Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11982 |
Resumo: | Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) cultivation in tropical and subtropical regions is carried out by family farmers without the use of technology and with low yields. This study aimed to evaluate the use of organic and mineral fertilizers in roselle growth and nutrition in São Luís, State of Maranhão, northeastern Brazil. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design in a factorial scheme [(7x2)+1]. The treatments consisted of seven doses of poultry litter (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 L), six percentages of NPK (100.0, 83.3, 66.3, 49.9, 33.2, and 16.5%), and an additional treatment (poultry litter plus PK at maximum doses), with three replications. Split harvests were conducted at 75, 105, 135, and 165 days after transplanting. Fresh phytomass and the number of primary, secondary, and commercial branches were evaluated in each harvest. Fertilization with poultry litter increased fresh biomass production and the number of commercial branches per plant. Phytomass and the number of commercial branches decreased with an increase in the cutting interval in the split harvests. The poultry litter enhanced the efficiency of mineral fertilization in crop management, standing out the combination of 1.0 L poultry litter plant−1 plus 66.3% of the recommended NPK dose. |
id |
UFERSA-1_fac9f8cd0e21a2235a3aae989abd4000 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11982 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruningProdução de ramos comerciais de vinagreira com adubação orgânica e mineral e poda da arquitetura da plantaHortaliça não convencional. Fitomassa. Acumulação de matéria fresca.Unconventional vegetables. Phytomass. Fresh matter accumulation.Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) cultivation in tropical and subtropical regions is carried out by family farmers without the use of technology and with low yields. This study aimed to evaluate the use of organic and mineral fertilizers in roselle growth and nutrition in São Luís, State of Maranhão, northeastern Brazil. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design in a factorial scheme [(7x2)+1]. The treatments consisted of seven doses of poultry litter (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 L), six percentages of NPK (100.0, 83.3, 66.3, 49.9, 33.2, and 16.5%), and an additional treatment (poultry litter plus PK at maximum doses), with three replications. Split harvests were conducted at 75, 105, 135, and 165 days after transplanting. Fresh phytomass and the number of primary, secondary, and commercial branches were evaluated in each harvest. Fertilization with poultry litter increased fresh biomass production and the number of commercial branches per plant. Phytomass and the number of commercial branches decreased with an increase in the cutting interval in the split harvests. The poultry litter enhanced the efficiency of mineral fertilization in crop management, standing out the combination of 1.0 L poultry litter plant−1 plus 66.3% of the recommended NPK dose.O cultivo da vinagreira nas regiões tropicais e subtropicais é realizado pelos agricultores familiares sem o uso de tecnologia, com baixo rendimento. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar o uso de adubação orgânica e mineral no crescimento e nutrição da vinagreira. O delineamento experimental foi de blocos casualizados em esquema fatorial [(7x2)+1]. Os tratamentos foram sete doses de cama de frango (0.0; 0.5; 1.0; 1.5; 2.0; 2.5 e 3.0 litros), seis percentagens de NPK (100.0%, 83.3%, 66.3%, 49.9%, 33.2%, 16.5 %), e um tratamento adicional (cama de frango mais PK, nas doses máximas) com 3 repetições. Foram feitas colheitas parceladas aos 75, 105, 135 e 165 dias após o transplante (DAT). Em cada colheita avaliou-se a fitomassa fresca e o número dos ramos primários, secundários e comerciais. A adubação com a cama de frango aumentou a produção de fitomassa fresca e o número de ramos comerciais por planta. Ocorreu diminuição da fitomassa e dos do número de ramos comerciais com o aumento do intervalo de corte na colheita parcelada. A cama de frango potencializou a eficiência da adubação mineral no manejo da cultura, com destaque para a combinação dose de 1.0 L planta-1 de cama de frango mais 66.3% da dose recomendada de NPK.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2023-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1198210.1590/1983-21252024v3711982rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 37 (2024); e11982Revista Caatinga; v. 37 (2024); e119821983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11982/11411Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendonça, Maria Cristina da SilvaAraújo, José Ribamar GusmãoMesquita, Mário Luiz RibeiroLemos, Raimunda Nonata Santos de Neves Júnior, Augusto César Vieira2024-04-22T17:59:20Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11982Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:47:06.563301Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning Produção de ramos comerciais de vinagreira com adubação orgânica e mineral e poda da arquitetura da planta |
title |
Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning |
spellingShingle |
Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning Mendonça, Maria Cristina da Silva Hortaliça não convencional. Fitomassa. Acumulação de matéria fresca. Unconventional vegetables. Phytomass. Fresh matter accumulation. |
title_short |
Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning |
title_full |
Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning |
title_fullStr |
Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning |
title_sort |
Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning |
author |
Mendonça, Maria Cristina da Silva |
author_facet |
Mendonça, Maria Cristina da Silva Araújo, José Ribamar Gusmão Mesquita, Mário Luiz Ribeiro Lemos, Raimunda Nonata Santos de Neves Júnior, Augusto César Vieira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Araújo, José Ribamar Gusmão Mesquita, Mário Luiz Ribeiro Lemos, Raimunda Nonata Santos de Neves Júnior, Augusto César Vieira |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mendonça, Maria Cristina da Silva Araújo, José Ribamar Gusmão Mesquita, Mário Luiz Ribeiro Lemos, Raimunda Nonata Santos de Neves Júnior, Augusto César Vieira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hortaliça não convencional. Fitomassa. Acumulação de matéria fresca. Unconventional vegetables. Phytomass. Fresh matter accumulation. |
topic |
Hortaliça não convencional. Fitomassa. Acumulação de matéria fresca. Unconventional vegetables. Phytomass. Fresh matter accumulation. |
description |
Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) cultivation in tropical and subtropical regions is carried out by family farmers without the use of technology and with low yields. This study aimed to evaluate the use of organic and mineral fertilizers in roselle growth and nutrition in São Luís, State of Maranhão, northeastern Brazil. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design in a factorial scheme [(7x2)+1]. The treatments consisted of seven doses of poultry litter (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 L), six percentages of NPK (100.0, 83.3, 66.3, 49.9, 33.2, and 16.5%), and an additional treatment (poultry litter plus PK at maximum doses), with three replications. Split harvests were conducted at 75, 105, 135, and 165 days after transplanting. Fresh phytomass and the number of primary, secondary, and commercial branches were evaluated in each harvest. Fertilization with poultry litter increased fresh biomass production and the number of commercial branches per plant. Phytomass and the number of commercial branches decreased with an increase in the cutting interval in the split harvests. The poultry litter enhanced the efficiency of mineral fertilization in crop management, standing out the combination of 1.0 L poultry litter plant−1 plus 66.3% of the recommended NPK dose. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11982 10.1590/1983-21252024v3711982rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11982 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252024v3711982rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11982/11411 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 37 (2024); e11982 Revista Caatinga; v. 37 (2024); e11982 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674030307737600 |