CLASSES AS THE OBJECT OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9294 |
Resumo: | The intent of recording classes as a means to consubstantiate claims against teachers and professors for so-called “indoctrination” has recently gained legal relevance. Inciting the recording and unauthorized public exposure of classes is one of the tactical expedients adopted by the “Escola Sem Partido” (ESP) – School Without Parties – movement, which pursues a multilevel agenda of statutory change geared towards restricting academic freedom. ESP is presented as non-partisan by its partisans, who attempt to cover their strong denial of political pluralism embodied in the Brazilian Constitution of 1988. The Brazilian legal system protects classes as copyright property pertaining to teachers/professors, to which moral and material entitlements ensue. Such legal protection means unauthorized public disclosures of videos or recordings of classes violate author’s entitlements and implicate civil liability of those responsible for unduly recording and disclosing them. This paper intends to highlight procedures available to teachers and professors whose copyright entitlements over classes have been breached. The main objective is to provide answers to the question: that rights do teachers and professors whose classes have been recorded and divulged without their authorization have, especially in a context of persecutory incentives carried out by political movements such as the ESP? |
id |
UFERSA_026c09150579a3672b2a8420f5d4b2e1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9294 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CLASSES AS THE OBJECT OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTIONA aula como objeto da proteção dos Direitos de autor: um guia para professores contra a divulgação não autorizada de suas aulas The intent of recording classes as a means to consubstantiate claims against teachers and professors for so-called “indoctrination” has recently gained legal relevance. Inciting the recording and unauthorized public exposure of classes is one of the tactical expedients adopted by the “Escola Sem Partido” (ESP) – School Without Parties – movement, which pursues a multilevel agenda of statutory change geared towards restricting academic freedom. ESP is presented as non-partisan by its partisans, who attempt to cover their strong denial of political pluralism embodied in the Brazilian Constitution of 1988. The Brazilian legal system protects classes as copyright property pertaining to teachers/professors, to which moral and material entitlements ensue. Such legal protection means unauthorized public disclosures of videos or recordings of classes violate author’s entitlements and implicate civil liability of those responsible for unduly recording and disclosing them. This paper intends to highlight procedures available to teachers and professors whose copyright entitlements over classes have been breached. The main objective is to provide answers to the question: that rights do teachers and professors whose classes have been recorded and divulged without their authorization have, especially in a context of persecutory incentives carried out by political movements such as the ESP? Ganhou relevância jurídica a pretensão de gravação de aulas para instruir denúncias contra professores por aquilo que é enigmaticamente referido como “doutrinação”. O incentivo à gravação e divulgação não autorizada de aulas de professores integra as táticas do movimento “Escola Sem Partido” (ESP), que impulsiona uma agenda multinível de alterações normativas com sentido geral de limitação da liberdade docente. A apresentação do ESP como “apartidário” por seus partidários é uma tentativa de encobrir sua forte proposta de negação do pluralismo político afirmado como fundamento da República no primeiro artigo da Constituição de 1988. O ordenamento jurídico protege as aulas como propriedade autoral do professor, a que correspondem direitos morais e patrimoniais. Tal proteção jurídica significa que a circulação de vídeos e gravações de aulas, sem autorização do professor, viola direitos de autor e enseja a responsabilidade civil de quem gravou e circulou indevidamente. O presente artigo pretende contribuir para visibilizar expedientes jurídicos disponíveis para professores que tenham seus direitos de autor violados. O objetivo principal é responder à questão: de que direitos dispõem professores cujas aulas tenham sido gravadas e divulgadas sem sua autorização, no contexto de perseguição à liberdade de expressão e ensino-aprendizagem por movimentos políticos como o ESP? Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2020-07-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/929410.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.p72-93.2020UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 4 No. 7 (2020): UFERSA´s Law Review; 72-93Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 4 n. 7 (2020): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 72-932526-948810.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.2020reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAporhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9294/10262Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica da UFERSAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Hugo Luís PenaDiniz, Carlos Augusto de Oliveira2023-01-18T16:07:42Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9294Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/oairejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br||2526-94882526-9488opendoar:2023-01-18T16:07:42Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CLASSES AS THE OBJECT OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION A aula como objeto da proteção dos Direitos de autor: um guia para professores contra a divulgação não autorizada de suas aulas |
title |
CLASSES AS THE OBJECT OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION |
spellingShingle |
CLASSES AS THE OBJECT OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION Ferreira, Hugo Luís Pena |
title_short |
CLASSES AS THE OBJECT OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION |
title_full |
CLASSES AS THE OBJECT OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION |
title_fullStr |
CLASSES AS THE OBJECT OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION |
title_full_unstemmed |
CLASSES AS THE OBJECT OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION |
title_sort |
CLASSES AS THE OBJECT OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION |
author |
Ferreira, Hugo Luís Pena |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Hugo Luís Pena Diniz, Carlos Augusto de Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Diniz, Carlos Augusto de Oliveira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Hugo Luís Pena Diniz, Carlos Augusto de Oliveira |
description |
The intent of recording classes as a means to consubstantiate claims against teachers and professors for so-called “indoctrination” has recently gained legal relevance. Inciting the recording and unauthorized public exposure of classes is one of the tactical expedients adopted by the “Escola Sem Partido” (ESP) – School Without Parties – movement, which pursues a multilevel agenda of statutory change geared towards restricting academic freedom. ESP is presented as non-partisan by its partisans, who attempt to cover their strong denial of political pluralism embodied in the Brazilian Constitution of 1988. The Brazilian legal system protects classes as copyright property pertaining to teachers/professors, to which moral and material entitlements ensue. Such legal protection means unauthorized public disclosures of videos or recordings of classes violate author’s entitlements and implicate civil liability of those responsible for unduly recording and disclosing them. This paper intends to highlight procedures available to teachers and professors whose copyright entitlements over classes have been breached. The main objective is to provide answers to the question: that rights do teachers and professors whose classes have been recorded and divulged without their authorization have, especially in a context of persecutory incentives carried out by political movements such as the ESP? |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9294 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.p72-93.2020 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9294 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.p72-93.2020 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9294/10262 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 4 No. 7 (2020): UFERSA´s Law Review; 72-93 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 4 n. 7 (2020): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 72-93 2526-9488 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.2020 reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersa instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
collection |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br|| |
_version_ |
1808129613934624768 |