INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8499 |
Resumo: | More than one herbicide application is usually necessary to manage glyphosate-resistant sourgrass in advanced stages of development efficiently during off-season fallow periods. The objective of this study was to determine the best interval between two sequential applications to control sourgrass, based on the number of days and tiller-height after the first treatment. Two experiments were conducted based on these criteria. Experiment 1 consisted of one application of glyphosate + clethodim (1140 ae ha-1 + 108 g ha-1) followed by glyphosate + clethodim or paraquat (400 g ai ha-1) at an interval of 10, 17, 24, 31, 28, or 45 days. Experiment 2 was conducted with the same herbicide treatments, but using the tiller-height as the criteria for the second application, which were 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, 21-30, and >30 cm. None of the treatments resulted in total sourgrass control during the evaluation period. Overall, treatments with glyphosate + clethodim in the second application were more efficient than paraquat. The most effective interval between sequential applications of glyphosate + clethodim was observed at 17 to 24 days. For paraquat, the best interval for the second application was 6-10 days. The most effective performances based on the tiller-height were found at 6-20 cm tall for glyphosate + clethodim and 6-10 cm tall for paraquat. |
id |
UFERSA-1_f6cd002b41e8df370aab0cf08930cf36 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8499 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENTINTERVALO ENTRE APLICAÇÕES SEQUENCIAIS PARA O CONTROLE DE CAPIM-AMARGOSODigitaria insularis L. Fedde. Altura de rebrote. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat.Digitaria insularis (L.) Fedde. Tiller-height. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat.More than one herbicide application is usually necessary to manage glyphosate-resistant sourgrass in advanced stages of development efficiently during off-season fallow periods. The objective of this study was to determine the best interval between two sequential applications to control sourgrass, based on the number of days and tiller-height after the first treatment. Two experiments were conducted based on these criteria. Experiment 1 consisted of one application of glyphosate + clethodim (1140 ae ha-1 + 108 g ha-1) followed by glyphosate + clethodim or paraquat (400 g ai ha-1) at an interval of 10, 17, 24, 31, 28, or 45 days. Experiment 2 was conducted with the same herbicide treatments, but using the tiller-height as the criteria for the second application, which were 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, 21-30, and >30 cm. None of the treatments resulted in total sourgrass control during the evaluation period. Overall, treatments with glyphosate + clethodim in the second application were more efficient than paraquat. The most effective interval between sequential applications of glyphosate + clethodim was observed at 17 to 24 days. For paraquat, the best interval for the second application was 6-10 days. The most effective performances based on the tiller-height were found at 6-20 cm tall for glyphosate + clethodim and 6-10 cm tall for paraquat. Para o manejo de capim-amargoso resistente ao glyphosate nos períodos de entressafra, existe a necessidade de mais de uma aplicação de herbicidas para o controle satisfatório. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o intervalo em número de dias e altura do rebrote entre aplicações sequenciais no controle de capim-amargoso perenizado. Foram realizados dois experimentos, sendo o experimento 1 consistuido pela aplicação sequencial de glyphosate + clethodim (1140 + 108 g ha-1) ou paraquat (400 g i.a. ha-1) em intervalos de 10, 17, 24, 31, 38 ou 45 dias após a aplicação de glyphosate + clethodim (1140 + 108 g ha-1). O experimento 2 foi formado pela aplicação dos mesmos tratamentos herbicidas, porém considerando a altura de rebrote como critério para a segunda aplicação, sendo 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, 21-30 ou >30 cm. Nenhum tratamento resultou em controle total das plantas durante o período de avaliação dos experimentos. De forma geral, melhores resultados são obtidos com a segunda aplicação de glyphosate + clethodim em relação ao paraquat. A segunda aplicação com glyphosate + clethodim deve ser realizada entre 17 e 24 dias após a primeira aplicação, enquanto o paraquat deve ser aplicado entre 6 e 10 dias após a primeira aplicação. Ao considerar o tamanho do rebrote das plantas na segunda aplicação, o ideal é de 6-20 cm para glyphosate + clethodim e de 6-10 cm para paraquat. Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2020-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/849910.1590/1983-21252020v33n301rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 33 No. 3 (2020); 579-590Revista Caatinga; v. 33 n. 3 (2020); 579-5901983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8499/10270Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendes, Rafael RomeroTakano, Hudson KagueyamaBiffe, Denis FernandoConstantin, JamilOliveira Junior, Rubem Silveiro de2023-07-21T16:56:41Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8499Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:40.420627Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT INTERVALO ENTRE APLICAÇÕES SEQUENCIAIS PARA O CONTROLE DE CAPIM-AMARGOSO |
title |
INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT |
spellingShingle |
INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT Mendes, Rafael Romero Digitaria insularis L. Fedde. Altura de rebrote. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat. Digitaria insularis (L.) Fedde. Tiller-height. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat. |
title_short |
INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT |
title_full |
INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT |
title_fullStr |
INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT |
title_full_unstemmed |
INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT |
title_sort |
INTERVAL BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE TREATMENTS FOR SOURGRASS MANAGEMENT |
author |
Mendes, Rafael Romero |
author_facet |
Mendes, Rafael Romero Takano, Hudson Kagueyama Biffe, Denis Fernando Constantin, Jamil Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silveiro de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Takano, Hudson Kagueyama Biffe, Denis Fernando Constantin, Jamil Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silveiro de |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mendes, Rafael Romero Takano, Hudson Kagueyama Biffe, Denis Fernando Constantin, Jamil Oliveira Junior, Rubem Silveiro de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Digitaria insularis L. Fedde. Altura de rebrote. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat. Digitaria insularis (L.) Fedde. Tiller-height. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat. |
topic |
Digitaria insularis L. Fedde. Altura de rebrote. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat. Digitaria insularis (L.) Fedde. Tiller-height. Glyphosate. Clethodim. Paraquat. |
description |
More than one herbicide application is usually necessary to manage glyphosate-resistant sourgrass in advanced stages of development efficiently during off-season fallow periods. The objective of this study was to determine the best interval between two sequential applications to control sourgrass, based on the number of days and tiller-height after the first treatment. Two experiments were conducted based on these criteria. Experiment 1 consisted of one application of glyphosate + clethodim (1140 ae ha-1 + 108 g ha-1) followed by glyphosate + clethodim or paraquat (400 g ai ha-1) at an interval of 10, 17, 24, 31, 28, or 45 days. Experiment 2 was conducted with the same herbicide treatments, but using the tiller-height as the criteria for the second application, which were 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, 21-30, and >30 cm. None of the treatments resulted in total sourgrass control during the evaluation period. Overall, treatments with glyphosate + clethodim in the second application were more efficient than paraquat. The most effective interval between sequential applications of glyphosate + clethodim was observed at 17 to 24 days. For paraquat, the best interval for the second application was 6-10 days. The most effective performances based on the tiller-height were found at 6-20 cm tall for glyphosate + clethodim and 6-10 cm tall for paraquat. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8499 10.1590/1983-21252020v33n301rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8499 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252020v33n301rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8499/10270 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 33 No. 3 (2020); 579-590 Revista Caatinga; v. 33 n. 3 (2020); 579-590 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674027785912320 |