GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY AND YIELD OF FORMOSA ‘PAPAYA’ CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT DOSES OF COATED AND CONVENTIONAL UREA
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4090 |
Resumo: | Mineral fertilizer management is one of the most important agronomic techniques applied in papaya cultivation, which generally extracts large amounts of nutrients from soil, especially nitrogen. This study aimed to assess the phytotechnical and physiological attributes and yield of ‘Formosa’ papaya hybrid Caliman 01 as a function of different doses of coated and conventional urea in the region of Bom Jesus - PI, Brazil. The treatments were arranged in a factorial scheme (2 × 4) and distributed in a randomized block design with four replications, corresponding to 2 nitrogen sources (coated urea, 43% of N; and conventional urea, 45% of N) and 4 doses nitrogen (350, 440, 530 and 620 g per plant). The N doses used corresponded to 80, 100, 120 and 140% of the nitrogen fertilization. It was used six plants per plot with two row borders, totaling 192 plants cultivated in the field. It was assessed the intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (int.PAR), radiation interception efficiency (PAREff.), leaf area index (LAI), plant height, stem diameter and yield. The coated urea promotes a higher growth and yield of ‘Formosa’ papaya compared to the conventional urea. The application of 1.0 g of coated N promotes the production of 2.87 g of fruit per hectare while the application of 1.0 g of conventional N produces only 1.89 g of fruit per hectare, showing that the source of polymerized N increases the use efficiency of N applied to soil. |
id |
UFERSA-1_f7c86ed0d9fcdc0a5ce093a1d61160d7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/4090 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY AND YIELD OF FORMOSA ‘PAPAYA’ CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT DOSES OF COATED AND CONVENTIONAL UREACRESCIMENTO, FISIOLOGIA E PRODUTIVIDADE DO MAMOEIRO FORMOSA CULTIVADO SOB DIFERENTES DOSES DE UREIA PROTEGIDA E CONVENCIONALCarica papaya. Coated N. Fruticulture. Fruit production.Carica papaya. N-protegido. Fruticultura. Produção de frutos.Mineral fertilizer management is one of the most important agronomic techniques applied in papaya cultivation, which generally extracts large amounts of nutrients from soil, especially nitrogen. This study aimed to assess the phytotechnical and physiological attributes and yield of ‘Formosa’ papaya hybrid Caliman 01 as a function of different doses of coated and conventional urea in the region of Bom Jesus - PI, Brazil. The treatments were arranged in a factorial scheme (2 × 4) and distributed in a randomized block design with four replications, corresponding to 2 nitrogen sources (coated urea, 43% of N; and conventional urea, 45% of N) and 4 doses nitrogen (350, 440, 530 and 620 g per plant). The N doses used corresponded to 80, 100, 120 and 140% of the nitrogen fertilization. It was used six plants per plot with two row borders, totaling 192 plants cultivated in the field. It was assessed the intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (int.PAR), radiation interception efficiency (PAREff.), leaf area index (LAI), plant height, stem diameter and yield. The coated urea promotes a higher growth and yield of ‘Formosa’ papaya compared to the conventional urea. The application of 1.0 g of coated N promotes the production of 2.87 g of fruit per hectare while the application of 1.0 g of conventional N produces only 1.89 g of fruit per hectare, showing that the source of polymerized N increases the use efficiency of N applied to soil.O manejo da adubação mineral é uma das mais importantes técnicas agronômicas aplicadas no cultivo do mamoeiro, que de modo geral, extrai grandes quantidades de nutrientes no solo, com destaque para o nitrogênio. Objetivou-se avaliar os atributos fitotécnicos, fisiológicos e a produtividade do mamoeiro Formosa híbrido Caliman 01 em função de diferentes doses de ureia protegida e convencional na região de Bom Jesus-PI. Os tratamentos foram dispostos em esquema fatorial (2 x 4), distribuídos em blocos ao acaso, com 4 repetições, correspondentes a 2 fontes de nitrogênio (ureia protegida, 43% de N; e ureia convencional, 45% de N) e 4 doses de nitrogênio (350, 440, 530 e 620 g planta-1 de N). As doses de N utilizadas são correspondentes às percentagens de 80, 100, 120 e 140% da adubação nitrogenada. Utilizou-se 6 plantas por parcela, sendo duas bordaduras, totalizando 192 plantas cultivadas no campo. Avaliou-se a radiação fotossinteticamente ativa interceptada (RFAint.), eficiência de interceptação da radiação (Ef.RFA), índice de área foliar (IAF), altura de planta, diâmetro do caule e produtividade. A ureia protegida promove maior crescimento e produtividade do mamoeiro formosa em relação à ureia convencional. A aplicação de 1,0 g de N protegido promove a produção de 2,87 g de frutos por hectare enquanto que a aplicação de 1,0 g de N na fonte ureia convencional produz apenas 1,89 g de frutos por hectare, mostrando que a fonte de N polimerizada incrementa a eficiência de uso do N aplicado no solo.