YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6920 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different doses of bovine biofertilizer on yield and post harvest of the strawberry crop in different growing environments. The experiment was carried out in two cycles of production, in Fortaleza, Ceará. The experimental design was in randomized blocks, arranged in subdivided plots, where the plots were of three cultivated environments (A1 = protected environment with screens, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A2 = environment with full sun, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A3 = environment with full sun, no cold-water spraying, and grey floor). The subplots consisted of five doses of biofertilizer (D1 = 0,0, D2 = 500, D3 = 750, D4 = 1000 and D5 = 1250 mL plant-1 week -1), with five replications. In the two-year period, the dose was higher in the protected environment of the weed type, with nebulization and on the white floor, at the dose of 500 mL week-1 plant-1 in the first cycle and 325 mL week-1 plant-1 in the second cycle. The dose of bovine biofertilizer of 1250 mL week-1 plant-1 promotes a longer duration and duration of the first cycle. During the second cycle, as the bovine biofertilizer doses of 585 and 620 provide higher and lower output than the protected environment. The environment without nebulization and on the floor without painting, the best soluble practices (° Brix) in relation to the protected environment of the type screened and a full sun with nebulization. |
id |
UFERSA-1_b6697c7d3af81401a069707aac963f86 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/6920 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZERPRODUTIVIDADE E QUALIDADE DE FRUTOS DE MORANGUEIRO ADUBADOS COM BIOFERTILIZANTE BOVINOFragaria x ananassa duch. Organic Input. Postharvest.Fragaria x ananassa duch. Insumo orgânico. Pós-colheita.The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different doses of bovine biofertilizer on yield and post harvest of the strawberry crop in different growing environments. The experiment was carried out in two cycles of production, in Fortaleza, Ceará. The experimental design was in randomized blocks, arranged in subdivided plots, where the plots were of three cultivated environments (A1 = protected environment with screens, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A2 = environment with full sun, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A3 = environment with full sun, no cold-water spraying, and grey floor). The subplots consisted of five doses of biofertilizer (D1 = 0,0, D2 = 500, D3 = 750, D4 = 1000 and D5 = 1250 mL plant-1 week -1), with five replications. In the two-year period, the dose was higher in the protected environment of the weed type, with nebulization and on the white floor, at the dose of 500 mL week-1 plant-1 in the first cycle and 325 mL week-1 plant-1 in the second cycle. The dose of bovine biofertilizer of 1250 mL week-1 plant-1 promotes a longer duration and duration of the first cycle. During the second cycle, as the bovine biofertilizer doses of 585 and 620 provide higher and lower output than the protected environment. The environment without nebulization and on the floor without painting, the best soluble practices (° Brix) in relation to the protected environment of the type screened and a full sun with nebulization.Objetivou-se avaliar o efeito de diferentes doses de biofertilizante bovino na produtividade e na pós-colheita da cultura do morango em diferentes ambientes de cultivo. O experimento foi desenvolvido, em dois ciclos de produção, em Fortaleza, Ceará. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos ao acaso, arranjados em parcelas subdivididas, onde as parcelas foram três ambientes de cultivo (A1= ambiente protegido do tipo telado, com nebulização com água gelada (temperatura variando entre 18 e 20 °C) e sobre piso branco, A2 = a pleno sol, com nebulização com água gelada e sobre piso branco, A3 = a pleno sol sem nebulização e sobre piso concretado sem pintura) e as subparcelas, cinco doses de biofertilizante (D1=0,0; D2=500; D3= 750; D4=1000; e D5= 1250 mL planta-1. semana-1), com cinco repetições. Nos dois anos, a produtividade foi maior no ambiente protegido do tipo telado, com nebulização e sobre piso branco, na dose de 500 mL semana-1 planta-1 no primeiro ciclo e 325 mL semana-1 planta-1 no segundo ciclo. A dose de biofertilizante bovino de 1250 mL semana-1 planta-1 promovem melhor diâmetro e comprimento do fruto dutante o primeiro ciclo. Durante o segundo ciclo, as doses de biofertilizante bovino de 585 e 620 proporcionam maior comprimento e diâmetro do fruto, respectivamente, no ambiente protegido do tipo telado, com nebulização e sobre piso branco. O ambiente a pleno sol sem nebulização e sobre piso sem pintura, apresentou melhores sólidos solúveis (°Brix) em relação ao ambiente protegido do tipo telado e a pleno sol com nebulização.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/692010.1590/1983-21252019v32n103rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2019); 16-26Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 1 (2019); 16-261983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6920/9906Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Elisangela Maria dosViana, Thales Vinícius de AraújoSousa, Geocleber Gomes deAzevedo, Benito Moreira deMoraes, João Gutemberg Leite2023-07-20T16:51:33Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/6920Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:32.050070Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER PRODUTIVIDADE E QUALIDADE DE FRUTOS DE MORANGUEIRO ADUBADOS COM BIOFERTILIZANTE BOVINO |
title |
YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER |
spellingShingle |
YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER Santos, Elisangela Maria dos Fragaria x ananassa duch. Organic Input. Postharvest. Fragaria x ananassa duch. Insumo orgânico. Pós-colheita. |
title_short |
YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER |
title_full |
YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER |
title_fullStr |
YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER |
title_full_unstemmed |
YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER |
title_sort |
YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER |
author |
Santos, Elisangela Maria dos |
author_facet |
Santos, Elisangela Maria dos Viana, Thales Vinícius de Araújo Sousa, Geocleber Gomes de Azevedo, Benito Moreira de Moraes, João Gutemberg Leite |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Viana, Thales Vinícius de Araújo Sousa, Geocleber Gomes de Azevedo, Benito Moreira de Moraes, João Gutemberg Leite |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Elisangela Maria dos Viana, Thales Vinícius de Araújo Sousa, Geocleber Gomes de Azevedo, Benito Moreira de Moraes, João Gutemberg Leite |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fragaria x ananassa duch. Organic Input. Postharvest. Fragaria x ananassa duch. Insumo orgânico. Pós-colheita. |
topic |
Fragaria x ananassa duch. Organic Input. Postharvest. Fragaria x ananassa duch. Insumo orgânico. Pós-colheita. |
description |
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different doses of bovine biofertilizer on yield and post harvest of the strawberry crop in different growing environments. The experiment was carried out in two cycles of production, in Fortaleza, Ceará. The experimental design was in randomized blocks, arranged in subdivided plots, where the plots were of three cultivated environments (A1 = protected environment with screens, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A2 = environment with full sun, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A3 = environment with full sun, no cold-water spraying, and grey floor). The subplots consisted of five doses of biofertilizer (D1 = 0,0, D2 = 500, D3 = 750, D4 = 1000 and D5 = 1250 mL plant-1 week -1), with five replications. In the two-year period, the dose was higher in the protected environment of the weed type, with nebulization and on the white floor, at the dose of 500 mL week-1 plant-1 in the first cycle and 325 mL week-1 plant-1 in the second cycle. The dose of bovine biofertilizer of 1250 mL week-1 plant-1 promotes a longer duration and duration of the first cycle. During the second cycle, as the bovine biofertilizer doses of 585 and 620 provide higher and lower output than the protected environment. The environment without nebulization and on the floor without painting, the best soluble practices (° Brix) in relation to the protected environment of the type screened and a full sun with nebulization. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6920 10.1590/1983-21252019v32n103rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6920 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252019v32n103rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6920/9906 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2019); 16-26 Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 1 (2019); 16-26 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674027068686336 |