Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Júlio César Sobreira
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Silva, José Antônio Aleixo da, Ferreira , Rinaldo Luiz Caraciolo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11721
Resumo: This study analyzes the economic viability of exotic and native caatinga forest species grown in silvopastoral systems, combined with the Guinea grass forage crop, compared to monoculture forestry systems, using carbon credits as an alternative source of extra income, aiming for an economic return on the sale of standing timber for firewood production. The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Station of the Pernambuco Agricultural Research Institute (IPA) in Belém do São Francisco, located in the semi-arid region of the state of Pernambuco, in the Itaparica micro region. Four tree crops were chosen, two of which are native to the Caatinga biome: Angico (Anadenanthera colubrina var. Cebil) and Aroeira (Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão), and two exotic eucalyptus clones, E. urophylla x E. tereticornis. Guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq) was chosen as the forage. The intercropping of Guinea grass with the two eucalyptus clones proved to be economically viable in all the economic parameters analyzed, and this is the most suitable for marketing standing wood for firewood production. It is not economically advisable to sell the standing wood for firewood production in the monoculture and silvopastoral systems with the native species (Angico and Aroeira) at 96 months of age due to the system's economic unfeasibility. By adding the possibility of financial credit through the atmospheric carbon sequestered by the trees, it is possible to make all the costs of forestry crops in silvopastoral and monoculture systems economically viable.
id UFERSA-1_8fdbb2db838b7549a26a5ae6c1d6ec55
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11721
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon creditsViabilidade econômica de um sistema silvipastoril com e sem a inclusão de crédito de carbonoSistemas agroflorestais. Eucalyptus. Capim Tanzânia. Mercado de carbono. Espaçamento.Agroforestry systems. Eucalyptus. Guinea grass. Carbon Market. Spacing.This study analyzes the economic viability of exotic and native caatinga forest species grown in silvopastoral systems, combined with the Guinea grass forage crop, compared to monoculture forestry systems, using carbon credits as an alternative source of extra income, aiming for an economic return on the sale of standing timber for firewood production. The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Station of the Pernambuco Agricultural Research Institute (IPA) in Belém do São Francisco, located in the semi-arid region of the state of Pernambuco, in the Itaparica micro region. Four tree crops were chosen, two of which are native to the Caatinga biome: Angico (Anadenanthera colubrina var. Cebil) and Aroeira (Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão), and two exotic eucalyptus clones, E. urophylla x E. tereticornis. Guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq) was chosen as the forage. The intercropping of Guinea grass with the two eucalyptus clones proved to be economically viable in all the economic parameters analyzed, and this is the most suitable for marketing standing wood for firewood production. It is not economically advisable to sell the standing wood for firewood production in the monoculture and silvopastoral systems with the native species (Angico and Aroeira) at 96 months of age due to the system's economic unfeasibility. By adding the possibility of financial credit through the atmospheric carbon sequestered by the trees, it is possible to make all the costs of forestry crops in silvopastoral and monoculture systems economically viable.O trabalho analisa a viabilidade econômica de essências florestais, exóticas e nativas da caatinga, cultivadas em sistemas silvipastoris, consorciados a cultura forrageira do capim Tanzânia, comparados aos de monocultivo florestal, utilizando-se do crédito de carbono como alternativa de renda extra, visando retorno econômico na venda da madeira em pé para produção de lenha. O experimento foi conduzido na estação Experimental do Pernambuco Agricultural Research Institute (IPA), no município de Belém do São Francisco, localizado na região Semiárida do estado de Pernambuco, Microrregião de Itaparica. Foram escolhidos quatro cultivos arbóreos, sendo eles dois nativos do bioma Caatinga: o Angico (Anadenanthera colubrina var. Cebil), a Aroeira (Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão), e dois clones exóticos de eucalipto, E. urophylla x E. tereticornis. Em relação a forrageira, foi escolhido o capim Tanzânia (Panicum maximum Jacq). Os consórcios agrícolas do capim Tanzânia, com os dois clones de eucaliptos, apresentaram-se viáveis economicamente em todos os parâmetros econômicos analisados, sendo esse o mais indicado na comercialização da madeira em pé para produção de lenha. Não é recomendável economicamente a venda da madeira em pé para produção de lenhas no sistema de monocultivo e no silvipastoril com as espécies nativas do Angico e da Aroeira aos 96 meses de idade, devido a inviabilidade econômica do sistema. Agregando a possibilidade de crédito financeiro, mediante ao carbono atmosférico sequestrado pelas árvores, é possível viabilizar economicamente todos os custos dos cultivos florestais em sistemas silvipastoris e em monocultivo.