Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendonça, Maria Cristina da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Araújo, José Ribamar Gusmão, Mesquita, Mário Luiz Ribeiro, Lemos, Raimunda Nonata Santos de, Neves Júnior, Augusto César Vieira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11982
Resumo: Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) cultivation in tropical and subtropical regions is carried out by family farmers without the use of technology and with low yields. This study aimed to evaluate the use of organic and mineral fertilizers in roselle growth and nutrition in São Luís, State of Maranhão, northeastern Brazil. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design in a factorial scheme [(7x2)+1]. The treatments consisted of seven doses of poultry litter (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 L), six percentages of NPK (100.0, 83.3, 66.3, 49.9, 33.2, and 16.5%), and an additional treatment (poultry litter plus PK at maximum doses), with three replications. Split harvests were conducted at 75, 105, 135, and 165 days after transplanting. Fresh phytomass and the number of primary, secondary, and commercial branches were evaluated in each harvest. Fertilization with poultry litter increased fresh biomass production and the number of commercial branches per plant. Phytomass and the number of commercial branches decreased with an increase in the cutting interval in the split harvests. The poultry litter enhanced the efficiency of mineral fertilization in crop management, standing out the combination of 1.0 L poultry litter plant−1 plus 66.3% of the recommended NPK dose.
id UFERSA-1_fac9f8cd0e21a2235a3aae989abd4000
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11982
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruningProdução de ramos comerciais de vinagreira com adubação orgânica e mineral e poda da arquitetura da plantaHortaliça não convencional. Fitomassa. Acumulação de matéria fresca.Unconventional vegetables. Phytomass. Fresh matter accumulation.Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) cultivation in tropical and subtropical regions is carried out by family farmers without the use of technology and with low yields. This study aimed to evaluate the use of organic and mineral fertilizers in roselle growth and nutrition in São Luís, State of Maranhão, northeastern Brazil. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design in a factorial scheme [(7x2)+1]. The treatments consisted of seven doses of poultry litter (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 L), six percentages of NPK (100.0, 83.3, 66.3, 49.9, 33.2, and 16.5%), and an additional treatment (poultry litter plus PK at maximum doses), with three replications. Split harvests were conducted at 75, 105, 135, and 165 days after transplanting. Fresh phytomass and the number of primary, secondary, and commercial branches were evaluated in each harvest. Fertilization with poultry litter increased fresh biomass production and the number of commercial branches per plant. Phytomass and the number of commercial branches decreased with an increase in the cutting interval in the split harvests. The poultry litter enhanced the efficiency of mineral fertilization in crop management, standing out the combination of 1.0 L poultry litter plant−1 plus 66.3% of the recommended NPK dose.O cultivo da vinagreira nas regiões tropicais e subtropicais é realizado pelos agricultores familiares sem o uso de tecnologia, com baixo rendimento. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar o uso de adubação orgânica e mineral no crescimento e nutrição da vinagreira. O delineamento experimental foi de blocos casualizados em esquema fatorial [(7x2)+1]. Os tratamentos foram sete doses de cama de frango (0.0; 0.5; 1.0; 1.5; 2.0; 2.5 e 3.0 litros), seis percentagens de NPK (100.0%, 83.3%, 66.3%, 49.9%, 33.2%, 16.5 %), e um tratamento adicional (cama de frango mais PK, nas doses máximas) com 3 repetições. Foram feitas colheitas parceladas aos 75, 105, 135 e 165 dias após o transplante (DAT). Em cada colheita avaliou-se a fitomassa fresca e o número dos ramos primários, secundários e comerciais. A adubação com a cama de frango aumentou a produção de fitomassa fresca e o número de ramos comerciais por planta. Ocorreu diminuição da fitomassa e dos do número de ramos comerciais com o aumento do intervalo de corte na colheita parcelada. A cama de frango potencializou a eficiência da adubação mineral no manejo da cultura, com destaque para a combinação dose de 1.0 L planta-1 de cama de frango mais 66.3% da dose recomendada de NPK.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2023-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1198210.1590/1983-21252024v3711982rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 37 (2024); e11982Revista Caatinga; v. 37 (2024); e119821983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11982/11411Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendonça, Maria Cristina da SilvaAraújo, José Ribamar GusmãoMesquita, Mário Luiz RibeiroLemos, Raimunda Nonata Santos de Neves Júnior, Augusto César Vieira2024-04-22T17:59:20Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/11982Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:47:06.563301Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning
Produção de ramos comerciais de vinagreira com adubação orgânica e mineral e poda da arquitetura da planta
title Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning
spellingShingle Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning
Mendonça, Maria Cristina da Silva
Hortaliça não convencional. Fitomassa. Acumulação de matéria fresca.
Unconventional vegetables. Phytomass. Fresh matter accumulation.
title_short Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning
title_full Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning
title_fullStr Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning
title_full_unstemmed Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning
title_sort Production of commercial branches of roselle with organic and mineral fertilization and plant architecture pruning
author Mendonça, Maria Cristina da Silva
author_facet Mendonça, Maria Cristina da Silva
Araújo, José Ribamar Gusmão
Mesquita, Mário Luiz Ribeiro
Lemos, Raimunda Nonata Santos de
Neves Júnior, Augusto César Vieira
author_role author
author2 Araújo, José Ribamar Gusmão
Mesquita, Mário Luiz Ribeiro
Lemos, Raimunda Nonata Santos de
Neves Júnior, Augusto César Vieira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendonça, Maria Cristina da Silva
Araújo, José Ribamar Gusmão
Mesquita, Mário Luiz Ribeiro
Lemos, Raimunda Nonata Santos de
Neves Júnior, Augusto César Vieira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hortaliça não convencional. Fitomassa. Acumulação de matéria fresca.
Unconventional vegetables. Phytomass. Fresh matter accumulation.
topic Hortaliça não convencional. Fitomassa. Acumulação de matéria fresca.
Unconventional vegetables. Phytomass. Fresh matter accumulation.
description Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) cultivation in tropical and subtropical regions is carried out by family farmers without the use of technology and with low yields. This study aimed to evaluate the use of organic and mineral fertilizers in roselle growth and nutrition in São Luís, State of Maranhão, northeastern Brazil. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design in a factorial scheme [(7x2)+1]. The treatments consisted of seven doses of poultry litter (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 L), six percentages of NPK (100.0, 83.3, 66.3, 49.9, 33.2, and 16.5%), and an additional treatment (poultry litter plus PK at maximum doses), with three replications. Split harvests were conducted at 75, 105, 135, and 165 days after transplanting. Fresh phytomass and the number of primary, secondary, and commercial branches were evaluated in each harvest. Fertilization with poultry litter increased fresh biomass production and the number of commercial branches per plant. Phytomass and the number of commercial branches decreased with an increase in the cutting interval in the split harvests. The poultry litter enhanced the efficiency of mineral fertilization in crop management, standing out the combination of 1.0 L poultry litter plant−1 plus 66.3% of the recommended NPK dose.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11982
10.1590/1983-21252024v3711982rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11982
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252024v3711982rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/11982/11411
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 37 (2024); e11982
Revista Caatinga; v. 37 (2024); e11982
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674030307737600