EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7789 |
Resumo: | Forest management can lead to numerous changes of different magnitudes in the composition and diversity of soil organisms, according to the level of interference with the habitat. Within this context, this study aimed to test the influence of different types of forest management on the edaphic macrofauna community in a region of arboreal Caatinga. The study was carried out in Contendas do Sincorá National Forest, Contendas do Sincorá – Bahia. The experimental area consisted of three types of management (clear cutting, selective cutting by diameter at breast height and selective cutting by species), and a condition of unmanaged Caatinga, which was used as control. The macrofauna was sampled twice a year (March and November) using the soil monolith method. Densities, total number of individuals, total richness, average richness, and Shannon and Pielou rates were estimated. The soil macrofauna was shown to be sensitive to different forest management practices, which indicates that selective cutting is a more conservative system to manage the Caatinga. Among these, selective cutting by species proved to be less impacting on the soil macrofauna, providing more expressive diversity and abundance indexes, and the occurrence of more demanding organisms in microclimate conditions, characteristic of preserved areas. The predominant groups of edaphic fauna, both in the unmanaged as in managed Caatinga, were Isoptera, Formicidae, Chilopoda, and Coleoptera Larvae. |
id |
UFERSA-1_f74e79649c344e33cd9b4baccbe6ffd2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7789 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGAEFEITO DE DIFERENTES PRÁTICAS DE MANEJO FLORESTAL SOBRE A MACROFAUNA EDÁFICA EM CAATINGA ARBOREASoil organisms. Sustainable exploration. Diversity of invertebrates.Organismos do solo. Exploração sustentável. Diversidade de invertebrados.Forest management can lead to numerous changes of different magnitudes in the composition and diversity of soil organisms, according to the level of interference with the habitat. Within this context, this study aimed to test the influence of different types of forest management on the edaphic macrofauna community in a region of arboreal Caatinga. The study was carried out in Contendas do Sincorá National Forest, Contendas do Sincorá – Bahia. The experimental area consisted of three types of management (clear cutting, selective cutting by diameter at breast height and selective cutting by species), and a condition of unmanaged Caatinga, which was used as control. The macrofauna was sampled twice a year (March and November) using the soil monolith method. Densities, total number of individuals, total richness, average richness, and Shannon and Pielou rates were estimated. The soil macrofauna was shown to be sensitive to different forest management practices, which indicates that selective cutting is a more conservative system to manage the Caatinga. Among these, selective cutting by species proved to be less impacting on the soil macrofauna, providing more expressive diversity and abundance indexes, and the occurrence of more demanding organisms in microclimate conditions, characteristic of preserved areas. The predominant groups of edaphic fauna, both in the unmanaged as in managed Caatinga, were Isoptera, Formicidae, Chilopoda, and Coleoptera Larvae.O manejo florestal pode acarretar inúmeras modificações na composição e diversidade dos organismos do solo, em diferentes magnitudes de acordo com o nível de interferência no habitat. Neste contexto, o objetivo deste estudo foi testar a influência de diferentes tipos de manejo florestal sobre a comunidade da macrofauna edáfica em área de Caatinga arbórea. O estudo foi realizado na Floresta Nacional Contendas do Sincorá, Contendas do Sincorá - BA. A área experimental foi constituída de três tipos de manejo (corte raso, corte seletivo por diâmetro e corte seletivo por espécie) e uma condição de Caatinga não manejada, que foi utilizada como controle. A macrofauna foi amostrada pelo método do monólito de solo, em duas épocas do ano (março e novembro). Foram estimadas as densidades, o número total de indivíduos, a riqueza total, a riqueza média e os índices de Shannon e de Pielou. A macrofauna do solo mostrou-se sensível às diferentes práticas de manejo florestal, sendo indicativa de que os cortes seletivos são sistemas mais conservacionistas de uso da Caatinga. Dentre esses, o corte seletivo por espécie mostra-se menos impactante à macrofauna do solo, proporcionando índices de diversidade e abundância mais expressivos e a ocorrência de organismos mais exigentes em condições de microclima, característicos de áreas preservadas. Os grupos predominantes da fauna edáfica, tanto na Caatinga não manejada quanto na manejada, foram Isoptera, Formicidae, Larvas de Coleóptera e Chilopoda.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-08-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/778910.1590/1983-21252019v32n318rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2019); 741-750Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 3 (2019); 741-7501983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7789/10059Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMatos, Priscila SilvaBarreto-Garcia, Patrícia Anjos BittencourtScoriza, Rafael Nogueira2023-07-20T17:38:19Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7789Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:36.637198Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA EFEITO DE DIFERENTES PRÁTICAS DE MANEJO FLORESTAL SOBRE A MACROFAUNA EDÁFICA EM CAATINGA ARBOREA |
title |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA |
spellingShingle |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA Matos, Priscila Silva Soil organisms. Sustainable exploration. Diversity of invertebrates. Organismos do solo. Exploração sustentável. Diversidade de invertebrados. |
title_short |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA |
title_full |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA |
title_fullStr |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA |
title_full_unstemmed |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA |
title_sort |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA |
author |
Matos, Priscila Silva |
author_facet |
Matos, Priscila Silva Barreto-Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Scoriza, Rafael Nogueira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barreto-Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Scoriza, Rafael Nogueira |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Matos, Priscila Silva Barreto-Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Scoriza, Rafael Nogueira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Soil organisms. Sustainable exploration. Diversity of invertebrates. Organismos do solo. Exploração sustentável. Diversidade de invertebrados. |
topic |
Soil organisms. Sustainable exploration. Diversity of invertebrates. Organismos do solo. Exploração sustentável. Diversidade de invertebrados. |
description |
Forest management can lead to numerous changes of different magnitudes in the composition and diversity of soil organisms, according to the level of interference with the habitat. Within this context, this study aimed to test the influence of different types of forest management on the edaphic macrofauna community in a region of arboreal Caatinga. The study was carried out in Contendas do Sincorá National Forest, Contendas do Sincorá – Bahia. The experimental area consisted of three types of management (clear cutting, selective cutting by diameter at breast height and selective cutting by species), and a condition of unmanaged Caatinga, which was used as control. The macrofauna was sampled twice a year (March and November) using the soil monolith method. Densities, total number of individuals, total richness, average richness, and Shannon and Pielou rates were estimated. The soil macrofauna was shown to be sensitive to different forest management practices, which indicates that selective cutting is a more conservative system to manage the Caatinga. Among these, selective cutting by species proved to be less impacting on the soil macrofauna, providing more expressive diversity and abundance indexes, and the occurrence of more demanding organisms in microclimate conditions, characteristic of preserved areas. The predominant groups of edaphic fauna, both in the unmanaged as in managed Caatinga, were Isoptera, Formicidae, Chilopoda, and Coleoptera Larvae. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7789 10.1590/1983-21252019v32n318rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7789 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252019v32n318rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7789/10059 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2019); 741-750 Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 3 (2019); 741-750 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674027273158656 |