WOODY NECROMASS STOCK IN MIXED OMBROPHILOUS FOREST USING DIFFERENT SAMPLING METHODS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Deus, Karina Henkel Proceke de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Figueiredo Filho, Afonso, Dias, Andrea Nogueira, Bonete, Izabel Passos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6662
Resumo: The objective of this study was to quantify the necromass stock in a Mixed Ombrophilous Forest (MOF) fragment in the National Forest of Irati, State of Paraná, Brazil. Two sampling methods were tested: FA1, consisting of a fixed area (FA) approach with sample units measuring 2,500 m2 (50 m × 50 m); and FA2, consisting of fixed area sampling units measuring 500 m2 (10 m × 50 m) and line intercept sampling (LI) using 50 m lines. Data were collected on permanent sample plots installed in the area, consisting of 25 square blocks of 1 ha. Fallen dead wood pieces with a diameter ≥ 10 cm were used in the analysis. The dead wood was classified into three degrees of decomposition, and masses were calculated as the corresponding density at each class. The tested sampling methods were evaluated using coefficient of variation and relative sampling error, and the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the results between the methods. Volume size of fallen dead wood did not statistically differ between the methods, but variation in necromass volume was lower in the FA1 method, whereas the FA2 method had a smaller sampling error. Overall sampling error ranged from 23.4–27.92%; lowering the sampling error to 15% would require a high sampling intensity (FA1: 42 area units [a.u.], FA2: 99 a.u., and LI: 236 a.u.). Total necromass weights amounted to 4.67 Mg.ha-1 (FA1); 5.16 Mg.ha-1 (FA2) and 4.58 Mg.ha-1 (IL), and carbon stock estimates were 2.00 Mg.C.ha-1 (FA1); 2.20 Mg.C.ha-1 (FA2) and 1.96 Mg.C.ha-1 (IL).
id UFERSA-1_ddfad4a40238520ca49ffaf33cd29f2a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/6662
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling WOODY NECROMASS STOCK IN MIXED OMBROPHILOUS FOREST USING DIFFERENT SAMPLING METHODSESTOQUE DE NECROMASSA LENHOSA EM FLORESTA OMBRÓFILA MISTA USANDO DIFERENTES MÉTODOS DE AMOSTRAGEMMadeira morta. Linha Interceptadora. Amostragem em área fixa. Teste não paramétrico.Dead wood. Line intercept sampling. Fixed area sampling. Nonparametric statistics.The objective of this study was to quantify the necromass stock in a Mixed Ombrophilous Forest (MOF) fragment in the National Forest of Irati, State of Paraná, Brazil. Two sampling methods were tested: FA1, consisting of a fixed area (FA) approach with sample units measuring 2,500 m2 (50 m × 50 m); and FA2, consisting of fixed area sampling units measuring 500 m2 (10 m × 50 m) and line intercept sampling (LI) using 50 m lines. Data were collected on permanent sample plots installed in the area, consisting of 25 square blocks of 1 ha. Fallen dead wood pieces with a diameter ≥ 10 cm were used in the analysis. The dead wood was classified into three degrees of decomposition, and masses were calculated as the corresponding density at each class. The tested sampling methods were evaluated using coefficient of variation and relative sampling error, and the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the results between the methods. Volume size of fallen dead wood did not statistically differ between the methods, but variation in necromass volume was lower in the FA1 method, whereas the FA2 method had a smaller sampling error. Overall sampling error ranged from 23.4–27.92%; lowering the sampling error to 15% would require a high sampling intensity (FA1: 42 area units [a.u.], FA2: 99 a.u., and LI: 236 a.u.). Total necromass weights amounted to 4.67 Mg.ha-1 (FA1); 5.16 Mg.ha-1 (FA2) and 4.58 Mg.ha-1 (IL), and carbon stock estimates were 2.00 Mg.C.ha-1 (FA1); 2.20 Mg.C.ha-1 (FA2) and 1.96 Mg.C.ha-1 (IL).O estudo teve por objetivo quantificar o estoque de necromassa, em um fragmento de Floresta Ombrófila Mista, na Floresta Nacional de Irati, estado do Paraná. Dois métodos de amostragem foram testados, sendo área fixa (AF) com unidades amostrais de 2500 m2 (50 m x 50 m) -AF1; área fixa com unidades amostrais de 500 m2 (10 m x 50 m) – AF2 e método de amostragem por Linha Interceptadora (LI), com linhas de 50 m. Os dados foram coletados em parcelas permanentes instaladas na área, constituídas por 25 blocos quadrados de 1 ha. Foram medidas peças de madeira morta caída com diâmetro ≥ 10 cm. A madeira morta foi classificada em três graus de decomposição e a massa foi calculada conforme a densidade correspondente a cada classe. Os métodos de amostragem testados foram avaliados por meio do Coeficiente de Variação e do Erro de Amostragem Relativo. Para comparações dos resultados entre os métodos utilizou-se o teste não paramétrico de Kruskal-Wallis. Os volumes para madeira morta caída não diferiram estatisticamente entre os métodos, porém o método AF1 teve menor variação do volume de necromassa e o método AF2 apresentou menor erro de amostragem. O erro amostral variou de 23,4 % a 27,92 % entre os métodos. Para atingir um erro de amostragem de 15% seria necessária uma elevada intensidade amostral (AF1: 42 unidades de área [u.a.], AF2: 99 u.a., e LI: 236 u.a.). O peso total de necromassa foi de 4,67 Mg.ha-1 (AF1); 5,16 Mg.ha-1 (AF2), e 4,58 Mg.ha-1 (LI) e o estoque de carbono foi de 2,00 Mg.C.ha-1(AF1); 2,20 Mg.C.ha-1 (AF2), e 1,96 Mg.C.ha-1 (LI).Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2018-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/666210.1590/1983-21252018v31n316rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 31 No. 3 (2018); 674-680Revista Caatinga; v. 31 n. 3 (2018); 674-6801983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6662/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDeus, Karina Henkel Proceke deFigueiredo Filho, AfonsoDias, Andrea NogueiraBonete, Izabel Passos2023-07-20T13:26:21Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/6662Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:29.973957Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv WOODY NECROMASS STOCK IN MIXED OMBROPHILOUS FOREST USING DIFFERENT SAMPLING METHODS
ESTOQUE DE NECROMASSA LENHOSA EM FLORESTA OMBRÓFILA MISTA USANDO DIFERENTES MÉTODOS DE AMOSTRAGEM
title WOODY NECROMASS STOCK IN MIXED OMBROPHILOUS FOREST USING DIFFERENT SAMPLING METHODS
spellingShingle WOODY NECROMASS STOCK IN MIXED OMBROPHILOUS FOREST USING DIFFERENT SAMPLING METHODS
Deus, Karina Henkel Proceke de
Madeira morta. Linha Interceptadora. Amostragem em área fixa. Teste não paramétrico.
Dead wood. Line intercept sampling. Fixed area sampling. Nonparametric statistics.
title_short WOODY NECROMASS STOCK IN MIXED OMBROPHILOUS FOREST USING DIFFERENT SAMPLING METHODS
title_full WOODY NECROMASS STOCK IN MIXED OMBROPHILOUS FOREST USING DIFFERENT SAMPLING METHODS
title_fullStr WOODY NECROMASS STOCK IN MIXED OMBROPHILOUS FOREST USING DIFFERENT SAMPLING METHODS
title_full_unstemmed WOODY NECROMASS STOCK IN MIXED OMBROPHILOUS FOREST USING DIFFERENT SAMPLING METHODS
title_sort WOODY NECROMASS STOCK IN MIXED OMBROPHILOUS FOREST USING DIFFERENT SAMPLING METHODS
author Deus, Karina Henkel Proceke de
author_facet Deus, Karina Henkel Proceke de
Figueiredo Filho, Afonso
Dias, Andrea Nogueira
Bonete, Izabel Passos
author_role author
author2 Figueiredo Filho, Afonso
Dias, Andrea Nogueira
Bonete, Izabel Passos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Deus, Karina Henkel Proceke de
Figueiredo Filho, Afonso
Dias, Andrea Nogueira
Bonete, Izabel Passos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Madeira morta. Linha Interceptadora. Amostragem em área fixa. Teste não paramétrico.
Dead wood. Line intercept sampling. Fixed area sampling. Nonparametric statistics.
topic Madeira morta. Linha Interceptadora. Amostragem em área fixa. Teste não paramétrico.
Dead wood. Line intercept sampling. Fixed area sampling. Nonparametric statistics.
description The objective of this study was to quantify the necromass stock in a Mixed Ombrophilous Forest (MOF) fragment in the National Forest of Irati, State of Paraná, Brazil. Two sampling methods were tested: FA1, consisting of a fixed area (FA) approach with sample units measuring 2,500 m2 (50 m × 50 m); and FA2, consisting of fixed area sampling units measuring 500 m2 (10 m × 50 m) and line intercept sampling (LI) using 50 m lines. Data were collected on permanent sample plots installed in the area, consisting of 25 square blocks of 1 ha. Fallen dead wood pieces with a diameter ≥ 10 cm were used in the analysis. The dead wood was classified into three degrees of decomposition, and masses were calculated as the corresponding density at each class. The tested sampling methods were evaluated using coefficient of variation and relative sampling error, and the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the results between the methods. Volume size of fallen dead wood did not statistically differ between the methods, but variation in necromass volume was lower in the FA1 method, whereas the FA2 method had a smaller sampling error. Overall sampling error ranged from 23.4–27.92%; lowering the sampling error to 15% would require a high sampling intensity (FA1: 42 area units [a.u.], FA2: 99 a.u., and LI: 236 a.u.). Total necromass weights amounted to 4.67 Mg.ha-1 (FA1); 5.16 Mg.ha-1 (FA2) and 4.58 Mg.ha-1 (IL), and carbon stock estimates were 2.00 Mg.C.ha-1 (FA1); 2.20 Mg.C.ha-1 (FA2) and 1.96 Mg.C.ha-1 (IL).
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6662
10.1590/1983-21252018v31n316rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6662
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252018v31n316rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/6662/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 31 No. 3 (2018); 674-680
Revista Caatinga; v. 31 n. 3 (2018); 674-680
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674026646110208