Social boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman History

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Faversani, Fabio
Publication Date: 2018
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Romanitas
Download full: https://periodicos.ufes.br/romanitas/article/view/21822
Summary: This article discusses different historiographical approaches that dominated the studies on early imperial Roman history during the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. In order to do this, it focuses on two historiographic controversies: in the first place, the modernist-primitivist debate concerning economic history; in the second place, the debate about the constitutionalist approach to Roman politics, and the criticism it attracted. We conclude that historians have paid great attention to the elements that characterize the different spheres of social life, and to the reasons why scholars ought to favour one of them - especially whether to consider more structural or more dynamic aspects of social life. Our article considers the challenges in surveying the elements that integrate and separate these different spheres, i.e. the frontiers, suggesting possible approaches to overcome these limits, mainly by paying attention to their boundaries and connections.
id UFES-7_6943c9116c7c99390474e40153ee1fc5
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufes.br:article/21822
network_acronym_str UFES-7
network_name_str Romanitas
repository_id_str
spelling Social boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman HistorySocial boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman History Império RomanoHistoriografiaHistória AntigaSênecaTácitoRoman EmpireHistoriographyAncient HistorySenecaTacitusThis article discusses different historiographical approaches that dominated the studies on early imperial Roman history during the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. In order to do this, it focuses on two historiographic controversies: in the first place, the modernist-primitivist debate concerning economic history; in the second place, the debate about the constitutionalist approach to Roman politics, and the criticism it attracted. We conclude that historians have paid great attention to the elements that characterize the different spheres of social life, and to the reasons why scholars ought to favour one of them - especially whether to consider more structural or more dynamic aspects of social life. Our article considers the challenges in surveying the elements that integrate and separate these different spheres, i.e. the frontiers, suggesting possible approaches to overcome these limits, mainly by paying attention to their boundaries and connections.This article discusses different historiographical approaches that dominated the studies on early imperial Roman history during the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. In order to do this, it focuses on two historiographic controversies: in the first place, the modernist-primitivist debate concerning economic history; in the second place, the debate about the constitutionalist approach to Roman politics, and the criticism it attracted. We conclude that historians have paid great attention to the elements that characterize the different spheres of social life, and to the reasons why scholars ought to favour one of them - especially whether to consider more structural or more dynamic aspects of social life. Our article considers the challenges in surveying the elements that integrate and separate these different spheres, i.e. the frontiers, suggesting possible approaches to overcome these limits, mainly by paying attention to their boundaries and connections.Portal de Periódicos da Ufes2018-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufes.br/romanitas/article/view/2182210.17648/rom.v0i11.21822Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos; N. 11 (2018): janeiro-junho; 154-167Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos; n. 11 (2018): janeiro-junho; 154-167Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos; No. 11 (2018): janeiro-junho; 154-167Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos; Núm. 11 (2018): janeiro-junho; 154-167Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos; No 11 (2018): janeiro-junho; 154-1672318-930410.17648/rom.v0i11reponame:Romanitasinstname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)instacron:UFESenghttps://periodicos.ufes.br/romanitas/article/view/21822/14443Copyright (c) 2018 Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaversani, Fabio2023-08-14T20:29:01Zoai:periodicos.ufes.br:article/21822Revistahttps://periodicos.ufes.br/romanitasPUBhttps://periodicos.ufes.br/romanitas/oaigil-ventura@uol.com.br || es.leir@gmail.com2318-93042318-9304opendoar:2023-08-14T20:29:01Romanitas - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman History
Social boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman History
title Social boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman History
spellingShingle Social boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman History
Faversani, Fabio
Império Romano
Historiografia
História Antiga
Sêneca
Tácito
Roman Empire
Historiography
Ancient History
Seneca
Tacitus
title_short Social boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman History
title_full Social boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman History
title_fullStr Social boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman History
title_full_unstemmed Social boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman History
title_sort Social boundaries and social-political categories in Early Imperial Roman History
author Faversani, Fabio
author_facet Faversani, Fabio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faversani, Fabio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Império Romano
Historiografia
História Antiga
Sêneca
Tácito
Roman Empire
Historiography
Ancient History
Seneca
Tacitus
topic Império Romano
Historiografia
História Antiga
Sêneca
Tácito
Roman Empire
Historiography
Ancient History
Seneca
Tacitus
description This article discusses different historiographical approaches that dominated the studies on early imperial Roman history during the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. In order to do this, it focuses on two historiographic controversies: in the first place, the modernist-primitivist debate concerning economic history; in the second place, the debate about the constitutionalist approach to Roman politics, and the criticism it attracted. We conclude that historians have paid great attention to the elements that characterize the different spheres of social life, and to the reasons why scholars ought to favour one of them - especially whether to consider more structural or more dynamic aspects of social life. Our article considers the challenges in surveying the elements that integrate and separate these different spheres, i.e. the frontiers, suggesting possible approaches to overcome these limits, mainly by paying attention to their boundaries and connections.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufes.br/romanitas/article/view/21822
10.17648/rom.v0i11.21822
url https://periodicos.ufes.br/romanitas/article/view/21822
identifier_str_mv 10.17648/rom.v0i11.21822
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufes.br/romanitas/article/view/21822/14443
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Portal de Periódicos da Ufes
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Portal de Periódicos da Ufes
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos; N. 11 (2018): janeiro-junho; 154-167
Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos; n. 11 (2018): janeiro-junho; 154-167
Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos; No. 11 (2018): janeiro-junho; 154-167
Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos; Núm. 11 (2018): janeiro-junho; 154-167
Romanitas - Revista de Estudos Grecolatinos; No 11 (2018): janeiro-junho; 154-167
2318-9304
10.17648/rom.v0i11
reponame:Romanitas
instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
instacron:UFES
instname_str Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
instacron_str UFES
institution UFES
reponame_str Romanitas
collection Romanitas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Romanitas - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gil-ventura@uol.com.br || es.leir@gmail.com
_version_ 1798045856276938752