COMPOSITION AND FREQUENCY OF FLOWER VISITORS IN SOME VARIETIES OF MELON UNDER DIFFERENT CROP CONDITIONS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9567 |
Resumo: | Previous investigations showed that diverse varieties of melon may have different attractiveness for bees. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the composition, frequency and behavior of flower visitors of some melon (Cucumis melo) cultivars (Amarelo, Pele de Sapo, Cantaloupe, Gália) in different conditions (conventional and organic farming, dry and rainy seasons, with and without mulching and introduction or not of honey bee hives) in the main production poles in the Brazilian Northeast (Petrolina-PE/Juazeiro-BA, Pacajus-CE and Mossoró-RN). Observations and collections of flower visitors occurred from 5p.m. to 6p.m, in non-consecutive days. We recorded 12 species of insects, mostly bees. The most frequent was Apis mellifera (99.68%), but other species appeared sporadically (less than 0.5%): Xylocopa grisescens, Trigona spinipes, Plebeia sp., Melipona mandacaia, Frieseomelitta doedereleini, Halicitidae. Apis mellifera was present in all studied cultivars and sites. Xylocopa grisescens appeared in two poles, but not in Pacajus-CE, Amarelo cultivar. In addition, Trigona spinipes, although present in the three poles, was not recorded on Pele de Sapo. The Amarelo cultivar, under organic farming, without the use of mulching, and presence of honey bee hives, in the Petrolina-PE/Juazeiro-BA pole, in the dry season, was the combination of factors showing the largest number of Apis mellifera as the main visitor of melon flowers. |
id |
UFERSA-1_a14f3403157e8cd30ba7abe7ecbb56db |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9567 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
COMPOSITION AND FREQUENCY OF FLOWER VISITORS IN SOME VARIETIES OF MELON UNDER DIFFERENT CROP CONDITIONSCOMPOSIÇÃO E FREQUÊNCIA DE VISITANTES FLORAIS EM ALGUMAS VARIEDADES DE MELOEIRO SOB DIFERENTES SITUAÇÕES DE CULTIVOSPolinização. Melão. Apis mellifera. Cucumis melo.Pollination. Melon. Apis mellifera. Cucumis melo.Previous investigations showed that diverse varieties of melon may have different attractiveness for bees. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the composition, frequency and behavior of flower visitors of some melon (Cucumis melo) cultivars (Amarelo, Pele de Sapo, Cantaloupe, Gália) in different conditions (conventional and organic farming, dry and rainy seasons, with and without mulching and introduction or not of honey bee hives) in the main production poles in the Brazilian Northeast (Petrolina-PE/Juazeiro-BA, Pacajus-CE and Mossoró-RN). Observations and collections of flower visitors occurred from 5p.m. to 6p.m, in non-consecutive days. We recorded 12 species of insects, mostly bees. The most frequent was Apis mellifera (99.68%), but other species appeared sporadically (less than 0.5%): Xylocopa grisescens, Trigona spinipes, Plebeia sp., Melipona mandacaia, Frieseomelitta doedereleini, Halicitidae. Apis mellifera was present in all studied cultivars and sites. Xylocopa grisescens appeared in two poles, but not in Pacajus-CE, Amarelo cultivar. In addition, Trigona spinipes, although present in the three poles, was not recorded on Pele de Sapo. The Amarelo cultivar, under organic farming, without the use of mulching, and presence of honey bee hives, in the Petrolina-PE/Juazeiro-BA pole, in the dry season, was the combination of factors showing the largest number of Apis mellifera as the main visitor of melon flowers.Investigações anteriores mostraram que cultivares diversas de meloeiro podem apresentar diferente atratividade para abelhas. Portanto, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a composição, frequência e comportamento de visitantes florais de algumas cultivares do meloeiro (Cucumis melo) (Amarelo, Pele de Sapo, Cantaloupe, Gália) em variadas situações (cultivo convencional e orgânico, época seca e chuvosa, com e sem mulching e introdução ou não de colmeias de abelhas melíferas) nos principais polos de produção do Nordeste brasileiro (Petrolina-PE/Juazeiro-BA, Pacajus-CE e Mossoró-RN). As observações e coletas dos visitantes ocorreram das 5h00 às 18h00, em dias não consecutivos. Foram registradas 12 espécies de insetos, a maioria abelhas. Entre elas, a mais frequente foi Apis mellifera (99.68%), mas outras espécies apareceram esporadicamente (menos de 0,5%): Xylocopa grisescens, Trigona spinipes, Plebeia sp., Melipona mandacaia, Frieseomelitta doedereleini, Halicitidae. Apis mellifera esteve presente em todas as cultivares e locais estudados. Xylocopa grisescens apareceu em dois polos, mas não em Pacajus-CE, no tipo Amarelo. E Trigona spinipes, embora estivesse presente nos três polos, não foi registrada no Pele de Sapo. O tipo Amarelo, com cultivo orgânico, sem o uso de mulching, e presença de colmeias de abelhas melíferas, no polo Petrolina-PE/Juazeiro-BA, na época seca, foi a combinação de fatores que apresentou maior número de Apis mellifera como principal polinizadora das flores do meloeiro.