EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Matos, Priscila Silva
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Barreto-Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt, Scoriza, Rafael Nogueira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7789
Resumo: Forest management can lead to numerous changes of different magnitudes in the composition and diversity of soil organisms, according to the level of interference with the habitat. Within this context, this study aimed to test the influence of different types of forest management on the edaphic macrofauna community in a region of arboreal Caatinga. The study was carried out in Contendas do Sincorá National Forest, Contendas do Sincorá – Bahia. The experimental area consisted of three types of management (clear cutting, selective cutting by diameter at breast height and selective cutting by species), and a condition of unmanaged Caatinga, which was used as control. The macrofauna was sampled twice a year (March and November) using the soil monolith method. Densities, total number of individuals, total richness, average richness, and Shannon and Pielou rates were estimated. The soil macrofauna was shown to be sensitive to different forest management practices, which indicates that selective cutting is a more conservative system to manage the Caatinga. Among these, selective cutting by species proved to be less impacting on the soil macrofauna, providing more expressive diversity and abundance indexes, and the occurrence of more demanding organisms in microclimate conditions, characteristic of preserved areas. The predominant groups of edaphic fauna, both in the unmanaged as in managed Caatinga, were Isoptera, Formicidae, Chilopoda, and Coleoptera Larvae.
id UFERSA-1_f74e79649c344e33cd9b4baccbe6ffd2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7789
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGAEFEITO DE DIFERENTES PRÁTICAS DE MANEJO FLORESTAL SOBRE A MACROFAUNA EDÁFICA EM CAATINGA ARBOREASoil organisms. Sustainable exploration. Diversity of invertebrates.Organismos do solo. Exploração sustentável. Diversidade de invertebrados.Forest management can lead to numerous changes of different magnitudes in the composition and diversity of soil organisms, according to the level of interference with the habitat. Within this context, this study aimed to test the influence of different types of forest management on the edaphic macrofauna community in a region of arboreal Caatinga. The study was carried out in Contendas do Sincorá National Forest, Contendas do Sincorá – Bahia. The experimental area consisted of three types of management (clear cutting, selective cutting by diameter at breast height and selective cutting by species), and a condition of unmanaged Caatinga, which was used as control. The macrofauna was sampled twice a year (March and November) using the soil monolith method. Densities, total number of individuals, total richness, average richness, and Shannon and Pielou rates were estimated. The soil macrofauna was shown to be sensitive to different forest management practices, which indicates that selective cutting is a more conservative system to manage the Caatinga. Among these, selective cutting by species proved to be less impacting on the soil macrofauna, providing more expressive diversity and abundance indexes, and the occurrence of more demanding organisms in microclimate conditions, characteristic of preserved areas. The predominant groups of edaphic fauna, both in the unmanaged as in managed Caatinga, were Isoptera, Formicidae, Chilopoda, and Coleoptera Larvae.O manejo florestal pode acarretar inúmeras modificações na composição e diversidade dos organismos do solo, em diferentes magnitudes de acordo com o nível de interferência no habitat. Neste contexto, o objetivo deste estudo foi testar a influência de diferentes tipos de manejo florestal sobre a comunidade da macrofauna edáfica em área de Caatinga arbórea. O estudo foi realizado na Floresta Nacional Contendas do Sincorá, Contendas do Sincorá - BA. A área experimental foi constituída de três tipos de manejo (corte raso, corte seletivo por diâmetro e corte seletivo por espécie) e uma condição de Caatinga não manejada, que foi utilizada como controle. A macrofauna foi amostrada pelo método do monólito de solo, em duas épocas do ano (março e novembro). Foram estimadas as densidades, o número total de indivíduos, a riqueza total, a riqueza média e os índices de Shannon e de Pielou. A macrofauna do solo mostrou-se sensível às diferentes práticas de manejo florestal, sendo indicativa de que os cortes seletivos são sistemas mais conservacionistas de uso da Caatinga. Dentre esses, o corte seletivo por espécie mostra-se menos impactante à macrofauna do solo, proporcionando índices de diversidade e abundância mais expressivos e a ocorrência de organismos mais exigentes em condições de microclima, característicos de áreas preservadas. Os grupos predominantes da fauna edáfica, tanto na Caatinga não manejada quanto na manejada, foram Isoptera, Formicidae, Larvas de Coleóptera e Chilopoda.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-08-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/778910.1590/1983-21252019v32n318rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2019); 741-750Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 3 (2019); 741-7501983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7789/10059Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMatos, Priscila SilvaBarreto-Garcia, Patrícia Anjos BittencourtScoriza, Rafael Nogueira2023-07-20T17:38:19Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7789Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:36.637198Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA
EFEITO DE DIFERENTES PRÁTICAS DE MANEJO FLORESTAL SOBRE A MACROFAUNA EDÁFICA EM CAATINGA ARBOREA
title EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA
spellingShingle EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA
Matos, Priscila Silva
Soil organisms. Sustainable exploration. Diversity of invertebrates.
Organismos do solo. Exploração sustentável. Diversidade de invertebrados.
title_short EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA
title_full EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA
title_fullStr EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA
title_full_unstemmed EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA
title_sort EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THE SOIL MACROFAUNA IN THE ARBOREAL CAATINGA
author Matos, Priscila Silva
author_facet Matos, Priscila Silva
Barreto-Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt
Scoriza, Rafael Nogueira
author_role author
author2 Barreto-Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt
Scoriza, Rafael Nogueira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Matos, Priscila Silva
Barreto-Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt
Scoriza, Rafael Nogueira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Soil organisms. Sustainable exploration. Diversity of invertebrates.
Organismos do solo. Exploração sustentável. Diversidade de invertebrados.
topic Soil organisms. Sustainable exploration. Diversity of invertebrates.
Organismos do solo. Exploração sustentável. Diversidade de invertebrados.
description Forest management can lead to numerous changes of different magnitudes in the composition and diversity of soil organisms, according to the level of interference with the habitat. Within this context, this study aimed to test the influence of different types of forest management on the edaphic macrofauna community in a region of arboreal Caatinga. The study was carried out in Contendas do Sincorá National Forest, Contendas do Sincorá – Bahia. The experimental area consisted of three types of management (clear cutting, selective cutting by diameter at breast height and selective cutting by species), and a condition of unmanaged Caatinga, which was used as control. The macrofauna was sampled twice a year (March and November) using the soil monolith method. Densities, total number of individuals, total richness, average richness, and Shannon and Pielou rates were estimated. The soil macrofauna was shown to be sensitive to different forest management practices, which indicates that selective cutting is a more conservative system to manage the Caatinga. Among these, selective cutting by species proved to be less impacting on the soil macrofauna, providing more expressive diversity and abundance indexes, and the occurrence of more demanding organisms in microclimate conditions, characteristic of preserved areas. The predominant groups of edaphic fauna, both in the unmanaged as in managed Caatinga, were Isoptera, Formicidae, Chilopoda, and Coleoptera Larvae.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7789
10.1590/1983-21252019v32n318rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7789
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252019v32n318rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7789/10059
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2019); 741-750
Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 3 (2019); 741-750
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674027273158656