MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF COFFEE IN HIGH SLOPE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santinato, Felipe
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Silva, Rouverson Pereira da, Silva, Vantuir de Albuquerque, Silva, Carlos Diego da, Tavares, Tiago de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4937
Resumo: Brazilian coffee farming is carried out both on flat and steep lands. In flat areas, mechanized operations are intensive; however, in steep slope areas, certain mechanized operations cannot be performed, such as harvesting. Based on this, the industry has developed machinery to harvest coffee in areas with up to 30% slope. However, harvesters have their efficiency and operational performance influenced by land slope. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the operational performance and harvesting efficiency of a steep-slope harvester under different situations, using different speed settings. The experiment was carried out in the county of Santo Antônio do Amparo, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, using five coffee stands with 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30% slope. Evaluations were performed with a self-propelled harvester (Electron, TDI®, Araguari, MG, Brazil) at three rotation speeds (600, 800 and 1.000 rpm) and two ground speeds (800 and 1.000 m h-1). The results showed the lower speed (800 m h-1) was suitable for 10% slope areas since the amount of fallen coffee berries. For areas of 20% slope, harvesting time was 21.6% longer than in flatter areas. Downtime varied from 10.66 to 29.18% total harvest due to a higher number of maneuvers.
id UFERSA-1_e872f55db950d789948d0f43a60fe6c4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/4937
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF COFFEE IN HIGH SLOPECOLHEITA MECANIZADA DO CAFÉ EM ELEVADAS DECLIVIDADESModified harvesters. Steep-sloping relief. Mechanization.Colhedoras adaptadas. Relevo montanhoso. Mecanização.Brazilian coffee farming is carried out both on flat and steep lands. In flat areas, mechanized operations are intensive; however, in steep slope areas, certain mechanized operations cannot be performed, such as harvesting. Based on this, the industry has developed machinery to harvest coffee in areas with up to 30% slope. However, harvesters have their efficiency and operational performance influenced by land slope. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the operational performance and harvesting efficiency of a steep-slope harvester under different situations, using different speed settings. The experiment was carried out in the county of Santo Antônio do Amparo, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, using five coffee stands with 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30% slope. Evaluations were performed with a self-propelled harvester (Electron, TDI®, Araguari, MG, Brazil) at three rotation speeds (600, 800 and 1.000 rpm) and two ground speeds (800 and 1.000 m h-1). The results showed the lower speed (800 m h-1) was suitable for 10% slope areas since the amount of fallen coffee berries. For areas of 20% slope, harvesting time was 21.6% longer than in flatter areas. Downtime varied from 10.66 to 29.18% total harvest due to a higher number of maneuvers.A cafeicultura brasileira está presente em áreas planas e declivosas. Nas regiões planas a mecanização nas operações cafeeiras é intensa, do contrário, são as regiões declivosas, que não mecanizam algumas das operações, dentre elas a colheita. Para suplantar esta dificuldade a indústria vem desenvolvendo colhedoras capazes de colher em declividades de até 30%. O desempenho operacional e a eficiência de colheita são influenciadas pela declividade. Diante disto objetivou-se no presente trabalho avaliar o desempenho operacional e a eficiência de colheita de uma colhedora confeccionada para colher em elevadas declividades, testando suas principais regulagens. O experimento foi conduzido no município de Santo Antônio do Amparo, região do Sul de Minas Gerais, em cinco talhões com declividade de 10, 15, 20, 25 e 30%, utilizando uma colhedora Electron automotriz (TDI), testando três vibrações das hastes (600, 800 e 1.000 rpm) e duas velocidades (800 e 1.000 m h-1). Obteve-se que em na declividade de 10%, deve-se utilizar velocidades reduzidas (800 m h-1) para minimizar a quantidade de café caído. Em declividades acima de 20% a colheita mecanizada demanda 21,6% a mais de tempo para ser procedida que em declividades menores. O tempo de parada na operação da colheita mecanizada corresponde a 10,66 a 29,18% do tempo total de colheita, em função do maior número de manobras.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2016-07-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/493710.1590/1983-21252016v29n319rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2016); 685-691Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 3 (2016); 685-6911983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4937/pdf_408Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantinato, FelipeSilva, Rouverson Pereira daSilva, Vantuir de AlbuquerqueSilva, Carlos Diego daTavares, Tiago de Oliveira2023-07-19T18:25:23Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/4937Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:19.865820Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF COFFEE IN HIGH SLOPE
COLHEITA MECANIZADA DO CAFÉ EM ELEVADAS DECLIVIDADES
title MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF COFFEE IN HIGH SLOPE
spellingShingle MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF COFFEE IN HIGH SLOPE
Santinato, Felipe
Modified harvesters. Steep-sloping relief. Mechanization.
Colhedoras adaptadas. Relevo montanhoso. Mecanização.
title_short MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF COFFEE IN HIGH SLOPE
title_full MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF COFFEE IN HIGH SLOPE
title_fullStr MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF COFFEE IN HIGH SLOPE
title_full_unstemmed MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF COFFEE IN HIGH SLOPE
title_sort MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF COFFEE IN HIGH SLOPE
author Santinato, Felipe
author_facet Santinato, Felipe
Silva, Rouverson Pereira da
Silva, Vantuir de Albuquerque
Silva, Carlos Diego da
Tavares, Tiago de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Silva, Rouverson Pereira da
Silva, Vantuir de Albuquerque
Silva, Carlos Diego da
Tavares, Tiago de Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santinato, Felipe
Silva, Rouverson Pereira da
Silva, Vantuir de Albuquerque
Silva, Carlos Diego da
Tavares, Tiago de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Modified harvesters. Steep-sloping relief. Mechanization.
Colhedoras adaptadas. Relevo montanhoso. Mecanização.
topic Modified harvesters. Steep-sloping relief. Mechanization.
Colhedoras adaptadas. Relevo montanhoso. Mecanização.
description Brazilian coffee farming is carried out both on flat and steep lands. In flat areas, mechanized operations are intensive; however, in steep slope areas, certain mechanized operations cannot be performed, such as harvesting. Based on this, the industry has developed machinery to harvest coffee in areas with up to 30% slope. However, harvesters have their efficiency and operational performance influenced by land slope. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the operational performance and harvesting efficiency of a steep-slope harvester under different situations, using different speed settings. The experiment was carried out in the county of Santo Antônio do Amparo, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, using five coffee stands with 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30% slope. Evaluations were performed with a self-propelled harvester (Electron, TDI®, Araguari, MG, Brazil) at three rotation speeds (600, 800 and 1.000 rpm) and two ground speeds (800 and 1.000 m h-1). The results showed the lower speed (800 m h-1) was suitable for 10% slope areas since the amount of fallen coffee berries. For areas of 20% slope, harvesting time was 21.6% longer than in flatter areas. Downtime varied from 10.66 to 29.18% total harvest due to a higher number of maneuvers.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4937
10.1590/1983-21252016v29n319rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4937
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252016v29n319rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4937/pdf_408
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2016); 685-691
Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 3 (2016); 685-691
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674025576562688