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2021-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/956710.1590/1983-21252021v34n425rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021); 976-984Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 4 (2021); 976-9841983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9567/10760Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Eva Monica Sarmento daRibeiro, Marcia de FátimaKiill, Lúcia Helena PiedadeCoelho, Márcia de SousaSilva, Mara Poline da2023-07-04T14:13:58Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9567Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:51.031065Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
COMPOSITION AND FREQUENCY OF FLOWER VISITORS IN SOME VARIETIES OF MELON UNDER DIFFERENT CROP CONDITIONS COMPOSIÇÃO E FREQUÊNCIA DE VISITANTES FLORAIS EM ALGUMAS VARIEDADES DE MELOEIRO SOB DIFERENTES SITUAÇÕES DE CULTIVOS |
title |
COMPOSITION AND FREQUENCY OF FLOWER VISITORS IN SOME VARIETIES OF MELON UNDER DIFFERENT CROP CONDITIONS |
spellingShingle |
COMPOSITION AND FREQUENCY OF FLOWER VISITORS IN SOME VARIETIES OF MELON UNDER DIFFERENT CROP CONDITIONS Silva, Eva Monica Sarmento da Polinização. Melão. Apis mellifera. Cucumis melo. Pollination. Melon. Apis mellifera. Cucumis melo. |
title_short |
COMPOSITION AND FREQUENCY OF FLOWER VISITORS IN SOME VARIETIES OF MELON UNDER DIFFERENT CROP CONDITIONS |
title_full |
COMPOSITION AND FREQUENCY OF FLOWER VISITORS IN SOME VARIETIES OF MELON UNDER DIFFERENT CROP CONDITIONS |
title_fullStr |
COMPOSITION AND FREQUENCY OF FLOWER VISITORS IN SOME VARIETIES OF MELON UNDER DIFFERENT CROP CONDITIONS |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPOSITION AND FREQUENCY OF FLOWER VISITORS IN SOME VARIETIES OF MELON UNDER DIFFERENT CROP CONDITIONS |
title_sort |
COMPOSITION AND FREQUENCY OF FLOWER VISITORS IN SOME VARIETIES OF MELON UNDER DIFFERENT CROP CONDITIONS |
author |
Silva, Eva Monica Sarmento da |
author_facet |
Silva, Eva Monica Sarmento da Ribeiro, Marcia de Fátima Kiill, Lúcia Helena Piedade Coelho, Márcia de Sousa Silva, Mara Poline da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro, Marcia de Fátima Kiill, Lúcia Helena Piedade Coelho, Márcia de Sousa Silva, Mara Poline da |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Eva Monica Sarmento da Ribeiro, Marcia de Fátima Kiill, Lúcia Helena Piedade Coelho, Márcia de Sousa Silva, Mara Poline da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Polinização. Melão. Apis mellifera. Cucumis melo. Pollination. Melon. Apis mellifera. Cucumis melo. |
topic |
Polinização. Melão. Apis mellifera. Cucumis melo. Pollination. Melon. Apis mellifera. Cucumis melo. |
description |
Previous investigations showed that diverse varieties of melon may have different attractiveness for bees. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the composition, frequency and behavior of flower visitors of some melon (Cucumis melo) cultivars (Amarelo, Pele de Sapo, Cantaloupe, Gália) in different conditions (conventional and organic farming, dry and rainy seasons, with and without mulching and introduction or not of honey bee hives) in the main production poles in the Brazilian Northeast (Petrolina-PE/Juazeiro-BA, Pacajus-CE and Mossoró-RN). Observations and collections of flower visitors occurred from 5p.m. to 6p.m, in non-consecutive days. We recorded 12 species of insects, mostly bees. The most frequent was Apis mellifera (99.68%), but other species appeared sporadically (less than 0.5%): Xylocopa grisescens, Trigona spinipes, Plebeia sp., Melipona mandacaia, Frieseomelitta doedereleini, Halicitidae. Apis mellifera was present in all studied cultivars and sites. Xylocopa grisescens appeared in two poles, but not in Pacajus-CE, Amarelo cultivar. In addition, Trigona spinipes, although present in the three poles, was not recorded on Pele de Sapo. The Amarelo cultivar, under organic farming, without the use of mulching, and presence of honey bee hives, in the Petrolina-PE/Juazeiro-BA pole, in the dry season, was the combination of factors showing the largest number of Apis mellifera as the main visitor of melon flowers. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9567 10.1590/1983-21252021v34n425rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9567 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252021v34n425rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9567/10760 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021); 976-984 Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 4 (2021); 976-984 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674028927811584 |