YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Elisangela Maria dos
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Viana, Thales Vinícius de Araújo, Sousa, Geocleber Gomes de, Azevedo, Benito Moreira de, Moraes, João Gutemberg Leite
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6920
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different doses of bovine biofertilizer on yield and post harvest of the strawberry crop in different growing environments. The experiment was carried out in two cycles of production, in Fortaleza, Ceará. The experimental design was in randomized blocks, arranged in subdivided plots, where the plots were of three cultivated environments (A1 = protected environment with screens, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A2 = environment with full sun, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A3 = environment with full sun, no cold-water spraying, and grey floor). The subplots consisted of five doses of biofertilizer (D1 = 0,0, D2 = 500, D3 = 750, D4 = 1000 and D5 = 1250 mL plant-1 week -1), with five replications. In the two-year period, the dose was higher in the protected environment of the weed type, with nebulization and on the white floor, at the dose of 500 mL week-1 plant-1 in the first cycle and 325 mL week-1 plant-1 in the second cycle. The dose of bovine biofertilizer of 1250 mL week-1 plant-1 promotes a longer duration and duration of the first cycle. During the second cycle, as the bovine biofertilizer doses of 585 and 620 provide higher and lower output than the protected environment. The environment without nebulization and on the floor without painting, the best soluble practices (° Brix) in relation to the protected environment of the type screened and a full sun with nebulization.
id UFERSA-1_b6697c7d3af81401a069707aac963f86
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/6920
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZERPRODUTIVIDADE E QUALIDADE DE FRUTOS DE MORANGUEIRO ADUBADOS COM BIOFERTILIZANTE BOVINOFragaria x ananassa duch. Organic Input. Postharvest.Fragaria x ananassa duch. Insumo orgânico. Pós-colheita.The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different doses of bovine biofertilizer on yield and post harvest of the strawberry crop in different growing environments. The experiment was carried out in two cycles of production, in Fortaleza, Ceará. The experimental design was in randomized blocks, arranged in subdivided plots, where the plots were of three cultivated environments (A1 = protected environment with screens, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A2 = environment with full sun, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A3 = environment with full sun, no cold-water spraying, and grey floor). The subplots consisted of five doses of biofertilizer (D1 = 0,0, D2 = 500, D3 = 750, D4 = 1000 and D5 = 1250 mL plant-1 week -1), with five replications. In the two-year period, the dose was higher in the protected environment of the weed type, with nebulization and on the white floor, at the dose of 500 mL week-1 plant-1 in the first cycle and 325 mL week-1 plant-1 in the second cycle. The dose of bovine biofertilizer of 1250 mL week-1 plant-1 promotes a longer duration and duration of the first cycle. During the second cycle, as the bovine biofertilizer doses of 585 and 620 provide higher and lower output than the protected environment. The environment without nebulization and on the floor without painting, the best soluble practices (° Brix) in relation to the protected environment of the type screened and a full sun with nebulization.Objetivou-se avaliar o efeito de diferentes doses de biofertilizante bovino na produtividade e na pós-colheita da cultura do morango em diferentes ambientes de cultivo. O experimento foi desenvolvido, em dois ciclos de produção, em Fortaleza, Ceará. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos ao acaso, arranjados em parcelas subdivididas, onde as parcelas foram três ambientes de cultivo (A1= ambiente protegido do tipo telado, com nebulização com água gelada (temperatura variando entre 18 e 20 °C) e sobre piso branco, A2 = a pleno sol, com nebulização com água gelada e sobre piso branco, A3 = a pleno sol sem nebulização e sobre piso concretado sem pintura) e as subparcelas, cinco doses de biofertilizante (D1=0,0; D2=500; D3= 750; D4=1000; e D5= 1250 mL planta-1. semana-1), com cinco repetições. Nos dois anos, a produtividade foi maior no ambiente protegido do tipo telado, com nebulização e sobre piso branco, na dose de 500 mL semana-1 planta-1 no primeiro ciclo e 325 mL semana-1 planta-1 no segundo ciclo. A dose de biofertilizante bovino de 1250 mL semana-1 planta-1 promovem melhor diâmetro e comprimento do fruto dutante o primeiro ciclo. Durante o segundo ciclo, as doses de biofertilizante bovino de 585 e 620 proporcionam maior comprimento e diâmetro do fruto, respectivamente, no ambiente protegido do tipo telado, com nebulização e sobre piso branco. O ambiente a pleno sol sem nebulização e sobre piso sem pintura, apresentou melhores sólidos solúveis (°Brix) em relação ao ambiente protegido do tipo telado e a pleno sol com nebulização.