Elites políticas espírito-santenses e reformismo autoritário (1930-1937)

• Autor(a) principal: Achiamé, Fernando Antonio de Moraes
• Data de Publicação: 2005
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/3485
• topic: State of Espírito Santo - History; Espírito Santo politics - Second Republic; João Punaro Bley - Administration (1930-37); Política espírito-santense - Segunda República; João Punaro Bley - Administração (1930-1937); História; Bley, João Punaro, 1900-1983; Espírito Santo (Estado). Governador (1930-1937 : João Punaro Bley); Elites políticas; Espírito Santo (Estado) - História, Segunda República; Espírito Santo (Estado) - Política e governo; 93/99

This dissertation is engaged in an analysis of the historical process of the 1930 Revolution in the State of Espírito Santo, and its political developments as far as 1937. It employs the theoretical apparatus devised by Antonio Gramsci as well as works by historians who have dealt with this issue in a Brazilian scope. It surveys the construction of the state in such aspects as territorial appropriation, economic organization, and social structuring, with an emphasis on the ‘20s and ‘30s. It compares world ideologies current during the first half of the 20th century to Brazilian politics in the period under analysis. It seeks to understand the oligarchic system extant in the First Republic so as to explain the scheme driving the revolutionary movement in the State and the implementation of the new regime as regards the commitment of local political elites. It interprets the activities of the João Punaro Bley administration both in sponsoring a financial recovery and a political and administrative centralization in terms of autocratic reforms. In the light of this situation, it deals with the preservation of revolutionary “spirit” and the creation of a personality cult surrounding the governmental leader. It deals with the reorganization and creation of Gramscian “parties” and surveys clashes for power occurring in a period of restricted democracy. As a conclusion it enhances the conservative pattern imprinted on the political activity during these years at the State level so as to prevent reforms carried out in social sectors from interfering with economic privileges of dominant classes, which were supposed to be preserved.