Gently handled foals generalize responses to humans

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schmidek, Anita
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Bruno Nogueira de, Trindade, Pedro, da Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
Texto Completo: https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/2786
Resumo: Equines perform tasks along humans, and there are evidences and controversies that they are able to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar humans. This study assessed whether foals can discriminate between humans in terms of familiarity and human experience in equine handling. Daily, in the first two weeks of life, 30 foals went through a short section of gentle handling. After about four months, a human forced approach test was carried out by 4 evaluators varying in the familiarity aspect and experience with equine handling. Data was submitted to the McNemar test (P<0.05). In 66.7% of the assessments, the foals accepted the human approach, and among the positive cases, 60.0% were characterized by seeking contact with the evaluators. Among the foals that accepted the human approach, 97.5% also accepted tactile stimulation. No differences were found regarding the familiarity of the evaluators (P>0.05) or their experience in equine handling (P>0.05). The individual variation was evident, which indicates that we must work with personalized training techniques, in which the behavior of each individual is the main factor to be considered. Our results show that the adoption of good handling practices with foals favored their relationship with humans, and it is possible to assume that such practices can improve animal welfare, as well as the safety of the humans that will have contact with them in the future.
id UFERSA-2_512f71c14be87390f63a13b2db7ec659
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.malque.pub:article/2786
network_acronym_str UFERSA-2
network_name_str Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
repository_id_str
spelling Gently handled foals generalize responses to humansanimal welfareequinestrainingEquines perform tasks along humans, and there are evidences and controversies that they are able to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar humans. This study assessed whether foals can discriminate between humans in terms of familiarity and human experience in equine handling. Daily, in the first two weeks of life, 30 foals went through a short section of gentle handling. After about four months, a human forced approach test was carried out by 4 evaluators varying in the familiarity aspect and experience with equine handling. Data was submitted to the McNemar test (P<0.05). In 66.7% of the assessments, the foals accepted the human approach, and among the positive cases, 60.0% were characterized by seeking contact with the evaluators. Among the foals that accepted the human approach, 97.5% also accepted tactile stimulation. No differences were found regarding the familiarity of the evaluators (P>0.05) or their experience in equine handling (P>0.05). The individual variation was evident, which indicates that we must work with personalized training techniques, in which the behavior of each individual is the main factor to be considered. Our results show that the adoption of good handling practices with foals favored their relationship with humans, and it is possible to assume that such practices can improve animal welfare, as well as the safety of the humans that will have contact with them in the future.Malque Publishing2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResearch Articlesapplication/pdfhttps://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/278610.31893/2318-1265jabb.v6n1p1-5Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018): January; 1-52318-12652318-1265reponame:Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorologyinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/2786/1193Copyright (c) 2018 Malque Publishinghttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchmidek, AnitaOliveira, Bruno Nogueira deTrindade, Pedroda Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos2024-02-26T22:32:43Zoai:ojs2.malque.pub:article/2786Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/jabbPUBhttp://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/revistas/index.php/jabb/oai||souza.jr@ufersa.edu.br2318-12652318-1265opendoar:2024-02-26T22:32:43Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gently handled foals generalize responses to humans
title Gently handled foals generalize responses to humans
spellingShingle Gently handled foals generalize responses to humans
Schmidek, Anita
animal welfare
equines
training
title_short Gently handled foals generalize responses to humans
title_full Gently handled foals generalize responses to humans
title_fullStr Gently handled foals generalize responses to humans
title_full_unstemmed Gently handled foals generalize responses to humans
title_sort Gently handled foals generalize responses to humans
author Schmidek, Anita
author_facet Schmidek, Anita
Oliveira, Bruno Nogueira de
Trindade, Pedro
da Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Bruno Nogueira de
Trindade, Pedro
da Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schmidek, Anita
Oliveira, Bruno Nogueira de
Trindade, Pedro
da Costa, Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv animal welfare
equines
training
topic animal welfare
equines
training
description Equines perform tasks along humans, and there are evidences and controversies that they are able to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar humans. This study assessed whether foals can discriminate between humans in terms of familiarity and human experience in equine handling. Daily, in the first two weeks of life, 30 foals went through a short section of gentle handling. After about four months, a human forced approach test was carried out by 4 evaluators varying in the familiarity aspect and experience with equine handling. Data was submitted to the McNemar test (P<0.05). In 66.7% of the assessments, the foals accepted the human approach, and among the positive cases, 60.0% were characterized by seeking contact with the evaluators. Among the foals that accepted the human approach, 97.5% also accepted tactile stimulation. No differences were found regarding the familiarity of the evaluators (P>0.05) or their experience in equine handling (P>0.05). The individual variation was evident, which indicates that we must work with personalized training techniques, in which the behavior of each individual is the main factor to be considered. Our results show that the adoption of good handling practices with foals favored their relationship with humans, and it is possible to assume that such practices can improve animal welfare, as well as the safety of the humans that will have contact with them in the future.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Research Articles
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/2786
10.31893/2318-1265jabb.v6n1p1-5
url https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/2786
identifier_str_mv 10.31893/2318-1265jabb.v6n1p1-5
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/2786/1193
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Malque Publishing
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Malque Publishing
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Malque Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Malque Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018): January; 1-5
2318-1265
2318-1265
reponame:Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
collection Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||souza.jr@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1799319802046578688