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2016-07-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/409010.1590/1983-21252016v29n305rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2016); 559-568Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 3 (2016); 559-5681983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4090/pdf_394Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva Júnior, Gabriel Barbosa daCavalcante, Ítalo Herbert LucenaSantos, Eduardo MonteiroAlbano, Francisca GisleneSilva, Adriel Moura2023-07-19T18:16:31Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/4090Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:12.850487Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY AND YIELD OF FORMOSA ‘PAPAYA’ CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT DOSES OF COATED AND CONVENTIONAL UREA CRESCIMENTO, FISIOLOGIA E PRODUTIVIDADE DO MAMOEIRO FORMOSA CULTIVADO SOB DIFERENTES DOSES DE UREIA PROTEGIDA E CONVENCIONAL |
title |
GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY AND YIELD OF FORMOSA ‘PAPAYA’ CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT DOSES OF COATED AND CONVENTIONAL UREA |
spellingShingle |
GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY AND YIELD OF FORMOSA ‘PAPAYA’ CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT DOSES OF COATED AND CONVENTIONAL UREA Silva Júnior, Gabriel Barbosa da Carica papaya. Coated N. Fruticulture. Fruit production. Carica papaya. N-protegido. Fruticultura. Produção de frutos. |
title_short |
GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY AND YIELD OF FORMOSA ‘PAPAYA’ CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT DOSES OF COATED AND CONVENTIONAL UREA |
title_full |
GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY AND YIELD OF FORMOSA ‘PAPAYA’ CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT DOSES OF COATED AND CONVENTIONAL UREA |
title_fullStr |
GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY AND YIELD OF FORMOSA ‘PAPAYA’ CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT DOSES OF COATED AND CONVENTIONAL UREA |
title_full_unstemmed |
GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY AND YIELD OF FORMOSA ‘PAPAYA’ CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT DOSES OF COATED AND CONVENTIONAL UREA |
title_sort |
GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY AND YIELD OF FORMOSA ‘PAPAYA’ CULTIVATED UNDER DIFFERENT DOSES OF COATED AND CONVENTIONAL UREA |
author |
Silva Júnior, Gabriel Barbosa da |
author_facet |
Silva Júnior, Gabriel Barbosa da Cavalcante, Ítalo Herbert Lucena Santos, Eduardo Monteiro Albano, Francisca Gislene Silva, Adriel Moura |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cavalcante, Ítalo Herbert Lucena Santos, Eduardo Monteiro Albano, Francisca Gislene Silva, Adriel Moura |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva Júnior, Gabriel Barbosa da Cavalcante, Ítalo Herbert Lucena Santos, Eduardo Monteiro Albano, Francisca Gislene Silva, Adriel Moura |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carica papaya. Coated N. Fruticulture. Fruit production. Carica papaya. N-protegido. Fruticultura. Produção de frutos. |
topic |
Carica papaya. Coated N. Fruticulture. Fruit production. Carica papaya. N-protegido. Fruticultura. Produção de frutos. |
description |
Mineral fertilizer management is one of the most important agronomic techniques applied in papaya cultivation, which generally extracts large amounts of nutrients from soil, especially nitrogen. This study aimed to assess the phytotechnical and physiological attributes and yield of ‘Formosa’ papaya hybrid Caliman 01 as a function of different doses of coated and conventional urea in the region of Bom Jesus - PI, Brazil. The treatments were arranged in a factorial scheme (2 × 4) and distributed in a randomized block design with four replications, corresponding to 2 nitrogen sources (coated urea, 43% of N; and conventional urea, 45% of N) and 4 doses nitrogen (350, 440, 530 and 620 g per plant). The N doses used corresponded to 80, 100, 120 and 140% of the nitrogen fertilization. It was used six plants per plot with two row borders, totaling 192 plants cultivated in the field. It was assessed the intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (int.PAR), radiation interception efficiency (PAREff.), leaf area index (LAI), plant height, stem diameter and yield. The coated urea promotes a higher growth and yield of ‘Formosa’ papaya compared to the conventional urea. The application of 1.0 g of coated N promotes the production of 2.87 g of fruit per hectare while the application of 1.0 g of conventional N produces only 1.89 g of fruit per hectare, showing that the source of polymerized N increases the use efficiency of N applied to soil. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4090 10.1590/1983-21252016v29n305rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4090 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252016v29n305rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4090/pdf_394 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2016); 559-568 Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 3 (2016); 559-568 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674024992505856 |