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2023-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1172110.1590/1983-21252024v3711721rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 37 (2024); e11721Revista Caatinga; v. 37 (2024); e117211983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11721/11401Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Júlio César SobreiraSilva, José Antônio Aleixo daFerreira , Rinaldo Luiz Caraciolo2024-04-22T17:59:21Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11721Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:47:05.061827Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits
Viabilidade econômica de um sistema silvipastoril com e sem a inclusão de crédito de carbono
title Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits
spellingShingle Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits
Ferreira, Júlio César Sobreira
Sistemas agroflorestais. Eucalyptus. Capim Tanzânia. Mercado de carbono. Espaçamento.
Agroforestry systems. Eucalyptus. Guinea grass. Carbon Market. Spacing.
title_short Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits
title_full Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits
title_fullStr Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits
title_full_unstemmed Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits
title_sort Economic viability of a silvopastoral system with and without the inclusion of carbon credits
author Ferreira, Júlio César Sobreira
author_facet Ferreira, Júlio César Sobreira
Silva, José Antônio Aleixo da
Ferreira , Rinaldo Luiz Caraciolo
author_role author
author2 Silva, José Antônio Aleixo da
Ferreira , Rinaldo Luiz Caraciolo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Júlio César Sobreira
Silva, José Antônio Aleixo da
Ferreira , Rinaldo Luiz Caraciolo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sistemas agroflorestais. Eucalyptus. Capim Tanzânia. Mercado de carbono. Espaçamento.
Agroforestry systems. Eucalyptus. Guinea grass. Carbon Market. Spacing.
topic Sistemas agroflorestais. Eucalyptus. Capim Tanzânia. Mercado de carbono. Espaçamento.
Agroforestry systems. Eucalyptus. Guinea grass. Carbon Market. Spacing.
description This study analyzes the economic viability of exotic and native caatinga forest species grown in silvopastoral systems, combined with the Guinea grass forage crop, compared to monoculture forestry systems, using carbon credits as an alternative source of extra income, aiming for an economic return on the sale of standing timber for firewood production. The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Station of the Pernambuco Agricultural Research Institute (IPA) in Belém do São Francisco, located in the semi-arid region of the state of Pernambuco, in the Itaparica micro region. Four tree crops were chosen, two of which are native to the Caatinga biome: Angico (Anadenanthera colubrina var. Cebil) and Aroeira (Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão), and two exotic eucalyptus clones, E. urophylla x E. tereticornis. Guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq) was chosen as the forage. The intercropping of Guinea grass with the two eucalyptus clones proved to be economically viable in all the economic parameters analyzed, and this is the most suitable for marketing standing wood for firewood production. It is not economically advisable to sell the standing wood for firewood production in the monoculture and silvopastoral systems with the native species (Angico and Aroeira) at 96 months of age due to the system's economic unfeasibility. By adding the possibility of financial credit through the atmospheric carbon sequestered by the trees, it is possible to make all the costs of forestry crops in silvopastoral and monoculture systems economically viable.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11721
10.1590/1983-21252024v3711721rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11721
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252024v3711721rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11721/11401
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 37 (2024); e11721
Revista Caatinga; v. 37 (2024); e11721
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674030127382528