INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendes, Rafael Romero
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Takano, Hudson Kagueyama, Biffe, Denis Fernando, Constantin, Jamil, Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silveiro de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8499
Resumo: More than one herbicide application is usually necessary to manage glyphosate-resistant sourgrass in advanced stages of development efficiently during off-season fallow periods. The objective of this study was to determine the best interval between two sequential applications to control sourgrass, based on the number of days and tiller-height after the first treatment. Two experiments were conducted based on these criteria. Experiment 1 consisted of one application of glyphosate + clethodim (1140 ae ha-1 + 108 g ha-1) followed by glyphosate + clethodim or paraquat (400 g ai ha-1) at an interval of 10, 17, 24, 31, 28, or 45 days. Experiment 2 was conducted with the same herbicide treatments, but using the tiller-height as the criteria for the second application, which were 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, 21-30, and >30 cm. None of the treatments resulted in total sourgrass control during the evaluation period. Overall, treatments with glyphosate + clethodim in the second application were more efficient than paraquat. The most effective interval between sequential applications of glyphosate + clethodim was observed at 17 to 24 days. For paraquat, the best interval for the second application was 6-10 days. The most effective performances based on the tiller-height were found at 6-20 cm tall for glyphosate + clethodim and 6-10 cm tall for paraquat.  
id UFERSA-1_f6cd002b41e8df370aab0cf08930cf36
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8499
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENTINTERVALO ENTRE APLICAÇÕES SEQUENCIAIS PARA O CONTROLE DE CAPIM-AMARGOSODigitaria insularis L. Fedde. Altura de rebrote. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat.Digitaria insularis (L.) Fedde. Tiller-height. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat.More than one herbicide application is usually necessary to manage glyphosate-resistant sourgrass in advanced stages of development efficiently during off-season fallow periods. The objective of this study was to determine the best interval between two sequential applications to control sourgrass, based on the number of days and tiller-height after the first treatment. Two experiments were conducted based on these criteria. Experiment 1 consisted of one application of glyphosate + clethodim (1140 ae ha-1 + 108 g ha-1) followed by glyphosate + clethodim or paraquat (400 g ai ha-1) at an interval of 10, 17, 24, 31, 28, or 45 days. Experiment 2 was conducted with the same herbicide treatments, but using the tiller-height as the criteria for the second application, which were 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, 21-30, and >30 cm. None of the treatments resulted in total sourgrass control during the evaluation period. Overall, treatments with glyphosate + clethodim in the second application were more efficient than paraquat. The most effective interval between sequential applications of glyphosate + clethodim was observed at 17 to 24 days. For paraquat, the best interval for the second application was 6-10 days. The most effective performances based on the tiller-height were found at 6-20 cm tall for glyphosate + clethodim and 6-10 cm tall for paraquat.  Para o manejo de capim-amargoso resistente ao glyphosate nos períodos de entressafra, existe a necessidade de mais de uma aplicação de herbicidas para o controle satisfatório. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o intervalo em número de dias e altura do rebrote entre aplicações sequenciais no controle de capim-amargoso perenizado. Foram realizados dois experimentos, sendo o experimento 1 consistuido pela aplicação sequencial de glyphosate + clethodim (1140 + 108 g ha-1) ou paraquat (400 g i.a. ha-1) em intervalos de 10, 17, 24, 31, 38 ou 45 dias após a aplicação de glyphosate + clethodim (1140 + 108 g ha-1). O experimento 2 foi formado pela aplicação dos mesmos tratamentos herbicidas, porém considerando a altura de rebrote como critério para a segunda aplicação, sendo 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, 21-30 ou >30 cm. Nenhum tratamento resultou em controle total das plantas durante o período de avaliação dos experimentos. De forma geral, melhores resultados são obtidos com a segunda aplicação de glyphosate + clethodim em relação ao paraquat. A segunda aplicação com glyphosate + clethodim deve ser realizada entre 17 e 24 dias após a primeira aplicação, enquanto o paraquat deve ser aplicado entre 6 e 10 dias após a primeira aplicação. Ao considerar o tamanho do rebrote das plantas na segunda aplicação, o ideal é de 6-20 cm para glyphosate + clethodim e de 6-10 cm para paraquat.  Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2020-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/849910.1590/1983-21252020v33n301rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 33 No. 3 (2020); 579-590Revista Caatinga; v. 33 n. 3 (2020); 579-5901983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8499/10270Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendes, Rafael RomeroTakano, Hudson KagueyamaBiffe, Denis FernandoConstantin, JamilOliveira Junior, Rubem Silveiro de2023-07-21T16:56:41Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8499Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:40.420627Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT
INTERVALO ENTRE APLICAÇÕES SEQUENCIAIS PARA O CONTROLE DE CAPIM-AMARGOSO
title INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT
spellingShingle INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT
Mendes, Rafael Romero
Digitaria insularis L. Fedde. Altura de rebrote. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat.
Digitaria insularis (L.) Fedde. Tiller-height. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat.
title_short INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT
title_full INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT
title_fullStr INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT
title_full_unstemmed INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT
title_sort INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT
author Mendes, Rafael Romero
author_facet Mendes, Rafael Romero
Takano, Hudson Kagueyama
Biffe, Denis Fernando
Constantin, Jamil
Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silveiro de
author_role author
author2 Takano, Hudson Kagueyama
Biffe, Denis Fernando
Constantin, Jamil
Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silveiro de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendes, Rafael Romero
Takano, Hudson Kagueyama
Biffe, Denis Fernando
Constantin, Jamil
Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silveiro de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Digitaria insularis L. Fedde. Altura de rebrote. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat.
Digitaria insularis (L.) Fedde. Tiller-height. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat.
topic Digitaria insularis L. Fedde. Altura de rebrote. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat.
Digitaria insularis (L.) Fedde. Tiller-height. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat.
description More than one herbicide application is usually necessary to manage glyphosate-resistant sourgrass in advanced stages of development efficiently during off-season fallow periods. The objective of this study was to determine the best interval between two sequential applications to control sourgrass, based on the number of days and tiller-height after the first treatment. Two experiments were conducted based on these criteria. Experiment 1 consisted of one application of glyphosate + clethodim (1140 ae ha-1 + 108 g ha-1) followed by glyphosate + clethodim or paraquat (400 g ai ha-1) at an interval of 10, 17, 24, 31, 28, or 45 days. Experiment 2 was conducted with the same herbicide treatments, but using the tiller-height as the criteria for the second application, which were 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, 21-30, and >30 cm. None of the treatments resulted in total sourgrass control during the evaluation period. Overall, treatments with glyphosate + clethodim in the second application were more efficient than paraquat. The most effective interval between sequential applications of glyphosate + clethodim was observed at 17 to 24 days. For paraquat, the best interval for the second application was 6-10 days. The most effective performances based on the tiller-height were found at 6-20 cm tall for glyphosate + clethodim and 6-10 cm tall for paraquat.  
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8499
10.1590/1983-21252020v33n301rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8499
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252020v33n301rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8499/10270
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 33 No. 3 (2020); 579-590
Revista Caatinga; v. 33 n. 3 (2020); 579-590
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674027785912320