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/692010.1590/1983-21252019v32n103rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2019); 16-26Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 1 (2019); 16-261983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6920/9906Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Elisangela Maria dosViana, Thales Vinícius de AraújoSousa, Geocleber Gomes deAzevedo, Benito Moreira deMoraes, João Gutemberg Leite2023-07-20T16:51:33Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/6920Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:32.050070Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER
PRODUTIVIDADE E QUALIDADE DE FRUTOS DE MORANGUEIRO ADUBADOS COM BIOFERTILIZANTE BOVINO
title YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER
spellingShingle YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER
Santos, Elisangela Maria dos
Fragaria x ananassa duch. Organic Input. Postharvest.
Fragaria x ananassa duch. Insumo orgânico. Pós-colheita.
title_short YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER
title_full YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER
title_fullStr YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER
title_full_unstemmed YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER
title_sort YIELD AND QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY FRUITS FERTILIZED WITH BOVINE BIOFERTILIZER
author Santos, Elisangela Maria dos
author_facet Santos, Elisangela Maria dos
Viana, Thales Vinícius de Araújo
Sousa, Geocleber Gomes de
Azevedo, Benito Moreira de
Moraes, João Gutemberg Leite
author_role author
author2 Viana, Thales Vinícius de Araújo
Sousa, Geocleber Gomes de
Azevedo, Benito Moreira de
Moraes, João Gutemberg Leite
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Elisangela Maria dos
Viana, Thales Vinícius de Araújo
Sousa, Geocleber Gomes de
Azevedo, Benito Moreira de
Moraes, João Gutemberg Leite
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fragaria x ananassa duch. Organic Input. Postharvest.
Fragaria x ananassa duch. Insumo orgânico. Pós-colheita.
topic Fragaria x ananassa duch. Organic Input. Postharvest.
Fragaria x ananassa duch. Insumo orgânico. Pós-colheita.
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different doses of bovine biofertilizer on yield and post harvest of the strawberry crop in different growing environments. The experiment was carried out in two cycles of production, in Fortaleza, Ceará. The experimental design was in randomized blocks, arranged in subdivided plots, where the plots were of three cultivated environments (A1 = protected environment with screens, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A2 = environment with full sun, cold-water spraying, and white floor; A3 = environment with full sun, no cold-water spraying, and grey floor). The subplots consisted of five doses of biofertilizer (D1 = 0,0, D2 = 500, D3 = 750, D4 = 1000 and D5 = 1250 mL plant-1 week -1), with five replications. In the two-year period, the dose was higher in the protected environment of the weed type, with nebulization and on the white floor, at the dose of 500 mL week-1 plant-1 in the first cycle and 325 mL week-1 plant-1 in the second cycle. The dose of bovine biofertilizer of 1250 mL week-1 plant-1 promotes a longer duration and duration of the first cycle. During the second cycle, as the bovine biofertilizer doses of 585 and 620 provide higher and lower output than the protected environment. The environment without nebulization and on the floor without painting, the best soluble practices (° Brix) in relation to the protected environment of the type screened and a full sun with nebulization.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6920
10.1590/1983-21252019v32n103rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6920
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252019v32n103rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6920/9906
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2019); 16-26
Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 1 (2019); 16-26
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674027068686336