinus communis. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, with delineation entirely randomized, with four repetitions. The treatments constituted of the spraying of different doses of the herbicides amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione and sulfentrazone over the weed plants M. aegyptia; I. purpurea; L. aegyptiaca; M. aterrima e R. communis when the plants had two pairs of true leaves. . The method used was the dose response curves, being sprayed doses equivalent to 1,5; 1,0; 0,5; 0,25 and 0,0 times the commercial dose of each product (amicarbazone, saflufenacil, mesotrione, and sulfentrazone). The herbicides were sprayed individually over each weed species,. By 7, 14 and 21 days after the applications of the treatments (DAT), the symptoms of phytotoxicity were visually evaluated, and by 21 DAT, the dry mass of the shoots was determined. The herbicides saflufenacil and mesotrione weren`t effective in controlling Luffa aegyptiaca e Ricinus communis, respectively. The application of the herbicides sulfentrazone and amicarbazone resulted in control superior to 80% for all weed species times the commercial dose studied. Therefore, different levels of susceptibility of the weed plants to post-emergent herbicides were observed. The herbicides amicarbazone and sulfentrazone were the most effective. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/3807 10.1590/1983-21252015v28n403rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/3807 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252015v28n403rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/3807/pdf_302 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2015); 21-32 Revista Caatinga; v. 28 n. 4 (2015); 21-32 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674024753430528 |