Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11721 |
Resumo: | This study analyzes the economic viability of exotic and native caatinga forest species grown in silvopastoral systems, combined with the Guinea grass forage crop, compared to monoculture forestry systems, using carbon credits as an alternative source of extra income, aiming for an economic return on the sale of standing timber for firewood production. The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Station of the Pernambuco Agricultural Research Institute (IPA) in Belém do São Francisco, located in the semi-arid region of the state of Pernambuco, in the Itaparica micro region. Four tree crops were chosen, two of which are native to the Caatinga biome: Angico (Anadenanthera colubrina var. Cebil) and Aroeira (Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão), and two exotic eucalyptus clones, E. urophylla x E. tereticornis. Guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq) was chosen as the forage. The intercropping of Guinea grass with the two eucalyptus clones proved to be economically viable in all the economic parameters analyzed, and this is the most suitable for marketing standing wood for firewood production. It is not economically advisable to sell the standing wood for firewood production in the monoculture and silvopastoral systems with the native species (Angico and Aroeira) at 96 months of age due to the system's economic unfeasibility. By adding the possibility of financial credit through the atmospheric carbon sequestered by the trees, it is possible to make all the costs of forestry crops in silvopastoral and monoculture systems economically viable. |
id |
UFERSA-1_8fdbb2db838b7549a26a5ae6c1d6ec55 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11721 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon creditsViabilidade econômica de um sistema silvipastoril com e sem a inclusão de crédito de carbonoSistemas agroflorestais. Eucalyptus. Capim Tanzânia. Mercado de carbono. Espaçamento.Agroforestry systems. Eucalyptus. Guinea grass. Carbon Market. Spacing.This study analyzes the economic viability of exotic and native caatinga forest species grown in silvopastoral systems, combined with the Guinea grass forage crop, compared to monoculture forestry systems, using carbon credits as an alternative source of extra income, aiming for an economic return on the sale of standing timber for firewood production. The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Station of the Pernambuco Agricultural Research Institute (IPA) in Belém do São Francisco, located in the semi-arid region of the state of Pernambuco, in the Itaparica micro region. Four tree crops were chosen, two of which are native to the Caatinga biome: Angico (Anadenanthera colubrina var. Cebil) and Aroeira (Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão), and two exotic eucalyptus clones, E. urophylla x E. tereticornis. Guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq) was chosen as the forage. The intercropping of Guinea grass with the two eucalyptus clones proved to be economically viable in all the economic parameters analyzed, and this is the most suitable for marketing standing wood for firewood production. It is not economically advisable to sell the standing wood for firewood production in the monoculture and silvopastoral systems with the native species (Angico and Aroeira) at 96 months of age due to the system's economic unfeasibility. By adding the possibility of financial credit through the atmospheric carbon sequestered by the trees, it is possible to make all the costs of forestry crops in silvopastoral and monoculture systems economically viable.O trabalho analisa a viabilidade econômica de essências florestais, exóticas e nativas da caatinga, cultivadas em sistemas silvipastoris, consorciados a cultura forrageira do capim Tanzânia, comparados aos de monocultivo florestal, utilizando-se do crédito de carbono como alternativa de renda extra, visando retorno econômico na venda da madeira em pé para produção de lenha. O experimento foi conduzido na estação Experimental do Pernambuco Agricultural Research Institute (IPA), no município de Belém do São Francisco, localizado na região Semiárida do estado de Pernambuco, Microrregião de Itaparica. Foram escolhidos quatro cultivos arbóreos, sendo eles dois nativos do bioma Caatinga: o Angico (Anadenanthera colubrina var. Cebil), a Aroeira (Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão), e dois clones exóticos de eucalipto, E. urophylla x E. tereticornis. Em relação a forrageira, foi escolhido o capim Tanzânia (Panicum maximum Jacq). Os consórcios agrícolas do capim Tanzânia, com os dois clones de eucaliptos, apresentaram-se viáveis economicamente em todos os parâmetros econômicos analisados, sendo esse o mais indicado na comercialização da madeira em pé para produção de lenha. Não é recomendável economicamente a venda da madeira em pé para produção de lenhas no sistema de monocultivo e no silvipastoril com as espécies nativas do Angico e da Aroeira aos 96 meses de idade, devido a inviabilidade econômica do sistema. Agregando a possibilidade de crédito financeiro, mediante ao carbono atmosférico sequestrado pelas árvores, é possível viabilizar economicamente todos os custos dos cultivos florestais em sistemas silvipastoris e em monocultivo.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2023-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1172110.1590/1983-21252024v3711721rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 37 (2024); e11721Revista Caatinga; v. 37 (2024); e117211983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11721/11401Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Júlio César SobreiraSilva, José Antônio Aleixo daFerreira , Rinaldo Luiz Caraciolo2024-04-22T17:59:21Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11721Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:47:05.061827Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits Viabilidade econômica de um sistema silvipastoril com e sem a inclusão de crédito de carbono |
title |
Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits |
spellingShingle |
Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits Ferreira, Júlio César Sobreira Sistemas agroflorestais. Eucalyptus. Capim Tanzânia. Mercado de carbono. Espaçamento. Agroforestry systems. Eucalyptus. Guinea grass. Carbon Market. Spacing. |
title_short |
Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits |
title_full |
Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits |
title_fullStr |
Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits |
title_sort |
Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits |
author |
Ferreira, Júlio César Sobreira |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Júlio César Sobreira Silva, José Antônio Aleixo da Ferreira , Rinaldo Luiz Caraciolo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, José Antônio Aleixo da Ferreira , Rinaldo Luiz Caraciolo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Júlio César Sobreira Silva, José Antônio Aleixo da Ferreira , Rinaldo Luiz Caraciolo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sistemas agroflorestais. Eucalyptus. Capim Tanzânia. Mercado de carbono. Espaçamento. Agroforestry systems. Eucalyptus. Guinea grass. Carbon Market. Spacing. |
topic |
Sistemas agroflorestais. Eucalyptus. Capim Tanzânia. Mercado de carbono. Espaçamento. Agroforestry systems. Eucalyptus. Guinea grass. Carbon Market. Spacing. |
description |
This study analyzes the economic viability of exotic and native caatinga forest species grown in silvopastoral systems, combined with the Guinea grass forage crop, compared to monoculture forestry systems, using carbon credits as an alternative source of extra income, aiming for an economic return on the sale of standing timber for firewood production. The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Station of the Pernambuco Agricultural Research Institute (IPA) in Belém do São Francisco, located in the semi-arid region of the state of Pernambuco, in the Itaparica micro region. Four tree crops were chosen, two of which are native to the Caatinga biome: Angico (Anadenanthera colubrina var. Cebil) and Aroeira (Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão), and two exotic eucalyptus clones, E. urophylla x E. tereticornis. Guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq) was chosen as the forage. The intercropping of Guinea grass with the two eucalyptus clones proved to be economically viable in all the economic parameters analyzed, and this is the most suitable for marketing standing wood for firewood production. It is not economically advisable to sell the standing wood for firewood production in the monoculture and silvopastoral systems with the native species (Angico and Aroeira) at 96 months of age due to the system's economic unfeasibility. By adding the possibility of financial credit through the atmospheric carbon sequestered by the trees, it is possible to make all the costs of forestry crops in silvopastoral and monoculture systems economically viable. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11721 10.1590/1983-21252024v3711721rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11721 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252024v3711721rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11721/11401 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 37 (2024); e11721 Revista Caatinga; v. 37 (2024); e11721 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674030127382528 |